Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread T. Shayne Ghere
Good morning.



Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than our
Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan
Controllers and Cisco WCS.



The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have been
spaced accordingly by Cisco and by us during the introduction of wireless
in the Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.



We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that the students
bring with them making our wireless nearly unusable.  I know this topic has
come up in the past, but this year is one of the worst we’ve seen, and the
students are getting restless.



We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients, however according
to a recent Court case against a large Hotel Chain, it was decided that on
an open free wireless spectrum, we would be breaking the law in jamming it.



How have you addressed this issue?  I’m about ready to ask upper management
to remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings and let the students bring
their own AP’s if they want wireless.   Has anyone resorted to this?



Thanks for your input

Shayne

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Ian McDonald
Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a disciplinary 
matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary system?

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of T. Shayne Ghere
Sent: 16 October 2014 16:11
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Good morning.

Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than our 
Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan Controllers 
and Cisco WCS.

The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have been spaced 
accordingly by Cisco and by us during the introduction of wireless in the 
Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.

We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that the students 
bring with them making our wireless nearly unusable.  I know this topic has 
come up in the past, but this year is one of the worst we’ve seen, and the 
students are getting restless.

We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients, however according to 
a recent Court case against a large Hotel Chain, it was decided that on an open 
free wireless spectrum, we would be breaking the law in jamming it.

How have you addressed this issue?  I’m about ready to ask upper management to 
remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings and let the students bring their own 
AP’s if they want wireless.   Has anyone resorted to this?

Thanks for your input
Shayne



** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Philippe Hanset
I think that the Marriott court case needs to be put into perspective.
Many of us have been quarantining rogue APs without any trouble.
The Marriott case is somewhat different. They were preventing all Wi-Fi from 
being enabled
and they were selling theirs as the only Wi-Fi around.

BTW, rogue containment is usually not jamming. Jamming requires to interfere 
with the spectrum.
Some of those smart containment software don't actually jam the frequency but 
send a disassociation frame to a specific client.

Also a lot of us are preventing rogue APs that are actually interfering with 
the University Infrastructure on the same frequencies.
Those students are actually the jammers in this case and I don't see why you 
couldn't protect yourself by preventing them from interfering with the 
University
Wi-Fi on University grounds.

As I wrote above, the Marriott case is being taken way too literally and being 
blown out of proportions.
I doubt that the FCC will come to you because you are actually trying to 
provide a service to your community and for free.
Just make sure that you only block channels that you are using (and a few 
around to guarantee non overlapping) and not ALL of them!
And don't use containment on the coffee shop next door ;-)

My 1.99 cents,

Philippe

Philippe Hanset
www.anyroam.net



On Oct 16, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Ian McDonald i...@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote:

 Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a disciplinary 
 matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary system?
  
 From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
 [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of T. Shayne Ghere
 Sent: 16 October 2014 16:11
 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms
  
 Good morning.
  
 Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than our 
 Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan Controllers 
 and Cisco WCS.
  
 The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have been 
 spaced accordingly by Cisco and by us during the introduction of wireless in 
 the Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.
  
 We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that the students 
 bring with them making our wireless nearly unusable.  I know this topic has 
 come up in the past, but this year is one of the worst we’ve seen, and the 
 students are getting restless.
  
 We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients, however according 
 to a recent Court case against a large Hotel Chain, it was decided that on an 
 open free wireless spectrum, we would be breaking the law in jamming it.
  
 How have you addressed this issue?  I’m about ready to ask upper management 
 to remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings and let the students bring their 
 own AP’s if they want wireless.   Has anyone resorted to this?
  
 Thanks for your input
 Shayne
  
  
  
 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found 
 athttp://www.educause.edu/groups/.


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


WPA2-Enterprise Thermostats?

2014-10-16 Thread Curtis K. Larsen
Hello,

Wondering if anyone has come across a 802.1x capable Wi-Fi thermostat.  
Preferably from Honeywell.  ...Still trying to avoid the PSK here whenever 
possible.  Let me know.

Thanks,

Curtis Larsen
University of Utah


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Hunter Fuller
If the user connects a home gateway box (or anything else doing PAT) then
the university equipment will only see one MAC and one IP, unfortunately :(
On Oct 16, 2014 10:36 AM, Justin Pederson 
justinpeder...@caspercollege.edu wrote:

 From a technical standpoint, why not just use port security on you wired
 networks to only allow 1 MAC address at a time. There should be no rouge
 APs and the students could still use the wireless and wired networks. I
 have been rolling this around in my head for a little while now. The only
 thing you should have to cover is cellular tethering, but from my
 experience, most of these devices don't have much power behind the radio.

 On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Ian McDonald i...@st-andrews.ac.uk
 wrote:

  Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a
 disciplinary matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary system?



 *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *T. Shayne Ghere
 *Sent:* 16 October 2014 16:11
 *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms



 Good morning.



 Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than our
 Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan
 Controllers and Cisco WCS.



 The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have been
 spaced accordingly by Cisco and by us during the introduction of wireless
 in the Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.



 We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that the
 students bring with them making our wireless nearly unusable.  I know this
 topic has come up in the past, but this year is one of the worst we’ve
 seen, and the students are getting restless.



 We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients, however
 according to a recent Court case against a large Hotel Chain, it was
 decided that on an open free wireless spectrum, we would be breaking the
 law in jamming it.



 How have you addressed this issue?  I’m about ready to ask upper
 management to remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings and let the
 students bring their own AP’s if they want wireless.   Has anyone resorted
 to this?



 Thanks for your input

 Shayne







 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




 --
 Thanks,
 Justin Pederson
 IT Network Coordinator
 Casper College
 (307)268-2481

  ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Kevin Kelly
We have only allowed one mac address per switch port in our Residence Halls for 
a long time now. Our wireless seems to work fairly well here. 

-- 
Kevin Kelly 
Director, Network Technology 
Whitman College 

- Original Message -

From: Justin Pederson justinpeder...@caspercollege.edu 
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 8:26:56 AM 
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms 

From a technical standpoint, why not just use port security on you wired 
networks to only allow 1 MAC address at a time. There should be no rouge APs 
and the students could still use the wireless and wired networks. I have been 
rolling this around in my head for a little while now. The only thing you 
should have to cover is cellular tethering, but from my experience, most of 
these devices don't have much power behind the radio. 

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Ian McDonald  i...@st-andrews.ac.uk  wrote: 





Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a disciplinary 
matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary system? 




From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU ] On Behalf Of T. Shayne Ghere 
Sent: 16 October 2014 16:11 
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms 




Good morning. 



Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than our 
Firewalls right now. We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan Controllers and 
Cisco WCS. 



The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have been spaced 
accordingly by Cisco and by us during the introduction of wireless in the 
Dorms, Greeks and Single housing. 



We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that the students 
bring with them making our wireless nearly unusable. I know this topic has come 
up in the past, but this year is one of the worst we’ve seen, and the students 
are getting restless. 



We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients, however according to 
a recent Court case against a large Hotel Chain, it was decided that on an open 
free wireless spectrum, we would be breaking the law in jamming it. 



How have you addressed this issue? I’m about ready to ask upper management to 
remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings and let the students bring their own 
AP’s if they want wireless. Has anyone resorted to this? 



Thanks for your input 

Shayne 







** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/ . 






-- 
Thanks, 
Justin Pederson 
IT Network Coordinator 
Casper College 
(307)268-2481 

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 




**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Benedick, Jason
That would work if the student plugs into one of the LAN switch ports on the 
wireless router (when they do a lot of times that causes problems with rogue 
DHCP servers), but we more often see them plugging it into the internet port so 
we only see 1 MAC/IP address.

