I agree. I also say that StarOS's support is actually pretty good for
manufacturer provided support. (They do not have as large a channel of
qualified third pary consultants like MT does).
It means alot when the person writing code is also the person responding to
End User List support request.
I am using 5830 products - is this not the latest point to multipoint
product Trango has to offer (in the 5.8 band)?
>>The only possible reasons you could get that spread was if you were not
comparing equivellent
anntennas or doing something wrong, or had a bad batch of radios, or
something, but i
Josh,
I did not mean to be disrespectful in my comments, but some of the
information that you posted was not factual, and was misleading.
You compared the older and most expesnive trango (because itwas old
technology) with the Newest less expensive Mikrotik.
That is not apples to apples. t mini
Butch,
First, my point is TX power + antenna gain = EIRP. 5.8G ofdm loss
across 1 mile of Air = the same thing, no matter what gear you use. (with
some exceptions such as mimo dual antenna multipath combining type
technologies). This is math, it has nothing to do with the manufacturer of
As far as client software I really like Cobian Backup v8. I havn't touched
v7 or 9. It does a great job automating things (email, runs as a service,
keeps directory structure, etc) and is open source.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Based on the reviews, it looks like these may have some firmware problems...
Marlon, what kind of space are you talking about?
Here's a Buffalo box that does 4 TB ( 3TB in RAID 5) for $1000
http://shop4.frys.com/product/5782802?site=sr:SEARCH:MAIN_RSLT_PG
John
Mike Hammett wrote:
> http://www
One question I really would love to hear the answer to..
What version of 3.x are you using (if any) on those multi core/processor
Mikrotiks?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it
If you use managed switches on both ends that properly support
EtherChannel and/or LACP, then your down time should be about 30 seconds
or less as the trunks setup. The main thing is that you will want the
links as balanced as you can get them.
John Thomas
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> Hi everyone
I didn't want to hijack Travis's Cisco thread, but wanted to throw in my .02
regarding MikroTik as a core router.
We began running MikroTik as a core router sometime back in 2004 when our
Cisco VXR DS3 router started to struggle. We purchased a couple LMC DS3
NICs from Eje at Wisp-Router and hav
Ok. When I bring the ring back up, the switch we have running spanning
tree changes VLAN1 to "blocking" on one port, but the VLAN150 still
shows "forwarding"... and creates a loop on VLAN150. Where do I start?
I'm not sure what to even look for or how to troubleshoot this?
Travis
Microserv
Ma
/PDF/Newsroom/fcc%20majority%20staff%20report%20081209.pdf
http://energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1455&Itemid=1
Wireless High Speed Broadband service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as $30.00/mth.
Check out www.info-ed.com/wireless.html for
We are using HP Carrier Servers on our Core, Dual Xenon 2.8 Ghz, Dual
PS, 2 GB Intel Nics with 3 PCIX 3 Port GB Cards for a total of 14 ports
per Router
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [
I answer with a question. What makes you think they couldn't do 100 megs?
I believe the original PowerRouter series does 5.9 gigabits and the latest
series does 8 gigabits.
I don't know how strong Mikrotik's VPLS offering is, but from what I've
heard, VPLS is the way to go.
-
Mike Hammet
Well, we can... But we only use them as POP routers We have a
couple with Metro Ethernet Fiber Backhauls running 100 mbps to our Core
facility, doing MPLS / VPLS ... No wireless stuff, we are a Moto shop
Those are RB1000 btw ...
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadba
How can you possibly get 100 megs with Mikrotik?
On 12/9/08, Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the "THEY ARE PAYING FOR IT"! :) Nothing wrong with that. You
> should be able to do that with some high end MTs and EoIP Tunnels though
> :)
>
> -
Matt,
This is for the 3550 right ... Cant be done on the 2950's?
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Tuesday, Dec
I like the "THEY ARE PAYING FOR IT"! :) Nothing wrong with that. You
should be able to do that with some high end MTs and EoIP Tunnels though
:)
--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services*
3
Just be careful if they want to do there own VLANs. If they do you
will need to dot1q tunnel them. Cisco has made it easy in that all you
have to do in addition to what you do now with a single VLAN is add
the switchport dot1q tunnel command to their interface on either side.
The VLAN stack
Check and see if you are running PVST, which runs spanning tree on
each VLAN.
-Matt
On Dec 9, 2008, at 7:30 PM, Travis Johnson wrote:
> Ok... found the original problem... a few switches did not have the
> vlan
> setup in the vlan database. So the VLAN is up and working now... but
> the
>
VPLS all the way!
WE used to do it on L2 with Cisco, just like you... After more than 80
circuits like this, most of them multi site... We area migrating to
Mikrotik MPLS/VPLS and loving it!
BTW on Cisco switches you have to define STP per Vlan, don't ask for the
command line... We use the Cisco
Hi,
Normally that is what we do... using Cisco ASA firewalls and setting up
VPN tunnels for the customers... however, this particular customer
needs the full 100Mbps between the ports and "transparent" transport...
and they are paying for it... :)
Travis
Microserv
Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs
Just a FYI, I would just create a tunnel between the two sites. No
configuration on your backend network, bandwidth restrictions are the
same as internet traffic typically, etc. Simpler, and no "loop" issues.
