I don't think you understand the issue of accessibility at all. In
many countries, laws have been needed to force people like you to
catch up.
THREAD CLOSED
I have been watching this thread for a while, concerned that it would move
from healthy discussion into abuse. It has.
This list is
THREAD CLOSED
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Here here. Bout 30 emails wasting everyones time.
More about standards less about egos!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of russ - maxdesign
Sent: Friday, 19 November 2004 9:21 PM
To: Web Standards Group
Subject: Re: [WSG] Font size ADMIN -
On 11/19/04 4:02 AM Brett Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
Here here.
Make that hear, hear and you're on! :-)
Best,
Rick Faaberg
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Chris
Now for plan B
I had a play around with the page and this is the most concise solution so
far:
#nav {
position: absolute;
left: 15px; top: 95px;
width: 120px;
margin: 15px 0;
}
That works in IE6, Firefox 1.0 and Opera 7.54 on PC. The original and new
versions both break in IE5 and
...and of course, the way to fix the table overflow in IE5 is to set
width:auto; and then Voice Family Hack to width:100% for everyone else.
That should make it work for the PC browsers - any Mac users still having
trouble?
Cheers,
Bryan
- Original Message -
From: Bryan Davis [EMAIL
Be nice Iain!
Final warning.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Iain Harrison
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 7:53 PM
To: Lothar B. Baier
Subject: Re[2]: [WSG] Font size and arrogance
Hello Lothar,
Thursday, November 18,
Henry Tapia wrote:
Points about allowing the user as much text size control as possible are
well made and I agree, however I don't think I'd have a job as a designer if
I relied upon the average user to change their browser's default text-size
manually. In my several years working on the web,
Any way there's a transcript available? I'm deaf and so very
interested in what Zeldman had to say. I'd love it if I could read the
transcript while watching the video...
What would send me to absolute nirvana would be to have the video
contain captioning (subtitling) right IN the
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Jeroen Visser [ vizi ] wrote:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
I know of no limitations in IE6 when doing this, and it saves some
coding too. The improved box-model isn't reason enough to debug
several versions of IE/win. IE/win can be made to almost behave like a
good browser
Leslie,
I'm trying to figure out if you were being serious, or just sarcastic...
but interestingly enough, I was actually going to do a quick transcript
of it this weekend and nudge Jeffrey to make that available as well.
I could also have a stab at SMIL...could be an interesting little
Patrick,
I was definitely serious. I miss out on so many excellent online
workshops, streaming audio, and presentations because I can't
hear/understand the people who speak during those events. Lipreading
over the Internet has its limitations ;)
Anyone who provides transcripts or subtitling
Now you've got me thinking. Is there anything similar to the Talking
Newspapers service for internet content? Should there be? A group of
fast typing volunteers/proofreaders could provide transcripts to popular
non subtitled items. We'd barely be scratching the surface of what needs
to be done
I think it's a fantastic idea. While I don't have any (notable)
vision or hearing problems, if there is a text transcript availible,
I'll choose that 10 times out of 10.
~j
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:31:07 +, Daisy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now you've got me thinking. Is there anything
I'm stuck on a strange behavior with IE.
For some reason, on only a few of our pages, the title of one of our form
inputs will wrap and parts of the title will repeat.
Yeah, it's not the greatest description.
Here's a sample page, naturally it looks fine in ff.
I want to think that it is
Is this valid
language=JavaScript type=text/javascript
or should I just have type only. I'm afraid of breaking any functions that
might require the language.
Ted
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
I just did a search for subtitles in Internet media and found this...
http://www.cpcweb.com/Webcasting/webcast_samples.htm
I know it costs MONEY to get this - but there's another one called
VideoLAN, which is free, open source software but I don't know a whole
lot about it:
Hello Ted,
Friday, November 19, 2004, 5:16:55 PM, you wrote:
I want to think that it is something in the main body that is
throwing it off, but I can't find it yet, I'd appreciate any help.
here's a page that is acting up:
http://www.csavg40.com/csa/sitemap-cheap-travel-insurance.do
Notice
Hi Ted
Validating the source sorts out the problem. There's a missing img end
tag, several that need to be amp; and some type=text/javascript
missing from script elements. Adding those fixes the strange behaviour.
Interestingly, the source as it stands causes IE to break if you try
resizing
Hi guys
I have fixed the image tag, that was an easy one. The problem is driving me
crazy. I remove them when I can but whenever I get rid of them all it trashes
the javascript functions. I wish I know which ones are safe to remove. On the
vast majority of the pages, the things are the last
Todd, no disagreement on leaving the back button to users but at the present
time we needed a quick fix beings our site went live two days ago and it
averages roughly 50,000 hits per day. We will work on a better solution next
month but for now this might do the trick
html
body
not sure if this will help or give a pointer, but we use this code to
keep users from hitting the refresh key and escape keys. Our enviroment
(3rd party web browser-like interface) doesn't have a back button, so
we never dealt with that issue. it might be able to be tweaked for the
back
Thanks for the links, Terrence. However, I think I was misunderstood. I
mean that for all the designer work I've seen in trying to figure out
what browsers do with various settings (such as these links), I haven't
seen much in the way of statistics on what users are doing with those
settings.
