The hardcoded height and width for the images is meant as an example.
Because the thumbnails are generated from a database (in a next level).
So the images have to fit inside a square of 36x36 pixels. The images
are always scaled to 36px width or 36px height.
But the problem is, I can't find a
Would any of you have and idea as to why my guestbook is so narrow and
screwed up in IE 6 and Opera? It's using the same html and css as the
rest of the site. Looks fine in FF 1.
http://bennieshepherd.com/orangeguestbook/powerbook.cgi
--
Get Firefox Browser
If you have a blog, why not join BlogAid and offer to donate your site
earnings for January to the aid agency of your choice.
http://www.blogaid.org.uk/
Andy Budd
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Creative Commons gives a bit of XML to paste into your page
...but XML is inside HTML comment.
Don't you think it's rather pointless?
XML parsers won't pick it up, so if you want to get license info,
you have to threat whole file like a tag soup anyway.
Do you know tools that read this rdf
(copying this to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Kornel Lesinski wrote:
Creative Commons gives a bit of XML to paste into your page
...but XML is inside HTML comment.
Don't you think it's rather pointless?
XML parsers won't pick it up, so if you want to get license info,
you have to threat whole file like a
Hey everybody,
I just asked for some advice on css-d, regarding gallery
pages, very similar to www.strombergarchitectural.com/products.php
- the same pages I asked for help on with cleaner, more semantic code on this
list not too long ago. The advice I received from several people, and
(X)HTML is so dualistic sometimes. Meaning that there are so many ways
that work fine but yet they are still not correct. In your case, the
extremes argue no tables, period vs tables within tables within
tables. The same extreme views apply to lists as well. The best use of
(X)HTML is to
Jan Brasna wrote:
Well, although definition lists are IMHO OK, I use just anonymous
elements (+ headings, paragraphs etc.) -
http://wellstyled.com/css-photo-cards.html or
http://murphy.cz/hofy/galerie-plavacek.htm
Jan,
I see how the technique on the two pages you linked to works, and I like
Ted Drake wrote:
I didn't see it on another computer, but it keeps showing up on my screen. I've
hit shift-refresh. Perhaps it is just a bug on my box. Is there a better way to
refresh the css cache on IE?
Thanks
Te
IE and Firefox's complete reload shortcut key combo is Ctrl + F5
AFAIK/IIRC, It
Chris,
Thanks for your response. It's funny - before I went to using unordered
lists for this, I had been using ALA's recommendation. However I wasn't
very happy with it semantically.
Ted Drake made this distinction: With the current div setup, you have
information but there is no connection
The Bo$$ wrote:
If you can, you should try switching to a bigger resolution. It's much
better, and you'll wonder how you ever survived using 800x600.
My guess is that he tested it at 800x600 res, which makes perfect sense.
And 800x600 resolution can be useful for detail work in Photoshop or
Hello all,
Can anyone tell me if server-side includes - ColdFusion specifically -
would adversely effect search engines/spiders at all? An SEO company we
are trying is telling us that our CF includes will effect our SE
rankings.
TIA
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia
You have some problems on PC/FF as well...
The position:relative on the footer produces the horizontal scrollbar
on my PC. Furthermore something is wrong with your style sheet... I
don't get the footer bg img and the arrows, green side bar etc.
BTW... what is this style doing?
* {
padding:0;
My apologies for the _very OT_ topic. I got my lists mixed up... :-P
If you happen to have any insight on this however, off-list replies are
welcome.
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
mlinc.com
On Jan 4, 2005, at 2:02 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
Hello all,
Can
On Jan 4, 2005, at 1:57 PM, Collin Davis wrote:
I don't agree with either position - I think tables should be used when
displaying tabular data, but definitely not overused as is the case
when
using tables for presentation.
Sorry, I left out the sentence that I meant to say And neither of
those
The only thing I would bring up with regards to the markup is that I really
don't see how those elements could be marked up as paragraphs.
