RE: [WSG] Site check please

On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 12:31:30 +1000, Taco Fleur wrote: >> Without even trying to be "obsessive compulsive" I can report that there >> is not enough room for the form labels on my end, so several of them wrap. > > Would you be able to post a link to the form in question? > The link is the one you ga

RE: [WSG] Site check please

> Without even trying to be "obsessive compulsive" I can report that there is not enough room for the form labels on my end, so several of them wrap. Would you be able to post a link to the form in question? Thanks *** List Guidel

RE: [WSG] Site check please

Thanks. > It is a little difficult to read. Can you elaborate on the above? > The fonts scale well. The overall look is nice. But color on color is sometimes a difficult trick to pull off. > Hozriontal overlap when fonts are scaled on this page:

Re: [WSG] Site check please

Taco Fleur wrote: Sorry, I meant: Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group, check our new site for problems please? :) www.clickfind.com.au It is a little difficult to read. The fonts scale well. The overall look is nice. But color on color is sometimes a difficult trick to

RE: [WSG] Site check please

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:53:13 +1000, Taco Fleur wrote: > > Sorry, I meant: Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group, check > our new > site for problems please? :) www.clickfind.com.au > Without even trying to be "obsessive compulsive" I can report that there is not enough room for th

RE: [WSG] Site check please

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:53:13 +1000, Taco Fleur wrote: > > Sorry, I meant: Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group, check > our new > site for problems please? :) www.clickfind.com.au > Without even trying to be "obsessive compulsive" I can report that there is not enough room for th

RE: [WSG] Site check please

: [WSG] Site check please Sorry, I meant: Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group, check our new site for problems please? :) www.clickfind.com.au *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm

RE: [WSG] Site check please

Sorry, I meant: Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group, check our new site for problems please? :) www.clickfind.com.au *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webst

Re: [WSG] site check please

Hi Jermayn, I notice the left and right columns white background colors (or image) are overlapping the 'g-background.jpg'. You either need to may transparent color for left/right column or if background images are used, use nee to make them narrower or maybe add z-index properties. Small

Re: [WSG] site check please

Jermayn Parker wrote: just wondering if people can have a quick look at the following website for any major errors, suggestions etc http://www.phillipwrayracing.com It is a little slow to load. I regret that font-scaling drops the floats and/or breaks the layout. Best, ~dL -- http://che

RE: [WSG] site check please

> http://www.phillipwrayracing.com XHTML error - img tag has been opened but not closed & add alt attributes to those images. Other than that nice! Thanks, Al *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm U

RE: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

p.org Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread http://web-strategists.com:888 Yes I agree a min width would be good, if not maybe look into png transparency for the floating logo. http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/png_overlay_with_no_extra_markup.asp -bes

RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread > http://web-strategists.com:888 You've got a transparent background-color set somewhere as all of the white space on the sides of the content and under the footer is currently browser default (mine is set to pink so I can see sites that aren&#x

Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

http://web-strategists.com:888 Yes I agree a min width would be good, if not maybe look into png transparency for the floating logo. http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/png_overlay_with_no_extra_markup.asp -best kvn *** List G

Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

http://web-strategists.com:888 You've got a transparent background-color set somewhere as all of the white space on the sides of the content and under the footer is currently browser default (mine is set to pink so I can see sites that aren't defining background-colors!). This prob isn't much o

Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

Taco Fleur wrote: http://web-strategists.com:888 Could do with suitable 'min-width' and 'max-width'. Not well prepared for regular 'minimum font size', or even for 'font resizing' in IE/win. Also, I get the "off-screen" text for the "click here to start selling" in at the left side on really

Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

Personally I think the header is too large. Other than that a really nice site. - Original Message - From: "Taco Fleur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 10:51 PM Subject: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread For some reason my other emails ended up in someone els

RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

Regards, Kepler -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Taco Fleur Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 12:35 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread Hi Felix thanks for the effort. A solution to the proble

RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

No, its perfectly fine, its exactly what I was asking for. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph R. B. Taylor Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 3:32 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread Taco

RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

ssage- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Felix Miata Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 2:22 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread [I have a minimum font size set to prevent eyestrain.] On 2007/05/16 12:51 (GMT+1000) Taco Fleur appar

Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

cipated 1 size up, as its already a large font. You can't win in every situation ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph R. B. Taylor Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 2:32 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Site chec

Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

[I have a minimum font size set to prevent eyestrain.] On 2007/05/16 12:51 (GMT+1000) Taco Fleur apparently typed: > Anyways; anyone interested in a site check? > http://web-strategists.com:888 I like it a lot above the yellow, but I don't like 3.5 word line lengths at all. An unset background

RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

eph R. B. Taylor Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 2:32 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread Taco, Everything looks real good with one exception which should be an easy fix: The yellow bar. As you increase the text size, the yellow bar does not expand wi

RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2:32 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread Taco, Everything looks real good with one exception which should be an easy fix: The yellow bar. As you increase the text size, the yellow bar does not expand with it. The content instead eventually hides as

Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

Taco, Everything looks real good with one exception which should be an easy fix: The yellow bar. As you increase the text size, the yellow bar does not expand with it. The content instead eventually hides as it passes the bottom of the bar. If the yellow bar and the drop shadow below it are

Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

I'm looking on a Mac in Firefox. It all seems to hold together fine. My comments are more on the design/layout side. The 'banner' area - to my mind it takes up way too much real estate. It's pretty much half the screen. And there's too much white space on the right side too I think. Another thing

Re: [WSG] Site check please

Elle Meredith wrote: Could you please have a look at http://digitaluwphotography.com/ and let me know what you think? Elle I regret that it is showing right column float drop in ie/6.0. Captures: Regards, ~dL -- http://chelseacreekst

Re: [WSG] Site check please

On 2007/05/02 09:15 (GMT+1100) Elle Meredith apparently typed: > Could you please have a look at http://digitaluwphotography.com/ and > let me know what you think? Once I zoom FF enough to read the #primary p content, the line length is down to about 5-6 words, too narrow, while on the right si

Re: [WSG] Site check please

Hi, I really like the layout but there are a few things I will arise that got my attention. Text too small and the "about us" goes to a second line (would be better as one line) apart from that well done... On 5/2/07, Elle Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Could you please have a loo

Re: [WSG] Site check please

Elle Meredith wrote: Could you please have a look at http://digitaluwphotography.com/ and let me know what you think? I also have a problem with the top div#access links that I don't know why just don't work (skip and site info). Elle, your css declares div#access as position:absolute, and

Re: [WSG] Site check please

I like the colours, not a bad design. What I would suggest is reducing the text on the main page, there is to much information in the main section. Users will rarely all the words on a page, so trying to get to much information across is pointless. Also it forces scrolling which is not the best of

Re: [WSG] Site check please

Its nice, maybe the leadings a bit extreme. If you crank the line-height down you might get all the navigation elements on the right hand showing up without the need to scrool down to them. hth Elle Meredith wrote: Hi, Could you please have a look at http://digitaluwphotography.com/ and let

Re: [WSG] Site Check Please (Citinet Lending)

I am still in learning-process but in my opinion your site is excellent! Just test your site for example at ' http://www.sidar.org '. This validator found some problems. What I miss is a 'skip to main content' and accesskeys. With ff the text from the main-content overlapps the footer by using t

Re: [WSG] Site Check Please (Citinet Lending)

Thank you Justin! I've begun the process of fixing those errors. Respectfully, Mario > Mario, > > Some of your CSS does not validate. > > http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css2&warning=2&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdev5.headclerk.net%2F > > My only major issue with the design is the "Upco

Re: [WSG] Site Check Please (Citinet Lending)

sorry please disregard that last observation i made about your footer breaking. i had another style sheet loaded into the page by accident looks good ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup

Re: [WSG] Site Check Please (Citinet Lending)

did you test it in firefox yet? In ff your footer seems to break way out of the wrapper. -best kvnmcwebn ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting

Re: [WSG] Site Check Please (Citinet Lending)

Mario, Some of your CSS does not validate. http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css2&warning=2&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdev5.headclerk.net%2F My only major issue with the design is the "Upcoming Training" background. There is not enough contrast between the type and the background for so

Re: [WSG] Site Check Please (Clattco)

On 12/22/05, Jay Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello All, > > I would like to know if I have made any huge gaffes with this site > (http://www.smashingred.com/clientspace/clattco/). On this page: http://www.smashingred.com/clientspace/clattco/renovations/ the last photo is overlapped by th

Re: [WSG] Site Check Please (Clattco)

Jay Gilmore wrote: > I would like to know if I have made any huge gaffes with this site > (http://www.smashingred.com/clientspace/clattco/). Nearly complete and > just requires copywriting completion. > All opinions are welcome. If there are mistakes out of ignorance please > point me to a refe

Re: [WSG] Site Check Please (Clattco)

