Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

Hi Andy and all, The protocol is flexible on that issue. The original weak signal QSO do contain a “RRR” that is “confirmed” by a “73” to keep both sizes of the QSO happy. The “RR73” is really intended for “strong signal” QSO’s and then the “73” is not needed to keep the QSO time short. 73,

Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

If you don't print the RR73,  then repeat your QSL/exchange message.  If you never receive the RR73, then don't log the QSO.   How many times you repeat your QSL/exchange message is a judgment call.  It's a tradeoff between completing the QSO and moving on to the next one.73,Ed W0YK Ori

Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

RR73 completes the QSO.   Both QSO partners have sent calls, exchanges and QSLs.  Am additional 73 message is a waste of time.73,Ed W0YK Original message From: sdegroff via wsjt-devel Date: 10/21/23 13:18 (GMT-08:00) To: WSJT software development Cc: sdegroff Subject: Re:

Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

+173,Ed W0YK Original message From: Ron WV4P via wsjt-devel Date: 10/21/23 13:02 (GMT-08:00) To: WSJT software development Cc: Ron WV4P Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73? I wish this was THE way, the useless final 73 should have never existed and is the b

Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

You CQ DX message should be in TX6. 73 -Jim NU0C On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 19:33:18 + Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel wrote: > After a review of ALL.TXT I no longer think this was related to prior use of > F/H mode. I had set TX5 to a "CQ DX message" and that was auto sequenced > after RR73 was

Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

Fox/Hound For dxpeditions...see the Help Mike W9MDB On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 11:24:46 PM CDT, sdegroff via wsjt-devel wrote: What is F/H mode ? Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: sdegroff via wsjt-devel Date: 10/21/23

Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

What is F/H mode ?Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: sdegroff via wsjt-devel Date: 10/21/23 11:22 PM (GMT-05:00) To: WSJT software development Cc: sdegroff Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73? Huh?Sent from my Verizon, Sam

Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

Huh?Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel Date: 10/21/23 7:06 PM (GMT-05:00) To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Andy Durbin Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73? After a review of ALL.TXT I no

Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

After a review of ALL.TXT I no longer think this was related to prior use of F/H mode. I had set TX5 to a "CQ DX message" and that was auto sequenced after RR73 was received. I'll need to be careful to ensure TX5 is set correctly when in QSO. 73, Andy, k3wyc ___

Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

> On Oct 21, 2023, at 16:04, Andrew Neumeier via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > If I am working a very weak station, and that station chooses to use RR73 > instead of 73, there > is a good chance that I have not received it, especially if I am waiting for > a qsb peak on the signal. And that’s wh

Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

In some cases the use of RR73 is problematic.  I operate FT8 almost exclusively on 2 meters, weak signal.  If I am working a very weak station, and that station chooses to use RR73 instead of 73, thereis a good chance that I have not received it, especially if I am waiting for a qsb peak on the

Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

FWIW ... if you received an RR73 .. there is no need to reply. The station is saying that RR I got your last, and 'over and out' ... The other party is not waiting for your reply, they're on to another contact. Neil, KN3ILZ On 10/21/2023 1:14 PM, Andy Durbin wrote: WSJT-X ver 2.6.1, Win 8.1.

Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

I don't know what F/H is,  but i have seen wsjtx hang and not complete the qso after RR73.Stan DeGroff W8SRDSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel Date: 10/21/23 3:49 PM (GMT-05:00) To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.ne

Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

I wish this was THE way, the useless final 73 should have never existed and is the bain of the mode. Ron, WV4P On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 2:55 PM Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > WSJT-X ver 2.6.1, Win 8.1. > > I have observed several times that I could not co

[wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

WSJT-X ver 2.6.1, Win 8.1. I have observed several times that I could not complete a QSO by sending 73 after I had received an RR73. This is expected operation with F/H active but not when F/H is not active. I suspect that something is latched in software if F/H mode has been used but is then

Re: [wsjt-devel] Extra characters in ALL.TXT for F/H

AP Decode see section 12.1 of User Guide wsjt.sourceforge.io [X]

Re: [wsjt-devel] Extra characters in ALL.TXT for F/H

Glenn Please read section 12 of the online documentation. It explains what you want to know. Dennis W1UE On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 8:27 AM Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi, > The following line of text is found once in my huge ALL.TXT file. Note > th

Re: [wsjt-devel] Extra characters in ALL.TXT for F/H

Search the Help file for "a4" or "a3". Mike W9MDB On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 07:26:27 AM CDT, Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi, The following line of text is found once in my huge ALL.TXT file.  Note the "a4" far to the right. V2.6.1  Windows 10 USB-USB to TS590SG DATA

[wsjt-devel] Extra characters in ALL.TXT for F/H

Hi, The following line of text is found once in my huge ALL.TXT file. Note the "a4" far to the right. V2.6.1 Windows 10 USB-USB to TS590SG DATA port, Special Op F/H, Split->Rig "231005_00530024.911 Rx FT8-20 0.0 720 AF8C RR73; NR4N -14 a4" The following 2 lines of text