Re: [WSG] IE 7 check please

2007-10-14 Thread Tee G. Peng
Hi Kepler, Thanks for checking. For http://spanish-portuguese.berkeley.edu/ - I'm not seeing a horizontal scrollbar in IE7 until you resize below around 770px (after the 3rd column drops below the 2nd). I suspect this is the behavior you wanted since FireFox behaves the same way. One thing

Re: [WSG] IE 7 check please

2007-10-14 Thread Donna Jones
For http://www.thinkvitamin.com/ - This site has a scrollbar in IE7 around 884px. It appears that this is caused by the footer. In FireFox it just ignores that the right portion of the footer is being chopped off and doesn't give you a scrollbar but as soon as the footer content doesn't fit

Re: [WSG] IE 7 check please

2007-10-14 Thread Tee G. Peng
On Oct 14, 2007, at 12:14 AM, Donna Jones wrote: Tee, i just looked more at the http://www.thinkvitamin.com/ site. yes, i get the scroll bar at 800 wide in IE7 (not standalone). and yes, its because its not chopping off the footer (wouldn't have noticed, probably, though if Kepler

Re: [WSG] IE 7 check please

2007-10-14 Thread Donna Jones
Thanks Donna, thanks for checking. I am not concerned how thinkvitamin has errors and warnings and text got chopped off because that is beyond my control but the owner of the My quest is whether IE 7 has issue with elastic + fluid' layout, as shown on that two sites and mine. hi Tee,

RE: [WSG] Catch 22 list problem

2007-10-14 Thread michael.brockington
Certainly for this example, the use of an ordered list is incorrect - there is a strong hint there in the description; this should be marked up with p tags, with the identifier as the first bit of text, ie the number is content in this example. If you think about it, the 'label' of each item

Re: [WSG] Catch 22 list problem

2007-10-14 Thread Tim White
Going back to the original post: Pick your poison: 1. Invalid code 2. Use a transitional DOCTYPE 3. Set value with DOM-script I'm surprised that no one has said #2; just fall back to a transitional doctype. You can still write your markup with standards in mind, use the deprecated attribute,

Re: [WSG] Jquery and/or Yahoo UI

2007-10-14 Thread Kit Grose
You're right; innerHTML is much, much, MUCH faster to execute (see http:// www.quirksmode.org/dom/innerhtml.html for numbers). It's also quicker to code and to implement. However it leaves you with less handles on the elements you're inserting, and 'feels' wrong (in the same way that

Re: [WSG] Catch 22 list problem

2007-10-14 Thread Jason Friesen
That's pretty much what we did; usually hx and p, with ul where appropriate. But I still look longingly at the counters in CSS, and grimace everytime someone says, But we have to add in another point between 2 and 3... On 2007-Oct-14, at 14:10 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [WSG] Jquery and/or Yahoo UI

2007-10-14 Thread David Hucklesby
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:23:04 +1000, Kit Grose wrote: [...] I'm a big fan of JS libraries. I use Prototype (and Script.aculo.us) and YUI quite a lot as the basis of a lot of my larger JS-based sites. The advantage of YUI isn't so much its ability to maintain strong standards, but its very