Kenny Graham (thoughtfully) wrote: With larger text sizes, your sidebar headings become white on white. I'd suggest vertically expanding that background image, or setting a similar background color along with the image. That and a few things like empty paragraph elements and stray on some o

Re: [WSG] Site Check Please (Clattco)

> Last (and probably least), a future-proofing warning: If you ever > decide to serve that site as xhtml instead of text/html, it'll break > because of the content of your style elements. Nevermind, it might not. I've become so paranoid that I tend to enclose any non-xml/html in cdata's because

Re: [WSG] Site Check Please (Clattco)

With larger text sizes, your sidebar headings become white on white. I'd suggest vertically expanding that background image, or setting a similar background color along with the image. That and a few things like empty paragraph elements and stray on some of the pages. Last (and probably least),

RE: [WSG] Site Check please

  kvnmcwebn,Are you talking about my site: http://www.smashingred.com or Joe's site: http://www.sitesbyjoe.com ?  sorry i meant joe not jay,   

Re: [WSG] Site Check please

kvnmcwebn wrote: pretty cool jay, what about the top links bottom border disapearing on the hover though? -kvnmcwebn kvnmcwebn, Are you talking about my site: http://www.smashingred.com or Joe's site: http://www.sitesbyjoe.com ? All the best, Jay Jay Gilmore Developer/Consultant Affo

RE: [WSG] Site Check please

pretty cool jay, what about the top links bottom border disapearing on the hover though? -kvnmcwebn ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to t

Re: [WSG] Site Check please

The poor practices mostly come from this code being slowly updated since version 1, (which was really bad), hopefully in time all the "no-no's" will be removed. I appreciate the time you spent looking in there and noticing that stuff, I forgot all about those stupid span tags all over the plac

Re: [WSG] Site Check please

On 12/12/05, Jay Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joe, The site "looks" ok but I have a few of comments: > > > Why are you using a transitional doctype? What elements or deprecated > attributes are you using that require this? > Why are you using "  for spacing? ... > Why are you using spans

Re: [WSG] Site Check please

Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote: Guys and Gals, I have just switched my site to a fluid layout vs. the old 750 pixels wide approach.  I have also changed all my font sizes to em's to adjust as needed. Can people in mac and linux take a glance to make sure all is well for me? Thanks, Joe Taylo

Re: [WSG] site check please

Drake, Ted C. wrote: Hi All I've been working on a re-design of my web site and I know the code is still rough. However, I think I could use some outside eyeballs on the design. You know how things are when you look at it for too long... http://www.tdrake.net/joan/index-liquid.html p.s. t

Re: [WSG] site check please

Drake, Ted C. wrote: Hi All I've been working on a re-design of my web site and I know the code is still rough. However, I think I could use some outside eyeballs on the design. You know how things are when you look at it for too long... http://www.tdrake.net/joan/index-liquid.html very n

Re: [WSG] site check please

Drake, Ted C. wrote: Hi All I've been working on a re-design of my web site and I know the code is still rough. However, I think I could use some outside eyeballs on the design. You know how things are when you look at it for too long... http://www.tdrake.net/joan/index-liquid.html T

Re: [WSG] site check please

Re: http://www.tdrake.net/joan/index-liquid.html   I think a nice Georgia font would go down well with that template.   Edward Clarke ECommerce and Software Consultant   TN38 Consulting http://blog.tn38.net   Creative Media Centre 17-19 Robertson Street Hastings East Suss

turning images off - RE: [WSG] site check please

: Friday, July 22, 2005 9:59 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] site check please Drake, Ted C. wrote: > http://www.tdrake.net/joan/index-liquid.html I really like the look of that one - but... - Scrolling left isn't easy, so maybe try this adjustment: body { padding-le

Re: [WSG] site check please

Drake, Ted C. wrote: http://www.tdrake.net/joan/index-liquid.html I really like the look of that one - but... - Scrolling left isn't easy, so maybe try this adjustment: body { padding-left: 95px;} ...tested in Opera, Firefox & IE6. (I can even make it line up perfectly in Opera 8's 'fit to wi

RE: [WSG] site check please

Ted, I love the layout, the colors, the borders, that image on the left - very nice! One browser related issue - the left hand side search area is messed up in Opera 8.01. Regarding general critique, the only things I would mention would be: 1. the blockquote colors (black bg/white text) is a littl

