Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
I've read your blogs and have been keeping up with them. What I can't seem
to find is the ULS registrations for the actual earth satellite stations.
It seems like most other ULS entires, they have a contact address and a
person's name.
I did a Geosearch of Orange
Would love to do that. Let me know what is needed from our side.
Jeff Booher
Channel Manager, North America
www.apertonet.com http://www.apertonet.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
24/7: 206-455-4950
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or work
On the EBS issue-
There are several operators out there who have obtained EBS licenses as
well. It just requires the work and time invested into entering a deal with
your school districts that own the right to the spectrum.
Jeff Booher
Channel Manager, North America
www.apertonet.com
I haven't studied this much, but did I see somewhere that existing BRS
(was MMDS) holders had some sort of priority on EBS licenses. Is that
the case, and if so, does this make it worse?
Randy
Jeff Booher wrote:
On the EBS issue-
There are several operators out there who have obtained EBS
1. Very high gain 120 degree sector capable of handling several hundred
watts
2. High output radio (even just an RF noise generator would work)
3. Butter
4. Boots
5. Very fast get away vehicle
Adjust your high gain antenna to point at the corn fields. Crank the RF
generator up. Throw your boots
The Wireless Connections app is actually based on Cricket, not Cacti.
Huge difference there...
I have released Alvarion templates for the Cacti system. They are
available from the Cacti forums at:
http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=18328
We also run the Nagios/Cacti combo. I have quite a
Just wanted to drop you folks a note to let you know www.sageni.com is live,
achieving my goal of going live on August 1. Still lots of room to build on,
but I hope you think it is a good start. Next up, for me to join WISPA under
my new company name.
Cheers all,
--
Patrick Leary
Sageni
Patrick Leary wrote:
Great link on 3650: http://www.sageni.com/raw%20knowledge_3650.html
:)
Just wanted to drop you folks a note to let you know www.sageni.com is live,
achieving my goal of going live on August 1. Still lots of room to build on,
but I hope you think it is a good start. Next
Nice... So Sageni = Sage Insider?
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wanted to drop you folks a note to let you know www.sageni.com is
live,
achieving my goal of going live on August 1. Still lots of room to build
on,
but I hope you think it is a
I used the cacti/nagios combo for years, but in Feb I switched to OpenNMS.
It was tricky to get setup, and the folks on their IRC were invaluable! Now
it auto scans multiple ip networks and ranges I specify every 4 hours and
sends me a txt msg each time I add customers. For all the normal stuff
WiMAX is for the birds as it exists today. It's for POTS replacement and
low bandwidth customers in third world countries, not the USA where we need
to be providing bigger pipes.
Mobile WiMAX in anything but true licensed spectrum is for the birds as
well. Just not enough power to make it
If anyone does... no one does that really would benefit me.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 3:16 PM
I'm having a hard time understanding why yawl just wouldn't use the
Dude? It's FREE, it emails me in the event of an anomaly, sends text
msgs, monitors/graphs number of hotspot users, bandwidth, outages,
traffic on my links, uptime, or just about anything else you want to
look at, log, notify
Hey John,
I didn't notice your company on the vendor member list? Are you a
vendor member or just plugging your company free on this list? Maybe I
just missed http://www.wirelessconnections.net when I did the search for
the vendor members? Maybe it was my bad for missing it?
Thanx
Jim
I'm having a hard time understanding why yawl just wouldn't use the
Dude? It's FREE, it emails me in the event of an anomaly, sends text
msgs, monitors/graphs number of hotspot users, bandwidth, outages,
traffic on my links, uptime, or just about anything else you want to
look at, log,
The dude is cool, our network admin has been playing with it. We all
have a copy on our machines we mess with too.
I like how it will show you real time bandwidth of a link. Lots of
information there.
But it must take up a lot of resources to do this to a large 1000 node
network.
We use
CUTE
Steve Barnes
Executive Manager
PCS-WIN
RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service
(765)584-2288
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adam Kennedy
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Corn
1. Very high
Jim-
Personally, I like Nagios because you can make it monitor literally
-anything-.
In a previous life, we had it monitoring the server room door. If it
was open for more than ~5 minutes, it nagged us.
