Hey Rick!
I've been trying to get in touch with you for the past several days on the
status of that order placed and paid for April 26th. Can you give me an
update?
Thanks,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Smith
Sent: Thursda
, been busy...i'll hit ya offlist.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 10:49 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Netgear Wall Plugged Ethernet
Hey Rick!
I've been trying
I typically just delete a post before scrolling all the way to the bottom.
Inevitably the bottom poster is just one of those "me too" or "thanks"
replies. It is rarely worth the effort and not worth the wear & tear on the
'ol mouse wheel to read bottom posts! lol
Best,
Brad
-Original Mess
So, 3650MHz isn't going to fall under Part90 rules?
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 10:51 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment
Comments inline.
> Even given t
No, not really. Our average RMC is similar to CBeyond, but the big
difference is how much we keep of that RMC as it compares to CBeyond.
CBeyond is still pumping dollars into their direct competitor (MaBell) and
operators like us that own their own network do not.
I know of ISPs like us all over
MikroTik supports this, correct?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eric Rogers
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 11:52 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] looking for a device
It is also referred as 802.1q tagging... If it
Title: Message
No kidding…ask him what he gets out
of his 38GHz links. Bastard…
Brad
-Original
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of JohnnyO
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 8:39
PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] High Gain
2.4g
Hello Patrick,
Were the 62 & 80Mbps results using a 20MHz channel or a 40MHz channel?
Regardless those are nice numbers.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 2:00 PM
To: 'WISPA General L
Oh, one last thing...can the B100 tune to 5.3GHz as well as 5.8GHz?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: Brad Belton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 2:30 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Help Needed PtP Links
Hello Patrick,
Were the 6
6GHz is licensed from the FCC on a link by link basis. Keep in mind the FCC
typically requires a 6' or larger antenna on each side of the link for 6GHz.
Try contacting www.comsearch.com or someone similar to learn more about the
process.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROT
We've always contracted out our fiber work, but be careful as not all fiber
techs are equal in their abilities.
We've settled on a group that is reasonable for small jobs and charges us
$400 for eight connectors total including travel and parts. They do a great
job no matter what type connector
ou can do it yourself? I figured it out which means anyone can.
:-)
Scriv
Brad Belton wrote:
>We've always contracted out our fiber work, but be careful as not all fiber
>techs are equal in their abilities.
>
>We've settled on a group that is reasonable for small jobs a
August 01, 2006 11:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] fiber connection for bridgewave
Does $400 include terminating ans testing Single mode? That is very cheap if
so. Even for multi mode, $400 is a reasonable rate.
John
>-Original Message-
>From: Brad Belton [mailto:
11MByte/sec as in approx 88Mbps? Sounds about like NStreme Turbo (40MHz
channel) or Alvarion B100 (40MHz channel).
Considering this thread was originally about the RB532 and its shortcomings,
has anyone tried loading MikroTik OS onto the StarOS 533MHz hardware?
Brad
-Original Message-
F
George, who wedged your panties in a wad this morning? Have you nothing
better to do than to pick a fight with JohnnyO?
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JohnnyO
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 1:07 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject
Wasn't there an ISP in Puerto Rico that was fined because they had set their
gear (Aperto I think) to a higher power than they should have? The
manufacturer's manual clearly stated it was up to the user to follow the
rules and regulations of the country the gear is deployed.
So, if this is the ca
Or maybe it was Adaptive Broadband gear that allowed the end user to break
the rules? Anyone remember?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: Brad Belton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 12:56 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: Not Babble: WAS Re:
"How would the number of customers I had on my network have any bearing on
this discussion?"
Well, it's a lot like having a medical intern weigh in on what a resident is
more qualified to answer. Certainly the intern is not to be considered a
dummy, but the intern's general lack of tenure, real
I didn't until now
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transponder_code#Transponder_codes
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Kerns
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 10:31 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] LIST HIJACKE
Hey Charles,
I tried contacting you off list, but got a reply from your filter
application. Just making sure you got my email.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 9:10 AM
To: WISPA General
That was probably for Rev3 gear. I believe that deal is no longer
available, but I could be wrong.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 11:11 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WIS
Agreed, but I think all the excitement was anticipating a new low price
point that Trango was promising. Trango did come in a bit cheaper, but not
cheap enough to really create any street parties.
