Hello!
I've an extrange problem, you can see it here:
http://www.2much4u.net/Problem/problem.gif
The page with the XHTML and CSS: http://www.2much4u.net/Problem/example.html
Page code source:
G'day
The page with the XHTML and CSS:
http://www.2much4u.net/Problem/example.html
...
Why there's a margin with any browser excepts IE6?
Because the default alignment for images in most of the other
browsers is baseline. Add the following to your CSS and see if
it fixes the problem:
Thanks Bert! that solved my problem.
Bert Doorn escribi:
G'day
The page with the XHTML and CSS:
http://www.2much4u.net/Problem/example.html
...
Why there's a margin with any browser excepts
IE6?
Because the default alignment for images in most of the other
Absalom Media wrote:
Amount of Javascript disabled based on various client profiles I've got:
My site: Less than 0.1%
Commercial music site: Less than 0.5%
Commercial / education health care site: Less than 0.7%
What methodology are you using to identify humans as opposed to search
engines
What methodology are you using to identify humans as opposed to search
engines and other robots?
-sorry this doesnt awnser your question and
maybe this its not worth mentioning-
Even hotmail.com doesnt work if javascript is disabled.
That says something i think.
Of course there is the search
Second day and I keep coming back to the same problem...IE6/7 keeps
placing a hortizontal scrollbar on this template. IE5, however, does
not.
http://client.vaska.com/escaut/index5.php
There are a number of other issues here (like the height of a div
being created by javascript) that I'll
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
height:1% or height:0 or whatever height you set gives layout to an
element, which is not the case with display:inline.
Making sure an element hasLayout is a big tool in the box when it comes to
fix IE bugs.
Just FYI, over on CSS-D there was a thread today about a web
I'm guessing its due to the overflow: auto; in your #content div.
Remove that, and use the DOM and some _javascript_ to reset your footers
(tutorial on http://www.alistapart.com/articles/footers/ )
On 2/10/06, Vaska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second day and I keep coming back to the same
Ian Anderson wrote:
IE7 will respect height: 1%, which if not filtered away from it could
break many layouts. They are retaining hasLayout as an internal property
and recommend using zoom: 100% for inducing hasLayout as a replacement
technique for height: 1%.
Which W3C
This article does not create a footer that is fixed to the bottom of
the screen. If your content is longer it will push the footer off the
bottom of the screen.
On 10 Feb 2006, at 11:33, Robbie Shepherd wrote:
I'm guessing its due to the overflow: auto; in your #content div.
Remove that,
ah yes youre right, I see what you're trying to do now...(though heaven knows why! :P I'm sure you have your reasons though :)
sorry I threw you a red herring thereOn 2/10/06, Vaska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This article does not create a footer that is fixed to the bottom ofthe screen. If your
Bert Doorn wrote:
Which W3C standard/recommendation for CSS defines the zoom property?
I don't see it in the CSS 2.1 spec.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/propidx.html
Look in MS special non-standard instead.
If indeed it's not defined in any CSS standard/recommendation, are MS
effectively
Hello!
I want to create an horizontal bar with some elements on it, some text,
a text box for searches, and date time, just below the top part
of the page.
What's the best way to create a vertical-center content with XHTML 1.0
Strict and CSS2?
Thanks!
2006/2/10, Roberto Santana [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello!
I want to create an horizontal bar with some elements on it, some text,
a text box for searches, and date time, just below the top part
of the page.
What's the best way to create a vertical-center content with XHTML 1.0
Strict and
Roberto Santana wrote:
I want to create an horizontal bar with some elements on it, some text,
a text box for searches, and date time, just below the top part of the
page.
What's the best way to create a vertical-center content with XHTML 1.0
Strict and CSS2?
Don't know about best, but...
From: Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which W3C standard/recommendation for CSS defines the zoom property?
I don't see it in the CSS 2.1 spec.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/propidx.html
If indeed it's not defined in any CSS standard/recommendation, are
MS effectively saying: We recommend you
On 09/02/06, Conyers, Dwayne, Mr [C] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I believe accessibility is an important design issue, is there legal
precedent for suing someone for poor design? It seems a bit like suing
Mickey Dees for spilling hot coffee in the lap...
Yes, but spilling hot coffee in the
I wholeheartedly agree with these incorrect/correct replies for a forum
such as this one.
About two or three years ago while reading a newsgroup post for Borland
Delphi someone posted suggested rules for posting on any forum or
newsgroup which was excellent, in the same vein as these by Russ...of
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Unfortunately, top posting (or failing to quote at all) is often the
result users of broken e-mail clients (usually Outlook or some web
based mail). I find the best approach is to just set a good example,
and hope that others eventually get the idea and/or switch mail
On Feb 10, 2006, at 8:24 AM, Rob Mientjes wrote:
On 09/02/06, Conyers, Dwayne, Mr [C] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: While I believe accessibility is an important design issue,
is there legal precedent for suing someone for poor design? It
seems a bit like suing Mickey Dees for spilling hot
I want to create an horizontal
bar with some elements on it, some text,
a text box for searches, and date time, just below the top part
of the page.
