We shoot across an airport (the big ones as well) with a bunch of 5.8
stuff, but I believe we needed to get clearance from the airport and
maybe the FAA before installing. Otherwise we've had zero problems with
interference from their systems. I would start by calling or gong to see
the person
If your equipment is on airport property proper you need approval to place
there.
You do not need approval to shoot accross the airport.
Now depending on your proximity to air traffic you may experience packet loss
but unless your path was where aircraft may park or taxi I would not expect
los
I somewhat disagree, in terms of the signal, no you don't need approval,
but to put a wireless network up with antenna's near any airport the
height of the antenna is governed by the FAA, you need their approval
from them in terms of an antenna perspective. Antenna heights are
governed by distan
I'd imagine it's on purpose by Sprint to get you to switch from Nextel to
Sprint.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Kurt Fankhauser"
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:35 PM
To: "'WISPA General
Agreed
But in this case he said they were going on 300' towers on each side and
because they were already existing I did not touch on structure construction
and FAA Letters of Determination.
And I assumed they were existing structures because people don't build 300'
towers every day for a WIS
This path I'm considering is 33 miles in length and the airport is 11 miles
from the closest tower. Both towers are existing structures so their
placement is okay but I was concerned when I saw that the path runs right
down runway 22R. Sigh. so every plane approaching that runway will be
sm
Jerry
Its proibably #6. You should be able to tap at the base of the pole. Usually
the contractor that installs the underground cable is not from the same
division as the crew that sets the poles.
If you still need to tap Brundy makes a "T" tap that will clip on and do what
you want to do. I
Unless the base of the runway is in the Fresnel zone... an airplane flying
through it is only going to cause a minor interruption... maybe a few
seconds? I would bet it is going to be okay
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com
>-Original Message-
>From: wireless-boun...@
Won't be a problem. Planes will not cause you an issue unless they fly into the
tower.
I have a link accross a runway at 5Ghz and jets pass through the path all day
long without a glitch. And the path is only about 2 miles long.
Bob
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Mes
As far as I can tell, the FZ is more than good there. My biggest concerns
were having a big obstruction moving through it and the RF being put out by
both the aircraft and the airport. Before DHL pulled out they were landing
a plane every 30 seconds starting around 10 pm and then they would take
That makes me feel a bit more confident then. Do they pass through it on
approach or cross the runway? The forward facing radar of the plane looking
right at me for a few seconds didn't sound good.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Agreed. Planes flying through the Fresnel zone will have more of an
impact on B type modulation than on say G. You might see selective
fading because of multipath, but OFDM or some other robust modulation
technique will recover from an aircraft on approach at 250 mph flying
through the Fresne
I have a 5.8 link over an airport and a 900ap next door to the airport. No
problems.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur
So far it all sounds good. Thanks! This one might be the winner.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:07 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem
FYI.
From SANS NewsBites September 29, 2009 Vol. 11, Num. 77
--Judge Orders Google to Deactivate Account
(September 24 & 28, 2009)
A US District Court Judge in California has ordered Google to deactivate
the Gmail account of a user who was accidentally sent confidential bank
information. An
We have an agreement with our city electric department that we will furnish
the enclosure and a cut-off computer power cable. They will come out and
wire power to that computer power cable, into the enclosure, for us.
One-time reasonable fee for us (I think it's $45, but I might be wrong).
That wa
LOL, I don't know about tower climbers, but in MO if you are under 21 you
cannot text and drive ;-)
Which I think is a great law!
V
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Fankhauser [mailto:k...@wavelinc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:13 PM
To: li...@stlbroadband.com; 'WISPA General L
So if you're 22 you can text and drive? What makes those older then 20
capable of driving while texting?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the tr
I'd say I can text and drive better than half the people out there can drive
by itself.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Josh Luthman"
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:26 AM
To: ; "WISPA Ge
I'm just shaking my head in wonder. Why, oh why, would anyone in the
position to have access to such information think it would be "okay" to send
this type of thing to an outside Gmail account? I can see an internal
address but Gmail???
100% Bonehead.
-Original Message-
From: wire
Here is an idea - don't email someone outside such information. Now that
you have it still gives no right to offend an innocent person. Simply call
that person and ask them to delete it and have Google verify it was done so.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Su
You also have the ability to be drunk, while texting. With just a hair of
driving.
Nick Olsen
Brevard Wireless
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: "Josh Luthman"
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:26 AM
To: "li...@stlbroadband.com" , "WISPA General List"
S
Okay, money making opportunity here. Come up with a way of doing a "text
test" like a breathalyzer. They hide the phone, you scan with a device,
find the phone, check for recent texting. Punch in some secret cop code,
phone talks to the provider, displays recent text activity... blah, blah,
bla
Robert:
I suggest grabbing your spectrum analyzer to look at the active
frequencies as planes are landing and taking off. If you're 11 miles
away from the airport and you are not stomping on a frequency used by
any of the navigation systems you should be fine.
I've run into Radar signals in
Needing to update 2 appliances
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
I take it that it's not actually happening "OCTOBER 2009" like the site
says?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
W
I haven't heard anything and Bullit is my upstream.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Jayson Baker"
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:06 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: [WISPA] WISPCON?
I can scan for other devices. In the scan, there is nothing else
except my other AP's which are separate channels not even close.
-RickG
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> I haven't used staros so I can't say much about the software. Can it
> see interference from anything o
Hello
I have bee requested to do some installs of 3G routers with external
antennas for Better signal. We could do it with standard yagi or panel
antenna for 800/1900 mhz and coax but I was wondering if there where on
the market any rootenna/Antenna Enclosure system where I could install
the 3
Butch,
Very good ideas but...