This also wouldn’t solve the slew of broadcasting WiFi devices we’re seeing 
this year such as Rokus, Chromecasts, printers, gaming headsets, etc.

Thanks,
Jason R. Benedick
IT Generalist
Thaddeus Stevens College of Technology
Office: (717) 391-6957 Cell: (717) 587-9065

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Justin Pederson
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:27 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

From a technical standpoint, why not just use port security on you wired 
networks to only allow 1 MAC address at a time. There should be no rouge APs 
and the students could still use the wireless and wired networks. I have been 
rolling this around in my head for a little while now. The only thing you 
should have to cover is cellular tethering, but from my experience, most of 
these devices don't have much power behind the radio.

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Ian McDonald 
i...@st-andrews.ac.ukmailto:i...@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote:
Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a disciplinary 
matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary system?

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of T. Shayne Ghere
Sent: 16 October 2014 16:11
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Good morning.

Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than our 
Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan Controllers 
and Cisco WCS.

The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have been spaced 
accordingly by Cisco and by us during the introduction of wireless in the 
Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.

We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that the students 
bring with them making our wireless nearly unusable.  I know this topic has 
come up in the past, but this year is one of the worst we’ve seen, and the 
students are getting restless.

We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients, however according to 
a recent Court case against a large Hotel Chain, it was decided that on an open 
free wireless spectrum, we would be breaking the law in jamming it.

How have you addressed this issue?  I’m about ready to ask upper management to 
remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings and let the students bring their own 
AP’s if they want wireless.   Has anyone resorted to this?

Thanks for your input
Shayne



** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



--
Thanks,
Justin Pederson
IT Network Coordinator
Casper College
(307)268-2481
[http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f181/wrenchp/CCNP_med.jpg?t=1402930230]
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
*This electronic communication from TSCT is confidential and intended 
solely for use by the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the 
named recipient do not forward, propagate or replicate this e-mail. Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by 
mistake and remove from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you 
are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action 
dependent upon the contents of this email or attachment is strictly 
prohibited.*


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Lee H Badman
Anyone ever think about adding a PSK SSID per dorm and letting them have a go 
with the toys? Allowing only Internet access of course.

Lee

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Benedick, Jason
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:45 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

That would work if the student plugs into one of the LAN switch ports on the 
wireless router (when they do a lot of times that causes problems with rogue 
DHCP servers), but we more often see them plugging it into the internet port so 
we only see 1 MAC/IP address.

This also wouldn’t solve the slew of broadcasting WiFi devices we’re seeing 
this year such as Rokus, Chromecasts, printers, gaming headsets, etc.

Thanks,
Jason R. Benedick
IT Generalist
Thaddeus Stevens College of Technology
Office: (717) 391-6957 Cell: (717) 587-9065

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Justin Pederson
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:27 AM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

From a technical standpoint, why not just use port security on you wired 
networks to only allow 1 MAC address at a time. There should be no rouge APs 
and the students could still use the wireless and wired networks. I have been 
rolling this around in my head for a little while now. The only thing you 
should have to cover is cellular tethering, but from my experience, most of 
these devices don't have much power behind the radio.

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Ian McDonald 
i...@st-andrews.ac.ukmailto:i...@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote:
Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a disciplinary 
matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary system?

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of T. Shayne Ghere
Sent: 16 October 2014 16:11
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Good morning.

Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than our 
Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan Controllers 
and Cisco WCS.

The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have been spaced 
accordingly by Cisco and by us during the introduction of wireless in the 
Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.

We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that the students 
bring with them making our wireless nearly unusable.  I know this topic has 
come up in the past, but this year is one of the worst we’ve seen, and the 
students are getting restless.

We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients, however according to 
a recent Court case against a large Hotel Chain, it was decided that on an open 
free wireless spectrum, we would be breaking the law in jamming it.

How have you addressed this issue?  I’m about ready to ask upper management to 
remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings and let the students bring their own 
AP’s if they want wireless.   Has anyone resorted to this?

Thanks for your input
Shayne



** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



--
Thanks,
Justin Pederson
IT Network Coordinator
Casper College
(307)268-2481
[http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f181/wrenchp/CCNP_med.jpg?t=1402930230]
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
*This electronic communication from TSCT is confidential and intended 
solely for use by the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the 
named recipient do not forward, propagate or replicate this e-mail. Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by 
mistake and remove from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you 
are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action 
dependent upon the contents of this email or attachment is strictly 
prohibited.*


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Ian McDonald
Dhcp snooping?

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Benedick, Jason
Sent: 16 October 2014 16:45
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

That would work if the student plugs into one of the LAN switch ports on the 
wireless router (when they do a lot of times that causes problems with rogue 
DHCP servers), but we more often see them plugging it into the internet port so 
we only see 1 MAC/IP address.

This also wouldn’t solve the slew of broadcasting WiFi devices we’re seeing 
this year such as Rokus, Chromecasts, printers, gaming headsets, etc.

Thanks,
Jason R. Benedick
IT Generalist
Thaddeus Stevens College of Technology
Office: (717) 391-6957 Cell: (717) 587-9065

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Justin Pederson
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:27 AM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

From a technical standpoint, why not just use port security on you wired 
networks to only allow 1 MAC address at a time. There should be no rouge APs 
and the students could still use the wireless and wired networks. I have been 
rolling this around in my head for a little while now. The only thing you 
should have to cover is cellular tethering, but from my experience, most of 
these devices don't have much power behind the radio.

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Ian McDonald 
i...@st-andrews.ac.ukmailto:i...@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote:
Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a disciplinary 
matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary system?

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of T. Shayne Ghere
Sent: 16 October 2014 16:11
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Good morning.

Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than our 
Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan Controllers 
and Cisco WCS.

The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have been spaced 
accordingly by Cisco and by us during the introduction of wireless in the 
Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.

We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that the students 
bring with them making our wireless nearly unusable.  I know this topic has 
come up in the past, but this year is one of the worst we’ve seen, and the 
students are getting restless.

We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients, however according to 
a recent Court case against a large Hotel Chain, it was decided that on an open 
free wireless spectrum, we would be breaking the law in jamming it.

How have you addressed this issue?  I’m about ready to ask upper management to 
remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings and let the students bring their own 
AP’s if they want wireless.   Has anyone resorted to this?

Thanks for your input
Shayne



** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



--
Thanks,
Justin Pederson
IT Network Coordinator
Casper College
(307)268-2481
[http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f181/wrenchp/CCNP_med.jpg?t=1402930230]
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
*This electronic communication from TSCT is confidential and intended 
solely for use by the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the 
named recipient do not forward, propagate or replicate this e-mail. Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by 
mistake and remove from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you 
are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action 
dependent upon the contents of this email or attachment is strictly 
prohibited.*


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Heath Barnhart
As I read the case, sending deauth's is exactly what the Marriot's system was 
doing.

We used don't have that bad of a rogue issue since we upgraded our WiFi in the 
dorms three years ago. I think I had 3 this year, and I just track them down 
the best I can (by me I mean my student worker), and have a polite conversation 
with the offender. I haven't had a problem with this method, though I've never 
been faced with 700 rogues. What types of devices are being classified as 
rogues?



--
Heath Barnhart
ITS Network Administrator
Washburn University
785-670-2307




On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 11:39 -0400, Philippe Hanset wrote:
I think that the Marriott court case needs to be put into perspective.
Many of us have been quarantining rogue APs without any trouble.
The Marriott case is somewhat different. They were preventing all Wi-Fi from 
being enabled
and they were selling theirs as the only Wi-Fi around.


BTW, rogue containment is usually not jamming. Jamming requires to interfere 
with the spectrum.
Some of those smart containment software don't actually jam the frequency but 
send a disassociation frame to a specific client.