Then again, it all depends on how much you care. For me, these days
caring doesn't
Maybe they aren't a vendor member and decided to share a resource that
was relevant to the thread. Maybe they won't share on the next thread
because of your response. Maybe neither of our messages should need to
have been sent to the whole list.
-Matt
On Aug 1, 2008, at 6:28 AM, Jim
George Rogato wrote:
[ about The Dude ]
But it must take up a lot of resources to do this to a large 1000 node
network.
It's not quite real time - The Dude's bandwidth indicia on its maps
update every 30 seconds or so. That's roughly how often MRTG and Cacti
(and basically everything else)
The ability to push configs out from a central location is really a nice
feature of Nagios/Cacti/MRTG. I also use Big Brother to monitor
customer connections, and it is nice to have something that
automatically pushes the configurations out whenever we make a change in
the billing system -
I keep hearing Monte Python in my head, which would make you the Sage that
says Ni.
David Peterson
WirelessGuys
(sorry had to let my geek flag fly)
On 8/1/08 10:17 AM, Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually,
Sageni is a word creation combining Sage and Genie...most of all it was an
I've never used the DUDE, and probably won't because I generally go
out of my way to avoid non-browser based multi-user applications.
Somewhat of a philosophical bias, but avoids installation / platform /
software / random-networking considerations / security hassles.
I highly recommend OpenNMS
Also, just a note that I forgot to mention
OpenNMS also handles SNMP traps very well and with little
configuration, something that is a weakness in a lot of the free/open
source applications which either simply don't or require some
cumbersome configuration (like Nagios).
-Clint
On Fri,
Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE wrote:
Charles...As I found out, Appendix D is just ONE way to do those
calculations.
Can you expand on this a bit?
Is there another way they should be done? Or are there different
conclusions one can reach by doing them differently (ie you follow the
method in
Thanks. This looks promising.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Jenkins
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 5:08 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network Monitor
Go get and install CactiEZ. Once setup and working its easy to
Nice Friday laugh David. I suppose there are worse things that could be
conjured up.
- Patrick
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:42 AM, David Peterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I keep hearing Monte Python in my head, which would make you the Sage that
says Ni.
David Peterson
WirelessGuys
(sorry had
I haven't looked at Appendix D in a while, but I don't think it takes
into account topology. Ground works really well at stopping noise.
-Matt
On Aug 1, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Charles Wyble wrote:
Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE wrote:
Charles...As I found out, Appendix D is just ONE way to do those
http://www.isp-planet.com/fixed_wireless/technology/2008/self+interference.html
Hope it helps some folks out.
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, Marlon
Mark Nash
UnwiredWest
78 Centennial Loop
Suite E
Eugene, OR 97401
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
http://www.unwiredwest.com
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 9:07 AM
Subject:
It does have a browser interface :)
--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services*
314-735-0270
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/
*/ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik
I just ran across this in my archives. Thought some here might find it
useful.
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
I just ran across this in my archives. Thought some here might find it
useful.
Fantastic link. Great overview. Thanks for sharing. :)
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
Dennis Burgess wrote:
It does have a browser interface :)
Technically true, but the Dude's Web interface is sorely lacking. You
can look at stuff, but most configuration changes (especially to maps)
require the Dude client.
There's also the minor annoyance, for some, that The Dude requires
Charles Wyble wrote:
Yes. Cacti is a nice solution, although it had a bit of a learning curve
and setup time.
MRTG was easier and quicker for me.
(cfgmaker and indexmaker and you are done).
Nagios is also nice as well. See something like
http://www.groundworkopensource.com/
Ditto on
Carl Shivers wrote:
Looks like you have to be a Unix guru to install and develop graphs.
In defense of Cacti, it's not a UNIX guru that you have to be (Cacti
installs on Windows), but you have to make sure your web and database
stack are working properly (e.g. Apache / MySQL) to get it
You bet. Hope it does some good
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original
Thank Bob Cannon from the FCC.
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message
You can load it on RouterOS as a server. We do this quite a bit for
remote dude agents we use 433s. Use them to monitor hotspot networks
behind firewalls and NAT from public dude servers.
--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies,
* Charles Wyble wrote, On 8/1/2008 11:08 AM:
Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE wrote:
Charles...As I found out, Appendix D is just ONE way to do those
calculations.
Can you expand on this a bit?
