I am running XFree86 Version 4.2.0 on Red Hat Linux
4.2.0-72. When drawing lines and other primitives to the window, only the
visible portions are displayed. If I scroll the window, the graphics are
missing. The text is where it should be. The code works on Solaris and HP.
What do I
Hello,
I have Redhat 9 running on my system and
i changed the runlevel in the file /etc/inittab to 3 and reboot the system and
tried to run the command startx to start the GUI, but i got an error
I am send the log file that it genetated, please advice.-- CheersSandeep Bharadwaj
Good day,
Have encountered a problem with starting up my laptop.
An error occurs, the log file attached should explain
everything. My laptop's specifications are listed as
requested.
XFree84 Version 4.3.0
RED HAT LINUX RELEASE: 4.3.0 - 2
RELEASE DATE: 27 FEB 2003
X PROTOCOL VERSION 11,
At the sunset hour of one warm spring day two men were to be seen at
Patriarch's Ponds. The first of them--aged about forty, dressed in a greyish
summer suit--was short, dark-haired, well-fed and bald. He carried his
decorous pork-pie hat by the brim and his neatly shaven face was
I recommend you specify
Screen1
in your SECOND device section.
Note, though, I have a notebook computer with an ATI Mobility IGP 320M
and still haven't been able to get a second monitor to work right. I
have seen similar concerns in this discussion group but not with a
I am using XFree86-4.2.0-8 on RedHat 7.3. I have an application
that draws to a pixmap as a buffer that is eventually drawn to a
mapped window. I have had the following error on a few occasions:
X Error of failed request: BadLength (poly request too large or internal
Xlib length error)
Please pardon what may be a very nieve question from a newbie! Please
also pardon me if this question is off topic? Otherwise, my question
has a slim chance of exposing a problem in XFree86 (I highly doubt it,
but we'll see).
On my XSetInputFocus() man page it says, XSetInputFocus() can
I modified the file /etc/X11/xdm/Xservers to start X with
the +bs option, but it didnt take. What file needs to be modified when
running xdm and the gnome desktop?
Xservers contains:
:0 local /usr/X11R6/bin/X +bs
I got it to work without xdm and gnome, when I manually
started X.
How can I configure the server to support the backing store
option as WHEN MAPPED for Screen 0? I cant find anything on configuring Backing
Store in the documentation.
Thanks Mark for the info on the bit planes.
Paul
Pearson
(281)
646-2750
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
We have an application that requires the 8 plane PseudoColor
Visual to run. We have required our Solaris and HP-UX customers to configure their
systems as 8 plane systems to support our application. I am porting the
application to Linux (Red Hat) and would like to run on the out-of-the-box
Thanks, but the fglrx package does not work with my device, ATI Radeon
IGP320 Mobility U1.
Regards,
*/Richard L. Mitchell (Rich)/*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've succeed getting my second monitor working on a Radeon 9200 with ATI
proprietary drivers
I've been working to get my second monitor working. So far, I have had
no luck. I've searched this group and the Internet. Here is my situation:
ATI Radeon IGP320M (U1) 4336
1280x800 LCD Notebook Panel
Sharp LL-M17W1u Monitor 1280x768
SUSE Professional 9.1
XFree86 version: 4.3.99.902
I have
On Sunday 30 May 2004 03:23 pm, Alain Poirier wrote:
The 0.2 version of 855resolution is now available. I modularized
it around plugins to be able to patch differents VBIOS.
I don't know how to compute the several resolution values of
the type 1. If you know how, please, look into the file
is all you need to see how to make your
tool more general. I'm sending the output of the tool on my machine along
with vbetest from lrmi as a comparison. Let me know if anything else would
be of use.
Here is the output of your tool with -l.
Chipset: 855GM
BIOS Configuration area offset
Title: XFree86: PCI device limited to 64 for xf86scanpci
Hello,
I am currently working on a platform that has 75 PCI devices with the last one being the video controller. The latest releases of XFree limits the number of PCI devices scanned by xf86scanpci to 64 (MAX_PCI_DEVICES in
, and to load driver ati
8500le correct where I can find it.