Also a lot of us are preventing rogue APs that are actually interfering with 
the University Infrastructure on the same frequencies.
Those students are actually the jammers in this case and I don't see why you 
couldn't protect yourself by preventing them from interfering with the 
University
Wi-Fi on University grounds.


As I wrote above, the Marriott case is being taken way too literally and being 
blown out of proportions.
I doubt that the FCC will come to you because you are actually trying to 
provide a service to your community and for free.
Just make sure that you only block channels that you are using (and a few 
around to guarantee non overlapping) and not ALL of them!
And don't use containment on the coffee shop next door ;-)


My 1.99 cents,


Philippe

Philippe Hanset
www.anyroam.nethttp://www.anyroam.net





On Oct 16, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Ian McDonald 
i...@st-andrews.ac.ukmailto:i...@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote:

Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a disciplinary 
matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary system?

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of T. Shayne Ghere
Sent: 16 October 2014 16:11
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Good morning.

Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than our 
Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan Controllers 
and Cisco WCS.

The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have been spaced 
accordingly by Cisco and by us during the introduction of wireless in the 
Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.

We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that the students 
bring with them making our wireless nearly unusable.  I know this topic has 
come up in the past, but this year is one of the worst we’ve seen, and the 
students are getting restless.

We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients, however according to 
a recent Court case against a large Hotel Chain, it was decided that on an open 
free wireless spectrum, we would be breaking the law in jamming it.

How have you addressed this issue?  I’m about ready to ask upper management to 
remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings and let the students bring their own 
AP’s if they want wireless.   Has anyone resorted to this?

Thanks for your input
Shayne



** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found 
athttp://www.educause.edu/groups/.


** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Vlade Ristevski
x2 on the NAT issue. Especially since wireless routers are way more 
popular and available in store than wireless APs.


I think it's going to take a multi-tiered approach to finding the 
APs/routers:


In place of an expensive NAC that will most likely use  of client to 
detect a NAT device I'm looking at a combination of :


1) I was playing with p0f (http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/p0f3/) last year 
for possibly detecting wireless routers. There is some promise there but 
false positives exist in my experience with this software.


2) DHCP fingerprinting. We use Infoblox and it's built into the system.

3) Check your dhcp logs for known default AP/Router hosts names. For 
instance, by default, you'll see the string airport in your DHCP logs 
for airport express. Linksys used WAP for APs and WRT for routers. The 
model numbers change and will need to be updated. A csv can be kept of 
known model numbers and alerting can be easily scripted. If you use DHCP 
snooping, looking in the files in your TFTP directory should give you 
the switch port easily once you have the mac/IP.


The wireless controller system will tell you where the rogues are and 
narrow down where to look for the switch port using the 3 methods above. 
With some development time, the whole process can be automated .



On 10/16/2014 11:40 AM, Hunter Fuller wrote:


If the user connects a home gateway box (or anything else doing PAT) 
then the university equipment will only see one MAC and one IP, 
unfortunately :(


On Oct 16, 2014 10:36 AM, Justin Pederson 
justinpeder...@caspercollege.edu 
mailto:justinpeder...@caspercollege.edu wrote:


From a technical standpoint, why not just use port security on you
wired networks to only allow 1 MAC address at a time. There should
be no rouge APs and the students could still use the wireless and
wired networks. I have been rolling this around in my head for a
little while now. The only thing you should have to cover is
cellular tethering, but from my experience, most of these devices
don't have much power behind the radio.

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Ian McDonald
i...@st-andrews.ac.uk mailto:i...@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote:

Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a
disciplinary matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary
system?

*From:*The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *T.
Shayne Ghere
*Sent:* 16 October 2014 16:11
*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Good morning.

Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other
than our Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508
Wireless Lan Controllers and Cisco WCS.

The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and
have been spaced accordingly by Cisco and by us during the
introduction of wireless in the Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.

We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that
the students bring with them making our wireless nearly
unusable.  I know this topic has come up in the past, but this
year is one of the worst we’ve seen, and the students are
getting restless.

We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients,
however according to a recent Court case against a large Hotel
Chain, it was decided that on an open free wireless spectrum,
we would be breaking the law in jamming it.

How have you addressed this issue?  I’m about ready to ask
upper management to remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings
and let the students bring their own AP’s if they want
wireless.   Has anyone resorted to this?

Thanks for your input

Shayne

** Participation and subscription information for this
EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




-- 
Thanks,

Justin Pederson
IT Network Coordinator
Casper College
(307)268-2481 tel:%28307%29268-2481

** Participation and subscription information for this
EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

** Participation and subscription information for this 
EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.





**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Vlade Ristevski
This our first year introducing wireless in the dorms and in the past we 
let students bring their own APs from a limited list of approved AP's 
that we tested (routers not allowed) to make up for us not providing 
wifi. You're going to run into the same issues in typical dense dorm 
rooms but much worse. AP's same channel transmitting max power, you have 
no control over placement and connections will still get dropped and of 
course your network will still get blamed for it. So you're going to run 
into the same issues compounded without the visibility and management 
tools that you need to address them. On top of that, students expect 
colleges to provide wifi so you'll get flac for not making available.


The plus, of course, is not having to worry about 802.1x client 
compatibility.


On 10/16/2014 11:10 AM, T. Shayne Ghere wrote:


Good morning.

Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than 
our Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan 
Controllers and Cisco WCS.


The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have 
been spaced accordingly by Cisco and by us during the introduction of 
wireless in the Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.


We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that the 
students bring with them making our wireless nearly unusable.  I know 
this topic has come up in the past, but this year is one of the worst 
we’ve seen, and the students are getting restless.


We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients, however 
according to a recent Court case against a large Hotel Chain, it was 
decided that on an open free wireless spectrum, we would be breaking 
the law in jamming it.


How have you addressed this issue?  I’m about ready to ask upper 
management to remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings and let the 
students bring their own AP’s if they want wireless.   Has anyone 
resorted to this?


Thanks for your input

Shayne

** Participation and subscription information for this 
EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.





**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Peter P Morrissey
That has been our approach. We have 100% coverage in residences and there isn’t 
usually a good reason to have an offending device with the exception of devices 
that just won’t work on our Enterprise network that Lee had mentioned. We have 
found that once we explain the situation to students, they are fine with 
turning them off or allowing us to help them turn them turn off the WiFi 
feature and find a better way to connect. Most devices have wired connections 
that can be utilized, and from what I understand, for a gamer this gives them a 
slight advantage due to lower latency. (I could be wrong about that though as I 
am not a gamer). We also attempt to do a lot of education before and during 
opening, and have a large stash of extra long USB cables that we give out 
freely. We have people helping students move in and nip a lot of this in the 
bud from the beginning.  You can get USB cables very cheap in bulk BTW. I’m not 
saying it is perfect, but we don’t get any performance complaints at all, 
although it is certainly possible that there are complaints that don’t get to 
us.

Pete Morrissey

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Heath Barnhart
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 12:04 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

As I read the case, sending deauth's is exactly what the Marriot's system was 
doing.

We used don't have that bad of a rogue issue since we upgraded our WiFi in the 
dorms three years ago. I think I had 3 this year, and I just track them down 
the best I can (by me I mean my student worker), and have a polite conversation 
with the offender. I haven't had a problem with this method, though I've never 
been faced with 700 rogues. What types of devices are being classified as 
rogues?



--

Heath Barnhart

ITS Network Administrator

Washburn University

785-670-2307

On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 11:39 -0400, Philippe Hanset wrote:

I think that the Marriott court case needs to be put into perspective.
Many of us have been quarantining rogue APs without any trouble.
The Marriott case is somewhat different. They were preventing all Wi-Fi from 
being enabled
and they were selling theirs as the only Wi-Fi around.