--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Ok... found the original problem... a few switches did not have the vlan
setup in the vlan database. So the VLAN is up and working now... but the
problem is because we have a "ring", we use Spanning Tree to keep from
having a loop in the network. But when we bring up the VLAN, the
spanning-tree
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12/05/richard_bennett_bittorrent_udp/
Would it not make sense for bittorrrent clients to have a preference
to share with users under the same AS number? Would not help much on
last mile but might on Internet backbone.
Matt
---
Gino,
I can't get through Barracuda. If you want to give me a call
I will give you pricing.
417-257-
Don't take your organs to heaven,
heaven knows we need them down here!
Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today.
- Original Message -
From: "Gino Villarini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Try a "show interface fastethernet x/y switchport" and see what is the
status of the port and that trunking VLANs enabled are also trunking
VLANs active.
Eric
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 5:17 PM
To: WISPA Gen
Hi,
By default, when doing the switchport mode trunk, all VLAN's are
allowed (I even issued the command "switchport trunk allowed vlan all"
and it did not display on the sho conf afterward).
Travis
Microserv
Patrick Shoemaker wrote:
Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
I need some Cisco s
How much?
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Blake Bowers
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 5:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: R
Yep, dana has some nice deals.
I am however selling these, not buying.
Don't take your organs to heaven,
heaven knows we need them down here!
Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today.
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Cosby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tues
Have you added the VLAN to the VLAN database on all the switches
between them? (Assuming you are not usinh VTP) That's what I usually
forget.
(On 2900/3500)
# vlan database
# vlan NNN name blah
# apply
# exit
On 12/9/08, Travis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need some Cisco switch
Travis Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need some Cisco switch VLAN help.
>
> I currently have about 60 Cisco 3500 series switches connected via the
> GBIC ports all in a ring configuration with spanning tree. I am trying
> to setup a VLAN for a customer between two of the FastEthernet ports so
> they
Hi,
I need some Cisco switch VLAN help.
I currently have about 60 Cisco 3500 series switches connected via the
GBIC ports all in a ring configuration with spanning tree. I am trying
to setup a VLAN for a customer between two of the FastEthernet ports so
they can connect their offices. I have p
http://www.telepp.com/bargains.html
Some pretty good looking deals there
Blake Bowers wrote:
> yes.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/6r4ptk
>
> Infinity outdoor cabinets by Tyco.
>
>
> Don't take your organs to heaven,
> heaven knows we need them down here!
> Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today.
yes.
http://tinyurl.com/6r4ptk
Infinity outdoor cabinets by Tyco.
Don't take your organs to heaven,
heaven knows we need them down here!
Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Jenkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday
Are you talking outdoor full rack cabinets?
Blake Bowers wrote:
> There has been a lot of talk about cabinets.
>
> If someone had a really good deal on them, and was
> willing to give a discount to the people on the list,
> would it be acceptable to post it here?
>
> Don't take your organs to h
Probably a better source here:
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/071708-comcast-fcc.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 3:38 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] BitTorren
Here is an article that outlines what happened. I don't agree with the
slant of the writer, but the info you are looking for is there.
http://www.naturalnews.com/024391.html
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesd
Initially they didn't say what they were, just that you as a customer broke
their imaginary limit, and therefore are without service.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Josh Luthman" <[EMAIL PROTEC
I think that depends a lot on the AP... I have multiple BitTorrent users
(although not crazy heavy) and my APs just keep charging along!
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "David E. Smith" <[EMAIL
I see - didn't hear that they denied traffic shaping. I must be behind on
the information as I only heard they announced their network was doing so.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to rei
Josh Luthman wrote:
> I don't believe
> Comcast lied nor lied about it. I read in the news that they announced
> their monthly bandwidth limits and Bittorent throttling practices became
> well known. Is this not the case? I do believe that limiting the type of
> traffic is wrong, however the amo
I absolutely agree that it is good customer relations, but how can anyone
expect to get to 1000 customers from 200 when you're busy being best friends
with everyone and making sure they understand bandwidth limits (especially
when there are some people that just do not understand).
Josh Luthman
Of
Can you go into detail on to what happened or some information to it? All I
saw was the nice and clean "500gigs/mo is enough for everyone, we're
limiting torrent traffic" announcements.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Those who don't
Comcast admitted lying about it.
Josh Luthman wrote:
I don't believe it is the provider's responsibility to ensure its customers
have read the AUP or abide by it. The customer put their signatures down
signing that they agree to the terms.
It may not be the providers responsibility, but
Actually they got in trouble for both lying and what they were actually
doing.
Jeff
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] BitTorrent to go UDP in next release
If
Jerry Richardson wrote:
> Isn't this the best argument for transfer caps?
>
> You can spend A LOT of money and time dancing with P2P and shaping, or
> you can just charge $X for Xbytes of data and $Y per Ybytes over that.
