It is true that a 802.11 based 3.650 product is not going to be any better
than 2.4. A wimax based 3.650 product is going to gve field performance
much like 2.4. A diversity based 3.650 system is going to provide coverage
much like, and oftentimes exceeding that of 900Mhz. These observations are
I don't think I'd go that far. In many areas 2.4 is useless, so by that
very token, 3.650 would be a world of better because it's virgin territory.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Mike Cowan"
Well there is NLOS performance and spectrum crowding to be considered.
Not sure which Mike Cowan was referring to.
Mike Hammett wrote:
> I don't think I'd go that far. In many areas 2.4 is useless, so by that
> very token, 3.650 would be a world of better because it's virgin territory.
>
>
I'm curious if anyone here has gotten access to the utility
infrastructure in your service area for communications gear?
Also what about mountain top colo facilities?
I'm in Los Angeles county and have been researching the matter.
For the mountain top stuff, it seems it would be best to hook up
From
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/broadbandgrants/BTOPQuarterlyReport_090518.pdf
In addition,
NTIA intends to release a separate NOFA with respect to the broadband map.
Excellent!
Would be awesome if they break it down per state/major metro area. Such
that multiple players can bid on the contr
Hrm.
Broadband Map Posted to WebsiteFebruary 17, 2011
Wonder if any of the new census data will be available by then? That
would help with showing some real numbers/markets/updated incomes etc.
Charles Wyble wrote:
> From
>
>
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/broadbandgrants/BTOPQuarterlyRep
David Hulsebus wrote:
> Ryan, How do you like the Moonblink antennas?
Eh, they are OK. Getting timely shipping and shipping information out of
Moonblink makes ordering from them a head-ache for my ordering person.
The antennas are sleek aluminum but they are fragile so you can't handle
them much
I am curious if anyone can tell me the technical reason why 900MHZ has
no reasonable cost CPE. Here I am paying $70 for CPE on 2.4 gear, $90
for 5.8 but the best price I can find is $290 for 900 MHZ. Just curious
as to why?
Forbes
---
I agree,
I think we are all waiting for UBNT to crush the pricing as they have
done in 2.4 & 5.8.
ryan
Forbes Mercy wrote:
> I am curious if anyone can tell me the technical reason why 900MHZ has
> no reasonable cost CPE. Here I am paying $70 for CPE on 2.4 gear, $90
> for 5.8 but the best pr
I thought it has to do wit there not being a standard. No bodies card will
work with each other. I mean how ridiculous that UBNT couldn't even make their
XR9 cards work with their SR9 card. Nothing works with Tranzeo's 900.
Steve Barnes
RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service
-Original Messa
The cards are more expensive to manufacture, due to lower volumes but also
the higher power they need to pump out (we add an external heat sink because
they get too hot for our comfort), and the exotic filtering necessary to get
them to work correctly on the very noisy 900Mhz band. The SR9 and X
Moto is about the same for each band though 900 is a bit more :/
On 6/5/09, D. Ryan Spott wrote:
> I agree,
>
> I think we are all waiting for UBNT to crush the pricing as they have
> done in 2.4 & 5.8.
>
> ryan
>
>
> Forbes Mercy wrote:
>> I am curious if anyone can tell me the technical reason
I have a few horizontal and they do tend to traverse through woods
better than the verticals, but the noise floor for us is just the
opposite. There are a half dozen Canopy systems running horizontal
omni's just to my east destroying most of the 900 spectrum. I don't have
any sectors wider than
I agree with your sentiment that 900 stuff is too expensive.
But I was pleasantly surprised. while looking around DoubleRadius last
weekend, to see Tranzeo TR-SL9 client radios for $234. (8dB or N
connector, take your pick). I missed any announcement of them.
One could hope that a multipack o
I emailed Ubiquity about that very subject, here was their response:
Hello,
Not at this time as there are size limitations do to the size of 900Mhz
antennas.
Thanks,
_
Michael Ford
Ubiquiti Support Team
-Original Message--
Anyone know how to reset the usernames/passwords to default on a Rev. 2
dragonwave airpair?
--
Randy Cosby
Vice President
InfoWest, Inc
work: 435-773-6071
email: rco...@infowest.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/randycosby
---
I'd offer technical reason not to buy 900 system based primarily on
price. The build-your-own gear using XR9 or SR9 type cards or wifi
systems converted to do 900 are inferior to popular proprietary 900
systems in many cases where interference exists.
I have used Alvarion BA-II 900, Trango 900
I'm a little under that, not by any great amount.
Mine's star-os, ubiqiti radios, and small yagi.We also have labor on top
of our cash price, but last I checked, we were about 265 for 900 cpe.
