These types of questions make my back-fat tingle... hehehe
The BSD route is the cheapest and still works great, in my small
environment. You can do what this gentleman is doing but with bandwidth
shaping with dummynet. I think that it can get a bit tricky when
figuring out the right bucket
Maybe it uses GPS sync?
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
As published by Georgia Municipal Association PO Box 105377 Atlanta, GA
30348 404-688-0472 678-686-6289 - FAX (http://www.glga.org/)
D - Wireless Internet Service Provider Hapeville, Georgia Posted: Thursday,
April 02, 2009 End Date: Friday, May 01, 2009 The City of Hapeville and the
Hapeville
Hi,
I would like to set up 2 antennas (East and West more or less) but
will not get more than 30 subs between the 2. I would like to connect
both antennas to one AP. Normally, I would not even dream of doing
this. However this is a small valey with low interferance. And all the
subs will be very
When you use a splitter you loose 3dB in signal (hal you power since it's being
split). If that is ok then you could do so.
/Eje
--Original Message--
From: Adam Goodman
Sender: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
To: WISPA General List
ReplyTo: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] 1 AP and 2
Device would be called a splitter/combiner.
Just remember, power to each antenna will be 1/2 of the output of the radio.
Adam Goodman wrote:
Hi,
I would like to set up 2 antennas (East and West more or less) but
will not get more than 30 subs between the 2. I would like to connect
both
Anybody have some Trango 900 SU's used or new they are willing to sell.
Looking for 5 or so. Contact me offlist.
-Cameron
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Thanks guys.
Loosing 3db is probably not an issue since I was going to lower the tx
power anyway doe to the distance to the subs.
found this for $50. says its good for 0-6ghz. does it need to be tuned
to a specific freq?
http://www.l-com.com/item.aspx?id=20865
Now all I need to do is test and
No.
Scriv
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Chuck Bartosch
ch...@clarityconnect.com wrote:
John,
Is this with diversity antennas?
Chuck
On Apr 23, 2009, at 4:41 PM, John Scrivner wrote:
I was not saying you CANNOT possibly do that distance. It was being
referenced as a typical cell
One thing you need to be careful of is both pieces of coax need to be tuned
to the proper length so that the antennas are in-phase with each other.
Otherwise you will have multiple signals hitting the receivers of your
clients and AP at different times.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
I was playing around on one of our wireless interfaces and couldn't help
but notice the options in the wireless tab for:
Default AP Tx Rate:
And
Default Client TX Rate:
Any insight on what this does? I couldn't seem to find much info on it.
Thanks,
Cameron
Income tax or personal property tax?
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with Nextel Direct Connect
-Original Message-
From: John Scrivner j...@scrivner.com
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:09:15
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Can a village levy a tax on my AP's?
If a town , county , village is authorized to levy Personal Property taxes
under their state law they can tax you.
AL Schneider
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Aaron D. Osgood
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 12:19 PM
Use a standoff bracket to mount an omni.
Scriv
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Adam Goodman a...@wispring.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to set up 2 antennas (East and West more or less) but
will not get more than 30 subs between the 2. I would like to connect
both antennas to one AP.
I recently set up an AP on a nearby village's water tower and they are now
sending me income tax papers saying I need file with their village. Our
office is not in their village and I don't live in their village so I see no
reason for filing. The only thing that ties me to them is the lone AP on
I would suggest taking this up with your attorney.
Scriv
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Kurt Fankhauser k...@wavelinc.com wrote:
I recently set up an AP on a nearby village's water tower and they are now
sending me income tax papers saying I need file with their village. Our
office is not
Why you take a RouterOS class :) But regardless, if you ahve a MT
client, it will set the TX and RX speeds for the clients by default.
YOu can set that by MAC as well, so you can control the bandwidth from
the AP to the CPE.
* ---
Talk with your CPA.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Fankhauser k...@wavelinc.com
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:55:44
To: 'WISPA General List'wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Can a village levy a tax on my AP's?
I recently set up an AP on a nearby
This is for income tax we do not have personal property tax in Ohio...
yet.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Aaron D. Osgood
Sent:
Plus the actual loss in the splitter. It's going to eat some of the
signal.
Greg
On Apr 24, 2009, at 10:04 AM, e...@wisp-router.com wrote:
When you use a splitter you loose 3dB in signal (hal you power since
it's being split). If that is ok then you could do so.
/Eje
--Original
You should know that a contract doesn't make anyone exempt from taxes,
only death does that.
Not even death exempts one from all taxes... Ever hear of inheritance
or estate taxes?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of jp
Rate-limiting. But only works with MT clients. (i.e. not other WiFi
clients)
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Cameron Kilton c...@midcoast.com wrote:
I was playing around on one of our wireless interfaces and couldn't help
but notice the options in the wireless tab for:
Default AP Tx
Does anyone here have any experience or background information on these
guys?