XFree86 4.4 (the latest release) has a radeon driver that supports
a Radeon 8500 card.
Karl L
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
that on to the
developers. I've found no sign of a similar problem in XFree86 emails so I'm hoping
those of you who know XFree86 a whole lot better than I can give me some guidance or
ideas about fixing this situation.
Thanks.
Karl L
___
XFree86 mailing list
The hack we implemented here, is to block in xf86EloGetPacket();
Tristan,
Even in your hack solution, isn't there still a small probability of
the same problem? Even if you wait for a complete packet, what
if another packet comes in after you're done reading data but
before X re-enables
Thanks for addressing this matter on the list, Matthew.
On Wednesday 21 April 2004 01:20 pm, Sottek, Matthew J wrote:
Unfortunately the 1400x1050 mode that was discussed on this list is not
supported in the IEGD driver when using the LVDS display. Although the
embedded driver does not rely on
From: Tristan Van Berkom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
Hi David,
This is a bug in xf86Elo.c (or a bug that I personaly fixed
in a local copy of that file).
Tristan,
I tried your patch and now X completely hangs. I can't even
control-alt-backspace to get out of X. Interestingly, the CPU
load is
I sent this to the general xfree86 mailing list but received no responses.
I think there
is a bug with the elographics driver:
I'm using XFree86 Version 4.4.0 (with circa redhat6.2 libraries and linux
kernel 2.6.4)
with an ELO touchscreen (elo2300 I think). If I have a real-time high
:
David
Veikko
-Original Message-
From: David L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 5:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [XFree86] lcd bottom of screen at top top at bottom
From: Veikko Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
to be taking ~8 seconds
to start up on my system while XMetro took about 5.
Veikko
-Original Message-
From: David L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 7:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [XFree86] lcd bottom of screen at top top at bottom
I'm tyring
I'm using XFree86 Version 4.4.0 (with circa redhat6.2 libraries and linux
kernel 2.6.4)
with an ELO touchscreen (elo2300 I think). If I have a real-time high
priority (SCHED_FIFO)
task that periodically sucks a lot of CPU time, the ELO touch interface
falls behind. Once
it's behind, it stays
I remember a setting in XF86Config where you tell X to use the BIOS setting
for the screen resolution. Because the problem you speak of is what I know
when one use a false BIOS setting for the display.
I found an option called SuspendHack:
Option SuspendHack
This option sets the
I'm tyring to run XFree86 Version 4.4.0 on a Jumtek MOPSLCD6 PC-104 (CT69000
chipset detected) computer with a 640x480 VGA LCD. The top of the screen
shows what should be on the bottom of the screen, then there is a black
horizontal band about an inch tall, and below that is what should be the
until you start X the screen is correct?
Yes, the screen is fine until I start X. And if I configure in the little
Linux
penguin boot logo, it's in the right place at the top of the screen too.
And
it's fine after I start the Metro version of X. It's only when I start
XFree86 that I have a
What are the washing instructions?Be quick to learn and wise to know.
CialiUXs at cheap prices.Most zones charge $20, we charge $4.95.
Quite a differencce.Ciali8Js is knoown as a Super Via44gra or Weekend ViaM8gra
because its eceftfs start sooner and last much lgeonr.Shipped
worldwide.Go
Hello, young lovers! :)We do not stop playing because we grow old we grow old because we stop playing.
Xfree, looking for a place to buy medicatigoEn?Premium ViagrFha and CialrHis.
Fast weight (sporidiolum cresamine) loss and anti-depressant medicatiIQon!Best price on ValiuyPm and XananJx.
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Mike A. Harris wrote:
As always, people can use another distribution, the binaries
from http://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/4.4.0/binaries/ , or
compile it.
