RE: Rotating 802.1x RADIUS CA certificate

While I agree with Ryan and others about user / client certificates, I believe the original topic was RADIUS Server certificates, not user. Bruce Osborne Senior Network Engineer Network Operations - Wireless (434) 592-4229 LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Training Champions for Christ since 1971 From:

RE: Anyone have experience with wireless lighting and contol systems?

I know Lutron is a great company with great products but I also know they are very expensive. Unlike Eaton, Lutron also uses proprietary frequencies (I believe Clear Connect works in the 400s), which from a wireless coexistence perspective is excellent, but it comes with the higher price tag.

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Rotating 802.1x RADIUS CA certificate

That is exactly what my last message was talking about  From: "WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" on behalf of "Osborne, Bruce W (Network Operations)" Reply-To: "WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU"

Re: Anyone have experience with wireless lighting and contol systems?

Hi Manny, I'm curious, why is your facilities department looking to replace Lutron? We are being asked to look at them as a lighting control solution on our campus. Thanks, Mike From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options

https://www.mist.com/ On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:10 PM John Rodkey wrote: > Our college - about 40 buildings, 1200 students, 3500 wireless clients per > day, currently 310 WAPs - is considering a major upgrade in WAPs, replacing > a number that are 9 years old and no longer

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options

We use Aerohive, we are approaching ~1,900 WAPs across 5 campuses. 2) Our experience with the product has overall been good, we’ve seen good hardware options available and have seen continuous improvement in the management system. The newer system fixes many of our issues with the legacy

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options

You need to include Aruba in your list. Regards, -- Jim Sr. Network Engineer Information Technology Department Johnson & Wales University 8 Abbott Park Place Providence, RI 02903 Office: 401-598-1556 Mobile: 401-249-0579 eFax: 401-223-4998 Email:

Wireless Options

Our college - about 40 buildings, 1200 students, 3500 wireless clients per day, currently 310 WAPs - is considering a major upgrade in WAPs, replacing a number that are 9 years old and no longer supported. We could replace with the latest model of our existing vendor, but want to consider all the

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options

I’m curious about the requirement that controllers be “cloud based” and what business requirement that maps to. Trying to understand what a cloud based controller give your business that an on-premises controller does not. How that translates to better experience, happier students or faster

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options

1. I recommend Aruba as well. 2. The AP’s are rock solid, reasonably priced, and easy to set up. 3. I have had varying experiences with support, licensing, and with upgrades (both good and bad). 4. I would ask why you have a requirement that the controller be cloud-based in this

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options

Aruba as well. From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv On Behalf Of Norton, Thomas (Network Operations) Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 2:14 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options I highly

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options

I highly recommend looking at Aruba as well. T.J. Norton Wireless Network Architect Network Operations Office: (434) 592-6552 [http://www.liberty.edu/media/1616/40themail/wordmark-for-email.jpg] Liberty University | Training Champions for Christ since 1971 From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options

Definitely include Aruba in your list. While no solution is perfect and all have their quirks I’ve found Aruba to be a very solid solution, well supported, with a large user base that can be utilized to bounce ideas and problems off of. As with most things the VAR you choose is often just as

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options

We are using Meraki (cloud) as well as Cisco (controller). For the cloud requirement, the Meraki is really easy to setup and manage and they have both small as well as very large enterprise deployments. The interface it great, and like other cloud offering, you get out of the management of

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options

Extreme networks is a vendor I would suggest. Sent from my iPhone On May 17, 2018, at 2:50 PM, Matt Freitag > wrote: Another +1 on Aruba. We've also had varying experiences with their support but they are mostly positive experiences. The two

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options

Those are good words to put in my mouth. In addition to these operational benefits, there is a strong philosophical commitment at the C-level to cloud-based services whenever it is feasible, so we don't go with on-prem unless there is no feasible way to do it with cloud. I am very appreciative

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options

Another +1 on Aruba. We've also had varying experiences with their support but they are mostly positive experiences. The two negative experiences I had with their support went about like this: - AP-125's spontaneously crash and reboot due to a memory management bug with no workaround. This

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options

I don’t want to put words in John’s mouth, but operating controllers requires time and effort beyond what’s required to manage configurations. Scaling, security, software upgrades, etc., all require resources but contribute nothing to the user experience. For us the benefits of hosting our

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Options

Extreme has APs that can be cloud or controller based. (and transferred back and forth) I participated in the pilot for the cloud based offering and it worked well. We were considering that for a satellite location and would have used it when our Meraki AP license lapsed, but that building is