That's one of the reasons that the WDS, EoIP combo works so well as the end user keeps that same address and it cuts out the repeated DHCP stage at AP hand over.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Langeler Sent: 07 September 2006 08:57 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bragging on Mikrotik It's too bad MT doesn't come up with a mobile roaming / routing protocol(unless they do and I don't know of it). Where the end user retains the same IP address even after it get routed between various towers and is wireless medium independent(wifi, wimax, cdma). Does anyone here have experience/ideas with that? Jon Langeler Michwave Tech. Butch Evans wrote: > On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Brian Rohrbacher wrote: > >> How long is a ping? Isn't windows ping like 4 sec? 7 times 4 = 28 >> seconds. To me, (if my math is correct) 28 sec is frustrating, not >> seamless. > > > Perhaps "seamless" is not the proper word. We did some testing today > and a cop used his laptop at 6 locations throughout the city to surf > the web and do license checks. From his perspective, it was > seamless. From the perspective of the network...there were seams. Is > that a more clear explanation? > -- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.1/440 - Release Date: 06/09/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.1/440 - Release Date: 06/09/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
