PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
It's quite unfortunate IMO but I've concluded that this is a typically
American problem. In America the courts broke up the Bell system thinking
that it'd be better for the average American to have local phone companies
competing with each other. Only
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:13 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
You bring up an interesting point, comparing to GSM..
The problem is, in a democracy full of special interests, how does one
determine fairly what that compatibilty standard should be?
One of the Reasons
General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
It's quite unfortunate IMO but I've concluded that this is a typically
American problem. In America the courts broke up the Bell system thinking
that it'd be better for the average American
Marlon K. wrote:
It's funny. I thought that getting the local businesses on broadband
would help me sell more of it. People would use it at work and want
it at home too right? Wrong. They just do all of their stuff at work
and sometimes cancel even the dialup!
This is because people
. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Rich, with all due respect, your idea has a REALLY big flaw in it.
Once government sets a standard, it's going to be a very long time
Marlon, I think I can appreciate most everything you've said. I can only
add to each of your points, while accepting your input, why I think that
your (and my) life would be better if we had some more constructive
requirements in the wisp market than anything that fits the transmit mask.
!
-
- Original Message -
From: Steve Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 3:54 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Patrick:
I posit that the LACK of any significant consensus from
:49 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Well George, ready for long answer that may not actually answer your
question? I'd prefer to give you the full story.
First,...so, is Alvarion building UL WiMAX? Of course, and I personally
see
lots of potential for it. When will it come? A few things
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Steve Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 1:04 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Patrick:
I disagree that the market is (directly) rewarding survival
Vonage: 650.641.1243
-Original Message-
From: Steve Stroh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 2:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Patrick:
Yup - agree to disagree, and remaining civil in the discussion.
The basic flaw in your
the best chance of
bringing about a positive revolution in UL BWA.
Regards,
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Tom DeReggi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 5:06 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Patrick,
Forgive the Me to, but Patrick
Patrick:
I disagree that the market is (directly) rewarding survival of the
nastiest - it's rewarding systems that are designed to survive in a mixed
environment. If that behavior is perceived as nasty by systems that are
less robust, oh well.
But there's a tradeoff - systems whose primary
Marketing
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
-Original Message-
From: Steve Stroh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:04 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Patrick:
I disagree that the market is (directly
Patrick:
Yup - agree to disagree, and remaining civil in the discussion.
The basic flaw in your perspective is that the current US license-exempt
bands are intended for communications use. They're not- their PRIMARY
allocation... WAY back, is for Industrial, Scientific, and Medical use,
so
Patrick Leary wrote:
Steve, I simply refuse to accept that the current rules are sacrosanct,
there are not, and the proposed rules for 3650MHz bolter my case. In
3650MHz, the FCC made strong and specific reference that they well might not
accept products that they believed were designed not to,
: 650.641.1243
-Original Message-
From: George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 10:16 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
That was a great answer Patrick.
You should post more often. This is the information all wisps crave.
What frequency
So these are just the licensed frequencies that will get mobile WIMAX.
There will be no unlicensed WIMAX mobile or fixed any time in 2006, is
that correct?
One of the reasons I ask this is there is a group that claims they will
be rolling out unlicensed mobile WIMAX here along the Oregon
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
So these are just the licensed frequencies that will get mobile WIMAX.
There will be no unlicensed WIMAX mobile or fixed any time in 2006, is
that correct?
One of the reasons I ask this is there is a group that claims they will
be rolling out unlicensed
, 2006 11:49 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Well George, ready for long answer that may not actually answer your
question? I'd prefer to give you the full story.
First,...so, is Alvarion building UL WiMAX? Of course, and I personally
see
lots of potential for it. When will it come
Well George, ready for long answer that may not actually answer your
question? I'd prefer to give you the full story.
First,...so, is Alvarion building UL WiMAX? Of course, and I personally see
lots of potential for it. When will it come? A few things are in line first,
so there is no firm date
Sorry, I meant to say NOT scrambling to build residential UL WiMAX CPE.
- Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Leary
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 8:50 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Well George, ready for long answer that may not actually answer
: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Well George, ready for long answer that may not actually answer your
question? I'd prefer to give you the full story.
First,...so, is Alvarion building UL WiMAX? Of course, and I personally
see
lots of potential for it. When will it come? A few things are in line
Patrick:
Wow - this is by far the most enlightening piece I've ever read on the WiMax market. Thanks a lot!
So who really cares about WiMax for backhaul? So what if I can build
links with ends from different vendors? Won't proprietary protocols win
(technically) if they aren't limited by
: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:19 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
GREAT post Patrick! Thank you so very much for it. This is one of the
reasons why I'm so proud of WISPA. We're attracting the cream
: 650.641.1243
From: Dylan Oliver
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006
11:19 AM
To: WISPA
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX
update
Patrick:
Wow - this is by far the most enlightening piece I've ever read on the WiMax
market. Thanks a lot!
So who really cares
That was a great answer Patrick.
You should post more often. This is the information all wisps crave.
What frequency is the mobile WIMAX?
And what is the expected release dates.
Thanks again
George
Patrick Leary wrote:
Well George, ready for long answer that may not actually answer your
26 matches
Mail list logo