Basically the money is the same between DragonWave and Trango, but Trango
gives you 100MB for Dragon
We have found many (most all?) <10kW "job site" type generators do not work
well if at all with APC UPS. In the event of a power failure we simply rent
a 25kW towable diesel generator. Granted 25kW is way overkill for most any
HUB site, but apparently the larger generators provide "cleaner" power
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 10:55 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Low cost generator
You could just add a line conditioner.
Brad Belton wrote:
>We have found many (most all?
neral List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Low cost generator
Brad,
You can adjust the sensitivity of the APC UPS's to handle just about any
type of incoming power. We have run a tower off a cheap Home Depot 2000watt
by adjusting the APC so it would not keep switching off an on.
Travis
Microserv
B
So, you bought this LP & Natural Gas generator for $1460 delivered,
including tax and transfer switch?
http://www.electricgeneratorsdirect.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id
=370
That is an amazing deal! Maybe Lowe's made a mistake on the price?
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [
though. I am not sure how true that is. I
don't think they (HD) sell them without installation.
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 9:26 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Low
This topic has come up many times over the years. I don't recall any real
consensus was ever reached based on a multiple due to the wide variation of
one operation to another.
How is it that one operation with 500 users is worth the same as another
operation with 500 users?
Would you pay the s
I could swear I detect a slight jubilation in your tone Patrick. Is this
rule change really in the best interest of the UL fixed wireless operator?
What better excuse could Alvarion ask for in not offering an UL dual or
tri-band product? Now you are comfortably able to hang your hat on the FCC
m
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 4:08 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Witching hour looms for 5.3 GHz - Can't buy any
moreaftertomorrow
I could swear I detect a slight jubilation in your tone Patr
GHz - Can't buy any
moreaftertomorrow
Rumor has it that Trango is just waiting FCC approval for a new triband
5ghz AP (5.3ghz, 5.4ghz and 5.8ghz). It will also have more horsepower
than the current 5830, but still be backward compatible with existing
SU's. Same 10Mbps bandwidth limit however.
I agree the oozing gel can be a mess, but it should be nonconductive and
have no adverse effects to an Ethernet port.
Years ago I found an eight port Netgear switch nearly flooded with the oozed
gel mess. Didn't seem to affect it in the least.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMA
McD's!!
Sheesh, don't sell yourself short. If they want to be an ISP then they need
to pay for a T1 and pay T1 prices.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 8:47 AM
To: WISPA General Lis
no, they will not pay T1 prices...
been there done that, long story.
Frank Muto
President
FSM Marketing Group, Inc.
Postini Gold Partner
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 10:12 AM
To: 'WISPA Gene
BTW we've been there done that with a long story too, but were successful.
As with anything your mileage will vary.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 10:42 AM
To: 'WIS
Butthe world does revolve around the Good 'ol United States! Nothing
new about that!
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Carl A jeptha
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 2:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
We have (off and on) been looking for the same solution, however we came to
a conclusion years ago. Why not just re-sell Direct TV or Dish?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 7:37 AM
the basics from DirecTV that include the channels they are after and be done
with it.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 8:09 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IPTV
Br
att Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IPTV
> Brad Belton wrote:
>> We have (off and on) been looking for the same solution, however we came
>> to
>> a conclusion years ago. Why
att Liotta
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 8:43 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IPTV
Brad Belton wrote:
> Correct, we see the same requests. However, why try re-inventing the
wheel
> when DirecTV already has a solution in place? Every time this issue has
> popped up the c
a better network
It probably is not quite viable for ultra-rural WISPs because of
really low densities and so forth. In areas with higher densities
(definitely MDU), it is viable and deployable
-Clint Ricker
Kentnis Technologies
On 9/10/07, Brad Belton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ot all the bells and whistles that VL brings. It does have a few
unique features like one CPE for all 5 GHz bands (yes, Brad Belton, you
heard it right :) ; you select whether to make the CPE 5.3, 5.4 or 5.8
GHz. So that's a big plus on the operations side. And though still
riding the same road
Hello Jory - Matt,
Thank you for the kind words Jory and the referral Matt.
