: Re: [WISPA] Tracking Signal / Noise / Resends / Etc.
I could be mis-remembering this, or confusing things (say, a tower
where
we replaced a 5800 with a 5830 or vice-versa), and if I'm wrong I'll cop
to it. But I truly believe, with religious fervor and zeal, that Trango
has
There are 2 fundamentally different approaches for monitoring.
[1] Poll parameters and strip-chart them displaying some specific duration
of history. In this approach data rolls off the end of the strip-chart and
is not retained. Only numerical data can be displayed graphically is
For StarOS we use MRTG and Starutil. You should be able to graph anything
that Starutil can provide.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: 03 November 2005 17:33
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Tracking Signal / Noise
At the risk of derailing (sorry, boss), has anyone gotten MRTG or
something similar (PRTG, Denika, or whatever) to reliably track *anything*
on a Trango?
Sure. TrangoLINK-10 integrated with Nagios and MRTG.
However, I had to write a wrapper perl script around the Nagios
RSSI check_command
] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: 03 November 2005 20:10
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tracking Signal / Noise / Resends / Etc.
rcomroe wrote:
There are 2 fundamentally different approaches for monitoring.
[ stuff ]
For reference, in the network Scriv is describing, there's a nasty
] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 1:10 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tracking Signal / Noise / Resends / Etc.
rcomroe wrote:
There are 2 fundamentally different approaches for monitoring.
[ stuff ]
For reference, in the network Scriv is describing
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tracking Signal / Noise / Resends / Etc.
Thank you Paul. This is exactly what I was looking for in regard o
customer links. If we take a service call it would be nice to see what a
customer's historical data has been in regard to signal levels,
bandwidth used, etc. It sounds
rcomroe wrote:
Under no circumstances should
any
manufacturer CHANGE THE DEFINITION OF A PREVIOUSLY DEFINED OID.
and yet...
Trango's MIBs for the 5800 and 5830 are wildly different. Never mind that
they're substantially the same hardware (from the point of view of how
you use them in your
5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tracking Signal / Noise / Resends / Etc.
rcomroe wrote:
Under no circumstances should
any
manufacturer CHANGE THE DEFINITION OF A PREVIOUSLY DEFINED OID.
and yet...
Trango's MIBs for the 5800 and 5830 are wildly different. Never mind that
they're substantially
rcomroe wrote:
On another part of David's reply he comments on interface.InOctets.
And don't even get me started on
the fact that they don't use the same Enterprise MIBs that pretty much
everyone else on the planet uses for 'interface.InOctets' and so on.
The interfaces MIB is a standard part
10 matches
Mail list logo
