We've been using the pacw wideband dual pole 2' and 3' solid dishes.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 01:13:26AM -0500, Scott Carullo wrote:
What antenna of choice are you using for rockets jp?
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
From: jp
Does anyone have any experience with having an attack done on your domain
where the sender spoofs the header and then puts your domain in it as the
sender. I think this is called a JoeJob and we are getting 1000's of the
bounced messages because of it and are now having difficulty sending to some
Not really. Being in Asia and all.
We have had this happen to us before. Just have to wait for them to go
away.
Nick Olsen
Brevard Wireless
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: Kurt Fankhauser k...@wavelinc.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 10:32 AM
To: WISPA
You can implement the use of SPF records in your dns/mx settings. This
will tell mail servers which use SPF checking (which many do) to only
allow mail from your domain name to come from the mail servers / IPs
that you specify (in the SPF records) are allowed. Any mail coming from
non-allowed IPs
You cant do anything to stop blocking them from being forged and sent, but
there are things you can do to help notify other ISPs what servers are
authorized to send mail for your domain, so that they can use smarter
methods to block and allow SPAM. For example, you can use a Sender Policy
I use MailScanner http://www.mailscanner.info/ . It allows you to put a
watermark on all messages leaving your mailserver. If a bounce come in
without the watermark , it trashes it . works like a charm for exactly
that.
Terry
- Original Message -
From: Nick Olsen
This assumes that the receiving party drops mail based on SPF.
And still, most of the time it will bounce the message saying it failed
spam checks or something like that.
Nick Olsen
Brevard Wireless
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: Matt Hardy
You're right, it does require the recipient domain to implement SPF
checking, but I think it's better than nothing.
It could at least help prevent from having your domain name end up on
some auto-populated spam lists like aol, yahoo, etc like he originally
said he was having problems with...
The watermark idea sounds like a clever idea, and worthy solution.
Only thing, should consider whether you let your mail users send through
other providers during travel or secondary locations. (Would also apply to
SPF to some extent).
If they send legitimate mail from their hotel or Home
We are looking for some more wimax gear to test for the 3.65 band, our
basic criteria would be 802.16e/mimo, we've tested Alvarion gear
already. We are looking for something that will work in an urban
environment with self install radios, can deliver voice and if possible
with PPP/NAT/DHCP in
Wait for q1 release of the Canopy 320, all that and more
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Are you registering all of your fixed CPEs?
Jerry Richardson wrote:
Here is the process:
1. Look up grandfathered stations here:
http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sd/3650/grandftr.pdf
2. Find the contact by looking up the license via the call sign
3. Contact the station to see if they will grant you a
Self install won't work in 3650 beyond 1/4 mile, maybe 1/2 mile. Patrick
has elaborated on this many times.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com
Sent: Tuesday, December
Gino,
Where can I find detailed info on the product there doesn't seem to be
much available in regards to it's routing features. I'm also concerned
about the CPE cost/licenses that's what drove us from Canopy before.
Regards
Michael Baird
Wait for q1 release of the Canopy 320, all that and
I think we will have to.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Matt Jenkins
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:34 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65GHz in grandfathered earth station areas
Are you
Patrick works for Aperto, they don't support beamshaping/mimo or
802.16e, my Alvarion and Navini gear with the non-mimo subscriber radio
(mimo on the tower) worked at a mile non-LOS. I appreciate the input,
but it disputes my results in the field (rural heavily treed, not urban).
Regards
Are you (Michael) talking about self install or outdoor install?
Mike (Hammett) is talking about self installs.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
--- Albert Einstein
On
Josh,
I tested via a truck, I could take the Alvarion unit and put it on the
back seat of the extended cab, and it worked everywhere within a mile
radius I drove to. This was an outdoor unit with a 14.5 db panel,
strictly speaking I was testing outdoor (I wanted SI's from Alvarion but
they
What you are asking for is going to be priced accordingly.
If you are looking for low cost 3.65 it's going to be Tranzeo or Ubiquity cards
on MT.
