Dave Barnett wrote:
The URL is: http://www.flinders.edu.au/
We have tested the page on all available browser/system setups without
a hitch, but we periodically receive emails from people complaining
about tiny font sizes.
Due to your style:
body {font: normal 0.75em/127% ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark B
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 5:41 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Semi-newbie: advice needed
Hiya.
I'm an experienced HTML CSS coder who has dabbled a little with the
XHTML/CSS
Will do Rick!
Thanks Dean!
:-D
--Zachary
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:55:41 +1100, Dean Burge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rick,
h2's on search page have wrong title values. A couple of }}'s messing
up your CSS validation.
-db
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey, If anyone can check my site (hopkinsprogramming.net) out in
Safari, IE 5.x Mac, and Konqueror and send me a screenie, I'd much
appreciate it. I have already been to browsercam.com. I've already
gone through my free trial.
Thanks for all the help guys! :-)
--Zachary Hopkins
On Thu, 24
Good Day Ladies and Gentlemen,
Let me get it off my chest - I use frames sometimes!
As far as I'm concerned, when you have a great long scrolling list (for
example) and you want (need) to keep the nav stuff stationary, frames
represent the ONLY way to do it. [posn-fixed] doesn't work in IE, nor
Thank you for all the feed back on LCD Monitors vs traditional monitors. I will look at all the suggestions.
Nancy
Paul Menard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could be the color calibration on the LCD or 'traditional' CRT. Check out some tools like:http://www.colorvision.com/ (PANTONE Spyder - hardware
As far as I'm concerned, when you have a great long scrolling list (for
example) and you want (need) to keep the nav stuff stationary, frames
represent the ONLY way to do it.
The ONLY? What about:
div style='width:300px;height:300px;overflow:auto;'
!-- put your stuff in here --
/div
That seems to
G'day
As far as I'm concerned, when you have a great long scrolling list (for
example) and you want (need) to keep the nav stuff stationary, frames
represent the ONLY way to do it.
They don't.
[posn-fixed] doesn't work in IE, nor is it likely to from
what we've heard.
I agree.
However You
does that work in IE. Im thinking of implementing it in my
blog, atm im jus using a blogger template. see:
http://nogg3r5.blogspot.com
Shaun Johnson
- Original Message Follows -
From: Vaska.WSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] you've been framed!
Date:
Bob McClelland wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, when you have a great long scrolling list
(for example) and you want (need) to keep the nav stuff stationary,
frames represent the ONLY way to do it.
Vaska.WSG responded:
div style='width:300px;height:300px;overflow:auto;'
!-- put your stuff in
when I put a right floating image in an unordered bulleted list, then in
opera 7.54 the list item holding the floating image doesn't show the
bullet anymore. I use the following code:
ul
liItem 1/li
liimg src=0_brailleleesregel_kleinst.jpg width=150
height=170 alt=Foto van een
This example can help you to decide what is better to use between frames
and fake-frames made with css instead:
http://soiland.no/frames_with_css/
And this one explains why really is better to avoid frames:
http://karlcore.com/articles/article.php?id=2
I obviously agree with the author of the
MAC IE 5 SCRENN SHOT
attachment: SCREENIE.gif
Hi,
I vaguely remember reading if the xml declaration position the
following:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en
head
titleVirtual
Georg,
That does help a lot actually. Thanks for taking the time to elaborate
on this...
diona
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 04:12 +0100, Gunlaug Srtun wrote:
diona kidd wrote:
Could some of you supply more information on this then? Maybe a
link to an article or two?
I don't understand what
Seems interesting... the address 127.0.0.1 is the
TCPaddress for loopback. This means that any computer that calls that
address is actually referring to itself. The only reason I can think of, is that
your browser is inserting it in order to allow or block certain functionality on
the page
Hi,
I thought these elements were deprecated:
Presentation Module
b, big, hr, i, small, sub, sup, tt
But there existence in XHMTL 1.1 specification contradicts this
assumption. Have the been ostracized by the web development community?
I can remember hr being frowned upon as far back as Dave
Gerard Copinga schrieb:
when I put a right floating image in an unordered bulleted list, then in
opera 7.54 the list item holding the floating image doesn't show the
bullet anymore.
ul
liItem 1/li
liimg src=0_brailleleesregel_kleinst.jpg width=150
height=170 alt=Foto van een brailleleesregel
http://forums.devshed.com/archive/t-77135
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Alex
KatechisSent: 24 March 2005 16:05To:
wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] Who's putting
_javascript_ in my code?
Seems interesting...
Hi all,
Im building a css layout that will be launched in a pop up window on click.
Its a template that will be updated by office staff using dreamweaver.
Anyway im experiencing some cross browser gliches with the layout that i
cant solve on my own.
So far Ive tested in
ie 5.mac
ie 6 win
You are correct - when IE sees the XML prologue, it thinks that it's the
doctype, and gets thrown into quirks mode. However, having the XML prologue
after the doctype (as in your second example) isn't proper. Per the W3C
specs, XHTML should be served as application/xhtml+xml or application/xml
Yes, I agree. XML Declaration must be (when used) the very first
element in the document.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
i had a similar problem recently...we figured out after a week that it wasn't just on my end...although the host claimed they had checked everything, the server had a virus (that was connect to a java applet on another site that was a known home for hackers)...hopefully your problem isn't nearly
Are
you using FireFox, IE or something else? I think that's browser based and
it's something I've ignored but also been curious about.
Christie Mason
-Original Message-
From:
Carol Doersom
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 9:12
PM
Hi,
I thought the article suggesting this was the specification, so I
asked. I'll file it under 'Urban Myth.
