and
I was able to get close to 16 megs!
---Original Message---
From: Carl Shivers
Date: 1/17/2012 8:58:47 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
We are planning to sell a mixture of speeds using our Ubiquiti 3.65 APs; 1,3
5 and 10 Mbps circuits. We
with a KPP reflector and
I was able to get close to 16 megs!
*---Original Message---*
*From:* Carl Shivers cshiv...@aristotle.net
*Date:* 1/17/2012 8:58:47 AM
*To:* 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
We are planning to sell a mixture
Does the M365 force AirMax?
Steve Barnes
General Manager
PCS-WIN / RC-WiFihttp://www.rcwifi.com/
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:19 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
** **
I have just completed testing and using a RocketM365 with a Nano365 with
a KPP reflector and I was able to get close to 16 megs!
5mhz channel?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
No it does not. You can turn off Airmax if you wish. On Point to
Multi-point I would not recommend not
using Airmax though
---Original Message---
From: Steve Barnes
Date: 1/18/2012 8:20:42 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
Does the M365
-point I would not recommend not
using Airmax though
*---Original Message---*
*From:* Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com
*Date:* 1/18/2012 8:20:42 AM
*To:* WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
Does the M365 force AirMax
/---Original Message---/
/*From:*/ Steve Barnes mailto:st...@pcswin.com
/*Date:*/ 1/18/2012 8:20:42 AM
/*To:*/ WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org
/*Subject:*/ Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
Does the M365 force AirMax?
__ __
Steve Barnes
General
Sorry, I was looking at a M5. Too many tests going on right now!
Josh is right. The Airmax box is greyed out.
---Original Message---
From: Josh Luthman
Date: 1/18/2012 9:00:54 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
Double check your AP, Doug
Thanks all for the info. I was out yesterday and wasn't able to respond.
Thanks again.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Carl Shivers
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 9:59 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
We
We are planning to sell a mixture of speeds using our Ubiquiti 3.65 APs;
1,3,5 and 10 Mbps circuits. We are a bit concerned on how many clients we
can get on each AP. Does anyone have some stats on this? Most of our
customers would be in the 1 and 3 Mbps range. Only a few are purchasing the
5 and
Unfortunately you asked a question that doesn't have a great solid answer.
You're going to need to monitor throughput usage on the sector to really
answer that question for you.
However, with that said, you can probably get upwards of 30-50 on a
sector without issue.
Matt Hoppes
Director of
That's a pretty good range of what I've heard also. 30-50.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 11:10 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 APs
How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues.
Thanks
Patrick Nix, Jr.,
Computer Network Solutions
CSWEB.NET Internet Services
Less coverage then 3.65 for sure.
On Jun 22, 2011 11:28 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr pni...@cnetworksolutions.com
wrote:
How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65
I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.
The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
if 3.65GHz could handle it.
I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is
linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85
What was the signal of the first link in 900?
On Jun 22, 2011 11:41 AM, Simon Westlake si...@powercode.com wrote:
I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.
The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
if 3.65GHz could handle it.
I am
: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax
I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.
The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
if 3.65GHz could handle it.
I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is
linked up with a noise
It wasn't working at the time. I don't know if it was a signal issue
though, this guy just ended up being in a good spot to beta test worst
case 3.65GHz scenario.
On 6/22/2011 10:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
What was the signal of the first link in 900?
On Jun 22, 2011 11:41 AM, Simon Westlake
@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax
I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.
The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
if 3.65GHz could handle it.
I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test
: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax
It wasn't working at the time. I don't know if it was a signal issue
though, this guy just ended up being in a good spot to beta test worst
case 3.65GHz scenario.
On 6/22/2011 10:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
What was the signal of the first link in 900?
On Jun 22
] On
Behalf Of Simon Westlake
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:41 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax
I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.
The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
if 3.65GHz could handle
://stlbroadband.com/ St. Louis Broadband
314.974.5600
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:01 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax
Hi Victoria,
In total seriousness, if one of my
You are asking a fair question, but the answer to this question is based
on a lot of IF's and But's
Frequency of 3.65 should have very similar characteristics of 2.4
UBNT Dual Polarity appears to have a great advantage over single
polarity when shooting thru Foliage
Going thru Foliage has
.
- Jerry
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Patrick D. Nix, Jr
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:58 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax
In a LOS situation with say -70 or so what kind of throughput
: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:58 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax
In a LOS situation with say -70 or so what kind of throughput with UBNT
3.65? Also on the FCC Registration do I file as Common Carrier, Non-Common,
or Private?
Thanks,
Patrick Nix, Jr
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax
However, if you are only putting one AP on a tower, you could go with a 25MHz
wide channel and get 25watts EIRP (44dB) at the AP and CPE ends. That's A LOT
of punch to get hrough foliage, BUT leaves no room for growth.
What's wrong
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:58 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax
In a LOS situation with say -70 or so what kind of throughput with
UBNT 3.65? Also on the FCC Registration do I file as Common
Carrier, Non-Common, or Private
Isnt a 40mhz channel in 3.65ghz against the rules?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Nash
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
I really can't remember about throughput
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
Isnt a 40mhz channel in 3.65ghz against the rules?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
--
From: Mark Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
Yes, but my message wasn't clear. When I said
We have a link that sits at -50 and its max on a 40MHz channel
Mark,
Just getting this far, are there any experiences you would care to share?
Thanks,
Message: 24
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:34:02 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:34:02 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
reply-type=original
Although I got my license
Using StarOS, we have tested them with 3.5GHz antennas. They got what we
would expect them to get with respect to SNR, with a slight loss due to the
3.5GHz antennas.
Two issues...
1. We purchased some of the original XR3's, but then they came out with the
new version XR3 - 3.7 which had
.
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
Using StarOS, we have tested them with 3.5GHz antennas. They got what we
would expect them to get with respect to SNR
-
From: Joel White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 1:34 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
Mark,
Just getting this far, are there any experiences you would care to share?
Thanks,
Message: 24
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:34:02 -0800
From: [EMAIL
I believe Mark in... Oregon has done so.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Joel White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 9:38 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti
@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
I believe Mark in... Oregon has done so.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Joel White [EMAIL PROTECTED
Anyone out there using the Ubiquiti 3.65 legally registered with the FCC?
Any ups or downs or knowledge you care to share?
TIA
Best Regards,
Joel
NexGenAccess Inc.
www.nexgenaccess.com
740-513-4122
NexGenAccess Inc. http://www.nexgenaccess.com
Joel White wrote:
Anyone out there using the Ubiquiti 3.65 legally registered with the FCC?
Any ups or downs or knowledge you care to share?
I would love to get an answer to this as well.
WISPA Wants You!
I'm putting stuff up the first of the week next week. I'll post results.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Joel White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 7:38 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65
Joel White wrote:
Anyone out there using the Ubiquiti 3.65 legally registered with the FCC?
Any ups or downs or knowledge you care to share?
I would love to get
41 matches
Mail list logo