Re: [WSG] Site check please - eCommerce

BTW, what OS is Jaguar? (you can answer this off-list) Mac OS X 10.2 I've checked with Safari v. 1.2.4 in OSX v.10.3.7 and it is working fine... 1.2.4 on 10.3.8 also fine -- Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com ** The d

Re: [WSG] Site check please - eCommerce

tee wrote: > Hi Thierry, > I think your page has issued with Safari (Jaguar), it shuts down the > browser after 2 or 3 second of loading. I tested 4 times, same result. Hi Tee, I was going to reply off-list, but on the other hand I'd like to see someone else using Jaguar to check the page. Just to

Re: [WSG] Site check please - eCommerce

Hi Thierry, I think your page has issued with Safari (Jaguar), it shuts down the browser after 2 or 3 second of loading. I tested 4 times, same result. tee > > Jan Brasna wrote: >> Label is in Priority 2, title is enough for Priority 1. >> BTW placing a label there and hiding it via CSS does

Re: [WSG] Site check please - eCommerce

diona kidd wrote: > I'm using FF 1.0.1 on Fedora 3 and the links are working for me. Which > version/platform FF are you using? I'm using v. 0.8 and 1.0.2 on WinXP When you say "working", do you mean you can click on them and jump to the anchors or that you can tab through all the links in the mai

Re: [WSG] Site check please - eCommerce

Jan Brasna wrote: > Label is in Priority 2, title is enough for Priority 1. > BTW placing a label there and hiding it via CSS does the job too... Duh! LOL Thanks, Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandards

Re: [WSG] Site check please - eCommerce

I'm using FF 1.0.1 on Fedora 3 and the links are working for me. Which version/platform FF are you using? On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 07:39 -0700, Thierry Koblentz wrote: Hi all, I have a WAI-AAA icon at the bottom of the pages and I'd like to know if I can leave it there or if I have a few more

Re: [WSG] Site check please - eCommerce

I'm using "label" with all my "input" elements, but the one for the search form at the top at the page. Does using the title attribute make it "accessible enough" or do I "must" use label? Label is in Priority 2, title is enough for Priority 1. BTW placing a label there and hiding it via CSS does t

Re: [WSG] site check please - Rowing History

On 30/4/05 12:31 AM, "Drake, Ted C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The top nav does bizarre things when you get off the index page. On one > page, the tabs were replaced with underlined text, yet the dropdowns > continued to work. When I went deeper, the navigation was missing entirely. Thanks for

RE: [WSG] site check please - Rowing History

PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Laakso Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:19 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] site check please - Rowing History On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:29:27 -0400, Hope Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >So, I'd be very interested hear your co

Re: [WSG] site check please - Rowing History

On 29/4/05 1:30 PM, "David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Seems fine on this end, although I can't for the life of me figure >> out what the b&w image is that appears to be a grasshopper? >> > > > > Haha - It's a grasshopper wearing a jail bird stripy outfit- haha.. > Actually, looks like p

Re: [WSG] site check please - Rowing History

Seems fine on this end, although I can't for the life of me figure out what the b&w image is that appears to be a grasshopper? Haha - It's a grasshopper wearing a jail bird stripy outfit- haha.. Actually, looks like people rowing - like they're supposed to be in motion. ( I think) -David *

Re: [WSG] site check please - Rowing History

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:29:27 -0400, Hope Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >So, I'd be very interested hear your comments. http://www.rowinghistory-aus.info/world-u23-championships/index.html Quick look in XP_SP2 at 1280 in Opera8.0 of the above page only: Seems fine on this end, although

Re: [WSG] site check please - Rowing History

On 28/4/05 8:46 PM, "Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only thing I really don't like is that when you click a link the top > menu disappears and the only way I can get it back is to click the Back > button. (I'm using IE6) If you click one of the links in the top green menu, it takes you

Re: [WSG] site check please - Rowing History

On 28/4/05 6:27 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2 errors in home page > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rowinghistory-aus.info/world-u23- > championships/index.html Thanks for this. Just goes to show that I need to validate EACH time I make changes! Cheers Hope(

Re: [WSG] site check please - Rowing History

congrats, very nice design :) 2 errors in home page http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rowinghistory-aus.info/world-u23-championships/index.html cheers Daniel http://www.gizax.it Hope Stewart wrote: I've been working on a huge site for over a year and it still has a long way to go. Unfort

Re: [WSG] site check please - Rowing History

Thanks Thierry for your detailed reply! I've implemented all your suggestions except the IE5/mac dropdowns -- I haven't had time to look at the suggested link yet, but I will. Regards, Hope On 28/4/05 2:27 PM, "Thierry Koblentz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ope Stewart wrote: >> comments. The d