BTW, rogue containment is usually not jamming. Jamming requires to interfere 
with the spectrum.
Some of those smart containment software don't actually jam the frequency but 
send a disassociation frame to a specific client.

Also a lot of us are preventing rogue APs that are actually interfering with 
the University Infrastructure on the same frequencies.
Those students are actually the jammers in this case and I don't see why you 
couldn't protect yourself by preventing them from interfering with the 
University
Wi-Fi on University grounds.

As I wrote above, the Marriott case is being taken way too literally and being 
blown out of proportions.
I doubt that the FCC will come to you because you are actually trying to 
provide a service to your community and for free.
Just make sure that you only block channels that you are using (and a few 
around to guarantee non overlapping) and not ALL of them!
And don't use containment on the coffee shop next door ;-)

My 1.99 cents,

Philippe

Philippe Hanset
www.anyroam.nethttp://www.anyroam.net



On Oct 16, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Ian McDonald 
i...@st-andrews.ac.ukmailto:i...@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote:

Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a disciplinary 
matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary system?

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of T. Shayne Ghere
Sent: 16 October 2014 16:11
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Good morning.

Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than our 
Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan Controllers 
and Cisco WCS.

The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have been spaced 
accordingly by Cisco and by us during the introduction of wireless in the 
Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.

We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that the students 
bring with them making our wireless nearly unusable.  I know this topic has 
come up in the past, but this year is one of the worst we’ve seen, and the 
students are getting restless.

We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients, however according to 
a recent Court case against a large Hotel Chain, it was decided that on an open 
free wireless spectrum, we would be breaking the law in jamming it.

How have you addressed this issue?  I’m about ready to ask upper management to 
remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings and let the students bring their own 
AP’s if they want wireless.   Has anyone resorted to this?

Thanks for your input
Shayne




Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Frank Sweetser
+1 to USB free USB cables as one of the more effective tools for combating 
wireless printers.


More and more, it's not a case of people deciding to use wireless over wired, 
but instead it simply never occurs to them that they can get internet through 
that funny rectangularish hole.  There's not much you can do for that except 
free cables and a constant, consistent education campaign.


Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu|  For every problem, there is a solution that
Manager of Network Operations   |  is simple, elegant, and wrong.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute |   - HL Mencken

On 10/16/2014 12:15 PM, Peter P Morrissey wrote:

That has been our approach. We have 100% coverage in residences and there
isn’t usually a good reason to have an offending device with the exception of
devices that just won’t work on our Enterprise network that Lee had mentioned.
We have found that once we explain the situation to students, they are fine
with turning them off or allowing us to help them turn them turn off the WiFi
feature and find a better way to connect. Most devices have wired connections
that can be utilized, and from what I understand, for a gamer this gives them
a slight advantage due to lower latency. (I could be wrong about that though
as I am not a gamer). We also attempt to do a lot of education before and
during opening, and have a large stash of extra long USB cables that we give
out freely. We have people helping students move in and nip a lot of this in
the bud from the beginning.  You can get USB cables very cheap in bulk BTW.
I’m not saying it is perfect, but we don’t get any performance complaints at
all, although it is certainly possible that there are complaints that don’t
get to us.

Pete Morrissey

*From:*The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Heath Barnhart
*Sent:* Thursday, October 16, 2014 12:04 PM
*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

As I read the case, sending deauth's is exactly what the Marriot's system was
doing.

We used don't have that bad of a rogue issue since we upgraded our WiFi in the
dorms three years ago. I think I had 3 this year, and I just track them down
the best I can (by me I mean my student worker), and have a polite
conversation with the offender. I haven't had a problem with this method,
though I've never been faced with 700 rogues. What types of devices are being
classified as rogues?



--

Heath Barnhart

ITS Network Administrator

Washburn University

785-670-2307

On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 11:39 -0400, Philippe Hanset wrote:

I think that the Marriott court case needs to be put into perspective.

Many of us have been quarantining rogue APs without any trouble.

The Marriott case is somewhat different. They were preventing all Wi-Fi
from being enabled

and they were selling theirs as the only Wi-Fi around.

BTW, rogue containment is usually not jamming. Jamming requires to
interfere with the spectrum.

Some of those smart containment software don't actually jam the frequency
but send a disassociation frame to a specific client.

Also a lot of us are preventing rogue APs that are actually interfering
with the University Infrastructure on the same frequencies.

Those students are actually the jammers in this case and I don't see why
you couldn't protect yourself by preventing them from interfering with the
University

Wi-Fi on University grounds.

As I wrote above, the Marriott case is being taken way too literally and
being blown out of proportions.

I doubt that the FCC will come to you because you are actually trying to
provide a service to your community and for free.

Just make sure that you only block channels that you are using (and a few
around to guarantee non overlapping) and not ALL of them!

And don't use containment on the coffee shop next door ;-)

My 1.99 cents,

Philippe

Philippe Hanset

www.anyroam.net http://www.anyroam.net

On Oct 16, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Ian McDonald i...@st-andrews.ac.uk
mailto:i...@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote:

Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a
disciplinary matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary system?

*From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *T. Shayne 
Ghere
*Sent:* 16 October 2014 16:11
*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Good morning.

Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than
our Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan
Controllers and Cisco WCS.

The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread James Elliott
We have a homegrown tool that uses some of the features of the Cisco Rogue 
Locator Tool, without needing the infringing wireless network to be open.  
We have cisco snmp mac -notification setup for all ports on campus, so we are 
able to identify each where each device is plugged in on our network.  We take 
the mac address of the observed rogue AP and add 1 to the mac, and subtract 1 
from the mac.  This gives us 3 MAC addresses to compare to what is plugged into 
the network.  Once the port is identified, we get an email of the device 
wireless mac, wired mac, switch and port it is connected to, and even the IP 
address it pulled from DHCP.

At this point, we use our maps to identify the room number, turn off all the 
ports in the room and notify Res Life of the infraction.  We were able to get 
most of the wireless routers on campus using this technique.

James Elliott

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank Sweetser
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 1:16 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

+1 to USB free USB cables as one of the more effective tools for 
+combating
wireless printers.

More and more, it's not a case of people deciding to use wireless over wired, 
but instead it simply never occurs to them that they can get internet through 
that funny rectangularish hole.  There's not much you can do for that except 
free cables and a constant, consistent education campaign.

Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu|  For every problem, there is a solution that
Manager of Network Operations   |  is simple, elegant, and wrong.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute |   - HL Mencken

On 10/16/2014 12:15 PM, Peter P Morrissey wrote:
 That has been our approach. We have 100% coverage in residences and 
 there isn’t usually a good reason to have an offending device with the 
 exception of devices that just won’t work on our Enterprise network that Lee 
 had mentioned.
 We have found that once we explain the situation to students, they are 
 fine with turning them off or allowing us to help them turn them turn 
 off the WiFi feature and find a better way to connect. Most devices 
 have wired connections that can be utilized, and from what I 
 understand, for a gamer this gives them a slight advantage due to 
 lower latency. (I could be wrong about that though as I am not a 
 gamer). We also attempt to do a lot of education before and during 
 opening, and have a large stash of extra long USB cables that we give 
 out freely. We have people helping students move in and nip a lot of this in 
 the bud from the beginning.  You can get USB cables very cheap in bulk BTW.
 I’m not saying it is perfect, but we don’t get any performance 
 complaints at all, although it is certainly possible that there are 
 complaints that don’t get to us.

 Pete Morrissey

 *From:*The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
 [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Heath 
 Barnhart
 *Sent:* Thursday, October 16, 2014 12:04 PM
 *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

 As I read the case, sending deauth's is exactly what the Marriot's 
 system was doing.