One interesting combination is that Tranzeo makes CPE's that inter-operate with
Redline.
We'll wait for CAP320 as screwing with anything lese is a
Q3 is a better guess I think...
Travis
Microserv
Gino Villarini wrote:
Wait for q1 release of the Canopy 320, all that and more
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Good information.
Keep in mind customer self installs != radio in truck bed.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
--- Albert Einstein
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:00 PM,
Ouch :-(
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 4:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
Back seat of truck facing the roof, not truck bed.
Regards
Michael Baird
Good information.
Keep in mind customer self installs != radio in truck bed.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
The secret to creativity is knowing how
That's what I had in my head typed it out wrong.
Do you have much foliage in the way? Was this all LOS driving around?
I would imagine once you get inside a house things changes drastically
coming from a truck.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
http://snpi.dell.com/sna/images/products/large/A0497965.jpg
If you have one, and are willing to open it, can you tell me what the
output voltage of the power supply is? Mine has a fried power supply
and I feel the need to jury-rig it.
ryan
Why is your basic criteria .16e with MIMO (or .16e at all)?
All .16e gets you in 3.65 GHz is much more (30% more) latency, less
throughput per MHz, higher overhead and more cost. And you won't get any
hope for interoperability, indoor modems, USB dongles or PC cards, since
those are only
Is supporting 802.16e really needed ? If you are providing your own
CPEs, 802.16d, pre-WiMAX or Navini CDMA with beamforming could work
just fine costing much less.
I've tested Redline RedMAX self-install 16d unit and 16d base station
and would give it a try on the real environment you wanna
Patrick,
16e is where the majority of the chipset development is at, and where
companies such as Alcatel/Cisco/Motorola/Alvarion/Zyxel are focusing,
and the new big deployments (Clearwire) are using 802.16e, and we want
the ability to go to 802.16m when available. We also want to take
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com wrote:
Patrick,
16e is where the majority of the chipset development is at, and where
companies such as Alcatel/Cisco/Motorola/Alvarion/Zyxel are focusing,
and the new big deployments (Clearwire) are using 802.16e, and we want
I used to drink the Koolaid, but in all fairness to Alvarion, there was
much more hope for a .16e future back then. Today, not so much. LTE has
already won and .16e will find only small, limited life and even less
mass development. Even if it had a long life, .16m won't do you a lick
of good in
Less?
Moto is comming out with a 16e system with 4.5 bits per hz using mimo
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Dec 29, 2009, at 4:45 PM, Patrick Leary ple...@apertonet.com
wrote:
Why is your basic criteria .16e with MIMO (or .16e at all)?
All .16e gets you in 3.65 GHz is much more (30%
I concur, Patrick hit the nail on the head with his response. 802.16e has
little value with current 3.65 rules, and 802.16d likely a better match..
One of the failicies is that 802.16e means smart antenna designs, which does
not have to be the case. Just because many 802.16d vendors favor cost
moto
Did you mean they are comming out with soon? or did you really mean they are
talking about comming out with?
In WISP time, there is a big difference.
Yeah, it would be cool if that was comming in the near future at current
Canopy level price points.
But that is an if.
Tom DeReggi
Soon as in q1 or q2
IIRC
$350~ SM
$3500~ AP
Specs are in the website under 320 series
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Dec 29, 2009, at 6:50 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
wrote:
moto
Did you mean they are comming out with soon? or did you really mean
they are
talking
Everytime I see that pricing it makes me cringe... since I've seen Moto give
pricing way before a product is actually set to release and its way off the
mark. I hope it's right for Moto sake :-)
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com
dan...@3-db.net
-Original Message-
And how is this product useful?
10 customers at 50/mo takes 140 months for an ROI. Assuming that's one AP.
On 12/29/09, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
Soon as in q1 or q2
IIRC
$350~ SM
$3500~ AP
Specs are in the website under 320 series
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On
LTE has already won and .16e will find only small, limited life and even less
mass development.
Do you see any point in small BRS/EBS (MMDS/ITFS) license holders deploying
802.16e in these frequency bands?