Re: [WSG] site check please - Rowing History

Hope Stewart wrote: > comments. The design is very basic, but I've never claimed to be a > graphic designer! It looks nice (I'd use a darker green for body though) I think you *need* to include a skipnav link. > I have been unable to test the new pages in Opera/win and IE5/win, so > would be grat

Re: [WSG] Site check please!! Oh, you MAC people ... are you getting sick of me yet? ;~)

You have some problems on PC/FF as well... The "position:relative" on the footer produces the horizontal scrollbar on my PC. Furthermore something is wrong with your style sheet... I don't get the footer bg img and the arrows, green side bar etc. BTW... what is this style doing? * { padding:0

Re: [WSG] Site check please!! Oh, you MAC people ... are you getting sick of me yet? ;~)

Mani Sheriar wrote: Hi All, I have another request for a site check and, once again, Mac users are especially needed. Please see: http://www.manisheriar.com/globalrocket/indexNEW.htm On Firefox 1.0 Win32, I get a horizontal scrollbar untill I increase the browser window size beyond 1100 pixels wi

Re: [WSG] Site check please!! Oh, you MAC people ... are you getting sick of me yet? ;~)

Looks fine in Mac Netscape 7.2 and Opera 7.54. Very small differences in Opera 6.03. The dashed underlines at bottom of page are black, not white, and the light grey bar on nav list at right only covers the type, not the whole bar. Really minor details. Best regards, Marilyn Langfeld http://www.l

Re: [WSG] Site check please!! Oh, you MAC people ... are you getting sick of me yet? ;~)

On 1/3/05 5:42 PM "Mani Sheriar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > I have another request for a site check and, once again, Mac users are > especially needed. > > Please see: http://www.manisheriar.com/globalrocket/indexNEW.htm > Superficially at least, looks fine on latest Safari. Same for

Re: [WSG] site check please - an illustrated novel

Bob, Purely from the aesthetics level. Drop the entire first page - or two - The very first one blinked on my screen for perhaps 3 seconds and was gone. The second was the spinning record. The main window - number three, is where I should land right off - no other pages between me and your main m

Re: [WSG] site check please - an illustrated novel

Hello, My only beef with this site is you seem to have *two* splash pages. One is bad enough... Tom Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist mlinc.com designer wrote: Hi All, I would be grateful for any and all feedback on a redesign I've done for a site which presents an illustrated novel. Some of

Re: [WSG] Site check please (especially Mac)

Seona Bellamy wrote: Hmm... Any suggestions about how I could better do it so that it stays put? I would have thought that absolute positioning with the coordinates given in px would have been fairly static. :( I'm not sure what else to try. You are relative-positioning those links inside an absolu

Re: [WSG] Site check please (especially Mac)

Thanks. I'll pass those suggestions on to her, since the design is hers (I'm deliberately making this one "not my problem" - I have enough problems getting this site up and running...). Anyone have any more suggestions about what to do about the glitching positioning in Mac browsers? I'm at a t

Re: [WSG] Site check please (especially Mac)

Maybe add a slight outline/glow/etc effect to the menu items as they don't stand out too well, especially when hovering. Also find a way of reducing image size that doesn't result in noticeable grain. Later Seona Bellamy wrote: Hi guys, Could I please have a few Mac users (both IE and Safari) ha

RE: [WSG] Site check please (especially Mac)

Marilyn LangfeldSent: Thursday, 2 December 2004 9:08 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check please (especially Mac)I see problems in both. In Safari 1.2.3, the navigation buttons separate (seeming to move progressively to the right), leaving funny white shapes where there

RE: [WSG] Site check please (especially Mac)

] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Gunlaug Sørtun > Sent: Thursday, 2 December 2004 9:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check please (especially Mac) > > > Seona Bellamy wrote: > > > Any PC users who want to look and give opinions woul

Re: [WSG] Site check please (especially Mac)

I see problems in both. In Safari 1.2.3, the navigation buttons separate (seeming to move progressively to the right), leaving funny white shapes where there should be a smooth grey curve. In IE 5.2, the footer is in the middle of the page, overlaying "One House Productions - is..." Looks good

Re: [WSG] Site check please (especially Mac)

Seona Bellamy wrote: Any PC users who want to look and give opinions would also be appreciated. :) The site: http://www.onehouseproductions.com/ohp2/ You should try a better positioning-method for that curved menu. The items leave the curved background-image and ends up all over the place upon fon

