Rogelio wrote:
One thing I use to monitor domains is check_dns on Nagios. With it, I
can monitor the IP of A records, DNS authorities, etc. You might
consider using this tool if this becomes an ongoing problem.
I just checked, and there is a new plugin that looks like it does more
than
Have you called Barracuda Support? They are good to work with and may be
able to help you-you could have something weird going on in the box that
needs to be fixed. We don't generally sell the 200's, but I have had
300's that handle 60,000 + emails a day and aren't breaking a sweat.
John
I have not called them, I am running about 20,000 emails a day through this
200.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Thomas
Sent: Sunday, June 29,
Mark,
We are NOT far at all, in House Springs, just south of St. Louis. Rolla
is just about 1 1/2 hours from us!
Give Jim a call on his cell at 314-565-6863. We are a MT distributor
and can get you whatever you need!
--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik
Kurt,
What firmware are you running?
How many emails are you filtering?
Have you done a hard reboot on it lately?
How many Spam emails are you killing per hour? Per day? (There is a Daily
Traffic graph/email that tell you this)
I know mine too (Cuda) is sluggish, but it's the amount of
What equipment lets me have 1 GB of throughput on a single site in only 20
MHz of available frequency?
WISPs need to be able to deploy 10 megabit plus pipes to the home. A single
user then chews up most of your 3.5 or 7 MHz channel.
I know physics comes into play. I know government policy
802.22 sounds good if the channel bonding makes it through to the end and is
usable. THAT would be wonderful. If not, 6 MHz isn't going to get us very
far in terms of delivering real throughput to any significant number of
users.
Price always comes into play and if we're looking at $10k APs
What is the status of this? I am investigating it more since Tony made
reference to 802.22. I became interested when I saw a provision for channel
bonding.
Have there been any references to a 3.65 esque license so the bands won't be
filled with junk?
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent
Just a thought, unless you have a 600 or better unit, you are running 1x10/100
Ethernet on 100-400 units vs. 2xGigabit on to
600-1000 units, IMO creating a bottleneck even with low to moderate user
accounts. This is where most of our cross-over sales
are from, in the lower model units. With
Mike
Right now it is in draft but very close to going to the next stage. But
there is a lot more going on here than just a standard.
- The 802.22 is setting a precedence, besides the engineers that are
creating 802.22 also involved are the incumbents that hold the TV channels
and they
Mike
- It's not just a single antenna on one channel, I am talking about channel
reuse. Again need to stop thinking 802.11
- It is possible to have 50Mb-60Mb real data in a 70Mb/7Mhz channel with the
right MAC and PHY and in real deployments.
- The only reason a single user could use all the
Mike
- You really need to read the full 802.22 spec :) There is A LOT more than
just channel bonding that make 802.22 good.
- 6Mhz is more than enough for all WISPs needs when it's used correctly,
again (I know) not 802.11
- 3.65Mhz is just in the startup Wimax was first to hit the street but
And on another thought... with that much junk mail, why not use a
service that blocks the spam BEFORE it uses your bandwidth and
resources? Like Postini... or others.
Travis
Microserv
Frank Muto wrote:
Just a thought, unless you have a 600 or better unit, you are running 1x10/100 Ethernet
The problem, here Tony, is that the MAC's and PHY that accomlishes this kind
of performance isn't built into chipsets that are mass produced like
consumer chipsets are. Even I'm going to end up with Atheros based 3.6 ghz
products, because nothing else currently makes any sense at all, dollar
Personally, I really wonder if it is possible to have 10 bits/HZ that a 60
Mbps channel in 6 MHz would have. 8VSB of HDTV was pretty advanced when it
was originally proffered as a standard. It does 19.2 Mbps in a 6 MHz
channel. Or approx 3 bits / Hz. That seems to be the upper limit of many
Never say never. My first cell phone (a 3 watt Uniden bag phone) cost me
over $1000.00. It may take time but the price levels will come down. It
won't happen right away but it will happen. You can't have relatively
protected spectrum and still have a throw away consumer priced piece of
gear. This
I agree with you 100% right now they are not and I should make the point
that what I am talking about is what will be coming down the line in the
next 18-24 months. I understand most WISP are in the here and now :) But
with this said things are in the works.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc
Crap this was a typo should have been 10Mhz channel. Also right now 802.16m
and LTE are doing 5bits/Hertz that has happen in field tests. Most of what
I am talking about is OFDMA, MIMO with some type of advanced antenna system.
I have seen test of AAS that are very cost effective it's just a
Travis, because there is an element of control that you lose when you
outsource. I have a client that got really upset when an email that was
addressed to 3 companies only made it to one employee. Long story short,
Frontbridge saw that the email came into their servers, but only one
copy went
Since when does Postini require a 3-year commitment? IMO there is more to the
Frontbridge saga and even Barracuda can not fix
the hiccups of MS Exchange.
Frank Muto
Postini - Google Apps Distributor
www.SecureEmailPlus.com
- Original Message -
From: John Thomas [EMAIL
Hi,
We have been a Postini customer since their first year in business.
Once you "outsource" that part of it, you wonder how you ever did it
before. Right now it is probably saving us at least 10Mbps of
bandwidth, which in our area is over $500 per month. We also charge
customers $1 per email
Unless you know something I don't, all the quotes we have received from
Postini require a 3 year commitment, with a minimum of 1 years payment
up front.
For my client that has 60,000 + emails coming into his Barracuda, his
Exchange 2003 server is happily running along.
John Thomas
Frank
Then you should be working with a reseller/distributor like us. Some of the
services do require an annual fee, but none that
require a minimum 3-year commitment.
At 60k emails, plus using Exchange; you are at a whole different level of
resources even with Barracuda, compared to the
average
23 matches
Mail list logo
