John,
I support that opinion. I was never for splitting the band. That was
always the worst choice in my opinion.
I was not against WiMax use of it, I was just dead against Full Licensing
of any of it, liek the WIMax guys originally were asking for.
Although a mute point for me, as I'm in a
Not only is Ligowave a WISPA member, but...
If you read your Ligowave advertisement, you might actually learn about a
really cool product.
I wouldn't advise opting out.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
Every once in a while you read a post, that you say, I'm really glad I read
that.
That was one of them.
Well said.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent:
I agree that CBP should not have been a requirement for the hardware. A
listen before you speak protocol makes some bad assumptions about the
chances of a successful packet delivery. For example, on a longer PTP
link, just because there is noise at the transmitter, it does not mean
that there is
Fair enough. All of our account sign-up forms have a required Ok to
email selection where there is no default and you must choose yes or
no.
https://store.ligowave.com/createaccount.aspx?
I guess this could be opt-in or opt-out depending on your view on
life. :-)
-Hal
-Original
There are cheaper options than 10k per sector but you are correct that's
about the going rate between 10 and 15k per sector. However, this equipment
is not anywhere near the same as the tinker toys as Scriv puts it. This
equipment will last you much longer than the commodity equipment. It's
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/ptech/07/02/broadband.study.ap/index.html
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
You can download the Pew Report here;
http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Broadband_2008.pdf
Frank Muto
www.SecureEmailPlus.com
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 9:29 AM
Subject: [WISPA]
I know it's done all the time, but I don't believe in wrecking a company
just to sell it (not that I plan on selling my operation).
From a buyer's perspective, I would rather the company hadn't converted
operations lately just so that I could convert to what I wanted without
having just bought
I am looking for a couple of Alvarion Subscriber units P/N SU-A-5.3-6-BD-VL
or SU-A-5.3-54-BD-VL.
If you have any, new or USED, please send asking price and qty off-line.
Cliff LeBoeuf
985-879-3219
www.cssla.com
www.triparish.net
This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain
Its irrelevent how long the equipment will last, if the company that deploys
it does not last.
Its all about cash flow and healthy financials, not spec sheets.
10k-15k a sector is Huge.
I hope these manufacturers, make it affordable, before the market is over.
how much more do you
think you
I think it's very important to remember the cost of the CPE in this
equation. The CPE will be the primary driver in your ROI. If you can
spread the fixed cost of the AP over a large number of subs, obviously
the cost to add a user declines each time you add another sub. However,
if the CPE
The WiMAX vendors are focused on the cost of the CPE; not the sector.
CPE can be had for anywhere between $200 and $500 currently depending
on vendor and volume. Vendors are working to get that price down with
a 12 month target of being under $100. The oversubscription you can do
on a
The economics is simple with WiMAX. Either high revenue customers or
lots of customers. If you don't have the volume or the revenue there
are plenty of other cost effective solutions.
-Matt
On Jul 3, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I've been seeing WiMAX CPE for $500 - $1000 in
I agree with what John is saying in most part. The reluctance to fully
support 3.65Ghz may be the cost for some, I know it is me. It is hard to
justify spending 3x to Nx for a 3.65Ghz AP or SM.
Another problem I have with 3.65Ghz is the NLOS problems. Where I operate we
have hills, and lots of
Low CPE cost
Excellent Point. However, its also important to be realistic about how many
subs will occur on a sector.
Our network has an average ratio of CPEs per AP of about 7. CPE cost has
little effect on ROI in that condition.
But yes agreed, if you can get the sub count up per sector
Matt,
Are you finding that the low noise floor (free spectrum) enabling high
modulations are getting you the more CPE per sector, or are you finding that
the WiMax protocol is delivering better results than other proprietary TDD
based systems of equivellent modulations?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL
I know that a certain number of us ARE going to build a network for the sole
purpose of suckering...errr, selling it to someone else.
Now, I have severe ethical disagreements with this notion. It reminds me
of flipping houses or speculative oil investing, perhaps?
Now, to build a business
Our network has an average ratio of CPEs per AP of about 7. CPE cost has
little effect on ROI in that condition.
Not so sure I understand this statement. If I currently pay $175/ CPE and a
Wimax CPE is $500 That greatly affects my ROI. If your saying from an
earlier thread that once a CPE is
Hmmm, didn't realize flipping houses was an ethical gray area...
(gosh, buy a distressed property, gut and redo the kitchen and bathroom,
give it some landscaping- and make some dough. That is unethical? You know
some of the original colonies of the new world had rules against charging
Does anybody have any pricing on Trango 900 SU 10 pk?
Thanks
Chris Cooper
Intelliwave LLC
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Id have to say that the current landscape makes the oil investors look
pretty sharp as well. I know the roughnecks around here poured some
serious money into those holes they punched in the ground. I think they
are pumping plenty of dollars back out now.
chris
-Original Message-
From:
Yeah, I got no problem with drilling for oil or any mineral. Actually even
trading in options and derivatives is fine with me. Sub prime predatory
lending is on the other side of the fence along with payday lenders, but we
all have a line that we will not cross. Not my day to judge.
-
I am considering upgrading a P2P link that is 18 miles to a licensed link.
It appears that Trango has attractive pricing on their Gigalink solution. We
have used Trango equipment and have experienced the good and bad. However, I
am overall pleased with the company and their products.
I would
I would suggest the 11ghz with 4ft dishes, just because of the smaller
dish size. Especially if you have a backup link in place.
Travis
Microserv
Cliff LeBoeuf wrote:
I am considering upgrading a P2P link that is 18 miles to a licensed link.
It appears that Trango has attractive pricing on
Hi,
With temps now hitting 95F in the late afternoon, we are seeing several
RB333 boards shut down and/or reboot. Once it cools down they go back to
running fine. We have seen 5 boards out of 50 we have installed fail.
They are all in DCE cases. Just wanted to share with everyone in case
they
Ow, definitely don't want to install those here in St. George. It gets
down to 95 around midnight...
Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
With temps now hitting 95F in the late afternoon, we are seeing several
RB333 boards shut down and/or reboot. Once it cools down they go back to
running fine.
I'm sure it's the sun hitting the DCE case with the temp being 95F... ;)
Travis
Randy Cosby wrote:
Ow, definitely don't want to install those here in St. George. It gets
down to 95 around midnight...
Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
With temps now hitting 95F in the late
Once upon a time, a man said that hell was full so they sent him to St. Geo.
- Original Message -
From: Randy Cosby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333 heat
Ow, definitely don't want to install
Yeahbut,
recognizing an arbitrage opportunity does not trigger my ethical shutdown
circuit.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and
Does anyone have any experience with Inscape Data?
What is the AB54 2.1 like?
What about support?
Anything would be much appreciated
Rudy
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
I do not think we should build our networks for the sole purpose of
suckering, err, selling to someone else. I do believe that I want
anything I build to have value in the event I do sell. That is not
suckering anyone. Why not build something that holds value or
appreciates in value? I know a
32 matches
Mail list logo