Re: [WSG] Site Check Please

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:31:50 +1100, Richard Czeiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all :o) Would appreciate any comments. PLEASE NOTE: Mac people - sorry not there yet, so don't even bother. I've served you up a crappy print style sheet :o( Here she is - http://www.grafx.com.au/wip/withPassio

Re: [WSG] Site Check Please

For me, the top nav is not only ten px to the left, it is also ten px up. Leaves a brown gap between your sliced images of the wedding couple. Not sure if that is fixed in your latest changes. Cheers Natalie On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 13:25:02 +1100, Richard Czeiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank

Re: [WSG] Site Check Please

Thanks Ted and John :o) The disconnecting text is not something I can change as this design element was specified by the client. I've fixed the topNav -10px wierdness - only happened on the home page - quelle bizarre! :o) No hover effect on action items (yet) Top Nav landing pages do not exist (

Re: [WSG] Site Check Please

Agree with Ted completely on the disconnect on those word pairs. Like the overall design. The 10px shift does exist in firefox, which, actually, does seem a bit visual interesting to me, even if it was unintended (naturally, cross browser uniformity would be good) only nearly-bothersome thing I

RE: [WSG] Site Check Please

I don't like the disconnect between the word pairs flowers plants and wedding events. If they share the same drop down, they should look like they share the same button. In ff1.0 the topnav sits about 10 pixels too far left, outside the main section. Are there hover effects on the various

Re: [WSG] Site Check Please

Aloha, Cosmetically, it looks okay. There's one bug where the top navigation element sticks out of the left side, and doesn't reach the right side completely. Your dropdown menus function perfectly, but it would be better to make those liks use the pointer cursor on mouseover, as to indicate to

Re: [WSG] Site check please - launched it finally!

Mike,   I do not know if you already fixed that (fonts look quite large on my screen right now, but thats becaouse I've changed resolution down to 1024x768 to run other tests), but here it goes:   I fix my fonts using keywords for modern browsers (including ie6 pc in standards mode and mac ie

Re: [WSG] Site check please - launched it finally!

Link? On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:20:04 +1100, James Gollan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > There is a small issue on the home page with the hover state in firefox/win. > On the link to the help page the hover state underline is pushing the > content box and footer down by 1px â creates a litt

RE: [WSG] Site check please - launched it finally!

There is a small issue on the home page with the hover state in firefox/win. On the link to the help page the hover state underline is pushing the content box and footer down by 1px – creates a little visual jump on rollover.

Re: [WSG] Site check please - launched it finally!

oming in late to the discussion) and I'm still interested in anyone's input about any aspect of the site, as long as it's polite.CheersMike KearAFP WebworksWindsor, NSW, Australia - Original Message ----From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL P

Re: [WSG] Site check please - launched it finally!

Michael, Whoops, that was a typo. I should, of course, have written "76% or 0.76em". I read somewhere (I'm sure someone on the list will remember where) that 76% works for all modern browsers better than 75%, because of a rendering difference in one of the browsers. -Hugh > 5) I'd suggest

Re: [WSG] Site check please - launched it finally!

Michael Kear wrote: > How does one get IE 7.1? > Oh DER!!! I'm using IE6.0.2900 - the one that came with WinXP Pro SP2. > It's NETSCAPE that's up to 7.1. Whoops. Netscape's been up to 7.2 since August. 7.1 has security bugs. -- "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of

RE: [WSG] Site check please - launched it finally!

> Ok well compare that with this one: > Median Windows Settings > 96DPI ("normal fonts") > IE7.1 set to "Medium" How does one get IE 7.1? Oh DER!!! I'm using IE6.0.2900 - the one that came with WinXP Pro SP2. It's NETSCAPE that's up to 7.1. Whoops. Cheers Mike Kear Windsor, NSW, Austr

Re: [WSG] Site check please - launched it finally!

Michael Kear wrote: > Here's what you posted: > Median windoze settings: > 96 DPI ("small fonts") > IE6 set to "medium" > 1024x768 > http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/tmp/hawkradioW98-IE1.png It turns out that PC I had intentionally left at IE5 on purpose, but forgot today when using it to visit http

RE: [WSG] Site check please - launched it finally!

Felix, I think you need to be a little less aggressive and judgemental in your opinions. You seem to be trying to make me out as an idiot and incompetent at setting up my system. In fact it's deliberately a default installation. I don't change my browser's defaults for fear of getting into the ve

  1   2   >