od following and community around
> them and there are loads of extensions (mixins, functions etc.) in Github and
> the like.
>
> http://compass-style.org
> http://sass-lang.com
>
> On 30 June 2012 13:55, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Learn something new everyday. Never heard o
Learn something new everyday. Never heard of this before!
Sent from iOS 5
On Jun 30, 2012, at 12:03 AM, David Hucklesby wrote:
> On 6/29/12 11:08 AM, coder wrote:
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "David Hucklesby"
>>
>>> Start with a simple design for mobile and old browsers. Add adva
fussing
and extra markup for "old" browsers.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org
Thanks all
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:40 PM, wrote:
> **
>
> Tom -
>
> Your markup should work. For a detailed description, look at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/lists.html#h-10.3
>
>
>
> Debbie
>
> On 2012-06-01 21:28, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> On 01/06/2012 21:00, Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>> a definition
>
>
>> What's most semantic and appropriate?
>
>
> a definition list?
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
I was going this
be:
Shipping facility
...
...
...
or a instead of s?
What's most semantic and appropriate?
TIA!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
e desktop version's navigation instead of
> making duplication.
>
> tee
>
>
> On May 24, 2012, at 1:12 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>> List,
>>
Thanks tee. My thoughts as well, but wasn't sure.
Also, I thought of absolute pos., but I do not think the
'navigation',
should the mobile nav at the bottom have that same role? Will that
mess up screen readers et al?
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 |
ine-readable format. If,
> however, you don't give the @datetime value then the content of the element
> itself must be a valid date. So this is OK:
>
> now
>
> and this is OK
>
> 2012-05-22
>
> HTH
>
> Phil.
Thanks for the info!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior
't sure if
*any* text was ok to be inside the time tags.
I found a lot of info on the datetime attribute, but not if the above
type of thing is allowed or not.
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.
I use VMWare and have not run into it... Yet
Sent from iOS 5
On Apr 20, 2012, at 11:17 PM, Al Sparber wrote:
> On 4/20/2012 10:18 PM, tee wrote:
>
>> And a google search showed that I am not the only one having this bizzarre
>> behavior in IE9.
>>
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/100395
.2220
> F: 646.613.0649
> www.tmp.com
> Twitter: @Spellacy
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/michael.spellacy
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
That's about on par with us. Half again - at least - as much for
different breakpoints. Like you say, there are us
You're kidding, right? You're not really arguing about More CSS are you?
To quote a popular TV personality: "Bazzinga!"
Check the date today, people...
Sent from iOS 5
On Apr 1, 2012, at 1:49 PM, "Chris F.A. Johnson" wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2012, Chad Furman wrote:
>
>> Eww. Why is "twenty-
Thank you Patrick.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Patrick H. Lauke
wrote:
> Run it through a validator and find out...
>
> (spoilers: yes)
>
>
> On 02/03/2012 16:39, Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>> Hello Listers,
>>
>> Quick question (maybe).
>&g
s into an LI really semantically ok/allowed?
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/ma
On Dec 30, 2011, at 3:39 PM, "Patrick H. Lauke" wrote:
> On 30/12/2011 17:32, coder wrote:
>> You just aren't getting this, are you Rob. We're talking about what you
>> do if you don't know there are options.
>
> Again, let me turn this discussion around once more. Explain to us WHY you
> fe
I would just add orientation to your queries and show/hide the right one with
the orientation change.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 29, 2011, at 5:28 PM, tee wrote:
> If you have SDKs, you can open Dashcode, create a page for Mobile Safari and
> check the resource log. There is also Browser sim
Unsubscribe link is in the footer.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 29, 2011, at 2:46 AM, Teddy Knoy wrote:
> My name is Ted Knoy and I have been receiving your company's e-mail for some
> time. I assume that this is confidential company information so I don't
> understand why I have been receivin
David, with nothing but mobile Safari, if I hit a page with multiple queries or
an element specced as display:none but has a bg image, how to you *verify* that
an unwanted image loads anyway or not? There's no inspector that I'm aware of
like desktop version.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 27, 20
ebook by Ethan
> Marcotte, that by targeting the rules in the media queries it prevent browers
> from loading unnecessary rules. But I can't find this important peice of info
> from the book with a quick search just now.
