Does anyone here us a Vista Columbus DVR. I need to back one up on-site and
off-site. I need some advise before going to the site.
Akin
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
I saw the spectrum analysis software at the last Ubiquiti conference in
Las Vegas.
It is excellent. It is also a simple firmware upgrade to certain
radios. I like the idea of being able to take an AP offline for a short
time to run an analysis on the sector antenna to see what noise looks
We use galvanized 2 pipe and 3/4 inch allthread. Drill an hole through the
pipe and pole and use nuts and washers to put them together with a 6 inch or
so space between them.
David
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of AJ
Who has the fastest 3650 access points?
Who has the fastest access points?
mc
--
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
Dangerous topic.
What solution are you looking for? Throughput or simply lowest latency?
What kind of scale? Ptp or ptmp?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
Wimax is definitely not the lowest latency.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
Date: February 1, 2010 12:58:32 PM CST
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fastest 3650 Access Points
Reply-To: WISPA General
PTMP, throughput with decent latency.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Dangerous topic.
What solution are you looking for? Throughput or simply lowest latency?
What kind of scale? Ptp or ptmp?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct:
I could be wrong but throughput is going to be more of a channel
bandwidth question. On my axxcelera equipment with a 7 MHz channel I
ge 12 mb of throughput.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Marco Coelho coelh...@gmail.com
Date: February 1, 2010 1:00:57 PM CST
To: WISPA
You might get some ideas here:
http://www.sunwize.com/catalog/pdf/Solar%20Module%20Mounts/SW%20SOP%20Mount.pdf
we use these guys for utility pole mounted battery and solar panels.
Tom S.
- Original Message -
From: David ad...@speedyquick.net
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
First, do harm.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296081A1.pdf
This speech was made at the end of January... At least ONE commissioner's
got his head on straight...
WISPA Wants You!
One question you should also ask Marco is how much capacity at what
range, and then that relative to channel size. Aperto will do over 18
mbps on a 7MHz channel with 25-30 ms latency. That latency is pretty
much standard with the D version of WiMAX. Due to a link optimization
patent we hold we can
I wonder what the catch is :)
-RickG
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:07 PM, MDK rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
First, do harm.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296081A1.pdf
This speech was made at the end of January... At least ONE commissioner's
got his head on straight...
I dont know if this is a question as much as a statement of interest. I've
had a few customer that wanted faster speeds and couldnt wait until my 5GHz
sectors were up. So, I used a NS5 and connected right off my backhaul grids
and they worked great. I dont plan to leave them on the backhauls but
OK, I need a little input. I've got several poor mans repeaters around by
using a pair of bullets, one for backhaul and the other for the AP. Today, I
installed a Bullet on a new customer that was a stones throw away from the
AP. At full power, he got just under 1Mbps. Turning down the power, he
I'm with ya, Rick. I have 2 installed the same way. Not in the rules
really, since my backhauls are pumping the power, too much for a PTMP as
that ends up turning it into but as a temporary solution, it's cool on this
side of things. :) One was for lack of a sector and the other was because,
I'd turn it down till you hit about a -60 signal wise or in the 50's
somewhere. should give you the best results.
Nick Olsen
Network Engineer / Customer Support
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 8:08 PM
I have a few like that. Cheap and quick for low density population. Use a
pac grid for the backhaul and a bullet with an omni for the AP. Check your
polarity, make sure you're on the right orientation and right radio. My
grids are horz. Pol and the omnis, well. Vertical of course!
Bob-
Yes. Get the eyes off the throughput and pay attention to your signal level
first. Right on the money, there, Nick.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Nick Olsen
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 8:21 PM
To: WISPA
So if I follow, You hooked people to your backhaul radio, And the CPE was a
NS5?
If I'm not mistaken, The default antenna setting on the NS5's is Adaptive,
so it will pick. Let me know if I'm way off on the scenario...