 We used don't have that bad of a rogue issue since we upgraded our 
 WiFi in the dorms three years ago. I think I had 3 this year, and I 
 just track them down the best I can (by me I mean my student worker), 
 and have a polite conversation with the offender. I haven't had a 
 problem with this method, though I've never been faced with 700 
 rogues. What types of devices are being classified as rogues?



 --

 Heath Barnhart

 ITS Network Administrator

 Washburn University

 785-670-2307

 On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 11:39 -0400, Philippe Hanset wrote:

 I think that the Marriott court case needs to be put into perspective.

 Many of us have been quarantining rogue APs without any trouble.

 The Marriott case is somewhat different. They were preventing all Wi-Fi
 from being enabled

 and they were selling theirs as the only Wi-Fi around.

 BTW, rogue containment is usually not jamming. Jamming requires to
 interfere with the spectrum.

 Some of those smart containment software don't actually jam the frequency
 but send a disassociation frame to a specific client.

 Also a lot of us are preventing rogue APs that are actually interfering
 with the University Infrastructure on the same frequencies.

 Those students are actually the jammers in this case and I don't see why
 you couldn't protect yourself by preventing them from interfering with the
 University

 Wi-Fi on University grounds.

 As I wrote above, the Marriott case is being taken way too literally and
 being blown out of proportions.

 I doubt that the FCC will come to you because you are actually trying to
 provide 

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Vlade Ristevski
Also forgot to mention that you can look at TTL in the IP packets as an 
indicator of a NAT router. Routers are required to decrement the TTL so 
that's another possible method of detection.



On 10/16/2014 11:40 AM, Hunter Fuller wrote:


If the user connects a home gateway box (or anything else doing PAT) 
then the university equipment will only see one MAC and one IP, 
unfortunately :(


On Oct 16, 2014 10:36 AM, Justin Pederson 
justinpeder...@caspercollege.edu 
mailto:justinpeder...@caspercollege.edu wrote:


From a technical standpoint, why not just use port security on you
wired networks to only allow 1 MAC address at a time. There should
be no rouge APs and the students could still use the wireless and
wired networks. I have been rolling this around in my head for a
little while now. The only thing you should have to cover is
cellular tethering, but from my experience, most of these devices
don't have much power behind the radio.

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Ian McDonald
i...@st-andrews.ac.uk mailto:i...@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote:

Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a
disciplinary matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary
system?

*From:*The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *T.
Shayne Ghere
*Sent:* 16 October 2014 16:11
*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Good morning.

Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other
than our Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508
Wireless Lan Controllers and Cisco WCS.

The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and
have been spaced accordingly by Cisco and by us during the
introduction of wireless in the Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.

We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that
the students bring with them making our wireless nearly
unusable.  I know this topic has come up in the past, but this
year is one of the worst we’ve seen, and the students are
getting restless.

We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients,
however according to a recent Court case against a large Hotel
Chain, it was decided that on an open free wireless spectrum,
we would be breaking the law in jamming it.

How have you addressed this issue?  I’m about ready to ask
upper management to remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings
and let the students bring their own AP’s if they want
wireless.   Has anyone resorted to this?

Thanks for your input

Shayne

** Participation and subscription information for this
EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




-- 
Thanks,

Justin Pederson
IT Network Coordinator
Casper College
(307)268-2481 tel:%28307%29268-2481

** Participation and subscription information for this
EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

** Participation and subscription information for this 
EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.





**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Benedick, Jason
That’s a good one. I actually never thought about that.

Thanks,
Jason R. Benedick
IT Generalist
Thaddeus Stevens College of Technology
Office: (717) 391-6957 Cell: (717) 587-9065

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Vlade Ristevski
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 1:37 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Also forgot to mention that you can look at TTL in the IP packets as an 
indicator of a NAT router. Routers are required to decrement the TTL so that's 
another possible method of detection.

On 10/16/2014 11:40 AM, Hunter Fuller wrote:

If the user connects a home gateway box (or anything else doing PAT) then the 
university equipment will only see one MAC and one IP, unfortunately :(
On Oct 16, 2014 10:36 AM, Justin Pederson 
justinpeder...@caspercollege.edumailto:justinpeder...@caspercollege.edu 
wrote:
From a technical standpoint, why not just use port security on you wired 
networks to only allow 1 MAC address at a time. There should be no rouge APs 
and the students could still use the wireless and wired networks. I have been 
rolling this around in my head for a little while now. The only thing you 
should have to cover is cellular tethering, but from my experience, most of 
these devices don't have much power behind the radio.

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Ian McDonald 
i...@st-andrews.ac.ukmailto:i...@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote:
Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a disciplinary 
matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary system?

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of T. Shayne Ghere
Sent: 16 October 2014 16:11
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Good morning.

Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than our 
Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan Controllers 
and Cisco WCS.

The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have been spaced 
accordingly by Cisco and by us during the introduction of wireless in the 
Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.

We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that the students 
bring with them making our wireless nearly unusable.  I know this topic has 
come up in the past, but this year is one of the worst we’ve seen, and the 
students are getting restless.

We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients, however according to 
a recent Court case against a large Hotel Chain, it was decided that on an open 
free wireless spectrum, we would be breaking the law in jamming it.

How have you addressed this issue?  I’m about ready to ask upper management to 
remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings and let the students bring their own 
AP’s if they want wireless.   Has anyone resorted to this?

Thanks for your input
Shayne



** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



--
Thanks,
Justin Pederson
IT Network Coordinator
Casper College
(307)268-2481tel:%28307%29268-2481
[http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f181/wrenchp/CCNP_med.jpg?t=1402930230]
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
*This electronic communication from TSCT is confidential and intended 
solely for use by the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the 
named recipient do not forward, propagate or replicate this e-mail. Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by 
mistake and remove from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you 
are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action 
dependent upon the contents of this email or attachment is strictly 
prohibited.*


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Vlade Ristevski
Do you mind sharing what system/method you use to record the mac-notify 
messages and to parse them? We also have mac-notification setup but 
Cisco doesn't send a user friendly notification but If-Indexes  with 
VLANs in hex instead. Its' very helpful to have put a pain in the ass to 
parse.



On 10/16/2014 1:19 PM, James Elliott wrote:

We have a homegrown tool that uses some of the features of the Cisco Rogue 
Locator Tool, without needing the infringing wireless network to be open.
We have cisco snmp mac -notification setup for all ports on campus, so we are 
able to identify each where each device is plugged in on our network.  We take 
the mac address of the observed rogue AP and add 1 to the mac, and subtract 1 
from the mac.  This gives us 3 MAC addresses to compare to what is plugged into 
the network.  Once the port is identified, we get an email of the device 
wireless mac, wired mac, switch and port it is connected to, and even the IP 
address it pulled from DHCP.

At this point, we use our maps to identify the room number, turn off all the 
ports in the room and notify Res Life of the infraction.  We were able to get 
most of the wireless routers on campus using this technique.

James Elliott

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank Sweetser
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 1:16 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

+1 to USB free USB cables as one of the more effective tools for
+combating
wireless printers.

More and more, it's not a case of people deciding to use wireless over wired, 
but instead it simply never occurs to them that they can get internet through 
that funny rectangularish hole.  There's not much you can do for that except 
free cables and a constant, consistent education campaign.

Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu|  For every problem, there is a solution that
Manager of Network Operations   |  is simple, elegant, and wrong.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute |   - HL Mencken

On 10/16/2014 12:15 PM, Peter P Morrissey wrote:

That has been our approach. We have 100% coverage in residences and
there isn’t usually a good reason to have an offending device with the
exception of devices that just won’t work on our Enterprise network that Lee 
had mentioned.
We have found that once we explain the situation to students, they are
fine with turning them off or allowing us to help them turn them turn
off the WiFi feature and find a better way to connect. Most devices
have wired connections that can be utilized, and from what I
understand, for a gamer this gives them a slight advantage due to
lower latency. (I could be wrong about that though as I am not a
gamer). We also attempt to do a lot of education before and during
opening, and have a large stash of extra long USB cables that we give
out freely. We have people helping students move in and nip a lot of this in 
the bud from the beginning.  You can get USB cables very cheap in bulk BTW.
I’m not saying it is perfect, but we don’t get any performance
complaints at all, although it is certainly possible that there are
complaints that don’t get to us.