I definitely agree with you Collin. I just want to show this as an
example how to structure it in a different way than by some types of
lists. It is neither
Can anyone tell me if server-side includes - ColdFusion specifically -
would adversely effect search engines/spiders at all?
I can't see how - the includes are parsed by the server before the page is
completely rendered to the UA, just as PHP. Any content or links in the
includes would be fully
Right... The bot can't find out, if the page is a static HTML file or
dynamically generated output by some sort of server-side technology...
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for
Collin Davis wrote:
Tables wouldnt do this. Also, lists are just easier for me to use
than tables, and tables create more code weight than do lists. Anybody
have thoughts on this?
Well, for me, the deciding factor on using a table is if the elements contained
in the table are 2 dimensional.
JohnyB wrote:
Right... The bot can't find out, if the page is a static HTML file or
dynamically generated output by some sort of server-side technology...
One can easily establish that by looking at the HTTP response times, the
file extension (if content negotiation, NSAPI/ISAPI filters, or
Collin Davis wrote:
I just asked for some advice on css-d, regarding gallery pages, very
similar to www.strombergarchitectural.com/products.php
http://www.strombergarchitectural.com/products.php - the same pages I
asked for help on with cleaner, more semantic code on this list not too
long
Hello all,
I'm having a bit of trouble using frames without a border and getting the
frameset to validate.
OK, throw your prejudices about frames to one side (I believe there are
times when the advantages outweigh the disadvantages) as I've heard them
many times and, at least for now, I want to
Charles Martin wrote:
Well, for me, the deciding factor on using a table is if the elements
contained in the table are 2 dimensional. In other words, can they be
grouped in two dimensions. For example, a list of population grouped by
cities AND age ranges would be two dimensional and would
Jan Brasna wrote:
(PS: I'm sorry for my English, I hope you can understand it...)
Your English is far better than my Czech ;)
Cheers,
Collin Davis - ACE, MCP
Web Architect
Stromberg Architectural Products
p 903.454.0904
f 903.454.3642
e [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web
This link should help.
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/present/frames.html
Look for inline frames: the IFRAME element.
On Tuesday, January 4, 2005, at 01:53 PM, designer wrote:
Hello all,
I'm having a bit of trouble using frames without a border and
Why?
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
mlinc.com
On Jan 4, 2005, at 3:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On search engines like Google there will be an adverse effect on
optimization when using coldfusion. Remember Google is a
Hypertextual Web Search Engine
On search engines like Google there will be an adverse effect on
optimization when using coldfusion. Remember Google is a
Hypertextual Web Search Engine
http://www-db.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html
I was ignoring this thread as off-topic, but this brings up an on-topic
point.
ColdFusion
Paul Novitski wrote:
At 11:34 AM 1/4/05, Charles Martin wrote:
Tables wouldn't do this. Also, lists are just easier for me to use
than tables, and tables create more code weight than do lists.
Anybody have thoughts on this?
Well, for me, the deciding factor on using a table is if the elements
Collin Davis wrote:
Google can, and others are going to be joining them soon. It's a simple
matter of using the Flash Search Engine SDK - it includes an application
called swf2html which dumps out text and links from .swf files and returns
as html.
When I put Flash in my documents, I am guilty of
Ben Curtis wrote:
In fact, I serve all my ColdFusion pages as .html because I migrated a
static site to ColdFusion and it was easier to tell Apache to send .html
file to ColdFusion than to change all the extensions and links.
Wouldn't that cause a processing overhead if you ever wanted to serve
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:14:25 +, David R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Curtis wrote:
In fact, I serve all my ColdFusion pages as .html because I migrated a
static site to ColdFusion and it was easier to tell Apache to send .html
file to ColdFusion than to change all the extensions and
Hi,
What do you people reckon should be the semantic markup for a song chart ala
Billboard Top 40? Sample here: http://www.i-bands.net/charts.php (no, I
don't own this site so I can't add a doctype etc etc)
It's a list of songs, so ol is the gut reaction. But what about the
information within
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 05:17:37 +0800, Wong Chin Shin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a list of songs, so ol is the gut reaction. But what about the
information within each song listing? table within a li?
