Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > I want this change to go into WSJT-X v1.8.0 RC2 > but I am aware that it is an awfully large change to drop in at this late > stage, nevertheless I feel it fixes more critical issues than it introduces. > Currently

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

On 26/07/2017 17:26, Bill Somerville wrote: AP decoding places more diligence on the operator as such decodes can be deceptively valid and you should look at the quality and other decoder information added after the message before making an assessment on the accuracy of the decode. I should

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

On 7/26/2017 12:01 PM, W9MDB Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: What is "AP" decoding? Decoding a message with aid of "a priori" information gathered cumulatively during the progress of a QSO. It has been in WSJT-X for about a year, in mode QRA64. It's now available in FT8. --

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

On 26/07/2017 17:01, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: What is "AP" decoding? Hi Mike, let me try a dumbed down explanation, not because I want to dumb it down but because that is probably as deep as my understanding goes. When decoding a signal we have some fixed criteria for a good

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

Hello Mike, according to the manual: "the available a priori (AP) information " = content of ALL.TXT (?) but I am not 100% sure ;-) 73 de Wolfgang OE1MWW -- Amateur radio is the most expensive type of free-of-charge communication! Amateurfunk ist die teuerste Art der kostenlosen

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

Hi Richard, ... (Haven't yet found out how to persuade JTSDK to pick a specific revision e.g. r7946. Maybe I should RTFM.) Questions regarding JTSDK-{win32/nix} should go here: jt...@groups.io 73's Greg, KI7MT --

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

What is "AP" decoding? de Mike W9MDB-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

On 25/07/17 22:50, Steven Franke wrote: > FWIW, you may find that r7946 is somewhat faster than r7944, on all settings. > I have made a change that will reduce the number of non-viable candidates > that are sent to the decoders. Thanks Steve. Thanks also to Joe for the tip on timer.out. I've

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

Hi Richard, On 7/25/2017 4:58 PM, Richard Lamont G4DYA wrote: On 25/07/17 00:17, Joe Taylor wrote: Ubuntu MATE 16.04 amd64 1.7.1-devel r7939 Auto seq and call 1st enabled Tried it and it looks as though FT8 now has a two-pass decoder, which is nice. Since you're providing feedback on

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

M To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic On 25/07/17 22:09, Steven Franke wrote: > Hi Richard, > >> As Bill mentioned in his OP, the FT8 decoder is still a work in >> progress but I have noticed

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

Hi Richard, > 1.8.0-rc1 fast/normal/deep 0.2s/0.5s/0.7s > 1.8.0-rc2-r7924fast/normal/deep 0.2s/0.5s/0.7s > 1.7.1-devel-r7944 fast/normal/deep 0.4s/0.8s/2.5s FWIW, you may find that r7946 is somewhat faster than r7944, on all settings. I have made a change that will reduce

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

On 25/07/2017 21:58, Richard Lamont wrote: As Bill mentioned in his OP, the FT8 decoder is still a work in progress but I have noticed that the r7939/r7944 decoder is currently too slow to be usable on my machine, which uses a Core 2 Duo E6700 CPU (2 x 2.66 GHz cores), even with nothing much

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

Hi Richard, > As Bill mentioned in his OP, the FT8 decoder is still a work in progress > but I have noticed that the r7939/r7944 decoder is currently too slow to > be usable on my machine, which uses a Core 2 Duo E6700 CPU (2 x 2.66 GHz > cores), even with nothing much else running. (Admittedly

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

> On Jul 24, 2017, at 8:24 PM, igwt1939 wrote: > > The biggest problems I have is it jumping around and I think it confuses the > other op so that sometime they don't come back to the finish ,but I still > enjoy it but will be glad when it gets stable. Could you explain

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

@lamont.me.uk> To: <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic On 24/07/17 20:35, Bill Somerville wrote: Currently it is only in the development branch but I urge those brave enough to

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

Hi Richard, Richard G4DYA wrote: Ubuntu MATE 16.04 amd64 1.7.1-devel r7939 Auto seq and call 1st enabled Tried it and it looks as though FT8 now has a two-pass decoder, which is nice. Since you're providing feedback on development code, you should not need to guess or make inferences

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

On 24/07/2017 23:10, Richard Lamont wrote: On 24/07/17 20:35, Bill Somerville wrote: Currently it is only in the development branch but I urge those brave enough to build the development branch to try it and report back. You should note that the development branch also contains FT8 decoder

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

Hi Bill I just built r7939 and Sh messages in JT4 and QRA64 now seem to be working correctly with Type 1 compound mycall. 73 Charlie > Hi All, > > I have finally got to a point where I can commit the large round of > changes that came from doing the above. The change (r7939) comment is > this:

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

Thanks Bill. That is what I thought the "policy" was. Just clarifying. 73, Tom - KQ5S On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > On 24/07/2017 21:50, Tom-KQ5S wrote: > > I built and installed 7939. You mentioned " Auto sequencing has been > made

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

On 24/07/2017 21:50, Tom-KQ5S wrote: I built and installed 7939. You mentioned " Auto sequencing has been made generic such that it can be used for more than one mode if desired." Does this mean JT9/65? If so where do you toggle it on? Hi Tom, the "if desired" refers to the developers

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

Thanks Bill. I built and installed 7939. You mentioned " Auto sequencing has been made generic such that it can be used for more than one mode if desired." Does this mean JT9/65? If so where do you toggle it on? 73, Tom - KQ5S On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Bill Somerville

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

Hi All, I have finally got to a point where I can commit the large round of changes that came from doing the above. The change (r7939) comment is this: + Add the option to ALT+click a decoded CQ or QRZ message which only moves the Rx frequency to