If the link is from the same domain as the email of the poster,
Then I'm glad I didn't tread in it..
I'm calling Barker's Eggs.
Chris
Sent from my iPhone
On 26/04/2012, at 11:59 AM, James Litten ja...@insydney.com.au wrote:
Hello Steve,
Google glass are attached to a frame like
Russ,
It's the Friday evening of a long weekend - and you take the time to
give code examples??
And you still can't see why everyone here thinks you are both a *Web
Standards* and *Nice Guy* Superhero?!?
Have a great weekend Russ.
I admire your dedication.
And so should all of us!!
;-)
Chris
Marvin, that is great.
Thank you for sharing.
Sincerely.
Chris
Sent from my iPhone
On 23/09/2011, at 10:32 AM, Marvin Hunkin startrekc...@gmail.com
wrote:
hi.
if you visit http://www.dickbaldwin.com, got this program link from
the top tid bits from http://top.enterprises.com
and it is a
We all go through this every holiday season Nick.
Look at the big picture.
Russ provides us with a great resource. For free.
1st auto responder message, and you are gone. Guilty until proven
guilty.
Just look at the first line, or header, then delete.
That's the deal. And Russ could charge.
He
Sorry for asking, but does any one else think this thread is a
webstandards topic?
I.e. How a font in Microsoft Publisher displays?
I'm having issues with IE7 crashing.
Is that a web standards issue list topic too???
Just a long day, a bit jaded, and not happy wading through a pile of
I'll just address one you raised Jens.
Google does not currently parse external Javascript files. So unless
Fairfax uses simple inline Javascript, and exposes spiderable URLS,
that's probably good enough for most of us to use progressive
enhancement methodology . Ask Lucas. When he gets
I think the answer is...
Yes, technically, there probably is more fibre nutrition in the
cardboard box
:)
Sent from my iPhone
On 16/06/2009, at 10:51 AM, Mike Kear w...@afpwebworks.com wrote:
This is off-topic for this list so please respond direct to me
rather than
the list ...
We can flag text that appears to be hidden using CSS at Google. To
date we have not algorithmically removed sites for doing that. We try
hard to avoid throwing babies out with bathwater.
MattCutts at Oct 21 2005 - 02:09
That was nearly 4 years ago - One of the issues is that sometimes,
Google
Hi guys,
Just to clarify. Google reads the sourcecode. In the order the
sourcecode is presented. Of course you can reposition with css. That
doesn't change the order of the sourcecode. Google doesn't generally
request the CSS file (check your logs) - unless other flags are
indicated (e.g
Q. What is the percentage of
population that does not have javascript enabled?
A. 100% of search engine spiders.
So if you don't want your site fully spidered.
***
List Guidelines:
Did anyone else see this??
will be seeking orders from the Federal Court forcing Virgin Blue
to make their websites accessible to the disabled as required under
the Federal Disability Discrimination Act or to take those websites
off-line.
I still think this guidance is good advice...
Try to use Flash only where it is needed. Many rich media sites such
as Google's YouTube use Flash for rich media but rely on HTML for
content and navigation. You can too, by limiting Flash to on-page
accents and rich media, not content and
-501ei=UTF-8
Best
Chris
The example I gave
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Elle Meredith
li...@designbyelle.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:51:52, Chris Dimmock wrote:
Actually, using the 'title' attribute in a link does NOT add a little
bit of SEO. Title element ('Page Title') - yes
Hi Jens
Actually, using the 'title' attribute in a link does NOT add a little
bit of SEO. Title element ('Page Title') - yes for SEO - but title
attribute - no.
Try it yourself. Put a few words in a title attribute - words which
don't otherwise appear on your page. The once Google has re-indexed
Thanks for the detailed précis of the iinet situation.
Next time I get booked for speeding on the Sydney - Newcastle freeway,
I think I'll sue the RTA. Well, after all, they provided me with the
road
;-)
Or maybe if you do speed, and don't get caught, then you can sue the
Police for
And congratulations to John Allsopp for having his earlier research
cited by Google!
Did anyone else notice that Google finally put paid to the rubbish
urban legend metadata meta name=revisit-after ?
Chris Dimmock
http://www.cogentis.com.au/
On 1/26/06, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Michael Cordover's comments were the correct answer. :)Here is an excerpt from an Interview with Matt Cutts, Google engineer, just last month:Q: In more general terms, what do you think is the relationship between Google and the W3C? Do you think it would be important for Google to
e.g. be
I wonder how many visits Google gets in a day...?
Brian - I'm not sure how many visits Google gets in a day,but Danny Sullivan reported on the Nielsen netratings numbers back in Julythat Google has 46.2%market share of 4.5 billion searches/ month
The SMH redesign is now live - just noticed
:)
I like the layout - but they've dropped the ball with over 200
validation errors...
Chris
www.cogentis.com.au
On 10/30/05, John Allsopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
last week http;//theage.com.au launched a redesign, and early next
week, it
So do the most popular Search Engines reward valid design?If so is there any proof or statements issued by search engines to confirm
this?
Semantic code is generally rewarded by ranking (i.e. relevance)
Accessible code is generally rewarded by spidering. Valid code is generally rewarded by SE's
Just wanted to clarify this area with some references.
Meta keywords - no - no search engine publically acknowdges that they refer to them.
Meta descriptions - yes - see below - but DMoz is often a factor as well
Meta robots - yes - see below
1. you can use robots.txt OR meta robots:
[quote]Use
have said that they would rtfm if there was an fm to fr
:)This is me http://www.cogentis.com.au No pics.
Chris Dimmock
World Usability Day, on November 3, 2005 is designed to promote the
fields of usability engineering and user-centered design.
More info:
http://www.worldusabilityday.net/about
Chris Dimmock
Cogentis Internet Marketing
www.cogentis.com.au
think Peter, John, Russ et
al are doing a great job.
Anyone else see a need for a manager level session to provide a range
of commercial justifications for adopting webstandards?
Chris Dimmock
Cogentis Internet Marketing Strategies
http://www.cogentis.com.au/
On 5/4/05, Peter Firminger [EMAIL
Tom Livingston wrote:
Flash actually is searchable. There's even a
search SDK for search engines. It's also
accessible, with tab order/indexing, etc.
Search SDK was designed as a tool for search engines themselves to
extract data from Flash (up to V6) files - the key issue, as outlined
below, is
.
However, as Andrew mentioned - the biggest risk of detection is human
detection and reporting. Your competitors are the threat. Whether
Google acts on specific spam reports - that's the risk you can take.
Feeling Lucky?
:)
Best regards
Chris Dimmock
Cogentis Search Engine Marketing
http
I think its important to actually note that it is a ninemsn content
partner - not ninemsn itself - whose site is causing the problem. Note
the redirection http://sib1.od2.com Its a branded content partner
site.
Chris
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 21:50:26 -0700, Shane Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep.
Hi,
Taco asked: Are there currently any laws in Australia that dictate a
website should be accessible to vision impaired people etc.?
Answer: Yes - The legislation is the Disability Discrimination Act 1992.
I wrote an overview of the (specifically) Australian situation a while
back, with links
Will,
Your new site looks fine to me. My only constructive comment is that
you should rethink your 'ahem' comments - as search engine spiders are
effectively text based browsers.
Telling Googlebot etc Our site should still be completely usable to
you, it just won't look as good as it could
29 matches
Mail list logo