Best for me is an ol with in that per song a dl.
--
Cheers,
Rob.
ยป http://zooibaai.nl
designer wrote:
I'm having a bit of trouble using frames without a border and getting the
frameset to validate.
This may be of interest
http://www.stopdesign.com/log/2003/03/04/swf_seeking_vwm.html
For the lazy ones, the conclusion: Assuming we must continue to use
frames, and that the default
Tables wouldn't do this. Also, lists are just easier for me to use
than tables, and tables create more code weight than do lists.
Anybody have thoughts on this?
Well, for me, the deciding factor on using a table is if the
elements contained in the table are 2 dimensional.
I agree with you,
Mike Linksvayer wrote:
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
link rel=meta type=application/rdf+xml title=Creative Commons
License href=my_cc_license.rdf /
You can do that, as suggested at
http://creativecommons.org/technology/metadata/extend#link
Wikipedia publishes CC-compatible metadata (for the GFDL) in
Wong Chin Shin wrote:
What do you people reckon should be the semantic markup for a song chart ala
Billboard Top 40?
Table, without a doubt. Make sure it's properly marked up, too (with
THEAD, proper THs, scope, TBODY)
It's a list of songs, so ol is the gut reaction. But what about the
Ben Curtis wrote:
Re: decision tree.
I'd love to help with this.
My decision tree revolves around what relationships matter and have
meaning. This is sort of what I go through:
I think your questions go in exactly the direction I was thinking when I
suggested the decision tree (which popped out
Had the same problem with my holiday snaps :o)
Check out http://www.grafx.com.au/dik/region.html?MuiNe-1-21 for an example
of how it's done.
Hope this helps :o)
R
- Original Message -
From: BonusOntwerp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005
Hi all.
As Tom has suggested, no more on this subject on the list please.
Thanks
James
--
admin
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:30:47 -0500, Tom Livingston
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Before the paddle is wielded, I remind that I did quickly post a reply
to my initial post stating this was OT and
Hello Group. Happy New Year!
I have a site that just went live: http://www.willlange.com/. There
are 5 pages that have external links that cause the page not to
validate. These links are called into an iFrame to give search results
for real estate product. In the past when I have had this
Why have that info in an iframe? Why not just
a div? (pardon
my ignorance I dont know much about iframes)
Mani Sheriar
Sheriar Designs | www.ManiSheriar.com
925|914.0741
= amp;
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting
Shane Helm wrote:
I have a site that just went live: http://www.willlange.com/. There are
5 pages that have external links that cause the page not to validate.
Change to amp;, e.g.
http://www.pcmls.com/willlange/cgi-bin/aa.fcgi?aacmd=resultsamp;id=dauckfamp;r=1amp;f=0amp;t=0
--
Patrick H.
= amp;
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz |
janbrasna.com
I tried amp; but it doesn't work for these external links to this
particular external website. That's the whole issue.
Shane Helm
sonzeDesignStudio
www.sonze.com
Change to amp;, e.g.
http://www.pcmls.com/willlange/cgi-bin/aa.fcgi?aacmd=resultsamp;
id=dauckfamp;r=1amp;f=0amp;t=0
--
Patrick H. Lauke
Did you test this link you just sent me because it doesn't work?
That's the issue. When you change to amp; the link no longer works.
I am very
Shane Helm wrote:
I tried amp; but it doesn't work for these external links to this
particular external website. That's the whole issue.
It *does* work. A browser translates the amp; into an when making the
request, there's nothing involving the particular external site that
would come into
Change to amp;, e.g.
http://www.pcmls.com/willlange/cgi-bin/aa.fcgi?aacmd=resultsamp;
id=dauckfamp;r=1amp;f=0amp;t=0
Did you test this link you just sent me because it doesn't work?
It works fine...