You mean there is a distribution that actually plans on
shipping 4.4.0? ;o)
Actually, according to
Måns Rullgård wrote:
I must have missed that, and I thought Gentoo looked like a
reasonable distribution. I guess I'll just stay with
Slackware if they are the only ones that base choices on the
usefulness of software rather than personal opinions about
the licenses.
Exactly. It's just a
Dominique Dumont wrote:
For instance, Debian maintainer (Branden Robinson) will not
package Xfree4.4 will its new licence.
As always, people can use another distribution, the binaries
from http://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/4.4.0/binaries/ , or
compile it.
--
Just compiled 4.4.0 and ran xf86config. In the first page it
displays, among others:
SuperProbe may be able to help with this.
SuperProbe has been removed in 4.2.0.
--
http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It also mentions
Now give the full device name that the mouse is connected to,
for example /dev/tty00.
I assume who wrote it meant /dev/ttyS0, what used to be a
standard some years ago (serial mouse on the first serial
port).
That's all. Congratulations for the release.
--
Empresa procura Pessoas, Profissionais e Empresários, para Trabalho e
Parceria com E-Business, usando a Internet.
Detalhes no site ou na Apresentação Gratuita em São Paulo.
Visite: http://www.hipernegocio.net
Mauricio L. Costa
NGTCorp - Dúvidas pelo email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para ser removido
Empresa procura Pessoas, Profissionais e Empresários, para Trabalho e
Parceria com E-Business, usando a Internet.
Detalhes no site ou na Apresentação Gratuita em São Paulo.
Visite: http://www.hipernegocio.net
Mauricio L. Costa
NGTCorp - Dúvidas pelo email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para ser removido
section to something like
what's below. The other key ingredient is to make sure that all the modules
needed for the usb mouse are loaded before X starts. Otherwise, you may see
an error in the log when the server tries to open the device. The list of
modules I use is below.
Best
L. Jensen
to use this?
Thanks a lot for the tips.
- L. Jensen
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
is described in this thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xfree86w=2r=1s=external+crt+i855q=b
The first problem with SXGA+ has been discussed a lot with the conclusion that
nothing can be done without more information from Intel. I just wanted to
ask what can be made of the register information
On Thursday 05 February 2004 12:47 pm, L. Jensen wrote:
Here's the config I've been using plus the log.
I am still very eager to get the external crt display working. One
possibility was to configure X so that it could drive the crt. Luca's
comment and some lines in the log make me think
1280x1024 for now. I really would like
to solve that problem too.
Thank you very much,
-- L
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:53:40AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
Clearly the future of XFree86 is very murky right now, as many developers
have left to work on other projects such as freedesktop.org, and now with
the core team disbanded it is unclear exactly how companies
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Martin Spott wrote:
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:17:30AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
[...], and I am in discussions
with some of the other members of the community about starting a new
project to take over where
David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:27:15AM -0800, Richard A. Hecker wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
I believe that this is an acknowlegement that the core team was no longer
representative of the active, experienced and skilled XFree86 developers,
or a place where technical discussion
Hello,
We have checks from $25 - $150 ready to send you for offering us your
honest opinion on various online surveys that only take a few minutes
to complete. So if you're interested in earning a few hundred extra dollars each month for just giving your opinion on various surveys then press
David,
Upon first inspection it looks like all of the names of people that
contributed Cygwin-related patches are there.
Thanks,
Harold
David Dawes wrote:
I was going to announce this after Christmas, but maybe today is
better.
I'm proposing to add a Credits section to the Release Notes for
The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of that patch.
The CVS log message says:
fixes for _XtInherit on cygwin.
The
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of that patch.
The CVS
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Your commit didn't mention this either.
Our change log is in our release notes, where the changes were
attributed to Ralf Habacker:
tsk, tsk: the actual commit on the code change bears only your name.
A casual reader
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
XFree86 should be taking care not to steal credit for our patches by
committing them without proper attribution.
your standards are inconsistent: your committing the change rather than
offering commit access to someone who
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Your commit didn't mention this either.
