On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Dylan Oliver wrote:
Meru Networks does ~2ms handoffs between access points through
controllers which run Redhat (or some other rpm-based distro; I
forget). The access points report the signal level of clients to
the controller, which then decides which AP to send traffic f
Meru Networks does ~2ms handoffs between access points through controllers which run Redhat (or some other rpm-based distro; I forget). The access points report the signal level of clients to the controller, which then decides which AP to send traffic for the client through. It's simple, smart and
Paul Hendry wrote:
That's one of the reasons that the WDS, EoIP combo works so well as the end
user keeps that same address and it cuts out the repeated DHCP stage at AP
hand over.
Since you are scripting the AP switch, I would look at using static IPs
per CPE/AP combo if speed of switch is i
Something like this
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6590/products_white_paper09186a00800a.shtml
John
>-Original Message-
>From: Jon Langeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2006 12:57 AM
>To: 'WISPA General List'
>Subject
these protocols.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/765/ccx/versions_and_features.shtml
John
>-Original Message-
>From: Butch Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2006 08:54 PM
>To: 'WISPA General List'
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bragging on Mikro
Wireless Roadshows
Coming to a City Near You
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jon Langeler
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 2:57 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bragging on Mikrotik
It's too b
ect: Re: [WISPA] Bragging on Mikrotik
It's too bad MT doesn't come up with a mobile roaming / routing
protocol(unless they do and I don't know of it). Where the end user
retains the same IP address even after it get routed between various
towers and is wireless medium independent(wi
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jon Langeler
Sent: 07 September 2006 08:57
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bragging on Mikrotik
It's too bad MT doesn't come up with a mobile roaming / routing
protocol(unless they do and I don'
57
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bragging on Mikrotik
It's too bad MT doesn't come up with a mobile roaming / routing
protocol(unless they do and I don't know of it). Where the end user
retains the same IP address even after it get routed between various
towers an
Was he able to use the same IP address at each location over the routed
network?
Jon Langeler
Michwave Tech.
Butch Evans wrote:
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
How long is a ping? Isn't windows ping like 4 sec? 7 times 4 = 28
seconds. To me, (if my math is correct) 28 sec is f
It's too bad MT doesn't come up with a mobile roaming / routing
protocol(unless they do and I don't know of it). Where the end user
retains the same IP address even after it get routed between various
towers and is wireless medium independent(wifi, wimax, cdma). Does
anyone here have experience
ld be
grouped into a bridge.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: 07 September 2006 04:50
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Bragging on Mikrotik
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Paul Hendry wrote:
>It was my understanding th
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
How long is a ping? Isn't windows ping like 4 sec? 7 times 4 = 28
seconds. To me, (if my math is correct) 28 sec is frustrating, not
seamless.
Perhaps "seamless" is not the proper word. We did some testing
today and a cop used his laptop at 6 lo
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Paul Hendry wrote:
It was my understanding that using Mikrotik, EoIP, WDS and RSTP you
could achieve a similar thing with only 1-2 ping drops per handoff
between AP's at least that's what is being claimed by some on the
MK forum. We are just about to test such a setup to fa
Administration
www.nwwnet.net <http://www.nwwnet.net/>
*-- Original Message ---*
From: Brian Rohrbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:10:19 -0400
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bragging on Mikrotik
> How long is a ping? Isn't win
WISPA General List
Sent: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:10:19 -0400
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bragging on Mikrotik
> How long is a ping? Isn't windows ping like 4 sec? 7 times
4 = 28
>
seconds. To me, (if my math is correct) 28 sec is frustrating, not
>
seamless.
>
>
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: 04 September 2006 03:58
To: Equipment List
Cc: Arnis Riekstins; Part-15 Mikrotik List; WISP List; Wispa List
Subject: [WISPA] Bragging on Mikrotik
I want to take this opportunity to share with these lists some
things that we hav
ct: [WISPA] Bragging on Mikrotik
I want to take this opportunity to share with these lists some
things that we have recently done with a Mikrotik RouterOS based
network. This may seem to some like "blatant advertising", but it
is certainly not intended to be that.
Many of you have l
I want to take this opportunity to share with these lists some
things that we have recently done with a Mikrotik RouterOS based
network. This may seem to some like "blatant advertising", but it
is certainly not intended to be that.
Many of you have looked for a solution that will let you do s
19 matches
Mail list logo