Pete Morrissey

*From:*The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Heath
Barnhart
*Sent:* Thursday, October 16, 2014 12:04 PM
*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

As I read the case, sending deauth's is exactly what the Marriot's
system was doing.

We used don't have that bad of a rogue issue since we upgraded our
WiFi in the dorms three years ago. I think I had 3 this year, and I
just track them down the best I can (by me I mean my student worker),
and have a polite conversation with the offender. I haven't had a
problem with this method, though I've never been faced with 700
rogues. What types of devices are being classified as rogues?



--

Heath Barnhart

ITS Network Administrator

Washburn University

785-670-2307

On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 11:39 -0400, Philippe Hanset wrote:

 I think that the Marriott court case needs to be put into perspective.

 Many of us have been quarantining rogue APs without any trouble.

 The Marriott case is somewhat different. They were preventing all Wi-Fi
 from being enabled

 and they were selling theirs as the only Wi-Fi around.

 BTW, rogue containment is usually not jamming. Jamming requires to
 interfere with the spectrum.

 Some of those smart containment software don't actually jam the frequency
 but send a disassociation frame to a specific client.

 Also a lot of us are preventing rogue APs that are actually interfering
 with the University Infrastructure on the same frequencies.

 Those students are actually the jammers in this case and I don't see why
 you couldn't protect yourself by preventing them 

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Ian McDonald
DHCP fingerprinting is another method for detecting the connected device type, 
assuming you mandate DHCP. If you're cunning you can even not give addresses to 
things you know what are..

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] on behalf of Benedick, Jason 
[bened...@stevenscollege.edu]
Sent: 16 October 2014 18:39
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

That’s a good one. I actually never thought about that.

Thanks,
Jason R. Benedick
IT Generalist
Thaddeus Stevens College of Technology
Office: (717) 391-6957 Cell: (717) 587-9065

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Vlade Ristevski
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 1:37 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Also forgot to mention that you can look at TTL in the IP packets as an 
indicator of a NAT router. Routers are required to decrement the TTL so that's 
another possible method of detection.

On 10/16/2014 11:40 AM, Hunter Fuller wrote:

If the user connects a home gateway box (or anything else doing PAT) then the 
university equipment will only see one MAC and one IP, unfortunately :(
On Oct 16, 2014 10:36 AM, Justin Pederson 
justinpeder...@caspercollege.edumailto:justinpeder...@caspercollege.edu 
wrote:
From a technical standpoint, why not just use port security on you wired 
networks to only allow 1 MAC address at a time. There should be no rouge APs 
and the students could still use the wireless and wired networks. I have been 
rolling this around in my head for a little while now. The only thing you 
should have to cover is cellular tethering, but from my experience, most of 
these devices don't have much power behind the radio.

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Ian McDonald 
i...@st-andrews.ac.ukmailto:i...@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote:
Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a disciplinary 
matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary system?

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of T. Shayne Ghere
Sent: 16 October 2014 16:11
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Good morning.

Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than our 
Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan Controllers 
and Cisco WCS.

The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have been spaced 
accordingly by Cisco and by us during the introduction of wireless in the 
Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.

We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that the students 
bring with them making our wireless nearly unusable.  I know this topic has 
come up in the past, but this year is one of the worst we’ve seen, and the 
students are getting restless.

We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients, however according to 
a recent Court case against a large Hotel Chain, it was decided that on an open 
free wireless spectrum, we would be breaking the law in jamming it.

How have you addressed this issue?  I’m about ready to ask upper management to 
remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings and let the students bring their own 
AP’s if they want wireless.   Has anyone resorted to this?

Thanks for your input
Shayne



** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



--
Thanks,
Justin Pederson
IT Network Coordinator
Casper College
(307)268-2481tel:%28307%29268-2481
[http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f181/wrenchp/CCNP_med.jpg?t=1402930230]
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
*This electronic communication from TSCT is confidential and intended 
solely for use by the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the 
named recipient do not forward, propagate or replicate this e-mail. Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by 
mistake and remove from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you 
are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action 
dependent upon the contents of this email or attachment is strictly 
prohibited.*

**
Participation and subscription information for 

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Joann Williamson
Here is what we are thinking since we “enjoy” a similar situation at USCA.  We 
have two WISMs, 1142’s  1252’s 2602’s, Cisco NCS Infrastructure reporting, 
and the ability to triangulate the rogue devices.  I hate the amount of time 
our one network engineer has to put into finding about 89 rogue devices in our 
housing area that has about 1000 beds.  Faculty/staff wireless on campus is 
rock solid, too.  They are not the ones really utilizing BYOD.

So, our plan of attack is going to be encouraging everyone to use 5Ghz because 
that’s the larger spectrum with more room.  We plan to tell students to bring 
dual band devices for doing their assignments in their room.  We noticed most 
all activity is on the 2.4Ghz side of things.  Is that the case with most of 
you?  We plan to put those recommended laptops and tablets for our students on 
our website so they don’t have to try to find a dual band device on their own.  
Most of the airport cards have been dual band for a while, the 3rd generation 
iPad has dual band, and the problem can really be seen in student’s brining 
single band laptops, single band bargain tablets and older smartphones to 
housing.

Additionally, we plan on deploying more APs and possibly turning down the 
2.4Ghz frequency.  We want to increase our lowest connection speed (for the 
clients) to 36mbps or 48mbps in the WISM on the 2.4Ghz side.  I am hoping  this 
is going cause the students with Bluetooth speakers/headphones, mobile 
hotspots, microwaves, older analog wireless phones, and wireless printers not 
to interfere as greatly as they are now.

5Ghz is just less crowded, but I am worried that the feat of telling students 
to bring a dual band device is going to make their eyes glaze over.  That’s 
going to be a challenge for us in this plan.  Does anyone have any thoughts 
about our plan?  I am open to suggestions.  Has anyone seen a 5ghz wireless 
printer, yet?  Thanks!




Joann L. Williamson
Director of Network Systems, Architecture,  Infrastructure
Computer Services Department at USC Aiken
phone: 803-641-3473
http://www.usca.edu


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of T. Shayne Ghere
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:29 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Our policy states if a device interferes with our network, then we reserve the 
right to have that device removed.  The problem is that the WCS and Controllers 
are seeing over 712 devices.  We can triangulate the “area” the device might 
be, but that would be going door to door.  We don’t have the man power to spend 
that much time searching for them.

Quite a few are wireless printers and mobile hotspots, but they usually get 
turned off when they aren’t in use.  By sending a DoS attack to the device 
doesn’t solve the wireless interference that it’s causing, but only degrades 
the service the 2-3 AP’s are providing to other students.

We have a Dorm/Greek/Singles living area of around 3,000 students and covers 
acres of land.  I’ve seen some schools putting an AP in each room, some 
removing all wireless out of the dorms and others fighting the same battle I 
am.  At what point to you just deal with it and say “yeah our wireless sucks 
because the students didn’t listen when they went through orientation.”

On the Academic side we have very very few rogues and the Wireless is rock 
solid.  Upper administration just doesn’t get it, I think, but we’re left to 
deal with it.  There are two of us that maintain everything network related and 
no student help.  It’s becoming a 24/7/365 work schedule, and we’re getting 
burned out fast.