Huwaei then (in my opinion)
uses its capture of .16e customers as the Trojan Horse
I hate to sabatage this 3650 thread, but I cant help myself, when 802.16e is
mentioned for PtMP
1) Ubiquiti Mimo AP - $89, capacity up to 150 mb, (or maybe 50mbps might be
more fair, for avg 20 Mhz channel 2x pole).
2) Mikroik AP MIMO- $400, capacity: same as Ubiquiti, but with Spectrum
BRS/EBS is a different story entirely and the only place where .16e has
a reasonable home in my opinion. The power allows for a zero truck roll
model, meaning self-install indoor modems become viable. But that comes
with some cost. I believe in BRS/EBS it makes sense to invest in a 5
meter clutter
In our case, the numbers are about $20k for three sectors yielding an
aggregate of about 60 mbps net for that cell. With WiMAX scheduling and
our QoS, you could realistically connect well over 600 CPE in that cell.
The sweet spot remains commercial, especially when implementing a double
play of
I read the Moto 802.16e MIMO spec. I found it interesting that receive
sensitivy for QAM64 was -89. That is awesome, compared to wifi OFDM of
about -68.
Doesn't help with the noise floor SNR requirements though. I also found it
insightful that the 802.16e model AUTO shifted from MIMO A to B.
Patrick,
Just for the record, let me say I realize there are many little details
between WiMax and Wifi that can translate to real big differences in value
proposition gain for Wimax, after all said and done. There is no doubt in
my mind that Wimax-D price tags for top quality gear can
Tom
ROTFL
You can't compare a ubiquiti to a motorola 16e
That's like comparing a Yugo with a Porsche
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Dec 29, 2009, at 9:00 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
wrote:
I will admit, Moto has made a name for itself as a company that is
here for
430 cpe is the same as current Canopy SM's
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Dec 29, 2009, at 9:00 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
wrote:
I read the Moto 802.16e MIMO spec. I found it interesting that
receive
sensitivy for QAM64 was -89. That is awesome, compared to wifi
Tom
Do you have any Ubiquity AirMac in production?
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Dec 29, 2009, at 8:15 PM, Patrick Leary ple...@apertonet.com
wrote:
In our case, the numbers are about $20k for three sectors yielding an
aggregate of about 60 mbps net for that cell. With WiMAX
If they send legitimate mail from their hotel or Home circuit (if it was
originally an Office account/circuit with you, but bring laptop home also),
which home provider blocks SMTP excpet for using Access provider's SMTP
server, the legitimate sender will no longer get notice when a send was
I'd say it'd be more like comparing a Corvette with a Porsche... in the
right hands in many cases, a Corvette will beat the Porsche, but the Porsche
is 35x more expensive.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net wrote:
I hate to sabatage this 3650 thread, but I cant help myself, when 802.16e is
mentioned for PtMP
1) Ubiquiti Mimo AP - $89, capacity up to 150 mb, (or maybe 50mbps might be
more fair, for avg 20 Mhz channel 2x
If you're looking to monitor only, check these out:
http://www.theenergydetective.com/index.html
They talk to Google. Yes, Google is now tracking your power consumption as
well. Who knew.
http://www.google.org/powermeter/
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Josh Luthman
I have owned both. Porsche is a true piece of german engineering
Corvette was GM crap
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Dec 29, 2009, at 10:40 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-
il.net wrote:
I'd say it'd be more like comparing a Corvette with a Porsche... in
the
right hands in
LTE has already won and .16e will find only small, limited life and even
less
mass development.
Do you see any point in small BRS/EBS (MMDS/ITFS) license holders deploying
802.16e in these frequency bands?
Hi Blake,
I'd say the question boils down to who's going to foot the bill for the
I'd say the question boils down to who's going to foot the bill for the
deployment -- you or the government =)
With or without government stimulus I'm curious of the lists' general consensus
on whether or not WiMAX is worthwhile investment in this 'war' of LTE vs WiMAX.
Having Uncle Sam
52 matches
Mail list logo