Is there another way they should be done? Or are there different
conclusions one can reach by doing
Please share performance info
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 3:40 PM
To: WISPA General
Joshua Rowe wrote:
Just wondered if anyone else had this happen and if the list management was
aware.
Well, now /everyone/ knows I'm playing with mod_security rules. :P
David Smith
MVN.net
WISPA Wants You!
We have not deployed it yet.
-Matt
On Aug 1, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Please share performance info
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah. They were too busy being amazed at the small size! :)
We are geeks. We don't put anything into production without taking
pictures, blogging/twittering about it and bragging. Then we start to
think about playing with the new toy ... er improving customer
satisfaction through aggressive
New in box, 5250 AP Advantage Canopy. Hit me offlist if interested. Free
shipping.
--
John M. McDowell
Boonlink Communications
307 Grand Ave NW
Fort Payne, AL 35967
256.844.9932
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.boonlink.com
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.
Performance was poor in our testing. the SU-I has only 8dbi gain on it's
directional antenna (back of unit). It would obviously need to be window
mounted for it to work. We tested on an interior room not even .25miles
out and could not link up.
-Eric
Gino Villarini wrote:
Please share
The Redline rep at the meeting I attended yesterday said "don't use the
indoor models... they suck" just for whatever that's worth... ;)
Travis
Microserv
Eric Muehleisen wrote:
Performance was poor in our testing. the SU-I has only 8dbi gain on it's
directional antenna (back of
I am sure the Redline rep meant that they suck because the FCC has
limited to 200mw of power. They are capable of 24dbm of power to drive
their 8dbi antenna. One of the things I want to test is the difference
in performance between the current FCC power limit and what it should
be if the
I'd love for that to happen...so many apartment complexes within a mile of
my towers...
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure the Redline rep meant that they suck because the FCC has
limited to 200mw of power. They are capable of 24dbm of power to drive
All,
I have a fully routed network behind a MT border gateway that does nat for
most residential customers. Recently, I am hearing more rumblings about
customers with pptp VPNs having problems. From what I undersand, isn't
PPPTP supposed to be NAT friendly?? Is there something inherent about
In your Mikrotik Service Ports tab (under IP Firewall), be sure that
PPtP is enabled. That is your PPtP Helper to allow it to pass via the
MT NAT. Don't have a clue as to why you would need it unless it allows
other ports through (GRE or something).
Eric Rogers
Precision Data Solutions, LLC
Yes I have that enabled already. In fact, on other MT systems that carry
the backhaul (no firewall or nat) I also enabled this just to be safe.
Version 2.9.x has a helper for GRE and PPtP, version 3.x only has PPtP, in
these firewall 'helpers'. My border system is version 3.10. I need to make
In forums.mikrotik.com I found this...
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=1t=21095p=107469hilit=nat+p
ptp+helper#p107469
It looks like there is an issue since 3.0 that they have removed IP
Helpers. I will keep looking.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually,
They didn't remove the IP helpers, they are built in. Try something for
me. If you go to the IPFirewallService Ports page, disable (not
delete) the PPtP port and see if that makes a difference. I had to
disable the SIP one to allow SIP via the NAT interface.
Let me know if it works.
The voodoo that I'm aware of is answering the questions in the setup,
though I may be thinking of something else.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: David E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
It's also severely limited in being a mobile unit. In 3650, mobile units
are allowed significantly less EIRP because they could be moved into an
exclusion zone without the network operator's knowledge or consent.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
From a purely technical perspective I am sure an argument could be made that
an indoor device should be allowed to use higher power levels because it
will not transmit unless under the control of an authorized base station.
From a more practical perspective fears of possible cancer or other damage
Hey Guys
OT Question for this slow Saturday (although we are working with some
lighting related failures)
How do you guys compensate NON sales Staff on referrals and sales?
Case is that we have a very industry connected IT Manager and he has
lately closed very good deals. But I don't know how
Gino Villarini wrote:
How do you guys compensate NON sales Staff on referrals and sales?
While I don't make compensation decisions, I've seen non-sales staff get
bonuses that around about 30% of their base income.
Case is that we have a very industry connected IT Manager and he has
lately
John,
I fail to understand your logic on this matter.
I see absolutely no benefit to WISPs for support of a Sprint/Clearwire
merger.
What does Sroint/Clearwire have to do with the success of WiMax?
