to get creative and
force users to auth before they connect.
Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Garrett Harmon
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 2:09 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN
authenticated
users (and still do) for our VPN users/clients so we never had to
re-invent that spoke on the wheel.
If you have any questions about details, please send me an email off
line, and I would be more than happy to help out.
Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
Jenkins, Matthew wrote:
How many others
an educated decision as to what is best
for you, and move forward.
Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
Walt Howd wrote:
We're doing 802.1x with LWAPP. We have two controllers, 300 APs and
average around 1100 concurrent wireless users.
We just switched to 802.1x authentication last year, with great
success
by all devices.
Chip Greene
Senior Network Specialist
University of Richmond
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv on behalf of
Jorge Bodden
Sent: Mon 7/21/2008 11:28 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN
appreciated.
Thanks
Jorge Bodden
btw...all other devices work fine (XP, Macs Linux)
This electronic message is intended to be for the use only of the named
recipient, and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If
you are not the intended recipient
at least explain to you how we do it at Columbia University Health
Sciences Campus/New York Presbyterian Hospital. But right now it seems
to me like you have many options to chose from, none of which are right
or wrong.
Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
Youngquist, Jason R. wrote:
All,
I have a few
Has anyone out there configured a splash page on the WLAN portion of the
controller. I can do it from the router, but it it a little bit too
cumbersome. I wanted to know if there was a way to get the WLAN to do
it. Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
This electronic message
the following
command at the prompt, 'config msglog level critical'. This should log
the MAC address in question. Please let me know if this helps out or if
you need any more assistance.
Jorge Bodden
Peter Arbouin wrote:
Hello,
We have a Cisco LWAPP installation running Wireless Control
understand what the second log entry means.
I have a little bit of literature that I am going to read this evening.
I just wanted to see if anyone in this group has come across, these
types of error messages.
Thanks in advance for all your help.
Jorge Bodden
to client has reached a maximum. So the client is not
getting/acknowledging or rerequesting important key information from the
AP/Network.
Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
Jorge Bodden wrote:
We are beginning to pilot a voice application on our wireless
network. We are a Cisco LWAPP shop. On the voice
This brings up the point of a very interesting philosophy of mine.
Never buy a first generation device. No matter how groundbreaking the
device might be, it always tends to lack extra features that make the
device more ergonomic and adaptable.
Jorge
Jonn Martell wrote:
This bring up a
?
I know that I have the option of running the DHCP server on my regular
DHCP server or I can also run it on Radius. Either of these would mean
a change in the infrastructure. But it would make it a little more
redundant. Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
This electronic message
Or does anyone know how to get the two routers to share the dhcp
DB/binding tables?
Jorge Bodden wrote:
Hey guys,
I ran into a little problem over the weekend while I was attempting to
make our wireless network redundant.
We run a WPA/TKIP encryption with EAP-TTLS/PAP authentication
James,
I've tested this theory with a B client and a G client on the same AP
and the B client works at B speeds and the G client works at G speeds.
We tested on both Cisco Aironet and Cisco LWAPP and both yielded the
same results. Someone out there may have had different results, but it
of the controllers through option 43 or is there some
other mechanism? Any help on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Jorge Bodden
This electronic message is intended to be for the use only of the named
recipient, and may contain information
Matt,
Are you using PAP? If so, PAP is a clear text protocol.
Jorge
BlackBerry service provided by Nextel
-Original Message-
From: Matt Ashfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:13:56
To:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] authentication policy
. If you lack this,
you are going to get a half @$$ job that you are not going to be happy.
You do not want the outsourcing company to dictate what you can and
cannot do. Just make sure you get your money's worth.
Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
Network Analyst
New York Hospital/Columbia University
Urrea
Mr. Epstein,
I am almost sure that your institution is always responsible for
anything that takes place in your network. You own it, you are responsible.
We just implemented the BroadHop solution, which forces people to login
to the system anytime they want to connect. Here certain members
. Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
This electronic message is intended to be for the use only of the named
recipient, and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying
the credentials coming in at all. I have configured this
device with the same settings that I put on, for any other device which
I connect onto my wireless network, yet it still will not work. Any
help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
This electronic
Shumon,
We used to have the same problem when we had the Aironet solution a
couple of years back. It was actually due to the APs sending a
re-association packet/frame to the device, even if that device was
directly underneath the AP. What type of platform are you currently
running your
was running a VOIP solution, where the number of users
per AP drops dramatically.
Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
Frank Bulk wrote:
Allen:
There is a load-balancing feature in the controller that you can take
advantage of, to require, for example, that only 8 users are on each AP.
The specific details
disconnects kill the citrix session. Has anyone experienced
any of this?
Thanks.
Jorge
Bruce Curtis wrote:
On Aug 23, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Jorge Bodden wrote:
Is there anyone out there that is running
a Cisco Airespace solution who knows how to look at the logs that tell
you client
Has anyone had a problem with users getting disconnected from the
wireless network every 4 hours or so. I get a hit on the wireless at
designated intervals (roughly) where they just get kicked off the
network. I have sniffed the traffic and noticed that every time a
disconnect takes place,
is
in the middle of making an order for a patient and she gets disconnected
and has to restart the application, it is a major concern for the
hospital. Thank you very much.\
Jorge Bodden
King, Michael wrote:
What version of Controller code are you running? There was a bug in
4.0.155.0
I am using Cisco Airespace 4400. Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
Emerson Parker wrote:
Could be a default reauth interval. This isn't that uncommon. What
controllers are you using?
-Emerson
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Bodden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11
.
Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
Urrea, Nick wrote:
We at UC Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco are using
Cisco Aironett 1231 APs and a Bluesocket solution.
Some of our users experience wireless connection drops.
These students say that they don't have any problems connecting anywhere else
Here
clientA associated with the network at time or clientB
disassociated from network at time with or without reason. Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
This electronic message is intended to be for the use only of the named
recipient, and may contain information that is confidential
free.
Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
Fred Archibald wrote:
Matt,
We too are investigating this combination with EAP-TTLS using the
securew2 client at EECS. We are just getting started with this next
week so I don't have anything to report yet. However, I will keep you
posted and be happy to hear your
Jim,
Yes, I have run into one particular problem when an SSID is not
broadcast. We call it a 'code 18, where the problem is 18 inches away
from the monitor. :-)
I have found that it is quite difficult for people who do not have some
experience with wireless, to set up their wireless
Michael,
We tried this and it was immediately shot down by the people higher up.
We only had it not broadcasting for 1 day. That takes a lot more
preparation than a couple of calls to the HD and the unchecking of a box
somewhere. Some people will scream wolf saying that the network is
FYI
This electronic message is intended to be for the use only of the named
recipient, and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of
this out there and they could provide any information on
this, it would be gratly appreciated.
We also do not want to go back to using Aironet.
Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
This electronic message is intended to be for the use only of the named
recipient, and may contain
Any type of knowledge is always worth the trouble.
Is it worth the money?
Are you a Cisco shop?
Have you committed to buying the equipment?
You may not have to spend a dime on the class. If you are a Cisco shop
or you have committed to buying a large number of APs ($400 per unit)
and
the top of my head.
If you have any specific questions please feel free to shoot me an email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Right now we have deployed about 600 APs (1010).
Please let me know how your integration of the cisco 1100 goes.
Jorge Bodden
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 00:08 -0400, Cal Frye wrote
with SSL VPN.
Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
Stephen Holland wrote:
I would like to know if anybody is using SSL vpn as an
authentication/encryption mechanism for wireless and how successful they
have been deploying it.
Also, I would be curious to know what other folks think about implementing
802.1x
to
actually know how well it works, but I don't think I'll exceed 2000 in
the next couple of years...
Nicola
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Bodden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 6/14/2006 8:48 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] SSL VPN over wireless
Does anyone out there know of a supplicant for a windows 5.0 pocket pc
that will allow for 802.1x authentication using TTLS? Securew2 is only
good for ppc 2003. It would be great if it is a free solution. If not
then I guess the cheapest will have to do.
Thanks.
Jorge Bodden
Network
-
From: Jorge Bodden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 11:33 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] PocketPC Windows Mobile 5.0
Does anyone out there know of a supplicant for a windows 5.0 pocket pc
that will allow for 802.1x authentication using
Ken,
How do you like the Aruba solution, as far as scalability,
manageability, etc?
We actually went with the Cisco Airespace solution, which is much better
than the Cisco Aironet solution.
Jorge Bodden
Network Analyst
New York Hospital
Agnes Box wrote:
Dear Ken,
What model numbers
40 matches
Mail list logo