Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-25 Thread Steve Olive
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 23:49, Ryan Lin wrote: Hi all, With the XHTML Strict DTD, forcing a new window to open for a link via target=_blank is not a valid semantic method anymore. I myself believe that whether to open in a new or current window should be user decision, not wed

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-25 Thread Ryan Lin
Steve, The other aspect of XHTML Strict DTD, the client won't even know unless I take my time to explain everything but this target stuff is something they will notice if they ask me to open certain links in new window. That's why I need arguments against this. :) XHTML Strict and 1.1 has

RE: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-25 Thread michael.brockington
, 2007 10:45 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank From: David Hucklesby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hmm. What's easy to use when you wind up with a bunch of spawned windows that must be closed one by one? I'm not advocating popup windows, but with a simple script is very

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-25 Thread Designer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That has to be just about the nastiest version of all - I click a link and get a new window. Fine, not what I wanted, but there was that other link that looked interesting, I'll just go back to the first window and open a few more links before I read that page. Hey!

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-25 Thread Gaspar
frames for simplicity, ease of navigation ?! for u i think!! u cant just think that's right just because u do it's easy for u... On 25/07/07, Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That has to be just about the nastiest version of all - I click a link and get a new

RE: [Spam] Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-25 Thread Christie Mason
I'm not sure who wrote the below, but I'm hoping it was a sarcastic comment and not someone's real impression of real users. I've never met a user who even liked frames, and that includes me. Also, perhaps I missed a thread, but I've wondering if the increasing use of tabs has overcome any new

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-25 Thread ron zisman
hey steve, without going into pros and cons on the target attribute, roger johansson has an interesting article on the subject with a javascript solution the degrades to opening in the same window if java is turned off or pop ups blocked. some clients want what they want and won't be

[WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Ryan Lin
Hi all, With the XHTML Strict DTD, forcing a new window to open for a link via target=_blank is not a valid semantic method anymore. I myself believe that whether to open in a new or current window should be user decision, not wed designer/developer. If I am using Strict DTD, the only way to

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Tim Offenstein
So what argument should I give to my clients not to use target=_blank ? If I say that won't validate your page, they won't care. So any non-technical argument that I can give to them? Ryan The best non-technical argument I can think of is that this approach breaks the back button. Jakob

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Hassan Schroeder
Ryan Lin wrote: With the XHTML Strict DTD, forcing a new window to open for a link via target=_blank is not a valid semantic method anymore. I myself believe that whether to open in a new or current window should be user decision, not wed designer/developer. Why? If you have logical

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Ryan Lin
Well, I am just gathering more argument points so that the clients have nothing to say but to agree and accept the concept. :) Hassan Schroeder wrote: Ryan Lin wrote: With the XHTML Strict DTD, forcing a new window to open for a link via target=_blank is not a valid semantic method

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Mike at Green-Beast.com
of. Or to provide some preference control widget. My two cents. Cheers. Mike Cherim - Original Message - From: Ryan Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 11:21 AM Subject: Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank Well, I am just gathering more argument points so

RE: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread michael.brockington
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Lin Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 4:21 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank Well, I am just gathering more argument points so that the clients have nothing to say but to agree

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread insure
Personally I prefer links to open in the same Window. But that's me. And I don't want to force my preference on anyone. That's why it's nicer to leave it to the user to decide. The only way to let users decide is to open links in the same window by default and teach said users a function of

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Brian Cummiskey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry but I don't agree...to a point. As a web designer and user myself, I prefer opening another window IF it is to a different website that I am referring them to. That way the customer doesn't go wondering thru the other website and forget to come back to mine.

RE: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Joyce Evans
I agree with you completely, but we are definitely in the minority here. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 12:19 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Chris Price
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I prefer opening another window IF it is to a different website that I am referring them to. That way the customer doesn't go wondering thru the other website and forget to come back to mine. Mine will always be open in the background to remind them (kind of like I'm

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Andrew Maben
On Jul 24, 2007, at 1:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That way the customer doesn't go wondering thru the other website and forget to come back to mine. If you go to the mall, would you be happier if every store you entered assigned a staff member to accompany you so you don't forget to

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread David Hucklesby
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:19:21 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personally I prefer links to open in the same Window. But that's me. And I don't want to force my preference on anyone. That's why it's nicer to leave it to the user to decide. The only way to let users decide is to open

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread insure
That way the customer doesn't go wondering thru the other website and forget to come back to mine. Further, it's a misunderstanding of the dynamics of the relationship to speak of users visiting your site. On the contrary, the user is extending an invitation to your site to visit HER browser, on

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Andrew Freedman
Firstly I have no argument for you to give your customer. Having a new window is not like having windows pop up automatically. If there is a requirement for the content to be displayed in a new window then why use a different doc type for that one page? Now when I mention requirement' I

RE: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Joyce Evans
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Cc: Andrew Maben Subject: Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank On Jul 24, 2007, at 1:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That way the customer doesn't go wondering thru the other website and forget to come back to mine. If you go to the mall, would you be happier if every

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Nick Fitzsimons
On Tue, July 24, 2007 6:19 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry but I don't agree...to a point. As a web designer and user myself, I prefer opening another window IF it is to a different website that I am referring them to. That way the customer doesn't go wondering thru the other website and

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Rimantas Liubertas
I used to work for a web development company who designed a website for a large homebuilder. At the bottom of the home page, we had a link to our website, i.e. Site designed by ourCompany. We did not use target=_blank. When our homebuilder customer clicked on our link and found themselves in

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Dave Lane
Wow, that's very well said, especially your clarification of the relationship dynamics between the website and the visitor. Thanks, Dave Andrew Maben wrote: If you go to the mall, would you be happier if every store you entered assigned a staff member to accompany you so you don't forget to

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Al Sparber
From: David Hucklesby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hmm. What's easy to use when you wind up with a bunch of spawned windows that must be closed one by one? I'm not advocating popup windows, but with a simple script is very easy to open popup windows while reusing the same window. That is, maximum number

visitor -- invitor -- was: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Sander Aarts
Andrew Maben schreef: Further, it's a misunderstanding of the dynamics of the relationship to speak of users visiting your site. On the contrary, the user is extending an invitation to your site to visit HER browser, on HER computer, in HER home or workplace, so you (we) are beholden to the

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Jermayn Parker
Unless im mistaken the original question was asking about some ideas to sell strict DTD to the client (which means no target=blank code) and not whether users/ designers prefer to have windows open in seperate windows. That discussion was last week, so discuss in that. about the original

Re: [WSG] Using target=_blank

2007-07-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Ryan Lin wrote: With the XHTML Strict DTD, forcing a new window to open for a link via target=_blank is not a valid semantic method anymore. I myself believe that whether to open in a new or current window should be user decision, not wed designer/developer. If I am using Strict DTD, the only