Nick Olsen
Network Engineer / Customer Support
(321) 205-1100 x106
On my Nano5's I've had the default show up as Horizontal, of all things. On
the 5M's I've had it different depending on firmware. Go figure.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Nick Olsen
Sent: Monday, February 01,
I had some waverider gear we tested that gave similar results. Mid
60's works much better.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
Date: February 1, 2010 7:24:12 PM CST
To: n...@brevardwireless.com, 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
You got it except, the installer set it for v-pol because it worked better
than h-pol! Go figure?
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Nick Olsen n...@brevardwireless.com wrote:
So if I follow, You hooked people to your backhaul radio, And the CPE was a
NS5?
If I'm not mistaken, The default
o.0
strange
Nick Olsen
Network Engineer / Customer Support
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 8:43 PM
To: n...@brevardwireless.com, WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
I really think if left alone, this is going to cause RF issues in the
future. Additionally, the Grids are going to provide a much hotter
signal than your sectors or omni's in the same place. So much so, that
the client may not reconnect to the omni or sector you plan on putting
up there.
Ya, thats what I do. I'm just concerned about what the best power level is?
I hate to create a monster based on the wrong settings.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.comwrote:
I have a few like that. Cheap and quick for low density population. Use a
pac grid
Ya, I already corrected it. It just doesnt feel right. I'll have PTMP
sectors up there soon. Thanks!
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
I really think if left alone, this is going to cause RF issues in the
future. Additionally, the Grids are going to provide
Like we said, Drop both sides till the signal gets in the -55 to -65 range.
Doesn't matter what the power is, as long as the signal is around there. As
its where your going to get your best throughput, Barring any other
interference.
Nick Olsen
Network Engineer / Customer Support
(321)
I believe it's set for Horizontal out of the box.
-- Original Message --
From: Nick Olsen n...@brevardwireless.com
Reply-To: n...@brevardwireless.com, WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:24:19 -0500
So if I follow, You hooked
Patches are in bassackwards
-- Original Message --
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:43:24 -0500
You got it except, the installer set it for v-pol because it worked better
than
I would say it would depend on how hot the signal was, you don't want it
yelling so loud it can't hear itself or anything else think.
-- Original Message --
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Mon, 1 Feb
I tend to use 20dB fade margin. If the floor is -80, then -60 is going
to be great. This works until you are dealing with a -60dB floor cause
-40dB is going to be too hot and overload the Rx of the radios.
Sent Mobile
Jerry Richardson
airCloud Communications
On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:56 PM, RickG
Lot of the threads on the forums suggest the same thing. It seems the
M equipment is more sensitive to such large amounts of energy.
On 2/1/10, Stuart Pierce spie...@avolve.net wrote:
I would say it would depend on how hot the signal was, you don't want it
yelling so loud it can't hear itself
It's a PtMP environment. I have some customers much further away running
high -70's.
If I drop the AP side, dont I risk loosing them or affecting their
throughput?
What about using an attenuator and padding it down some?
Thanks! -RickG
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Nick Olsen
Floor is -98. So, using 20dB fade margin would mean -70's is good?
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Jerry Richardson
jrichard...@aircloud.comwrote:
I tend to use 20dB fade margin. If the floor is -80, then -60 is going
to be great. This works until you are dealing with a -60dB floor cause
You may have to rotate your cpe to get a lower signal from the tower.
I have one that is pointed at a 45 degree angle away from the tower.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 1, 2010, at 9:06 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a PtMP environment. I have some customers much further away
RF is such a funny animal!
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
You may have to rotate your cpe to get a lower signal from the tower.
I have one that is pointed at a 45 degree angle away from the tower.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 1, 2010, at 9:06 PM,
That's not a good idea. You will create multipath interference, which will
have an overall negative impact.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
You may have to rotate your cpe to get a lower signal from the tower.