I'm only interjecting here just to clarify that nearly every opportunity
presented to BelWave has to be evaluated on a case by case basis. In this
particular case there were several criteria that dictated the price per M
my strange behavior, but
well...(get it? "Well", that's a deep subject,
LOL) well.because some of you asked me too
(cough cough Brad Belton cough cough).
Here goes..
It is somewhat of an interesting story I guess,
for inside industry people like us, or else this
might
: Thursday, September 13, 2007 12:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] The MOBL Sage (Warning: Long Post)
At 11:03 AM 9/13/2007, Brad Belton wrote:
>Thanks for taking the time to touch on some of your experiences with
>MobilePro. As you know my interest is because Jack Beech is m
rning: Long Post)
> At 01:04 PM 9/13/2007, Brad Belton wrote:
> >Sorry for the confusion. No Jack Beech is my brother's (Jack Belton)
> >brother-in-law.
>
> Ah, yeah now I remember you telling me that years ago. I do
> appreciate you refreshing my memory. Jack Beec
No worries here Allen, feel free to fire away. It's not like Beech is
blood...lol...and it's probably good people see and hear the stories (good
and bad) for their own good.
I will say in Beech's defense that it sounds like he was saddled with an
impossible task.
Best,
Brad
-Original
Kinda funny.the video says it delivered "perfect service" in the park while
only pulling up about a third of the www.localnews8.com website over several
seconds. Now compare that video to pulling up www.localnews8.com yourself.
It leaves quite a bit to be desired when comparing "broadband" service
Matt beat me to the punch, so I'll just add a "yah...what Matt said."
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 4:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: TowerStream (was Re: [WISPA] OT: vide
Exactly...we're setting up a 1.25Gbps link for a client with line speed
AES256 encryption. I believe the link meets and will be FIPS 140-2
compliant as well. However, even with this level of security on the link
hardware it is always best to encrypt BEFORE the data leaves your network.
Best,
B
espn.com took almost 15
seconds to completely load. :(
Travis
Microserv
Brad Belton wrote:
> Kinda funny.the video says it delivered "perfect service" in the park
while
> only pulling up about a third of the www.localnews8.com website over
several
> seconds. Now compare that
with indoor CPE. And that's at
50/50 downlink/uplink.
I don't know how much more can say due to NDA's. So I better stop here.
The point is I bet something wasn't right.
Mike Bushard, Jr
Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC
320-256-WISP (9477)
320-256-9478 Fax
-Original
Curious as to why Cogent would de-peer with anyone?
You're peered with LimeLight and WV Fiber?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 9:25 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
I read somewhere that you don't want to perform the latest "Update" from
Apple with a hacked IPhone. Something about the update can "break" the
hacked phones. Of course Apple says the update has no intention of doing
so...yah right!
Quick search came up with this:
http://www.daniusoft.com/news/
This doesn't come as a surprise. We deployed a couple VL units and they
were all but shut down due to a less than ideal RF environment. Countless
hours over days if not weeks with Alvarion's finest in an effort to remedy
the situation were unsuccessful.
Reflecting back on our particular scenario
Have to agree the iPhone is just plain cool. Sure makes my Sprint HTC Mogul
look like a clunky, dumpy brick by comparison! lol
I've been a Sprint wireless subscriber since their inception. Just can't
bring myself to jump ship...even for the iPhone.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
dband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 11:18 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?
This doesn't come as a surprise.
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 8:18 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?
This doesn't come as a surprise. We deployed a couple VL units and they
were all but shut down due to a less than ideal RF environment
D] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 8:18 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?
This doesn't come as a surprise. We deployed a couple VL units and they
were all but shut down due to a less than ideal RF environment.
Countless
hou
expending considerable effort to
salvage the client relationship.