>
>
> tee
>
>
> On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:02 PM,
11 at 9:59 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> I'm not 100% sure, but I believe so, yes. I was just brow-beaten
> offlist by someone because of my reply below. YES, I have an iPhone,
> but what I don't know is how to test - with JUST iOS Safari - whether
> of not a bg image is downlo
background:blue
> url(bg-bodytop-1024.jpg) no-repeat left 20px} }
>
>
> tee
>
>
> On Sep 27, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>> I believe it's the iOS Safari with the issue, where it would be most
>> troublesome. Not sure how to test t
I believe it's the iOS Safari with the issue, where it would be most
troublesome. Not sure how to test this.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:08 PM, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
> On 9/27/11 3:33 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>> I believe that Safari may be the browser with the
I believe that Safari may be the browser with the 'loads anyway' problem.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 27, 2011, at 5:33 PM, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
> On 9/27/11 1:42 PM, Frances de Waal wrote:
>
>> As far as I know all the stylesheets ánd all the linked resources in them
>> like background-ima
ut at least convenient - have you tried
> https://browserlab.adobe.com/ ?
> You can check a wide range of browsers easily, including IE6/7/8/9
>
> HTH
> Russ
>
Also see http://www.browsercam.com/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456
ign suite, adn what is acessible
>> and what is not?
>> let me know asap.
>> doing a website development course online.
>> so what to purchase in australia.
>>
>>
Yikes. Time to switch to decaf.
--
Tom L
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Patrick H. Lauke
wrote:
> On 17/08/2011 15:04, Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>> Just trying to get a better grip on the proper use of the new
>> elements. I have a site with a persistent nav of the site on the top
>> of the page and on a cou
u fall in, like "members" etc.
Thanks in advance.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/g
o this maybe useful to you
> http://html5doctor.com/wp-content/uploads/HTML5Doctor-sectioning-flowchart.pdf
>
>
> - S
>
>
>
>
> On 28 January 2011 15:42, Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the replies. Still working out the new elements in my head.
>>
&g
subscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> ***
>
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
Is it ok to nest elements inside the element? Can't
come up with anything about this scenario on Google...
I'll have a first real attempt at an HTML5 page for critique soon...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 51
gap between the bottom
of main menu items and top of sub menu items.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgr
I was able to recreate my situation with text and bg images. I am fascinated
how this thread grew. All great things to keep in mind. TY all.
Sent from my iPod
On Oct 15, 2010, at 3:35 AM, Jayachandran Kandasamy
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am encountering a strange problem in image mapping techni
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:52 PM, David Dorward wrote:
>
> On 14 Oct 2010, at 17:27, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>> Are image maps still ok?
>
> Still?
>
> Server side image maps are as inaccessible as ever.
>
> Client side image maps had issues last time I looked
Are image maps still ok?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Thierry Koblentz
wrote:
>> "/>" is not necessary to close the meta tag.
>>
>>
>>
>> Maybe this solve the problem.
>
Thierry is correct, the "/" made no difference. It was put back in.
Thanks all.
--
was the trick!
I can't, however, change the number of dashes as that is a ColdFusion
comment and, well, I'm using ColdFusion!
Thanks Again.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
was the trick!
I can't, however, change the number of dashes as that is a ColdFusion
comment and, well, I'm using ColdFusion!
Thanks Again.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
> That was it. I was using Paul Irish's trick with conditional comments
> to feed IE's CSS w/o conditionals with this:
>
And when I said "w/o conditionals" I mean the traditional method,
feeding IE's their own sheets. But, as I said, I'll be going back to
th
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:11 PM, David Dorward wrote:
>
> On 27 Aug 2010, at 19:30, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>> Line 12, Column 21: A charset attribute on a meta element found after
>> the first 512 bytes.
>>
>> Can anyone tell me why?
>
>
> You have too
y page:
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
Title
Any help would be appreciated. Can't post a link at this time...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
*
In an attempt to begin "using HTML5", I am getting this error:
Line 12, Column 21: A charset attribute on a meta element found after
the first 512 bytes.
Can anyone tell me why?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 51
> truly understand CSS.
>
> If you are worried about a client, than do it on your personal site or for a
> more progressive client.
>
> Ted
Thanks Ted. Appreciate it.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer |
ith folk accepting it. For a simple
> example, see:
>
> http://www.betasite.fsnet.co.uk/gam/altgam/gwelanmor.html
>
> Also see:
>
This is great. THanks. One other thing that's making me shy from the
edge. A production (client site) site that relies on JS to render
makes me sweat
one). My structure above is what I am literally using on
a page. WHat I am after is an HTML5 analogy to this. Does a
div.section belong in there somewhere?
THanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
*
using HTML5 elements, but using it as an
analogy - via the classes and IDs - could this be improved upon? Is
there a place for (s) here? Did I get the element concepts
right?
Thanks again...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.
Ps and As and a picture
Content with an H2, a UL, Ps and As and a picture
Sidebar
Footer
-
I actually have this book. And read it cover to cover. The problem
comes when I actually have to BUILD something using these elements...
guess I'll read it again...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interacti
l/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> ***
>
>
THanks all
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 51
quot;Uh
oh... it's the same as i've always done with etc. Am I
wrong? Is there still benefit to using ... I don't wanna just
substitute div for section... am I way off track already??
help...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
p
Like the site says, it's "delete-key friendly" :-)
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM, David Hucklesby wrote:
> On 8/12/10 4:57 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>> Anyone have any thoughts on this? Worth a try? On a production site?
>>
>> http://html5boil
; Webmaster & ERP Administrator
>>> 800.650.6506 (TOLL FREE)
>>> 330.655.0341 (DIRECT)
>>> www.lexi.com
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
>>> Behalf Of
What is " profrontend template " ?
Tnx
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guid
Anyone have any thoughts on this? Worth a try? On a production site?
http://html5boilerplate.com/
Looks pretty good to me... what say ye?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
too will extend the life of
> their systems as far as possible. 'Domestic' users are feeling the pinch
> just as much.
>[snip]
> Duncan
> (sent from my ageing, low spec machine using Opera 10.54)
>
--
T
hout
> upgrading the OS. XP will run on a P3 machine, but for sure neither Vista
> nor Win 7 will work.
> I can no longer buy a new copy of XP, therefore to upgrade my browser I
> would have to buy a new system.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive
FYI, I just looked at the site we used this on. Apparently something
changed with the latest FLash player, and the caption on/off is
broken, but the captions default to on.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> We have successfully used FLash CS4's ability to capt
**
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> **
Fabulous! Thanks all.
yes, I do know how to Google, but I thought listers might have thinned
the pack to the most up-to-date and reliable info.
Thanks again!
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Uns
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:05 PM, David Laakso
wrote:
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>> List,
>>
>> Does anyone have any good Up-to-date resources for mobile front-end dev?
>>
Thanks to those who replied...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media
List,
Does anyone have any good Up-to-date resources for mobile front-end dev?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http
> Does this help?
> Russ
Very much. That's great! THanks a lot!!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guide
rst body rule
would be ignored - or, according to the spec, SHOULD be ignored -
because there is no media type specified for it?
Just trying to follow you here...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
**
YES! THanks SO much!
Sorry Mr. Clarke ;-)
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Simon Wilder wrote:
> http://24ways.org/2009/ignorance-is-bliss is that article. Was by Andy
> Clarke for 24ways. I hope this was the one you were after.
>
> On 16 Feb 2010, at 21:29, Tom Livin
and I unfortunately didn't bookmark it.
If you know of this article, please forward a link - OFF LIST.
Thanks a bunch, if you spend any time on this. I appreciate it.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlin
get at now is how people are delivering a base experience to
IE 6, and building on it for modern browsers. Hope I am explaining my
point right.
Thierry, I agree with you whole-heartedly.
Also, IMHO, Google buried that date feature. I had to dig for it. ;-)
--
Tom Livingston | Senior
ted, email me and I can forward findings to you.
Thanks in advance for any help as I dig into this.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidel
alts are not.
If anyone could educate me as to why this is occuring - OFF-LIST - i
would appreciate it.
Thanks a lot.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlin
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:14 PM, David Hucklesby wrote:
> On 1/11/10 11:25 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I tried to repurpose this example from Eric Meyer:
>> http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/popups/demo.html
>>
>> His page work
Hello list,
I tried to repurpose this example from Eric Meyer:
http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/popups/demo.html
His page works in IE6.
My attempt, however, does not. Can anyone see why?
http://www.mlinc.com/css_popup/
Thanks in advance
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer
y subscriber to this list agrees with. Sounds
> simple enough to me.
>
> Merry Christmas (to all who will celebrate it).
>
> and loosen up :-)
>
> --
> Al Sparber - PVII
> http://www.projectseven.com
> Dreamweaver Menus | Galleries | Widgets
> http://www.projectseven.
ail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> *******
>
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic
g
> Subject: RE: [WSG] Accessible Forms
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelin
For clarity, I submit this edit:
First Name
The for attribute matches the input ID. Always.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> The reason I use this was because I found an easy way to style forms
> that included the broader compatibility for the clickability of
ach other:
> label {position:relative;}
> input {position:absolute; right:x;}
> I think there are some older browsers that like one method over the other.
