with a
hub/switch.
Darren.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Britton Anderson
Sent: 08 August 2017 21:25
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
Anybody else
: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 3:25 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
Anybody else running 1810Ws on 8.2 running into the multiple devices per port
bug?
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCux78581
We are deploying 8540's now running
d to go.
>>
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
>> ----------
>> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
>> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Hunter Fuller <
>> hf0...@uah.edu>
>> *Sen
n, if its
> the actual value from AD i'd say your good to go.
>
>
> Nick
>
>
> --
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Hunter Fuller <
> hf0...@uah.edu>
_
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Hunter Fuller <hf0...@uah.edu>
Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 4:59 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
You're right, I
You're right, I had misread that.
Upon reading it that way, though, isn't that fine too? The person's device
reports its MAC, and then ACS or any other RADIUS just responds with that
MAC's owner's assigned PSK. If the device's MAC isn't known, we just
respond with an empty or garbage PSK to
I think your going to have the same problem with ACS as there is with ISE. The
controller does not send the PSK the user used to the RADIUS server for
verification/validation. Instead the RADIUS server will send back the PSK
value the user/device should be using and the WLC does the
Yep - we use Cisco ACS, backed with AD. Should be able to just add another
rule to our ruleset, then configure iPSK on the controllers. Then it would
check the PSK against AD, as the machine password for the machine account.
(We already make machine accounts for registered MACs of game consoles,
On 1 Aug 2017, at 17:33, Ciesinski, Nick wrote:
While WLC 8.5 did add IPSK it is probably safe to say its rather
worthless for most at this time. For those who have used ISE if you
watch the video on how they make IPSK work it isn’t feasible to give
each of your users their own PSK key to
ERSITY
syr.edu
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jake Snyder
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 11:24 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
One of the things as a par
; From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
> <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of "lhbad...@syr.edu"
> <lhbad...@syr.edu>
> Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
> <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> Date:
:55 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
Lee,
I can only speak to my experience, and in the case of the x800 series, we were
a first-customer-ship and had them in production in Aug 2016. I ran into a few
bugs, mostly stuck radios, but with
SS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 6:04 AM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
I value what Jeff is doing with Beta, but also have to agree with James
Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of James Helzerman
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 7:57 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
With your beta controller how many access points and concurrent
ducause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Date: *Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 3:39 PM
> *To: *"wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Subject: *Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
>
>
>
>
U>
on behalf of James Helzerman <jarh...@umich.edu>
Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 3:39 PM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject:
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ciesinski, Nick
Sent: Wednesday, 2 August 2017 1:04 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
While WLC 8.5 did add IPSK it is probably safe to say its rather worthless for
most at this time. For those who have used
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
I feel like we might be used as QA..anyone else?
On Aug 1, 2017 6:32 PM, "Mccormick, Kevin"
<ke-mccorm...@wiu.edu<mailto:ke-mccorm...@wiu.edu>> wrote:
They just released 8.2.160.0
443.4325 <(315)%20443-4325> e
> lhbad...@syr.edu w its.syr.edu
>
> SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY syr.edu
>
>
>
> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [
> mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>] On Behalf Of James Helzer
es Constituent Group Listserv [
> mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>] On Behalf Of James Helzerman Sent:
> Monday, July 31, 2017 1:57 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
>
ts.syr.edu
>
> SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY syr.edu
>
>
>
> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [
> mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>] On Behalf Of James Helzerman Sent:
> Monday, July 31, 2017 1:57 PM To: WI
uent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of James
Helzerman Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 1:57 PM To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code
Version
Hi. For those with Cisco access points what code version are
planning
AN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
From the iPSK config guide at:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/8-5/b_Identity_PSK_Feature_Deployment_Guide.pdf
"IPSK can be configured o
The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, 1 August 2017 at 8:10 pm
To: "WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
I’m interested here
Thanks, Jake.
-Original Message-
From: Jake Snyder [jsnyde...@gmail.com]
Received: Tuesday, 01 Aug 2017, 9:35
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU [WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
Lee,
IPSK falls into base licensing as it is just
: Tuesday, 1 August 2017 11:51 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
From the iPSK config guide at:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/8-5/b_Identity_PSK_Feature_Deployment_Guide.pdf
"IPSK can be configured on an
so simple implementation we were
>> hoping for. So that might be on the back burner L
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Jason Cook
>>
>> Technology Services
>>
>> The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005
>>
>> Ph:
> Technology Services
>
> The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005
>
> Ph: +61 8 8313 4800 <+61%208%208313%204800>
>
>
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Entwistle, Bruce
Sent: Tuesday, 1 August 2017 4:16 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
I had seen the comments made by the group during the summer related to bugs and
the 2800 APs, so as a precautionary measure we did
Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of James Helzerman
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 1:57 PM To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code
Version
Hi. For those with Cisco access points what code version
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 11:26 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
Bruce,
Was there anything that you were absolutely hitting, or are you doing the “just
in case” thing here?
Lee Badman | Network
SS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
We completed the upgrade from 8.2.151.0 to 8.2.160.0 this morning. The primary
reason for the upgrade was the identified bugs related to the 2800 APs.
Bruce Entwistle
Network Manager
University of Redlands
From: The EDUCAUSE Wi
UCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of James Helzerman
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 1:57 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
Hi. For those with Cisco access points what code v
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of James Helzerman
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 10:57 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
Hi. For those with Cisco access points what code version are planning on
running for start of fall semester?
At this point we
;WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Monday, July 31, 2017 at 10:57 AM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version
Hi. For those with Cisco access points what code version are planning on
running
35 matches
Mail list logo