Geeshh...give me a break!
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 11:18 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [
Hey Travis,
What calculator are you using and what is it telling you the expected rssi
will be?
Best,
Brad
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 11:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: R
I've been meaning to throw this out to a couple lists for some time now.
My father-in-law is looking for service and may be willing to provide space
for a tower as well. He tells me the local computer shop isn't aware of any
wireless providers in the area, but I know I've seen antennas on the dri
Well done Travis. Congratulations!
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Award
Hi,
I would like to publicly thank everyone in the W
Hello Ralph,
Very interesting read.
As an early Ricochet adopter I'd like to add one of these boxes to my "museum
collection" alongside my Ricochet PCMCIA card. Let me know off list if you can
come up with a good example.
Best,
Brad
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be
Wow, already down 30%+ this morning. Hate to say I told ya so (not your
Frank, but the list in general) on the over-valuation of Clearwire, but I
told ya so.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Frank Muto
Sent: Thursday, Novemb
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 8:21 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Sprint and Clearwire scrap WiMax deal
Wow, already down 30%+ this morning. Hate to say I told ya so (not your
Frank, but the list
hips, whether it be
with customers or real estate/property owners.
Mark my words In two years, Clearwire will either be bankrupt, or they
will be one of the major consolidators, BUYING up local WISPs.
Just my 2 cents.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadb
s.com/2007/11/good-day-bwia-4.html#more
We will see Sprint buying Clearwire and Craig McCaw as CEO of
Sprint-Nextel-Xohm-Clearwire
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
Wouldn't BGP multi-hop have worked in this situation?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ryan Langseth
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 10:11 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion VL TRUTH
You are correct.
We
ion for us, and my limited BGP
skills ;)
Although I do not think multi-hop BGP would have been any harder, it
just avoids the extra delay and load for us.
Ryan
On Nov 13, 2007, at 10:28 PM, Brad Belton wrote:
> Wouldn't BGP multi-hop have worked in this situation?
&g
Hello Cameron,
As good as Alvarion gear is or may be, it is still best effort gear and not
committed rate. Many factors will play into what an end user will actually
be able to produce across Alvarion gear.
If you are looking for a committed rate backhaul you need to look at the
Trango GigaLINK
Yes and yes they handle the license. Not sue if it was five days on the
license for us, but if they are telling you five days then I'd believe it.
The beamwidths are so tight on these links that the chances of you receiving
or causing interference is almost nil.
Best,
Brad
-Original Mess
Ok, here is a curve ball for you Butch; WinBox into a MikroTik router
running v2.8.
Only because recently you said you couldn't WinBox into a v2.8 client router
we were working on together from your Linux machine.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E
Just wouldn't be Christmas without Allen's annual post!
Merry Christmas Allen!
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Allen Marsalis
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 5:27 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WISPA
Just a suggestion, but I would cross reference your cable loss settings with
the manual's guidelines.
Your flaky behavior could be due to the ODU being overdriven or starved for
power. Then again if you've already had Trango looking into this I'm sure
they have already thought to double check y
EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bryan Scott
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:21 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for short licensed link
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brad Belton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Just a suggestion, but I w
AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for short licensed link
Brad Belton wrote:
> If you like, please provide me the cable length and type on each end.
Then
> provide me the loss figures you have entered for each side. We'll compare
> notes between yours and ours.
&g
Trango GigaLINK radios have eight wayside T1 circuits alongside four
independent copper GigE ports for data. If this is too pricy or overkill
then I would look into the RAD Data Communications Airmux-200. Gives you up
to four T1 ports along with Ethernet transport all in one package. Works
well
I think the point of the article is once big government got out of the way,
private interests (i.e. businesses) ran with the idea and it flourished.
Best,
Brad
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2
I've only seen this behavior twice from a Trango radio...it pains me to
admit the first time was user error. This happened during a new
installation. I was in a hurry.it turned out that one side had "opmode"
enabled and the other was not yet turned on! That'll pretty much guarantee
one way t
y traffic only?