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
I've been reading my digests after a small holiday and I came across this
link posted a few days ago for moronic designers to be sent. Is this really
a good idea?
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~night.owl/morons.html
I mean I'm pro web standards etc and in all honestly I'd read the first bit
Steven, I agree with you.
The message about web standards is important, but pages like the one
linked to only serves to aggravate and insult.
Companies or individuals responsible for managing sites that are
poorly constructed do not need to be treated in this manner. A more
friendly, educational
Steven Clark wrote:
I only mention it because it was posted with next to no comment and
its really an important issue.
It's quite possible that I either missed the email, deleted it, or it
was sent before I registered with this list. I had wondered why the
moderator had to send an email
Title: Can't get image and text to line up in unordered list...
Kay,
I get a DNS timeout error when trying to access your
link.
Graham
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Murphey,
KaySent: Wednesday, 5 January 2005 11:48 AMTo:
Steven Clark wrote:
I've been reading my digests after a small holiday and I came across
this link posted a few days ago for moronic designers to be sent. Is
this really a good idea?
Of course it's not. It says a lot about the intellectual level and
elitist head firmly up my recharge socket
Hi All
The WSG Core group are with you guys 100% here. No foul language,
abuse, negativity or other offensive behaviour will be tolerated on
the list. We do our best to keep an eye on things and deal with in
appropriate behaviour by contacting those concerned directly.
If you have any specific
I never meant to actually complain about anyone on the list or the list
itself, I apologise to anyone I've offended who may think I'm pointing at
them. I simply meant to point in the direction of what I see as a bad
practise of pushing the right wheelbarrow the wrong way. I know the
companies
My problem is only in IE on the PC. This is the last issue I am having
problems with on this site. I can't figure it out but am hoping I am
forgetting something simple. On this page:
http://www.willlange.com/index.html between the top button that says
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER and the
Shane Helm wrote:
http://www.willlange.com/index.html between the top button that says
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER and the 12px tan border of the header bar
there is a green space where those 2 graphics aren't lining up. Got any
reason why this is a problem? Can it simply be fixed in the
I can't find a problem with the lineup - looks fine to me on IE6.
I have a problem however with the Flash menu bar in the top panel. Using
the keyboard the tab order is all over the place. Eg Featured
Developments goes to first 2 child tabs then back to parent, then to
last 2 tabs, About our team
Otherwise - LOVE THE SITE
I agree.
However, the main menu doesn't work in FF 0.9.3...
And the problem in IE - try to use some IE-only rules (* html foo) to
adjust it.
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
Bert Doorn wrote:
Try putting the image map (if it's really necessary to use that),
somewhere else in the document, rather than in the flow, or remove the
spaces inside the map.../map. Seems that's the cause of the
problem.
I made these changes but I am not near a PC at the moment. Could you
Shane Helm wrote:
I made these changes but I am not near a PC at the moment. Could you
check this page http://www.willlange.com/index.html to see if the
problem is corrected (that no gap exists now).
From what I can tell (having looked at the website before you made this
change and after, the
Steven Clark wrote:
I've been reading my digests after a small holiday and I came across
this link posted a few days ago for moronic designers to be sent. Is
this really a good idea?
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~night.owl/morons.html
I mean I'm pro web standards etc and in all honestly I'd
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~night.owl/morons.html
Effective design principles would dictate that the whole point of the page
is to get the information to the target audience, but really does it? Its
offensively written, rude, long and even a bit angry
I've seen this page before and
I'm having a bit of trouble using frames without a border and getting the
frameset to validate.
This may be of interest
http://www.stopdesign.com/log/2003/03/04/swf_seeking_vwm.html
Hard as it is to accept, borderless framesets just won't validate. The
best thing to do is go for something
Charles Martin wrote:
Now, were this tree to be more thoroughly documented (i.e., via
flowchart in a Visio[-like] product, or develop an outline based on
the type of information being classified, or whatever), what does
everyone suggest as the best choice to make this easily usable and
65 matches
Mail list logo
