Hi Doug...I've been doing this since January and it's been very slow.
Comsearch seems to rep many of the FSSes. As soon as I have more info on
where we are I'll post it or you can contact me off list.
Thanks leon
* Doug Ratcliffe wrote, On 7/27/2008 6:16 PM:
Has anyone gotten any headway on
I used to live in Boca Raton and my ham repeater is still on the air
down there. We're also doing some 3650 in Florida as well. Currently
we're 4 miles just west of the 150km zone so we're in the clear.
I've had numerous calls with higherups at the WTB on this over the last
few months.
Leon
* Charles Wyble wrote, On 8/1/2008 11:08 AM:
Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE wrote:
Charles...As I found out, Appendix D is just ONE way to do those
calculations.
Can you expand on this a bit?
Is there another way they should be done? Or are there different
conclusions one can reach by doing
* Charles Wyble wrote, On 8/3/2008 11:54 AM:
I was searching for information on grandfathered earth stations and
came across
www.comsearch.com/files/PA-102473-EN_Extended_C-Band_Protection_3650-3700.pdf
Our friends at comsearch. :)
Comsearch is in the business of protection in addition
* Jerry Richardson wrote, On 8/4/2008 3:44 PM:
Is it possible to get an injunction against a HAM if he moved to a
900MHz frequency as is causing interference that would disrupt our
ability to do business? I know he has a license and I don't however
there must be some precedent that allows for
THought was a surge suppressor. Nice install.
Are you using silicone to seal besides the tape? We used silicone in our
amateur stuff iat our FLorida repeater location and also at my house
when I lived down there. Works good.
Leon
PS: The battery is there are a failover, I'm assuming you have
Mobile type ops in 3650 probably is not going to happen IMHO - a big can
of worms the FCC opened up. But in an emergency, then there's always the
capability of getting an STA.
Leon
* Stuart Browne wrote, On 8/10/2008 1:28 PM:
The transportable 3650 base station idea is akin to a transportable
* Jerry Richardson wrote, On 8/12/2008 11:55 AM:
How accurate is the FCC ULC?
I am searching by call sign for grandfathered earth stations and all
four of the call signs come back not found.
It's not in there except a reference to the grandfathered PDF. The
International Bureau is where
* Patrick Shoemaker wrote, On 12/30/2008 3:40 PM:
What companies are the operators here using for domain registration? I
am looking to transfer my customers' domains to a new registrar. I am
looking for a credible US-based company that does not have a huge setup
fee and that does not employ
One thing you might try is making an RF choke at the tower base coiling
up the CAT5 and possibly even using a ferrite on it as well.
Leon
* Jack Unger wrote, On 1/3/2009 3:35 PM:
Doug,
The only way to tell if using shielded cable would work is to try it.
Every high-power (radio tower)
* Jack Unger wrote, On 1/3/2009 8:15 PM:
... the TRANSMITTER is 10 kW, not the tower...
Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
The tower is a 4-leg self supporting tower, it was built a long time ago,
built from what I've heard in the mid 1900's... The antennas for the tower
are isolated from the tower,
* Doug Ratcliffe wrote, On 1/3/2009 7:33 PM:
The tower is a 4-leg self supporting tower, it was built a long time ago,
built from what I've heard in the mid 1900's... The antennas for the tower
are isolated from the tower, it appears that there are 3 vertical antennas,
attached with copper
The XR3 has FCC compliance.
* Michael Baird wrote, On 11/14/2009 12:24 AM:
Ubiquity does not have any licensed 3.65 gear for the US, they have
XR3/Nano3's but they are for overseas customers.
They have announced they will be coming out with 3.65/900 mhz airmax
gear 2nd Quarterish next
* Forbes Mercy wrote, On 1/20/2009 7:00 PM:
snip
Took a back-up 433AH board up and used the same radio card, worked like
a charm for both our access and customer throughput. We didn't want to
waste a three port/LAN board so ordered a 433a single port board. Once
it arrived we logged into
if that helps.
We can try this.
Forbes
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Microtik Remote Weirdness
Scott has a good idea. Combine that with the Dude and it works nice.
Another thing to do is make the management of the devices on a
non-routeable.
Leon
* Scott Reed wrote, On 1/31/2009 11:08 AM:
Radius.
You can make groups in Radius that map to groups on the routers. You
can then make
* Marlon K. Schafer wrote, On 3/18/2009 10:32 PM:
Thanks Leon,
You;re welcome Marlon...
Do you have a contact person?
Harold Bledsoe he's a WISPA member vendor.
Also, what ranges and speeds are people seeing with 3650?