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Ian McDonald
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 10:13 AM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a disciplinary 
matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary system?

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of T. Shayne Ghere
Sent: 16 October 2014 16:11
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Good morning.

Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than our 
Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan Controllers 
and Cisco WCS.

The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have been spaced 
accordingly by Cisco and by us during the introduction of wireless in the 
Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.

We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that the students 
bring with them making our wireless nearly unusable.  I know 

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread James Elliott
We use snmptrap translator aka snmptt running on our monitoring server that 
sends them to a perl script that I wrote to put them into a friendly output.

~James Elliott

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Vlade Ristevski
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 1:44 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Do you mind sharing what system/method you use to record the mac-notify 
messages and to parse them? We also have mac-notification setup but Cisco 
doesn't send a user friendly notification but If-Indexes  with VLANs in hex 
instead. Its' very helpful to have put a pain in the ass to parse.


On 10/16/2014 1:19 PM, James Elliott wrote:
 We have a homegrown tool that uses some of the features of the Cisco Rogue 
 Locator Tool, without needing the infringing wireless network to be open.
 We have cisco snmp mac -notification setup for all ports on campus, so we are 
 able to identify each where each device is plugged in on our network.  We 
 take the mac address of the observed rogue AP and add 1 to the mac, and 
 subtract 1 from the mac.  This gives us 3 MAC addresses to compare to what is 
 plugged into the network.  Once the port is identified, we get an email of 
 the device wireless mac, wired mac, switch and port it is connected to, and 
 even the IP address it pulled from DHCP.

 At this point, we use our maps to identify the room number, turn off all the 
 ports in the room and notify Res Life of the infraction.  We were able to get 
 most of the wireless routers on campus using this technique.

 James Elliott

 -Original Message-
 From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
 [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank 
 Sweetser
 Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 1:16 PM
 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

 +1 to USB free USB cables as one of the more effective tools for 
 +combating
 wireless printers.

 More and more, it's not a case of people deciding to use wireless over wired, 
 but instead it simply never occurs to them that they can get internet through 
 that funny rectangularish hole.  There's not much you can do for that except 
 free cables and a constant, consistent education campaign.

 Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu|  For every problem, there is a solution that
 Manager of Network Operations   |  is simple, elegant, and wrong.
 Worcester Polytechnic Institute |   - HL Mencken

 On 10/16/2014 12:15 PM, Peter P Morrissey wrote:
 That has been our approach. We have 100% coverage in residences and 
 there isn’t usually a good reason to have an offending device with 
 the exception of devices that just won’t work on our Enterprise network that 
 Lee had mentioned.
 We have found that once we explain the situation to students, they 
 are fine with turning them off or allowing us to help them turn them 
 turn off the WiFi feature and find a better way to connect. Most 
 devices have wired connections that can be utilized, and from what I 
 understand, for a gamer this gives them a slight advantage due to 
 lower latency. (I could be wrong about that though as I am not a 
 gamer). We also attempt to do a lot of education before and during 
 opening, and have a large stash of extra long USB cables that we give 
 out freely. We have people helping students move in and nip a lot of this in 
 the bud from the beginning.  You can get USB cables very cheap in bulk BTW.
 I’m not saying it is perfect, but we don’t get any performance 
 complaints at all, although it is certainly possible that there are 
 complaints that don’t get to us.

 Pete Morrissey

 *From:*The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
 [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Heath 
 Barnhart
 *Sent:* Thursday, October 16, 2014 12:04 PM
 *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

 As I read the case, sending deauth's is exactly what the Marriot's 
 system was doing.

 We used don't have that bad of a rogue issue since we upgraded our 
 WiFi in the dorms three years ago. I think I had 3 this year, and I 
 just track them down the best I can (by me I mean my student worker), 
 and have a polite conversation with the offender. I haven't had a 
 problem with this method, though I've never been faced with 700 
 rogues. What types of devices are being classified as rogues?



 --

 Heath Barnhart

 ITS Network Administrator

 Washburn University

 785-670-2307

 On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 11:39 -0400, Philippe Hanset wrote:

  I think that the Marriott court case needs to be put into perspective.

  Many of us have been quarantining rogue APs without any trouble.

  The Marriott case is somewhat different. They were preventing all Wi-Fi
  from being enabled

  and they were selling 

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Frank Sweetser
One thing that helps is the fact that 11ac is not defined in the 2.4 band. 
Instead of trying to teach them about dual band devices, you can just tell them 
to look for the ac logo on the box, and they're guaranteed to get a dual band 
device.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

On October 16, 2014 2:05:02 PM EDT, Joann Williamson joa...@usca.edu wrote:
Here is what we are thinking since we “enjoy” a similar situation at
USCA.  We have two WISMs, 1142’s  1252’s 2602’s, Cisco NCS
Infrastructure reporting, and the ability to triangulate the rogue
devices.  I hate the amount of time our one network engineer has to put
into finding about 89 rogue devices in our housing area that has about
1000 beds.  Faculty/staff wireless on campus is rock solid, too.  They
are not the ones really utilizing BYOD.

So, our plan of attack is going to be encouraging everyone to use 5Ghz
because that’s the larger spectrum with more room.  We plan to tell
students to bring dual band devices for doing their assignments in
their room.  We noticed most all activity is on the 2.4Ghz side of
things.  Is that the case with most of you?  We plan to put those
recommended laptops and tablets for our students on our website so they
don’t have to try to find a dual band device on their own.  Most of the
airport cards have been dual band for a while, the 3rd generation iPad
has dual band, and the problem can really be seen in student’s brining
single band laptops, single band bargain tablets and older smartphones
to housing.

Additionally, we plan on deploying more APs and possibly turning down
the 2.4Ghz frequency.  We want to increase our lowest connection speed
(for the clients) to 36mbps or 48mbps in the WISM on the 2.4Ghz side. 
I am hoping  this is going cause the students with Bluetooth
speakers/headphones, mobile hotspots, microwaves, older analog wireless
phones, and wireless printers not to interfere as greatly as they are
now.

5Ghz is just less crowded, but I am worried that the feat of telling
students to bring a dual band device is going to make their eyes glaze
over.  That’s going to be a challenge for us in this plan.  Does anyone
have any thoughts about our plan?  I am open to suggestions.  Has
anyone seen a 5ghz wireless printer, yet?  Thanks!




Joann L. Williamson
Director of Network Systems, Architecture,  Infrastructure
Computer Services Department at USC Aiken
phone: 803-641-3473
http://www.usca.edu


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of T. Shayne
Ghere
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:29 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Our policy states if a device interferes with our network, then we
reserve the right to have that device removed.  The problem is that the
WCS and Controllers are seeing over 712 devices.  We can triangulate
the “area” the device might be, but that would be going door to door. 
We don’t have the man power to spend that much time searching for them.

Quite a few are wireless printers and mobile hotspots, but they usually
get turned off when they aren’t in use.  By sending a DoS attack to the
device doesn’t solve the wireless interference that it’s causing, but
only degrades the service the 2-3 AP’s are providing to other students.

We have a Dorm/Greek/Singles living area of around 3,000 students and
covers acres of land.  I’ve seen some schools putting an AP in each
room, some removing all wireless out of the dorms and others fighting
the same battle I am.  At what point to you just deal with it and say
“yeah our wireless sucks because the students didn’t listen when they
went through orientation.”

On the Academic side we have very very few rogues and the Wireless is
rock solid.  Upper administration just doesn’t get it, I think, but
we’re left to deal with it.  There are two of us that maintain
everything network related and no student help.  It’s becoming a
24/7/365 work schedule, and we’re getting burned out fast.



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
On Behalf Of Ian McDonald
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 10:13 AM
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a
disciplinary matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary system?