Thanks,
Bobby
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
If you deploy a fiber only network, or a coaxial only network (100% IP)
are you forced into being a common carrier? The way way I read it, no
you do not. The way a partner reads it, Yes, you do/can be. I know many
people here have talked about doing/have done fiber/coax deployments.
Where did
AP TX rate works on any client, but you have to have MT for the client
TX rate .. :)
* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP
All that I know if that's required depends on state\local regulations as to
if you're required to be a CLEC or franchise or not.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: jree...@18-30chat.net
Sent:
Adam,
It can work, but there are a couple notes and problems Its probably not
a good idea to do with 900Mhz. However, it has been done, examples are
Hyperlinktech's quad or Maxrad's tri antenna arrays for 2.4g and 5.8G.
First, you'd be violating FCC regs, as that combination would not be
They have 359 reviews on this site: www.voipreview.org/review.all.aspx.
For full disclosure, please note that Vox is a competitor (in that we both
promote the same services). But whenever I want to see what users say about
a VoIP provider, I go to this generic site. As always, do your due
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 12:22 -0400, Cameron Kilton wrote:
I was playing around on one of our wireless interfaces and couldn't help
but notice the options in the wireless tab for:
Default AP Tx Rate:
And
Default Client TX Rate:
These 2 options set default rates for how much bandwidth is
Ok... I have multiple peers, bgp, etc... Normal stuff.
I am looking for someone who has MT, has bgp peers but maybe would like to
have a little more redundancy just in case. For example our main router
with both peers is in the same facility so I still currently have some
single point of
What is the best way to provide speed limit per clients where they are
not all MT clients?
I would like to have something setup where every connected client gets
so much bandwidth. I would like something that is automated nothing that
has to be done every time. I know you can do this with
I'm looking to place a server in someones data center that can do the same
with me. I have a requirement to have data backup up outside or county and
even out of state better for disaster recovery. If you have a desire to do
the same and we can swap services and make a buck or two from
MT Queues
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
Original Message
From: Cameron Kilton c...@midcoast.com
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 3:58 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
What is the best way to provide speed
Good question
Might be a good reason to seperate the Cable versus Wireless portions of
activities into two seperate company entities.
Even on a Grant app, there could be benefits to calling it a joint
application, and seperating the cable versus wireless entities.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL
You can setup the hotspot to authenticate based on MAC address via
RADIUS. Have the RADIUS server send back the speed limit (and bursting
if so desired). The AP will create a dynamic simple queue for the
client. When the client goes away, so does the queue.
Cameron Kilton wrote:
What is
We don't use radius or PPPoE. We provide every customer with a static
address.
I like the idea of a dynamic queue is there a way to create dynamic
queues for connected clients?
-Cameron
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 16:05 -0400, Cameron Kilton wrote:
What is the best way to provide speed limit per clients where they are
not all MT clients?
This can be done via queues. That's a better solution than the layer2
approach anyway (sort of).
I would like to have something setup where
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 16:46 -0400, Cameron Kilton wrote:
I like the idea of a dynamic queue is there a way to create dynamic
queues for connected clients?
One other method I just thought of is PCQ. PCQ is a queue type that
will allow you to classify a customer by IP address (in mangle) and
Assuming you plan to use sectors, make sure that the sectors are very
isolated from each other...
But, with the ranges you are talking about, why bother with 2 antennas?
one good omni should do fine...
Adam Goodman wrote:
Hi,
I would like to set up 2 antennas (East and West more or less)
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 19:37 -0400, Tom DeReggi wrote:
Over a Layer2 PTP its usually not an issue, but it is over a standard
transit connection.
(customer and Internet needs to see 1500 bytes, but an ISP's tunnel causes
packet size to exceed 1500 MTU.
I have built tunnels that carry 12000
I've got a situation where I need some lower end affordable 2.4 GHz
repeaters, and the itch can't really be scratched with a customer CPE
device (such as a Ruckus or Tranzeo).
Anyone have any 2.4 GHz repeaters that they can recommend? There won't
be many people connecting in that area, so I'm
Everyone,
I had trouble during an install today regarding signal strengths.
2.4Ghz CPE in a location that should be no problem. Moving the CPE two
feet in any direction from the point where the CPE was installed
increased the signal by around 20db (-90 to -70!)
Any idea of what
Engenius and ubiquity
Jerry Richardson
airCloud Communications
Sent from mobile device
-Original Message-
From: Rogelio scubac...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 8:21 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] affordable 2.4 GHz repeaters
I've got a situation
Low cost and 2.4 sounds like MT to me.
On 4/24/09, Rogelio scubac...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got a situation where I need some lower end affordable 2.4 GHz
repeaters, and the itch can't really be scratched with a customer CPE
device (such as a Ruckus or Tranzeo).
Anyone have any 2.4 GHz
I would avoid Engenius. Heard a lot of good things abot the Ubnt
stuff, especially the bullet.
On 4/25/09, Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
Engenius and ubiquity
Jerry Richardson
airCloud Communications
Sent from mobile device
-Original Message-
From: Rogelio
45 matches
Mail list logo
