Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned?

k.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2FX.Org=02%7C01%7Cstephen.langer%40nist.gov%7C16d7bdea424a40c252fb08d60f62363f%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C636713311816455775=aRmMODzcfHZMi11aJpp1pnEFUOvItezL0Ug%2BjSRKxjg%3D=0> >> components. This is the big advantage compared to XQuartz, in that anyone >>

Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned?

it within MacPorts. X11 is certainly not dead in MacPorts, and I do recommend anyone using the server to look to migrating to use the MacPorts supplied version (port name is xors-server). Chris David On Aug 30, 2018, at 2:51 PM, x11-users-requ...@lists.apple.com wrote: 4. Re: Is XQuartz de

Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned?

gt; who wants to can contribute to it within MacPorts. X11 is certainly not dead > in MacPorts, and I do recommend anyone using the server to look to migrating > to use the MacPorts supplied version (port name is xors-server). > > > Chris > > > > > David &g

Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned?

ug 30, 2018, at 2:51 PM, x11-users-requ...@lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users-requ...@lists.apple.com> wrote: 4. Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned? (Filhol Alain) Message: 4 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:51:01 +0200 From: Filhol Alain mailto:fil...@ill.eu>> To: x11-users@lists.a

Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned?

11aJpp1pnEFUOvItezL0Ug%2BjSRKxjg%3D=0> > components. This is the big advantage compared to XQuartz, in that anyone > who wants to can contribute to it within MacPorts. X11 is certainly not dead > in MacPorts, and I do recommend anyone using the server to look to migrating >

Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned?

tz, in that anyone > who wants to can contribute to it within MacPorts. X11 is certainly not dead > in MacPorts, and I do recommend anyone using the server to look to migrating > to use the MacPorts supplied version (port name is xors-server). > > Chris > > >> >>

Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned?

equ...@lists.apple.com> wrote: 4. Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned? (Filhol Alain) Message: 4 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:51:01 +0200 From: Filhol Alain mailto:fil...@ill.eu>> To: x11-users@lists.apple.com<mailto:x11-users@lists.apple.com> Subject: Re: Is XQuartz developme

Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned?

2:51 PM, x11-users-requ...@lists.apple.com wrote: >> >> 4. Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned? (Filhol Alain) >> >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:51:01 +0200 >> From: Filhol Alain >> To: x11-users@lists.apple.com >> Subject: R

Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned?

Jeremyhu is listed as the maintainer of xorg-server on MacPorts. does he spend more time working on that than XQuartz? David > On Aug 30, 2018, at 2:51 PM, x11-users-requ...@lists.apple.com wrote: > > 4. Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned? (Filhol Alain) > > >

Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned?

Here the answer I got from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia on 02 Feb 2017. I think we can be real pessimistic concerning X11 on macOS. > [AF] A question about slow dialogues with OpenMotif and XQuartz (much slower > than with Linux). > > [JHS] > There is a known issue there, I believe with Yosemite

Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned?

When issues are fixed in xorg-server, the the related tickets closed? John > On Aug 30, 2018, at 1:30 PM, Langer, Stephen A. (Fed) > wrote: > > xorg-server from MacPorts is more up to date. > -- Steve > > On 8/30/18, 3:54 PM, "X11-users on behalf of Mick Mueck" >

Re: Is XQuartz development abandoned?

xorg-server from MacPorts is more up to date. -- Steve On 8/30/18, 3:54 PM, "X11-users on behalf of Mick Mueck" mailto:x11-users-bounces+stephen.langer=nist@lists.apple.com> on behalf of mick.mu...@mac.com> wrote: Hi All, I'm an XQuartz user and immensely glad I