Our change log is in our release notes, where the changes were
attributed to Ralf Habacker:
tsk, tsk: the actual
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:02:20PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
found Ralf
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
The only responsible thing for you to do would be to correct the
ChangeLog to attribute it to the patch's author.
well that's polite enough.
unlike Harold.
I
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
No, that is not good enough. You should amend your change log entry to
attribute the patch to Ralf and you should apologize to the X community
at large for being so sloppy with attributing credit.
yes, you're right.
Thanks
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
been corrected later, with a follow email from Harold.
It's a simple change to put that right in the CHANGELOG. So I'll do that.
I had that on my next set of commits.
Then why not say so earlier?
There was no point in doing
Hmmm Maybe this is a tenderfoot answer...
but why can't you just use the shared memory extension to the Xserver ?
That gives you a window into the Xserver and retains the event processing.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for your reply, but I'm not entirely sure what you mean...
I'm really not that well acquainted with the details of how the Xserver
works; I realise I'd have to do a lot of reading if I'm actually to get
anywhere with this idea :-) but is your suggestion to take care of what I
had
I am running version 4.3.0 of XFree86 and I have a problem with
the Xserver removing shared memory partitions that belong to other
processes when it starts.
Apparently when I originally wrote my code which uses shared
memory I unwisely choose to use shared memory keys in the
range 1 - 200.
I
It seems that David Dawes has made his decision not to let the
Cygwin/XFree86 project commit patches directly to the XFree86.org CVS
tree; he doesn't seem to want to go on record saying this, but he has
written several messages during this discussion about ftp servers, cvs
servers, etc., while
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:35:20AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
6) Alternatives are being evaluated for hosting Cygwin/XFree86 code in
CVS. Hosts that can provide CVS commit access for at least five
Cygwin/XFree86 developers will be given priority.
Harold,
I thought
Craig,
Craig Groeschel wrote:
I'm afraid your rants and threats won't do
much good there though.
Great. Shoot the messenger. (btw, No one is ranting or
threatening. Just being lucid and assertive. IMHO.)
Thanks for your support. I have tried, and failed on occasion, to
maintain my
David Dawes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 12:37:29PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
Well, you know, XFree86's disregard for offers to help made by
developers that have been with the project for over two years are
certainly part of the problem.
Err, this is about bug
David Dawes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 02:34:02PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Seriously, I don't know why I waste my time submitting patches that are
specific to my platform and then wait up to three weeks for them
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Peter Firefly Lund wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote:
When I discussed this with you privately a while ago all I got were
disrespectful and insulting responses. Now there is more of the same.
Err... No.
He was quite reasonable, in my
Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Peter Firefly Lund wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote:
When I discussed this with you privately a while ago all I got were
disrespectful and insulting responses. Now there is more of the same.
Err... No.
He was quite
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 03:51:05PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Peter Firefly Lund wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote:
When I discussed this with you privately a while ago all I got were
disrespectful and insulting responses. Now
Torrey,
Looks like you may have had the same sort of trouble that we are now
having with regards to building a shared version of the lesstif
libraries that link to a shared version of the Xt library. The
particular error message, when starting a lesstif app is:
XmManager ClassInitialize:
Michel Dnzer wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 17:13, Egbert Eich wrote:
Marc Aurele La France writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is an ML anyone can subscribe to. I am, and, I
believe, so is Egbert.
No, not currently. I usually go to the web interface and
look at the open bugs, process new ones that
which are supposed to
remain undefined are likely being satisfied at library link time so
nothing from lesstif is being included at application link time.
--Torrey
At 2:43 AM -0400 10/25/03, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Torrey,
Looks like you may have had the same sort of trouble that we are now
Egbert Eich wrote:
Marc Aurele La France writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is an ML anyone can subscribe to. I am, and, I
believe, so is Egbert.