- Original Message -
From: "Forbes Mercy"
To: "WISPA
Never mind, I got it...
Randy Cosby wrote:
> Anyone know how to reset the usernames/passwords to default on a Rev. 2
> dragonwave airpair?
>
>
--
Randy Cosby
Vice President
InfoWest, Inc
work: 435-773-6071
email: rco...@infowest.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/randycosby
--
Please share how so we all know!
On 6/5/09, Randy Cosby wrote:
> Never mind, I got it...
>
>
>
> Randy Cosby wrote:
>> Anyone know how to reset the usernames/passwords to default on a Rev. 2
>> dragonwave airpair?
>>
>>
>
> --
> Randy Cosby
> Vice President
> InfoWest, Inc
>
> work: 435-773-6071
A heat sink? Are your radios in an enclosure? I've got mine in an
outbuilding. It doesnt get too hot in there but perhaps I should
consider?
-RickG
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Tom Sharples wrote:
> The cards are more expensive to manufacture, due to lower volumes but also
> the higher power th
I will invite any 3.65 Mfg to let me test their gear in my environment. I have
found nothing to work past 2 miles in the hills and trees of TN, except 900 Mhz
Canopy.
Scottie
-- Original Message --
From: "Mike Cowan"
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Date:
The WiMax guys aren't interested in the WISP market... they are after
the cell guys and big operators looking to place 5,000 and 10,000 CPE
orders.
Travis
Microserv
Scottie Arnett wrote:
I will invite any 3.65 Mfg to let me test their gear in my environment. I have found nothing to work pa
I've got a question that tangentially pertains to wireless stuff, but
isn't really related to wireless technology, per se.
We sometimes have several people working on KMZ files, and the different
versions that we have gets really out of hand, and I'm hoping for a
web-based (LAMP?) solution that
Forbes Mercy wrote:
> I am curious if anyone can tell me the technical reason why 900MHZ has
> no reasonable cost CPE. Here I am paying $70 for CPE on 2.4 gear, $90
> for 5.8 but the best price I can find is $290 for 900 MHZ. Just curious
> as to why?
This is a good question, as I have not had t
I agree. When you see wifi vendors with sub-$1000 APs in the 2.4 space and they
suddenly want to sell yo basically the same tech (at a different freq range)
for $1 there is a problem.
Someone is cashing in on hype becase the R&D CANNOT be that expensive when you
take volume of CPE/AP sales
KMZ is a binary file format?
What do you use for XLS/Word version control? Or do you simply use the
built in reconciliation functionality?
I'm also interested in what folks are using for binary source control.
KMZ/SHP etc.
Rogelio wrote:
> I've got a question that tangentially pertains to wire
Charles Wyble wrote:
> KMZ is a binary file format?
KMZ is an XML-ish format you use for Google Earth locations, which are
insanely handy when planning out wi-fi spots
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyhole_Markup_Language
(While reading the wikipedia page just now, I found this interesting
tidb
Ah.
Well then if it's text, git may be useful. Trac is a good frontend, that
I use on a regular basis.
Or something more along the lines of sharepoint I really like
http://www.knowledgetree.com/ http://www.knowledgetree.com/opensource
Rogelio wrote:
> Charles Wyble wrote:
>> KMZ is a bin
Charles Wyble wrote:
> Well then if it's text, git may be useful. Trac is a good frontend, that
> I use on a regular basis.
>
> Or something more along the lines of sharepoint I really like
> http://www.knowledgetree.com/ http://www.knowledgetree.com/opensource
I've heard great things abo
Subversion. ;)
Bitch to setup but then easy.
ryan
-Original Message-
From: Rogelio
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 6:23 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] document version control? (e.g. web-based solution to "check
out" KMZ files)
I've got a question that tangentially pertains t
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:27 PM, D. Ryan Spott wrote:
> Subversion. ;)
>
> Bitch to setup but then easy.
Thanks, I'll look into possibly doing that also.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
-
I apologize for my language. :(
I am 3 pitchers in after a long week. Turning off the not so smart
phone now!!
ryan
On Jun 5, 2009, at 9:44 PM, Rogelio wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:27 PM, D. Ryan Spott
> wrote:
> Subversion. ;)
>
> Bitch to setup but then easy.
>
> Thanks, I'll loo
Ditto. :-)
If you go the subversion route check out tortoise svn for windows
desktop client. http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/
Makes subversion on the client side a piece of cake.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:49 PM, D. Ryan Spott wrote:
> I apologize for my language. :(
>
> I am 3 pitchers in after a l
34 matches
Mail list logo
