Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-25 Thread kate
- From: Susie Gardner-Brown To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 11:10 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] First Attempt Seconded ... (or 10th, whatever!) You (one) really have to be able to handcode. I use Dreamweaver but I always have it open in both views, never

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-25 Thread kate
@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 7:07 AM Subject: Re: [WSG] First Attempt Well, I started with Dreamweaver's design view, since, that was what I was thought. My first site was a table crap :) I didn't know what was going on. I decided to learn the nuts bolts of HTML. My

RE: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-25 Thread Elizabeth Spiegel
Hi Kate You said: do need to study how frames work (naming) too. Nononono! Frames are awful for accessibility and usability (iFrames are arguably better). I can't think of an example of a really good framed site (although other list members may be able to offer some). I used to

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-25 Thread Dave Lane
Thank you for saying that, Elizabeth, couldn't agree more about both frames and Flash... I strongly recommend customers against fully-flash sites due to the inconsistent (compared to web conventions), usually non-spiderable, and inaccessible navigation, but agree it can be useful for specific

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-25 Thread Dave Lane
Bruce, I couldn't agree more - the road is littered with web developers who don't know how to write XHTML or CSS. We rescue their customers frequently. I'd say that, in order to learn how the web really works, write HTML and CSS from scratch (yes, in a text editor). To get started, find a site

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-25 Thread Blake
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Dave Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course, there are some who say that hand coding websites is too inefficient... but the way to make hand coding more efficient *isn't* to use Dreamweaver or [insert your favourite WYSIWYG HTML editor here]. Actually, as far

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-25 Thread Michael MD
The way to make it work is to stop writing static HTML sites. Instead use one of the many freely available open source CMS frameworks and simply hand code the templates for them once (making hand coded changes for other customer sites as required). That's what we do with Drupal. I would not

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-25 Thread Andrew Barnett
But the ease of updating a site using a CMS such as Drupal or WordPress is often what people are wanting. To code each page individually, for many people would be a right pain in the ass, as well as looking after file structures and all that. Using a CMS is just bleedingly obvious for most people,

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-25 Thread Joseph Taylor
If we plan on working in the web design world, you'll find that the real world (at least for the moment) is far from standardized. Frames, iframes, flash, nested table madness - it's out there on both old sites _and_ new. Sometimes you have to go in and fix something on one of these

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-25 Thread Dave Lane
Actually, Michael Michael MD wrote: I would not recommend this for sites on shared servers unless they really do need a full-featured CMS. Speed is important .. why add bloat if its not needed? A mysql server in a typical ISP shared hosting environment often struggles to handle a large

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread Peter Mount
Hi What's the url? -- Peter Mount Web Development for Business Mobile: 0411 276602 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.petermount.com On 24/11/2008, at 9:55 PM, kate wrote: Hello, My first attempt at Web design but only first step to any design and wondered what you think so far as to: Top

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread kate
Hello Peter, I followed with another messge for the link but here it is: http://www.jungaling.com/katalinadesigns/index.html Sorry.! Kate - Original Message - From: Peter Mount [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 11:08 AM Subject: Re: [WSG

RE: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread Rachel Radford
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kate Sent: 24 November 2008 11:57 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] First Attempt Hello Peter, I followed with another messge for the link but here it is: http://www.jungaling.com/katalinadesigns/index.html Sorry.! Kate

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread Todd Budnikas
As someone who hasn't opened dreamweaver in years and codes css and xhtml by hand, but learned to build websites in Dreamweaver, I would say Rachel's approach might be difficult for some. This being your first website Kate, I would say to use some of the better tools Dreamweaver offers and

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread kate
Subject: RE: [WSG] First Attempt Hi Kate, For a first webpage you're doing pretty well - you have some images there and have changed the background colour and text colour on the page. However, using the Dreamweaver design view approach will not give you the best end results, or teach you the best

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread Andrew Maben
On Nov 24, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Kate wrote: Wow! You hand code For now, and I think, the foreseeable future, this is still the only way available if you want to get it right... ...although its a long road Yes it is! But worth it, and if you start simply, and follow the excellent advice

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread Brett Patterson
As someone who has read the post, in Dreamweaver 8, to follow along with Todd's statement, choose (File -- New) and under the General tab choose Starter Pages. You may choose from the list DW8 has. The rest I agree with. Try learning some of the code from the pre-existing sites, modify one section

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread kate
: Monday, November 24, 2008 3:20 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] First Attempt As someone who has read the post, in Dreamweaver 8, to follow along with Todd's statement, choose (File -- New) and under the General tab choose Starter Pages. You may choose from the list DW8 has. The rest I agree with. Try

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread Kate
, Todd Budnikas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Todd Budnikas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] First Attempt To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Date: Monday, 24 November, 2008, 3:19 PM As someone who hasn't opened dreamweaver in years and codes css and xhtml by hand, but learned to build websites

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread Bruce
Andrew November 24, 2008 10:59 AM On Nov 24, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Kate wrote: Wow! You hand code For now, and I think, the foreseeable future, this is still the only way available if you want to get it right... ...although its a long road Yes it is! But worth it, and if you start simply,

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread kate
in Notepad but I am impressed by people that can..who knows I may try it. Thanks Bruce! Kate - Original Message - From: Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 4:21 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] First Attempt Andrew November 24, 2008 10:59 AM

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread Bruce
kate wrote: Thanks Bruce, Best viewed lolol was funny to read because about three years ago someone created an awesome site for me with Wordpress. He worked the China Red theme and wrote nin the sidebar best viewed in IE5 or higher. I never knew then about testing in different browsers

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread Hassan Schroeder
Kate wrote: Wow! You hand code. You realize many people started developing web sites before anything like DreamWeaver even existed -- when the *only* option was opening up a file in vi or emacs or whatever text editor and hand coding? It's not rocket science, honest. And the sooner you throw

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread Bruce
kate wrote: Wow Bruce, I transferred my code from Dreamweaver to Notepad gave it the .index.html and bingo even images..wow my giddy aunt I am amazed. lolol Positive from this is no upgrades for Dreamweaver. Kate wow my giddy aunt I am amazed. This statement is destined to go down in

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread Ron Zisman
kate, thought i'd throw in my two cents. firstly i was in your position a couple years ago, using dreamweaver. at a certain point i realized i didn't know what i was doing or what was going wrong when things didn't view properly. i hadn't heard anything about box models, didn't know what

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread kate
5:09 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] First Attempt kate, thought i'd throw in my two cents. firstly i was in your position a couple years ago, using dreamweaver. at a certain point i realized i didn't know what i was doing or what was going wrong when things didn't view properly. i hadn't heard

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread kate
Subject: Re: [WSG] First Attempt Kate wrote: Wow! You hand code. You realize many people started developing web sites before anything like DreamWeaver even existed -- when the *only* option was opening up a file in vi or emacs or whatever text editor and hand coding? It's not rocket science

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread Andrew Maben
On Nov 24, 2008, at 2:33 PM, Bruce wrote: Hopefully this can get back on web standards topic... ...might be a good moment to remember a previous thread re: standards and swf. I'm sorry not to remember who provided this link, but I've found it invaluable:

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread kate
Thanks Bruce Agree BOT, I can now from the help get learning. Thankyou! Kate - Original Message - From: Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 7:33 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] First Attempt kate wrote: Thanks Hassan, I am trying to create

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

2008-11-24 Thread Mustafa Quilon
Well, I started with Dreamweaver's design view, since, that was what I was thought. My first site was a table crap :) I didn't know what was going on. I decided to learn the nuts bolts of HTML. My next site was table based but with a valid code. Then, I joined various lists, communities and saw