I've used this example:
http://www.wellstyled.com/css-single-line-vertical-centering.html
Thanks Nuno and Bert!
Conyers, Dwayne, Mr
While I believe accessibility is an important design issue,
is there legal
precedent for suing someone for poor design?
Does the Ramada/Priceline debacle count?
http://news.com.com/Travel+sites+agree+to+changes+for+the+blind/2100-1038_3-5318568.html
P
Sorry to break this to you, but you're trying to accomplish something that's as good as impossible (maybe not impossible, but you're most likely to unless you drop IE5 or alternatively give it another stylesheet that don't have a fixed footer. It just won't work for IE5 because of something or
haha...after two days and coming back to the same problem four
times...i got the message!
thanks for th enote though...
;)
On 10 Feb 2006, at 17:43, Vincent Hasselgård wrote:
Sorry to break this to you, but you're trying to accomplish
something that's as good as impossible (maybe not
Stephen Stagg wrote:
And how, pray tell, would a screen reader know - based on a series of
presentational rules - what the meaning of a made-up tag soup is?
The same way that they would with normal HTML, by reading the XML, and
the stylesheet and guessing, if an element has the
Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
http://mcdowell.sitesbyjoe.com/agents.asp
Trouble is if I stick a floated element in the center column and then
try to clear it with another element, the element with the style of
clear clears the whole left column instead of just the floated
element within the
http://solardreamstudios.com/learn/css/footerstick was one I remember
from ages ago, but there's now a message there pointing to a revised
version: http://www.themaninblue.com/experiment/footerStickAlt/
Not certain this is the behaviour you want, but it's pretty nifty nonetheless.
On 2/11/06,
I discovered something weird today. When I was creating my
layout that contains includes for some reason my rules would not work properly
only if the layout was like this.
-- code starts
Main Layout
div id=header
Include header.php;
/div
div id=content
Include content.php;
My sincerist apologies to Thierry, his interpretation of Nielsen was
indeed correct. And thanks, I have certainly learnt something
With reference to the articles Thierry cited earlier Jakob Nielsen
responded to my request for clarification as follows:
Does this imply that links to
Nic,
Whoops! I missed that subtle distinction between the ADA and the Rehab
Act. It's been a rough week. Slap me with a blink tag.
In any case, I really would like to see a Section 508 (or ADA) case here in
the States brought against a private company. The law itself needs a court
challenge
Does this mean we're supposed to make all the sites we've ever made useless in IE5 and IE6?Maybe it's time we just give up on Internet Explorer and design for standards compliant browsers instead?The sad thing is that of course everyone who's using Explorer will blame the designer of the site and
In the store itself they wouldn't see any better but would still pick out shirts, pants, etc. It is the alt tags that make the difference for their software to read a site. Without the alt tags the software doesn't tell them if it's a shirt or a wheelbarrow.
LauraOn 2/9/06, Leslie Riggs [EMAIL
On 10 Feb 2006, at 19:14, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Stephen Stagg wrote:
And how, pray tell, would a screen reader know - based on a
series of presentational rules - what the meaning of a made-up
tag soup is?
The same way that they would with normal HTML, by reading the XML,
and the
Vincent Hasselgård wrote:
Does this mean we're supposed to make all the sites we've ever made
useless in IE5 and IE6?
No need to dump earlier versions. IE7 has some bug-fixes and somewhat
better selector-support. Apart from that it's just an IE6 which is
slightly harder to make behave like a
Dennis Lapcewich wrote:
In any case, I really would like to see a Section 508 (or ADA) case here in
the States brought against a private company.
According to http://www.phillipsnizer.com/internetlib.htm, there has
been a Court challenge under the ADA and the private company won:
Access
On 2/10/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vincent Hasselgård wrote:
The sad thing is that of course everyone who's using Explorer will
blame the designer of the site and our clients will rip the hair out
of their heads because most people use IE anyway.
Don't panic...
Sit down
Stephen Stagg wrote:
Screen readers look at the structure of the document, which is clearly
defined as it's standardised in the HTML specification.
And they PRESENT it to someone with visual impairment, The
presentational properties should be set in the presentational layer
So by your
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
generic XML + CSS would be meaningless without some third technology
that defines semantics (a DTD, XBL, etc)
Neither a DTD nor XBL define document semantics at all. A DTD only
defines the document syntax and structure. XBL is only a binding
language for attaching
38 matches
Mail list logo