I don;t know as I'm not with Bluemont anymore and we/I were
Hi Guys...I'd steer away from inverters since they soak up a lot of
power. You might want to look at some solar stuff with some of the AGM
batteries Marlon mentioned in another thread. Run everything @ 24V is
good that way you don't need any dc-dc converters.
Leon
* os10ru...@gmail.com
* Gary Garrett wrote, On 8/7/2009 2:34 PM:
Seems to me it is ethernet cable picking up EMP. I seem to lose a lot of
Netgear routers lately. Seems to go right through the POE and gets the
WAN port. Also Transmit side of XR2's. Always see receive side
degrading after mid path lightning strikes
* Jason Hensley wrote, On 8/20/2009 3:51 PM:
I know it works, but will the FCC come crashing down on me if they find out
I have these in place?
FIrst you need to lite-license yourself and make sure you (your
locations) are not in an exclusion zone. If so, then take 2. Otherwise,
proceed and
* Josh Luthman wrote, On 9/1/2009 6:31 PM:
30 megs with a 20 mhz channel is what Travis and I always see in 5ghz.
Xr5 and r52(h) myself.
we had almost a 30 mile path using I believe SR5s and I think it was 10
mHz channels and I think we topped it at 15m but throttled it back to
cap @ 10m
Rick...what data rate(s) are you running on the CPE and AP? What speed
is the cust supposed to get? I would use something like 6/9/12/18 data
rates at both ends. The slower the data rate the more headroom you will
have.
Leon
* RickG wrote, On 9/2/2009 8:44 PM:
I've got two customers on a
* Jack Unger wrote, On 9/12/2009 3:06 PM:
On Friday (9/4) WISPA, with assistance from Rini/Coran, filed Comments
in the FCC's Section 706 Notice of Inquiry. This NOI asked if
Broadband was being deployed in a reasonable and timely fashion to all
Americans.
WISPA's reply answered No to this
Mark Nash wrote:
I'm getting conflicting information from Trango sales reps, their online PDF
datasheet and others who know the product. So... Does the M900 AP come
connectorized? If so, what connector?
My application is about 2 miles NLOS (many trees). Looking to do it with
omni...don't
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
http://forums.star-os.com/showthread.php?t=5838
I just posted our early rsults of the 900 MHz gear. Needless to say
this is better than I was hoping for and this stuff has a FIRM place
in our tool chest. Forget higher power on 2.4 GHz to get through some
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
Vertical and horizontal were tried. The results are the same.
Thanks Lonnie...we're trying some Mikrotik with the 900 cards and not
having much luck through the trees using a 900 120* sector H-pol
Leon
Lonnie
On 9/17/06, *Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE* [EMAIL PROTECTED
- Original Message - From: Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lonnie Nunweiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Initial SR9 test results
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
Vertical and horizontal were tried
Larry Yunker wrote:
Let us know more about the configuration(s) and maybe we can figure
out what else you should try.
OK here's the Sector antenna:
http://www.teletronics.com/tant900sector12-5dbi.html
The yagi's are PacWireless YA9-13
Interesting that at the customer with the yagi in the
Larry Yunker wrote:
How much difference are you seeing? 2db or more?
yeah maybe 6-10 I think
- Original Message - From: Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Larry Yunker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 5:55 PM
Larry Yunker wrote:
Sounds like multipath you are probably picking up a bounced signal
on one end.
could be I think we saw this somewhere else but I can't remember;
we did so much on Thursday it sometimes is a blur :-(
I think the plan is to try a yagi up on the tower in place of the
I have a few of them to use with my Trango 900s. A little pricey but
they're built well.
Leon
Eric Rogers wrote:
I don't know if anyone has looked into modular lightning suppression,
but I have been talking with someone from Transtector. They make a 24V
version for Motorola with Cat5 jacks,
Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
Has anyone used the SR9's in a RB112? They are a little bigger so will they
physically fit? How do you like them?
We're using them and they seem to work ok. Having the right antenna is a
key too.
leon
Mark Nash
Network Engineer
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
We've got the following that we just removed from service replaced with
higher bandwidth equipment:
Four (4) pairs of Tsunami 45m full duplex radios
(301-27710-1a1/301-27710-1a2)
One (1) pair Tsunami 100m full duplex radio
Two (2) pairs Alvarion LB; one pair 36m, one pair 72m
No antennas
We've retired the following and looking to find a good home for them:
Tsunami 100M full duplex radio
Tsunami 45M full duplex radio
Barracuda Spam Firewall 400 (This was purchased from another company and
we have no use for it.)
Please contact me off-list with any questions.
