And CrazyBrowser (IE)
www.crazybrowser.com
its awesome :)
cheers!
Original Message Follows
From: James Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] do people still use bookmarks?
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 11:56:28 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Rec
Not to miss the blessing of tabbed browsing where I can bookmark a group
of tabs, then open the tabs all in one go. I think the browsers that do
this are Mozilla and Safari - not sure about Opera 6/7.
Cheers
James
Mark Stanton wrote:
Yes my firebird links toolbar looks like:
- AClientNa
Thanks for all those thoughts - I'd guessed it pretty much but it's
nice to have confirmation. I'll let you know what the site owners say!
(www.newstatesman.co.uk had a similar problem and were oblivious to the
fact the site didn't work on anything other than their setup. I ended
up emailing th
This is quite an interesting off-topic thread!
On 12 Dec 2003, at 07:17, Gary Menzel wrote:
Agree that you need to own the directory structure. The directory
structure for a site should make sense to the owner of the
information. It
may make no sense at all to a user of the information.
Mmm...
With all the OT posts lately - I don't feel as guilty posting this : )
I have always wanted to be able to make my bookmarks available. From anywhere.
Everywhere. Home, work, cafe's, mate's houses - even the in-laws. Maybe even my dingy
PDA.
I always envisioned it being a plugin that worked in
> "URL's change"
With all due respect Gary...
http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html (look for "I didn't think URLs
have to be persistent - that was URNs")
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201
Fax: 9956 8433
http:/
> I think "logical to the user not the owner" is spot in for the website
> navigation.
Definitely agree with that.
> But the actual directory structure, where you put your content, you need
to
> own that. And the #1 rule I aim for is that you don't want to change
your
> directory structure (wher
> For myself, only rarely.
> I still think it's nice to have a URL that
> can sort of be read
I suppose the place I am coming from on this is that...
"URL's change"
Many sites are updated regularly and things move around. There is no
gaurantee that something you bookmark (or remember) tod
>>
It's more to do with usability than accessibility, as it affects all
users IMHO. But as a start, a logical directory structure is important,
so long as it's logical to the user not the owner.
<<
Well, I agree and disagree.
I think "logical to the user not the owner" is spot in for the website