I have one that is pointed at a 45 degree
Having a radio screaming at an ap also tends to affect other cpe's by
desensitizing your ap. Just what I have experienced in my deployment.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 1, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Jayson Baker jay...@spectrasurf.com wrote:
That's not a good idea. You will create multipath
Then turn the transmit power down on you CPEs, don't create multipath
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
Having a radio screaming at an ap also tends to affect other cpe's by
desensitizing your ap. Just what I have experienced in my deployment.
Sent from my
Could be a bounce. I've had that off the metal barn roofs in the area.
Some have a magical ability to flip the polarization.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 8:04 PM
To:
Normally I'd agree with you and usually look for reflection. But, this
install is only a stone's throw away from the water tank. That said, I
suppose I could be getting reflection off the tank itself.
-RickG
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.comwrote:
Could be
You'll know if you have a monster when you install neighboring AP's. Just
adjust the power when you need to. I have some AP's that have clients
connected that are actually closer to a different AP but the signal is
better from one further out. I tend to deploy with a smaller foot print
per AP
They should make a cuddly stuffed Nano that I could sleep with at
night..
Yeah, I know but it's late.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 10:12 PM
To: WISPA General
If the signal is too hot, I bet so. You may be scattering the RF all over
and reflecting back at you. Rf will bounce off a sponge if loud enough.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Monday, February 01,
From NewsMax:
Obama Surrendering Internet to Foreign Powers
Sunday, 31 Jan 2010 06:41 PM Article Font Size
By: Bradley A. Blakeman
Without the ingenuity of America's brightest minds and the investment of
U.S. taxpayer dollars, there would be no Internet, as we now know it today.
Now, the
I've had the same experiences. Like I said before, our WISP's are simular :)
-RickG
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.comwrote:
You'll know if you have a monster when you install neighboring AP's. Just
adjust the power when you need to. I have some AP's that
I was just wondering about this the other day. It seems that we (USA) give
things away so freely only to have them used against us. In the case of the
net, I find it ironic that the very thing we developed is being used to
attack our government and our people in so many ways yet we let everyone
You know I really didn't like Obama in the beginning.
Now he's really pissing me off.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill
Josh
How does it feel to be in the middle of a state where your vote hardly
matters?
I, in NJ had the same issue until recently.
Let's hope the larger cities finally wake the heck up!
On Feb 1, 2010, at 11:56 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
You know I really didn't like Obama in the beginning.
I have not voted to this day, to be honest.
It is the masses and the public that votes and they well out number me.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
that
I would find it interesting if the runner up was the victor, of course
there wold have to actually be more than our current two party
majority system.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
I have not voted to this day, to be honest.
It is the masses
well - I always think it is important to vote...
but... my motto is simple:
go Vote - choose the one that wont hurt me the most ...
on the way home stop @ the store and buy 2 gallons of bleach
turn on a bath and then disinfect...
I generally use the 2nd gallon on their inauguration day ;-)
On
Every vote counts. For every guy that thinks not there is two other that
don't vote. If people came over this mentality your vote would matter
because no matter what people think they are not alone in their believes.
Look at the 2008 President election
StateMargin
Missouri 0.14%
NC
I was going to vote but then I realized there was no space for Ron Paul.
On 2/2/10, Eje Gustafsson e...@wisp-router.com wrote:
Every vote counts. For every guy that thinks not there is two other that
don't vote. If people came over this mentality your vote would matter
because no matter what
Right on Eje! The other side hopes that their opposition wont vote and they
win by default. I realize its usually the lesser of two evils but dont let
that stop you. -RickG
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Eje Gustafsson e...@wisp-router.com wrote:
Every vote counts. For every guy that thinks
One day soon - either Ron Paul or someone like him. As soon as enough people
get pissed off. -RickG
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:
I was going to vote but then I realized there was no space for Ron Paul.
On 2/2/10, Eje Gustafsson
I would say yes with one caveat, If you need -71 to get full
modulation and need to guarantee that it holds like in a PTP link then
you would want additional fade margin. Assuming an additional 10db
would mean you would want -61 minimum. A PTMP network may or may not
need that kind margin
57 matches
Mail list logo