Thanks, Leon
I'm currently working on that myself. I have had numerous discussions
with the WTB and IB over the last few months regarding the grandfathered
FSS'
Leon
* Joe Miller wrote, On 4/8/2008 3:27 PM:
Partrick,
Thanks a lot, this is more information regarding the
3.65 ghz band than I've ever
We have the following equipment available for shipment:
Tsunami 45m full duplex radio 301-27710-1A1/301-27710-1A2 (5.7/5.8g)
Tsunami 100m full duplex radio 301-27720-1A1/301-27720-1A2 (5.3/5.8g)
Multiple Enterasys SSR8 with controller boards and fast ethernet cards
Multiple Enterasys SSR16
We have the following equipment available for shipment:
Tsunami 45m full duplex radio 301-27710-1A1/301-27710-1A2 (5.7/5.8g)
Tsunami 100m full duplex radio 301-27720-1A1/301-27720-1A2 (5.3/5.8g)
Multiple Enterasys SSR8 with controller boards and fast ethernet cards
Multiple Enterasys SSR16 with
* Travis Johnson wrote, On 6/3/2008 10:17 PM:
Yup... and it's only because they can... they are getting the big
operators to pay that kind of money, so they will keep selling at those
prices. Supply and demand... but you can build a MT 3.65ghz CPE for less
than $400, but it's still
The rules are quite clear unfortunately. The FCC opened a can of worms
IMHO. All licensees have to work together to resolve anything. There
are no first rights to a site I've been told.
Leon
* Scottie Arnett wrote, On 6/4/2008 2:45 AM:
All I can say is OUCH!
-- Original Message
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:07 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rapid Link Launches WiMax Service in Atlanta
* Travis Johnson wrote, On 6/3/2008 10:17 PM:
Yup... and it's only because they can... they are getting
an error in his
registration.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA
George...you can not plug-n-play components as I said earlier. It has to
be certified as a system that makes use of a contention based protocol.
Leon
* George Rogato wrote, On 6/4/2008 11:22 AM:
Thanks for explaining that Travis.
I asked Jack Unger to look into this recently.
There was a
. There was
ideas hashed around between them and us.
Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE wrote:
George...you can not plug-n-play components as I said earlier. It has
to be certified as a system that makes use of a contention based
protocol.
Leon
* George Rogato wrote, On 6/4/2008 11:22 AM:
Thanks
. I want to do what is legal, as well as wise.
Randy
Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE wrote:
George...you can not plug-n-play components as I said earlier. It has to
be certified as a system that makes use of a contention based protocol.
Leon
* George Rogato wrote, On 6/4/2008 11:22 AM
Link Launches WiMax Service in Atlanta
Another WISP has already gotten an FCC license using the Ubiquiti XR3 card
as the registered device... in fact, the FCC actually called this person to
clarify the specified frequency ranges.
Travis
Microserv
Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE wrote
- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message - From: Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rapid Link Launches WiMax Service in Atlanta
* ralph wrote, On 6/4/2008 9:40 AM:
Who
Ralph -- please contact me off list.
Thanks leon
* ralph wrote, On 6/8/2008 2:43 PM:
I'm very frustrated with this application. Having trouble getting SSL
activated on the authentication server.
I have posted numerous times on MT's forum and received not even one answer.
I have not received
* Kurt Fankhauser wrote, On 6/13/2008 3:56 PM:
It is my understanding that the 900mhz cards are actually 2.4ghz with
converters built in. So obviously putting a 900mhz card on the same board as
a 2.4ghz card would be a bad idea. Now can I put them on the same tower?
Lets say I put the 900mhz
126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 4:15 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] XR9 separation from other 2.4 stuff
* Blair Davis wrote, On 7/1/2008 2:33 PM:
Anyone happen to know the Power Supply voltage for the old RouterBoard
112? Just got some of them and I can't find it on the RouterBoard
ste Thanks.
up to 48volts
leon
* Harold Bledsoe wrote, On 7/2/2008 3:19 PM:
I respectfully disagree. In my opinion, any frequency that is tied to a
particular standard by regulation will do nothing but stifle innovation
in that band.
I agree with Hal. As an amateur radio operator as well as someone in
this and the
* Mike Hammett wrote, On 7/19/2008 12:40 PM:
I've seen one by PacWireless and one by MTI. Does anyone know of one with
greater gain than 12.5 dBi?
Hi Mike...ArC Wireless has some...we use them and are good Titan
Wireless carriers them.
take care leon
* Mike Hammett wrote, On 7/20/2008 12:09 PM:
So could the link work because both ends are 200'+ over the bulk of the
middle?
I don't think it will work. We tried last year to get through some thick
trees and couldn't do it even with a relay at the edge of the tree line.
We do have 900
53 matches
Mail list logo