On Jul 31, 2012, at 9:04 AM, Brad Belton wrote:
> If you are experiencing traffic lockups & Ethernet instability on
> several of Trango's models I would suggest looking into what common
> denominators are in play on these links. We have not had the trouble
&
Exactly. We've acquired many high value accounts that otherwise would have
been lost if the client got the incorrect impression that we couldn't serve
them.
A better approach would be for Rick to list the 70 ZIP codes and let the
membership speak up if they feel they can service the area.
We have facilitated several data circuits around the country. Should we
simply list every ZIP Code in the country?
Best,
Brad
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 12:06 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subje
om this information. I assume when more details are
known, you will get the opportunity to bid on various locations, whether
wirelessly or by data circuit (hardline).
Rick
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Friday, August
Agreed. I almost hit that $9ish range a week or so ago, but my order was
just a bit too late. My stake in UBNT is very small, but have been
averaging down and it's been entertaining at the very least to watch.
Hoping to acquire a few more shares tomorrow if the price is right!
Vegas or the st
o low?
On Aug 10, 2012, at 0:19, George Rogato wrote:
After hours had a low of $6.90
http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/ubnt/after-hours
There was a lot of transactions.
On 8/9/2012 7:05 PM, Brad Belton wrote:
Agreed. I almost hit that $9ish range a week or so ago, but my order was just
a bi
, the more shares they can buy back with the $100M
repurchase. That will also flush out some of the whiny investors who don’t
really have any faith in the company.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Brad Belton
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2
ny faith in the company.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 8:11 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquity ... Stock Price .. News ...
It will be interesting to watch today a
Jeff,
Always enjoy your input on the various topics discussed. Keep me posted as
to where you end up.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick - Lists
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 9:03 AM
To: 'WI
Relatively speaking we deploy few UBNT radios as compared to many operators
here, but ever since v5.3.2 we haven't had any issues with UBNT lockups or
UBNT radios requiring a power cycle. Install and forget. Very pleased with
their radios.
I think the UBNT router platform is premature and would
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Doug Clark wrote:
Just had a RocketM5 running 5.5.2 hang up and need a powercycle to come back
to life two days ago. Maybe it has something to do with Utah
---Original Message---
From: Brad
Hello Ben,
We are very interested in UBNT multi-megapixel cameras. Love to see some
5MP or 10MP cameras! We have one airCAM that we've been playing with, but
as expected it pales in comparison to the Arecont 5105's we currently use.
If UBNT wants to truly be "market disruptive" than they
Good to hear you’re back Patrick. All the best and Happy Thanksgiving.
Brad
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 7:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Thanksg
Agreed. A carpenter once told me that some tools require more skill than other
tools to use properly and get the desired results. This isn’t meant as a jab
towards anyone, but I feel is an honest truth. I know there are several tools
in my bag that I wish I was more skilled with…MikroTik incl
Hello Ian,
I'm certain we can serve your Dallas site.
Thanks,
Brad
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Ian Framson
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 6:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] WISP Referral Needed in Dallas, TX
H
Why fiber if only 10M?
Brad
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 8:33 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Need 10M transport in Ashburn VA
Not that I can do it, but transport to where?
Link / URL for this router? Specs?
Brad
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:20 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik launches CCR Router with SFP+ ports
CCR1036-8G-2S+
2
We're very familiar with PACS. Not sure what if anything you need to do
unless the network is congested. Typically the remote user will either have
a pptp or ipsec tunnel back to the server/network. The bandwidth the remote
user has available to them (at home, hotel etc.) will obviously vary
dep
Thanks Cameron…and yes, we are very close to this location with a couple
towers. Not a problem for us to provide several hundred Mbps here within a day
or so. Gigabit or beyond with a little more time!
I sent an email off list to Scott, but I am running out of the office right
this minute.
DROID
Brad Belton wrote:
Thanks Cameron…and yes, we are very close to this location with a couple
towers. Not a problem for us to provide several hundred Mbps here within a day
or so. Gigabit or beyond with a little more time!
I sent an email off list to Scott, but I am running out of the o
1 - 100 of 626 matches
Mail list logo