> Just a few thoughts.
> Jim
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518
> Have you tested it out with any screen readers? I would like to hear
> about the results.
>
> Kevin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
> On Behalf Of Tom Livingston
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 2:
AM, James O'Neill wrote:
> I think the ID's are required for the 'for' attribute to work for labels,
> which enables the their clickability. When these labels are clicked on they
> focus on the element whose ID is in the for attribute.
>> Thank you,
>&
is possible to make a Flash file ADA compliant, and if ANY
file can pass ADA (i.e. does a passing Flash file have to be very
simple/lack-luster), I'd love to hear about it and see some resources.
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
Hello list,
Is it possible to have an ADA (no, not the dentists' thing) compliant
Flash site? Anyone have a good resource, if it is possible? All my
searching has resulted in the feeling that this subject is one people
avoid.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic
t for FireBug to become compatible with it as it is so crucial
> for us of course.
I am using FireBug 1.2.0b2 with FF3. Works fine.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
arranted extremes,
> especially if, as Andrew points out, it doesn't accompany some effort to
> respond to the question at hand.
> I move that henceforth it should be acceptable here to use 'tag' as
> shorthand for 'attribute' and 'code' for 'marku
ight
to me...
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubsc
Well, maybe this is better:
Lets make this word visually called out
p b{color:#f00; font-weight:normal;}
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
ag to achieve the
color, etc. through the style. And when styles are off, the visual
effect is intact.
Lets make this word red to visually call it out
p b{color:#f00; font-weight:normal;}
No? Am I STILL in need of more coffee for this???
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Me
an in your example, but I may still be thinking about
it from a visual standpoint...
Also, can you - or anyone else - give me an example of a semantic use
of ? Emphasized text as opposed to italicized? Around here, bold
text is emphasized text, if you know what I mean. :-P
Thanks for the discuss
> Case in point, Wordpress doesn't offer or in the post editor,
> just and , and yet the buttons for these say "i" and "b"!
> Annoying!
>
Thanks Christian and others,
Another question though... do you have an example of proper, semantic
use of vs ? Is it just just a tag to allow you to style
r 2 ago
that "b" and "i" were so "last year" I'm just still a little confused
with this statement. I am SLOWLY trying to better my skill set here.
Sorry if this is basic stuff to you...
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive
Thanks folks!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http
Hi listers,
Does anyone have a reference (link) to a site that actually spells out
what criteria must be met for the levels of WCAG and 508 compliance.
Can't seem to come up with quite what I am after from Google...
Thanks a lot in advance.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Deve
where one method is needed over another.
> http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/accessible-forms1.html
>
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 |
les, but it's
always a struggle. Especially where labels are to the left of text
inputs.
Thanks a bunch in advance.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | www.mlinc.com
***
On 8/1/07, Daniel Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree Al.
>
> Christian its not bad. There are MANY pixel to em calcs online to google it.
> :)
>
> --DK
I use this religiously (well, ya know...):
http://riddle.pl/emcalc/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multime
essage.
Just a thought. And 2¢... :-P
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsu
On 6/27/07, David Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for some advice on best practice methods of embedding a
QT/Flash movie in a page in a standards compliant way, so any ideas
would be very gratefully received!
I use this:
http://blog.deconcept.com/swfobject/
Not sure about
On 3/30/07, Tom Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi list,
Here's the page:
http://proof.mlinc.com/mlinc.com/06/news/
Hit it in FF/Safari for desired layout for head/paragraph relation.
Why won't it work in IE 6/7?
Just can't see it.
Thanks
--
Always happens to
Hi list,
Here's the page:
http://proof.mlinc.com/mlinc.com/06/news/
Hit it in FF/Safari for desired layout for head/paragraph relation.
Why won't it work in IE 6/7?
Just can't see it.
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.45
On 3/26/07, Tom Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello list,
Anyone have resources for close captioning Flash video?
Thanks.
--
Here's where we are headed. We found a Flash component to do
captioning and we were going to a link to a transcript for screen
reader users. Our
Hello list,
Anyone have resources for close captioning Flash video?
Thanks.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http
am sure...
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandard
See. When i say it out loud is when I find my problem.
DOH!
Thanks anyway ...
On 2/26/07, Tom Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi listers,
here's the page:
http://proof.mlinc.com/mlinc.com/06/clients/stories1.cfm
It validates.
Scroll down to the third "story block"
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