I don't see how WISP's Wimax benefit from WimAx being made for a spectrum
WISPs can't use
Well,
Very good question, and I only have one answer...
Nagios/Cacti is open source, so it can be adapted to the WISP's specific
need as required.
However, for someone that doesn't want to be a developer, I agree, Dude is
pretty sweet, and much easier to put up and run.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL
Tom, your logic doesn't make sense to me either.
1. I mentioned before that the two largest entities pushing WiMax worldwide
are Sprint and Clearwire, without their success MOBILE WiMax will fail, and
LTE will prevail. If there is no one to build a WiMax network, the
technology has no value.
2.
I just deployed my backup link and took a direct hit on a tower with two
Redline PTPs
Anybody have a Redline AN80i 5.4 and 5.8 in stock that I could drive to pick
up? I live in NE Alabama?
C. Wu, do you have anything in Atlanta?
Thanks,
--
John M. McDowell
Boonlink Communications
307 Grand
John,
We have Ligowave PTPs available in GA at our warehouse (Concord, GA).
I think we also have a couple of integrated units in our office in ATL.
If you need for us to meet you somewhere in between we could do that
too.
-Hal
-Original Message-
From: John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wow, talk about customer care!
Would you meet us in between too?
Let See... halfway between ATL and San Juan, would be smack right in
downtown Habana, Cuba!!!
:-)
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Sprint and Clearwire
2. WISPs can use 2.5ghz spectrum and
Wow, talk about customer support!
Would you meet us halfway too?
Hmmm halfway to PR should be right in Habana, Cuba!!!
gino
-Original Message-
From: Harold Bledsoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 10:39 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
Dude is very simple. It combines the monitoring and notification
settings of Nagios in with the link and notification information of
MRTG. All in a slick graphic interface with multiple maps, drill down
capabilities, etc. You can run it on a RouterOS device or any windows
box. It runs just
I was searching for information on grandfathered earth stations and
came across
www.comsearch.com/files/PA-102473-EN_Extended_C-Band_Protection_3650-3700.pdf
Our friends at comsearch. :)
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
CTO Known Element Enterprises / SoCal
Free is also a good thing. Alerts and such work great, the kewl part is
the agents. You can put a remote agent out there ( we use it for
hotspot networks ), and the agent polls the devices behind the NAT at
the hotspot location. Slick as can be, simple, and works!
Guess I am biased though,
obtain a lease from an educational institution
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday,
* Charles Wyble wrote, On 8/3/2008 11:54 AM:
I was searching for information on grandfathered earth stations and
came across
www.comsearch.com/files/PA-102473-EN_Extended_C-Band_Protection_3650-3700.pdf
Our friends at comsearch. :)
Comsearch is in the business of protection in addition
Wouldn't all the leases that were worth anything already snapped up?
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 12:19
You say that as if Sprint and Clearwire have not already bought up
everything.
As far as I can tell, at least in the three states around me, they have.
EVERYTHING. They have it all.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: John
In my opinion, no. There are two still available in my coverage area...and
the other part of my coverage is whitespace.
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wouldn't all the leases that were worth anything already snapped up?
--
Mike Hammett
Whitespace?
The last time I investigated, the area I am in is divided up into little
boxes and all of the former holders had leased to Sprint or Clearwire. The
box I am in had all of the holders either actively using, or leasing.
I could find no information on there being any unallocated
BUT... you can have the educational institution to get the license and
then YOU build it out for them. In exchange for building it out for
them, you are allowed to use it for customers.
EXCELLENT public/private partnership.
ryan
On Aug 3, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I believe
But... like he mentioned, almost all that space is gone. In my area a
different company (BridgeMaxx) owns the 2.5ghz spectrum and is using it
for internet service already. Of course, they paid millions of dollars
for it, and their service is terrible (as we have a modem in our office
for
I am looking for recommendations of an IP based security system with high
quality video. I believe PC based is what we're after for low cost and
upgradability.
I am not looking for a single camera, but a whole system with perhaps dozens of
cameras. Most security systems I've seen (albeit I'm
A good value system is WiLife by LukWerks. They were purchased by Logitech
so I am not sure if the name stayed the same.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 4:29 PM
Subject: [WISPA] IP based security
I have used the Netbotz appliances before with great success. APC bought
them a few years ago. Axis might be another option.