A single BitTorrent peer, rate-limited to 64kbps, is still enough to
bri
I don't believe it is the provider's responsibility to ensure its customers
have read the AUP or abide by it. The customer put their signatures down
signing that they agree to the terms. At this point it is only reasonable
to act as one would like to be treated (the golden rule!) I don't believe
If you put it in your AUP, and make sure your users know about it, then
you are fine.
It is the hiding of it and lying about it that got comcast in trouble.
Jeff Broadwick wrote:
That, and if you block it you risk running afoul of the same FCC that
hammered Comcast. Just because you aren'
I think it is the best argument for bit caps...question is, is the market
ready for them at a level that you can live with.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:51 PM
To: WISPA General
Isn't this the best argument for transfer caps?
You can spend A LOT of money and time dancing with P2P and shaping, or
you can just charge $X for Xbytes of data and $Y per Ybytes over that.
If a user wants to use P2P, Netflix, etc and pay me 300/mo for his
overage, who am I to stop him? If 300/m
That, and if you block it you risk running afoul of the same FCC that
hammered Comcast. Just because you aren't huge you aren't immune. If a
customer complains you have the burden of proof that you are not blocking
ptp or any other service. Doesn't even have to be your customer. Any
internet cu
There are serial to Ethernet devices out there that have mini web servers
built in to them as well. I think they call them rabbits. Some programs will
allow you to map a com port to an IP address as well. Maybe that would be
of use.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: [EM
Randy - that is really cool! Thank you for sharing that. I'm certain that
will be very useful =)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer
On Tue, Dec 9
http://www.serial-port-redirector.com/ - another windows-side client
that looks promising.
I'd rather have native serial connectivity though, but this may be the
best we can do.
Randy Cosby wrote:
> Hm... looks like that may not be necessary:
>
> In Routeros 3.0rc2:
>
> *) RFC 2217 serial serv
Hm... looks like that may not be necessary:
In Routeros 3.0rc2:
*) RFC 2217 serial server TCP to serial
Now you can set the serial port to RFC 2217 server mode and
you can use a remote application to communicate/control the serial device.
Find out more about this protocol at http://www.
Have you considered serial extenders? Then you can centrally monitor
them all?
Lantronix.com
Eric Rogers
Precision Data Solutions, LLC
(317) 831-3000 x200
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 11:
A complicated ridiculous way of doing it may be to take a Mikrotik
motherboard (or any small board, but MT is probably the least cost) and use
Linux+wine or virtualization/Xen to get a copy of windows running.
Yay for products and their Windows only software...
Hopefully someday Morningstar and o
I'm planning to upgrade from a 30 to 60 amp solar controller soon on one
of our sites when we add more panels / batteries. This time I'd like to
make sure I get a good, remotely-monitorable (is that a word?) unit.
Any recommendations?
Morningstar Tristar 60 looks good, but I'm not sure yet i
I have to disagree with the below.
There's a short, very steep curve at the bottom, but it's not as bad as one
might think from his description.
Compared to Mikrotik, it is the model of simplicity.
I have used it for the vast majority of everything, from backhauls to ap's
to clients, and I hav
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 10:32 -0500, Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
> Darn, so there isn't a good way to block it anymore.
Well, it will be MUCH more difficult to manage, that is a certainty. It
will be MUCH more expensive in terms of CPU requirements as well as
network utilization that will happen in spi
Darn, so there isn't a good way to block it anymore.
Butch Evans wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 21:11 -0500, Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
It's a good thing I didn't get into being a voip provider. Shouldn't
I be able to block it all now?
All UDP? Nope. You have streaming au
Redline 286 0.29%
Alvarion 4030 4.15%
Ubiquity 1778 1.83%
Canopy 43767 45.09%
Other 8326 8.58%
Trango 11352 11.70%
Tranzeo 12779 13.17%
MT 14746 15.19%
97064 100.00%
Responses 96
---
Any location within or very close to our market coverage we will build
and install 100Mbps for $3600 MRC. Fiber lit locations and carrier
hotels are way cheaper, but it depends on the address. There are WISPs
who currently pay us $1000 MRC for a 100 meg commit on a GigE port at
carrier hote
I want to answer some of this from my perspective.
Why is StarOS not used as much and not as widely available? SUPPORT!!!
Valemont networks are hard people to deal with. You have to be
immensely patient to get support and ignore some of what is stated by
the support staff about how you are usi
Wilson Electronics makes some of the best systems I know of.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Brownson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AT&T Cell Band
> Both of the guys below are ok for your home or small busi
If Matt says it can be done, it can be done... even if he uses that...
other... OS. :-p
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Matt Larsen - Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 20
Next year...it would be nice if they'd do a follow-on story about the story
they missed.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:59 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Fwd: WISP Broadband
Matt, how much is your bandwidth, say 100megs, in the Pittock?
George
Matt Liotta wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
>> *nods* I've looked at the Any2 Exchange here in Chicago.
>> Unfortunately
>> they only have like 3 participants.
>>
>> Despite their lower particip
Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
> It's a good thing I didn't get into being a voip provider.
You might want to rethink that strategy.
I think if you don't offer a phone replacement to the consumer in the
future, you will miss out on a large portion of the market.
Consider this, the telco's use chea
69 matches
Mail list logo