Hello Ben,
Friday, November 19, 2004, 8:18:09 PM, you wrote:
Javascript can measure this easily
If you can suggest some javascript to do this, I'd love to run it on
a few pages.
--
Best regards,
Iainmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, folks.
I'm having a bit of trouble ridding myself of some top and bottom
padding inside a box. Can anybody assist, please?
http://www.drzeus.net/redesign/cslewis/
The quote of the day box, to be specific. Thanks.
--
~john
_
Dr. Zeus Web Development
Hello Ben,
Friday, November 19, 2004, 8:18:09 PM, you wrote:
Javascript can measure this easily
If you can suggest some javascript to do this, I'd love to run it on
a few pages.
I'm suspecting this is a new idea. I'd like to make a nice package for
people to use. Something simple, a single tag
Hi,
Well at first glance I'd say the division itself has 5 px applied on all
sides as per the #qotd rules. The extra white space is most probably a mix
of margin and line-heights on the paragraphs you use within the div.
Iain
--
Iain Gardiner
http://www.firelightning.com
Ted Drake wrote:
Hi guys
I have fixed the image tag, that was an easy one. The problem is driving me crazy. I remove them when I can but whenever I get rid of them all it trashes the javascript functions. I wish I know which ones are safe to remove. On the vast majority of the pages, the
Thanks for the response. The 5px padding is only applied to the left
and right (at least, that's what happens when viewing). I have no line
heights applied to that div, so I'm still not sure what's causing it.
I really just need to remove the extra space, but I can't figure out
where it's
No, Ian's right. You have 5px padding all the way around, and then you
have the margins of the paragraphs contained within #qotd. Add
#qotd p { margin:0; padding:0; }
to you CSS.
Patrick H. Lauke
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used
Hi Ted,
I'm no javascript expert, but I believe language=javascript is
deprecated and no longer really required anyway. I only use 'type' and
haven't found any scripts breaking.
Cheers
Jason.
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:34:28 -0800, Ted Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this valid
Sorry to disagree, but your CSS rules for the division are as follows:
#qotd {
background: #fff;
font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
text-align: left;
padding: 5px; -- Applies 5px on all sides
In addition to my previous e-mail, I also spotted this rule:
html p {
text-align: left;
line-height: 1.5; -- This is applied to all paragraphs in
your document
}
--
Iain Gardiner
http://www.firelightning.com
The problem is p the p have a margin. You have to set the margin to
0px;
Berry
Thanks for the response. The 5px padding is only applied to the left
and right (at least, that's what happens when viewing). I have no line
heights applied to that div, so I'm still not sure what's causing it.
I
Hello All,
This might be a dumb question but I don't really know how to search
correctly in google for my answer.
Is it possible that any anchor inside a DIV will inherit all the properties
from the DIV?
For example
/***
CSS
**/
#idName {
font-family: Verdana;
}
a.idName:link {
You make me feel like a pudding head, Iain.
~john
on 11/19/2004 11:03 PM Iain Gardiner said the following:
In addition to my previous e-mail, I also spotted this rule:
html p {
text-align: left;
line-height: 1.5; -- This is applied to all paragraphs in
The problem is driving me crazy. I remove them when I can but
whenever I get rid of them all it trashes the javascript functions. I
wish I know which ones are safe to remove. On the vast majority of the
pages, the things are the last hurdles.
Ack! Don't remove the unless you know what they
Hi John,
You make me feel like a pudding head, Iain.
~john
lol, not my intention at all, sorry. I sould say now that I love the clean
and uncluttered design you have made. Your client should be very pleased.
And I am pleased as I have been a fan of CS Lewis ever since having
You have the right idea, but the wrong methodology. The selectors you need
to use are:
#idName {
font-family: Verdana;
}
#idName a:link {
color: #FFF;
}
#idName a:visited {
color: #FFF;
}
Hey everyone
I've been hacking away at this all day, the strange ghost words.
I finally came up with a holly hack to make it a bit better.
Here's what I was coming across.
I have a series of titles/inputs that are very similar and play well. Then,
there is one with a longer title and it wraps.
hehe...well thanks. In this case, I am my own client. *grin* The
site's been up for 10 years, and this is v3.0 to keep up with the times. :)
~john
_
Dr. Zeus Web Development
http://www.DrZeus.net
content without clutter
on 11/19/2004 11:23 PM Iain Gardiner said the
AHH!!
Thank you very much
...helmut
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Iain Gardiner
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] anchor, classes and IDs
You have the right idea, but the wrong
Hi Ted,
Sorry to be late with this response, but I'd encountered this problem in the
last two weeks at work. I've written some documentation for it at work, but
really the best reference is from PiE:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/dup-characters.html
This behaviour, dubbed the
Jeroen Visser [ vizi ] wrote:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
I don't belong to the group of screaming developers.
Hi Georg,
Sorry for this misunderstanding --I didn't mean to group you in any
way. It's just that I was a bit amazed about your view when in
general, the web standards 'society' regards IE as
Hi John,
I've found if you delete the paragraph tags containing the first and last
sentences that should do the trick. You have the middle paragraph
contained within a set of paragraph and blockquote tags, which will retain
your layout and formatting.
Since div tags are considered block-level
45 matches
Mail list logo