Eric Albert
Application Engineer
Alvarion, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Sunday,
Hi,
Does anyone know if there is a way to turn off the color features on
the newer Mikrotik ROS versions when doing a telnet? It is messing up
our remote telnet scripts because the color codes are being sent and the
Net::Telnet perl module does not know how to deal with them.
thanks,
Travis
Sigh *no*...
http://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/US07/v3.pdf (page 21)
Console: Colors
Console consumes less memory, it hasfaster startup and fast export time
References to items, commands, prompts and exports are coloured
Currently no way to turn colours off, except running under a dumb
The best system I've worked with is the Honeywell RapidEye. I've only
used it for cameras, but it also does relay input/output for sensors
and door locks.
Runs $3-$10K depending on the I/O options and storage capacity.
http://www.honeywellvideo.com/products/recorders/pc/index.html
For stand alone
Can you set your TERM env variable to something different?
I don't have a mikrotik to try it on, but if you set your TERM env
variable to vt100 it should not use color
Ryan
D. Ryan Spott wrote:
Sigh *no*...
http://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/US07/v3.pdf (page 21)
Console: Colors
Is it possible to get an injunction against a HAM if he moved to a
900MHz frequency as is causing interference that would disrupt our
ability to do business? I know he has a license and I don't however
there must be some precedent that allows for commercial venture versus
amateur radio.
Any
By the way, we have been up there for 4 years - this HAM only recently
increased the power in the last three weeks.
__
Jerry Richardson
airCloud Communications
From: Jerry Richardson
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 12:45 PM
Looking for service in LA, near the home depot center. If you service this
area please email me.
Dustin Jurman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
It's my understanding that as long as the Ham operator is within his operating
privileges, any interference with part 15 users or other NON-Licensed
user/equipment, there is not much that can be done. I would however bring it to
his attention and constructively work on a solution with him.
Louisiana? Los Angeles? Latin America? :-)
Dustin Jurman wrote:
Looking for service in LA, near the home depot center. If you service this
area please email me.
Dustin Jurman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jerry
You may get an initial injunction but as a Part 15 user you don't have much in
the line of rights as far as federal law is concerned unless you can show
willful interference from he ham.
From a business point of view anything is possible in court
Unfortunately amateur radio becomes
Where are u located Jerry?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 12:45:17
To: Jerry Richardson[EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General
Listwireless@wispa.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Motorola Canopy User
Since I have no case, a work around is the way to go IMO. I'm not
interested in dragging this out. I do have a plan for a work-around and
I am confident it will work. It's just a PITA.
Thanks for the input
__
Jerry Richardson
airCloud Communications
Yep, Hams OWN this band. We are simply visitors.
- Original Message -
From: Lance Jahnke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 2:01 PM
Subject: [WISPA] 900mhz - Ham
It's my understanding that as long as the Ham operator is within his
operating
OK, to warm things up, I proffer the following:
Ham radio is essential to the emergency communications network of the
planet. When all else fails, hams and the American Red Cross can always get
business done. At 5.7 GHz, the distance record is 3,982 km. At 903 MHz the
distance record is
And the ARC? Spew
And amateur radio is dying. Its a fact. The last one
left needs to shut off the lights.
Just look at the hamfests. (I call them the land of the
great unwashed) Numbers are diminishing all the time.
Springfield MO just announced they are canceling theirs
this year.
I got my HAM license about 9 years ago (gee its almost time to renew!) and I
have never really used it. My original intent was to use it in a
walkie-talkie type of way with my Dad... but besides the its cool I can talk
to someone over the radio at this range, I never really saw the purpose...
Of
OK, to warm things up, I proffer the following:
Ham radio is essential to the emergency communications network of the
planet. When all else fails, hams and the American Red Cross can always
get business done. At 5.7 GHz, the distance record is 3,982 km. At 903
MHz the distance record
Well, I thought a filter might have killed the previous message since I
hadn't seen it.
Oh well... The original sentiment was the intended one...
- Original Message -
From: Michael Handiboe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Motorola Canopy User Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008
I personally worked in the 911 system during 9-11 and I can say that most of
the emergency traffic was self generated and duplicate to info that was
already exchanged by other means.
While I agree that they may have a place during emergencies I say that they
should use 2 meters and 440 for
301 - 400 of 62388 matches
Mail list logo