C
On Thursday, March 24, 2005, at 08:08 AM, Patrick Lauke wrote:
Chris Kennon
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd;
html
Vaska.WSG wrote:
i had a similar problem recently...we figured out after a week that it
wasn't just on my end...although the host claimed they had checked
everything, the server had a virus (that was connect to a java applet
on another site that was a known home for hackers)...hopefully your
Collin Davis
Per the W3C
specs, XHTML should be served as application/xhtml+xml or
application/xml or
text/xml and should not be served as text/html.
Actually, it doesn't say should not! As per section 5.1, it
actually states that documents may be sent as text/html:
XHTML Documents which
That's what I would expect from Microsoft, they are always behind, and
then when they realize that they need to update, they just copy
someone else *ehh hmm, new MSN site*.
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:41:01 +1200, Rebecca Cox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, apologies if this has been posted
Vlad Alexander (XStandard)
sub and sup are not presentational.
I beg to differ...they are entirely visual.
There is a valid need
for superscript and subscript in markup. For example:
E = mcsup2/sup
Again, that's visual markup. It doesn't say M C squared,
but M C and then a 2 that lives
Hi,
I can gather from this exchange, although the elements have not been
deprecated, they should not be included in clean semantic markup?
Thanks
C
On Thursday, March 24, 2005, at 09:06 AM, Patrick Lauke wrote:
Vlad Alexander (XStandard)
sub and sup are not presentational.
I beg to
Hi Patrick,
The following is take from:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html
Before somebody smart in this list points out that this document is a working
draft, let me say that (1) there are other sources that say the same thing - I
don't have time to hunt for them right now and (2) I am
Vlad Alexander (XStandard) wrote:
[quote:]
Separators: in previous versions of HTML, the hr element was used to separate sections of a text from each other. In retrospect, the name hr (for horizontal rule) was badly chosen, because an hr was neither necessarily horizontal (in vertical text it was
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick H. Lauke
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 1:06 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] XHTML 1.1 Presentation Module
Examples:
E = mcsup2/sup
span xml:lang=frMsuplle/sup
I can gather from this exchange, although the elements have not been
deprecated, they should not be included in clean semantic markup?
One could argue that the replacement of i, b, sup, sub, tt, and hr with
spans, classes, and the like are equally unclean semantically. What is
the semantic
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
Here's how xhtml2.0 defines the text module which includes [sup]
[...]
Note in particular the phrase in this case it is intended to only have a
semantic meaning. That seems pretty clear. While that may or may not be the
current definition of [sup], it certainly seems to be
Carol Doersom wrote:
(I'm using FF1.0.1. )
Actually Neerav and Patrick are right that it's something Zone Alarm
does. I turned off ad blocking and the postamble line went away,
eliminating 2 of the warnings I was getting.
Can't figure out how to lose the in-head line, though. One of the
links
Hi all,
I notice a bug in Firefox (I think it is, anyway) which shows itself as a
2-3 pixel gap appearing in the bottom border of an image when the viewport
is altered by scrolling with the mouse wheel. It doesn't affect all the
images (strange) only some, and the image must be outside the
designer wrote:
Hi all,
I notice a bug in Firefox (I think it is, anyway) which shows itself as a
2-3 pixel gap appearing in the bottom border of an image when the viewport
is altered by scrolling with the mouse wheel. It doesn't affect all the
images (strange) only some, and the image must be
On 25 Mar 2005 at 9:22, Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
Is there any situation where IE6 renders in standard compliance mode with
the ?xml ... preamble?
If IE6 finds an Xml-Declaration, he switchs in BackCompat.
I did use two testpages, look at http://www.sql-und-xml.de/
then at
I have been working on upgradeing http://choroideremia.org to web standards.
When I use FireFox 1.01 to go to http://choroideremia.org , my PC crashes
and all I can do is a cold boot. Anyone know why?
Angus MacKinnon
MacKinnon Crest Saying
Latin - Audentes Fortuna Juvat
English - Fortune
Hi Vaska,
I think I may have a solution for you -- negative margins. I've used
this method before and have had great luck with it. You can read up on Creating
Liquid Layouts with Negative Margins for some details on the
technique. This is one of my favorite articles on A List Apart.
I was
Hi Angus,
It would help to know some more details about your machine such as your
OS, etc. I've been able to load the site fine, however an image
chm_disease.jpg does not load. I'm running Win XP Pro SP2 and tested
the site with IE6 and Firefox 1.0.2
regards,
Andrew
InfoForce Services
Hi
This has nothing to do with web standards, more of a software support
issue so I'm closing this thread.
The WSG list doesn't cover software support.
Cheers
James
---
admin
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:22:02 -0600, Carol Doersom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I'm using FF1.0.1. )
Actually Neerav
Hi everyone
Just a quick note that all WSG subscribers should adhere to the
mailing list guidelines regarding attachments on the list. If you want
to send someone a screenshot or something send it directly to them or
make it available on your website.
If you send a 100kb file to the list it gets
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:20:14 -0800, InfoForce Services (Angus MacKinnon)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been working on upgradeing http://choroideremia.org to web
standards.
When I use FireFox 1.01 to go to http://choroideremia.org , my PC crashes
and all I can do is a cold boot. Anyone know
Sorry. Your Highness.
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:32:39 -0800, Chris W. Parker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, March 24, 2005 8:56 AM said:
Looks good in Konqueror.
Please don't send 107kb attachments to a public mailing list. In fact
designer wrote:
OK, I know about the pitfalls, but the bookmarking thing is easy to
get over - just add 2 short lines of javascript from
www.CodeLifter.com :
if (parent.location.href == self.location.href){
window.location.href = 'whateverframeset.html' }
I don't think this has to do
47 matches
Mail list logo