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of T. Shayne
Ghere
Sent: 16 October 2014 16:11
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Good morning.

Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than our
Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Hunter Fuller
Thanks for the capture. This is really interesting!


--
Hunter Fuller
Network Engineer
VBRH M-9B
+1 256 824 5331

Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Systems and Infrastructure

I am part of the UAH Safe Zone LGBTQIA support network:
http://www.uah.edu/student-affairs/safe-zone

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Trent Hurt trent.h...@louisville.edu
wrote:

  Xbox one controller is on 5GHz.  Here is pic of it from spectrum
 analyzer.  Also the wii u has miracast from console to controller and it is
 on 5GHz as well.





 *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Joann Williamson
 *Sent:* Thursday, October 16, 2014 2:05 PM

 *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms



 Here is what we are thinking since we “enjoy” a similar situation at
 USCA.  We have two WISMs, 1142’s  1252’s 2602’s, Cisco NCS Infrastructure
 reporting, and the ability to triangulate the rogue devices.  I hate the
 amount of time our one network engineer has to put into finding about 89
 rogue devices in our housing area that has about 1000 beds.  Faculty/staff
 wireless on campus is rock solid, too.  They are not the ones really
 utilizing BYOD.



 So, our plan of attack is going to be encouraging everyone to use 5Ghz
 because that’s the larger spectrum with more room.  We plan to tell
 students to bring dual band devices for doing their assignments in their
 room.  We noticed most all activity is on the 2.4Ghz side of things.  Is
 that the case with most of you?  We plan to put those recommended laptops
 and tablets for our students on our website so they don’t have to try to
 find a dual band device on their own.  Most of the airport cards have been
 dual band for a while, the 3rd generation iPad has dual band, and the
 problem can really be seen in student’s brining single band laptops, single
 band bargain tablets and older smartphones to housing.



 Additionally, we plan on deploying *more* APs and possibly turning down
 the 2.4Ghz frequency.  We want to increase our lowest connection speed (for
 the clients) to 36mbps or 48mbps in the WISM on the 2.4Ghz side.  I am
 hoping  this is going cause the students with Bluetooth
 speakers/headphones, mobile hotspots, microwaves, older analog wireless
 phones, and wireless printers not to interfere as greatly as they are now.



 5Ghz is just less crowded, but I am worried that the feat of telling
 students to bring a dual band device is going to make their eyes glaze
 over.  That’s going to be a challenge for us in this plan.  Does anyone
 have any thoughts about our plan?  I am open to suggestions.  Has anyone
 seen a 5ghz wireless printer, yet?  Thanks!









 Joann L. Williamson

 Director of Network Systems, Architecture,  Infrastructure

 Computer Services Department at USC Aiken

 phone: 803-641-3473

 http://www.usca.edu





 *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [
 mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *T. Shayne Ghere
 *Sent:* Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:29 AM
 *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms



 Our policy states if a device interferes with our network, then we reserve
 the right to have that device removed.  The problem is that the WCS and
 Controllers are seeing over 712 devices.  We can triangulate the “area” the
 device might be, but that would be going door to door.  We don’t have the
 man power to spend that much time searching for them.



 Quite a few are wireless printers and mobile hotspots, but they usually
 get turned off when they aren’t in use.  By sending a DoS attack to the
 device doesn’t solve the wireless interference that it’s causing, but only
 degrades the service the 2-3 AP’s are providing to other students.



 We have a Dorm/Greek/Singles living area of around 3,000 students and
 covers acres of land.  I’ve seen some schools putting an AP in each room,
 some removing all wireless out of the dorms and others fighting the same
 battle I am.  At what point to you just deal with it and say “yeah our
 wireless sucks because the students didn’t listen when they went through
 orientation.”



 On the Academic side we have very very few rogues and the Wireless is rock
 solid.  Upper administration just doesn’t get it, I think, but we’re left
 to deal with it.  There are two of us that maintain everything network
 related and no student help.  It’s becoming a 24/7/365 work schedule, and
 we’re getting burned out fast.







 *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Ian McDonald
 *Sent:* Thursday, October 16, 2014 10:13 AM
 *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms



 Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things 

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

2014-10-16 Thread Vlade Ristevski

Thanks!

On 10/16/2014 2:12 PM, James Elliott wrote:

We use snmptrap translator aka snmptt running on our monitoring server that 
sends them to a perl script that I wrote to put them into a friendly output.

~James Elliott

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Vlade Ristevski
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 1:44 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Do you mind sharing what system/method you use to record the mac-notify 
messages and to parse them? We also have mac-notification setup but Cisco 
doesn't send a user friendly notification but If-Indexes  with VLANs in hex 
instead. Its' very helpful to have put a pain in the ass to parse.


On 10/16/2014 1:19 PM, James Elliott wrote:

We have a homegrown tool that uses some of the features of the Cisco Rogue 
Locator Tool, without needing the infringing wireless network to be open.
We have cisco snmp mac -notification setup for all ports on campus, so we are 
able to identify each where each device is plugged in on our network.  We take 
the mac address of the observed rogue AP and add 1 to the mac, and subtract 1 
from the mac.  This gives us 3 MAC addresses to compare to what is plugged into 
the network.  Once the port is identified, we get an email of the device 
wireless mac, wired mac, switch and port it is connected to, and even the IP 
address it pulled from DHCP.

At this point, we use our maps to identify the room number, turn off all the 
ports in the room and notify Res Life of the infraction.  We were able to get 
most of the wireless routers on campus using this technique.

James Elliott

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank
Sweetser
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 1:16 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

+1 to USB free USB cables as one of the more effective tools for
+combating
wireless printers.

More and more, it's not a case of people deciding to use wireless over wired, 
but instead it simply never occurs to them that they can get internet through 
that funny rectangularish hole.  There's not much you can do for that except 
free cables and a constant, consistent education campaign.

Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu|  For every problem, there is a solution that
Manager of Network Operations   |  is simple, elegant, and wrong.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute |   - HL Mencken

On 10/16/2014 12:15 PM, Peter P Morrissey wrote:

That has been our approach. We have 100% coverage in residences and
there isn’t usually a good reason to have an offending device with
the exception of devices that just won’t work on our Enterprise network that 
Lee had mentioned.
We have found that once we explain the situation to students, they
are fine with turning them off or allowing us to help them turn them
turn off the WiFi feature and find a better way to connect. Most
devices have wired connections that can be utilized, and from what I
understand, for a gamer this gives them a slight advantage due to
lower latency. (I could be wrong about that though as I am not a
gamer). We also attempt to do a lot of education before and during
opening, and have a large stash of extra long USB cables that we give
out freely. We have people helping students move in and nip a lot of this in 
the bud from the beginning.  You can get USB cables very cheap in bulk BTW.
I’m not saying it is perfect, but we don’t get any performance
complaints at all, although it is certainly possible that there are
complaints that don’t get to us.

Pete Morrissey

*From:*The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Heath
Barnhart
*Sent:* Thursday, October 16, 2014 12:04 PM
*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

As I read the case, sending deauth's is exactly what the Marriot's
system was doing.

We used don't have that bad of a rogue issue since we upgraded our
WiFi in the dorms three years ago. I think I had 3 this year, and I
just track them down the best I can (by me I mean my student worker),
and have a polite conversation with the offender. I haven't had a
problem with this method, though I've never been faced with 700
rogues. What types of devices are being classified as rogues?



--

Heath Barnhart

ITS Network Administrator

Washburn University

785-670-2307

On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 11:39 -0400, Philippe Hanset wrote:

  I think that the Marriott court case needs to be put into perspective.

  Many of us have been quarantining rogue APs without any trouble.

  The Marriott case is somewhat different. They were preventing all Wi-Fi
  from being enabled

  and they were selling theirs as the only Wi-Fi around.