1) Security (encryption is off).
2) I've tried several freqs. Either way, both ends are the same
equipment so there shoudl not be a problem. I am familiar with
Mikrotik and there is no scan list in StarOS that I am aware of.
3) No mac filtering. Unit is wide open.
Yo
Matt, Are you using the R52H cards on WRAPS?
-RickG
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Matt Larsen - Lists
wrote:
> I have a couple of StarOS backhauls that will only work in AP mode in
> one direction. This is very frustrating, but I have not been able to
> find a solution to it, so I just deal
I've been doing many of my installs this way for years. I really like it. -RickG
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Jerry Richardson
wrote:
> Under eave/over eave/facia/tree
>
> Can't believe nobody thought of this sooner.
>
> http://www.mowinet.com
>
> [cid:image001.jpg@01CA41AD.4ADCEA60]
>
>
Last I had heard, Michael decided that due to the state of the economy,
October 2009 was probably not the right time to hold another conference. I
know he has interest in scheduling another conference, but the timing must
be right to draw sufficient interest & demand.
Regards,
Larry Yunker
I think ther are specific issues regarding ofdm and 900 MHz that
causes problems. We did everything possible to fix noise and radio
issues. We use all tiltek sector antennas with lmr cabling and cavity
filters at each radio. We were able to get sporadic speeds up to
8mbps. We did a radio fi
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 12:53 -0400, RickG wrote:
> 2) I've tried several freqs. Either way, both ends are the same
> equipment so there shoudl not be a problem. I am familiar with
> Mikrotik and there is no scan list in StarOS that I am aware of.
Both ends being the same is not the issue. It is t
General heads up!
I've been using Administaff for employee leasing for a few years now.
Up to this point they have been ok. They are about a 34% load on your
base payroll costs (including 15% SS insurance). The health insurance
was not really all that cheap at $1235.77 per month for employee +
f
The idea is great. But I challenge whether that single Ubolt is a very
secure way to mount the Dish bracket to the J-arm, considering windload.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "RickG"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent:
I have put up some small dishes with 1 U bolt they tend to move after
time I go back and fit another bolt end of movement problems.
Richard
2009/9/30 Tom DeReggi :
> The idea is great. But I challenge whether that single Ubolt is a very
> secure way to mount the Dish bracket to the J-arm, consid
Which version of the Mac OS?
Greg
On Sep 28, 2009, at 2:57 PM, Steve Barnes wrote:
> I have a problem. Tranzeo CPE Running firmware 4.0.5 connected to
> MTIK AP. Client was having connection issue so I went out and
> tested with my laptop. I had no issue but just to make sure I
> replace
Also mDNSResponder (Bonjour) can do a lot of traffic especially if the
user has a MobileMe account.
Greg
On Sep 28, 2009, at 3:51 PM, David E. Smith wrote:
> e...@wisp-router.com wrote:
>> Someone at one point told me that they seen some versions of Safari
>> that is doing a lot of heavy pre
Rick,
Is the cloaking rate set the same on both? How about vds? Could be vds is
set up on one but not the other.
Rick Harnish
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 3:24 PM
To:
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 19:39 -0400, Rick Harnish wrote:
> Is the cloaking rate set the same on both?
IIRC, "cloaking" is the name StarOS gives to 5 and 10 MHz channels? If
so, this is one thing I didn't think of. Some cards MAY be able to see
an AP that is "cloaked" even if that isn't the client
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 21:31 -0500, Butch Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 19:39 -0400, Rick Harnish wrote:
> > Is the cloaking rate set the same on both?
>
> IIRC, "cloaking" is the name StarOS gives to 5 and 10 MHz channels? If
> so, this is one thing I didn't think of. Some cards MAY be
I agree on that. Heck, I dont even trust grids with one u-bolt! -RickG
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
> The idea is great. But I challenge whether that single Ubolt is a very
> secure way to mount the Dish bracket to the J-arm, considering windload.
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDS
VDS reads to me like a StarOS proprietary WDS (at least the WDS in MT land)
SRC: http://staros.tog.net/wiki/VDS
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 23:01 -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
> VDS reads to me like a StarOS proprietary WDS (at least the WDS in MT land)
It looks more like EoIP to me. I am basing that on this statement from
the page you provided a link to:
"Using this you can even do authentication and IP handout
Cloaking is set to 1x. VDS is off.
BTW: Both ends are not exactly the same: The remote (station) is
running StarOS v2, the local (AP) is running v3. As I mentioned
though, I have another client on it which is also running v2 with no
issues. I also have a 3rd client (me) running a NS5.
-RickG
On We
VDS is a fancy way of "tunneling" a routable ip addy through multiple
WRAP's without adding it to the routing tables in each. -RickG
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 19:39 -0400, Rick Harnish wrote:
>> Is the cloaking rate set the same on both?
>
> IIRC
I see - I stopped at the bullet points. Poorly written document but at
least the information is there.
Is the other company paying attention...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which rem
Butch,
You're good! Your comments got me investigating further. The AP
running StarOS v3 (which I'm not as familiar with) did not accept the
freq I put into it and defaulted to an odd freq. The config page
showed the freq I wanted but the status page showed another. I have to
go out to the remote
See why everyone should pay WISPA that tiny annual fee?! Do it now if
you haven't!
On 9/30/09, RickG wrote:
> Butch,
>
> You're good! Your comments got me investigating further. The AP
> running StarOS v3 (which I'm not as familiar with) did not accept the
> freq I put into it and defaulted to a
51 matches
Mail list logo