No, not currently. I usually go to the web interface and
look at the open bugs, process new ones that can be handled
quickly, or try to assign
I wouldn't be opposed to just wiping out the #ifdef __CYGWIN__ stuff and
starting fresh with a test build. I can always put back any
platform-specific #if's that turn out to still be valid.
Harold
David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:00:23PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Oct
David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:04:55PM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:34:53PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
What happens when I assign patches in the Cygwin Xserver project to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Does
Jakub,
I just noticed this thread today. If this will have problems, then they
will definitely be visible on Cygwin. So, I ask that I please be
included in the testing process before this is committed, if it ever is.
I would gladly do test builds under Cygwin to confirm that the new
scheme
It would help if you attach your XF86Config file, as well as your
Xfree86.0.log
I had the same problem, but I cant exactly remember what I did to fix it,
attach the above mentioned files
Thanks
David
sir,
i have installed RHL9.0, my mouse get detected but instead of getting mouse
the behaviour you are describing on my dual screen set
up so that is about all the help I can give you.
Hope this is of use to you
David L
Hi!
I recently configured my dual-head card (radeon, if it makes any
difference) to actually use both the monitors connected to
it. However, I want
Hi,
Please copy over you XF86Config file, it will be easier for someone to bew
of help.
However this line of the error log seems to give away what the problem is,
could not open default font 'fixed'
Still it would be of use to copy over you configuration file
Thanks
David L
for the BusID. So how can XFree see the
difference.
So try to find out why XFree only sees one head ?
Regards,
Marcel Stegehuis
-- Oorspronkelijk bericht --
From: David L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [XFree86] Radeon 8500 Dual Head
Date
Hi ,
Im trying to set up Dual Screen on my FreeBSD 5.1 Release Machine using a
Hercules Radeon 8500 LE Dual Head ( one VGA and one DVI ) the card has an
ATI chip. I have had a look at a few configurations of people using the 7000
and I beleive I did find one with a 8500. However I
Hi ,
Im trying to set up Dual Screen on my FreeBSD 5.1 Release Machine using a
Hercules Radeon 8500 LE Dual Head ( one VGA and one DVI ) the card has an
ATI chip. I have had a look at a few configurations of people using the 7000
and I beleive I did find one with a 8500. However I
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestions, I have made the changes however no output on my
second head. Following is the XFree86.0.log (sorry about the length of this)
XFree86 Version 4.3.0
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: FreeBSD 5.1
I am getting a fatal server error while booting
into Linux redhat 7.3.
It gives me a Fatal server error:
xf86MapPciMem: could not mmap PCI memory
[base=0xe000,hostbase=0xe000,size=0] (invalid argument)
I think there is also a problem reading my video
display drivers, my laptop is a
David,
David Dawes wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:13:10AM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The only suggestion I have is that the function prototypes in
include/os.h should follow the conventions of all other prototypes in
os.h, using #if NeedFunctionPrototypes:
extern void
Matthieu,
The new file, prngc.c, uses sockaddr_storage. However, I know that at
least Cygwin does not have sockaddr_storage.
No alternative is provided and no conditional compilation is in effect
to fall back to previous functionality when sockaddr_storage is not
available. This breaks the
Matthieu (and Matthias),
Matthias Scheler wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:58:19PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
It seems to me that the C langage version of ucs2any.pl developped by
Ben Collver and other NetBSD developpers is now stable enough to be
included in XFree86.
Two comments:
1.)
David Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:01:00PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Matthieu (and Matthias),
Matthias Scheler wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:58:19PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
It seems to me that the C langage version of ucs2any.pl developped by
Ben Collver and other
Matthieu,
I appreciate the notification in advance of committing something like
this. I am doing a build test right now on Cygwin. I will let you know
if I find any problems.
Harold
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me that the C langage version of ucs2any.pl developped by
Ben Collver
Matthieu,
I found two things:
1) In ucs2any.c the libgen.h header is included only to provide
basename, while a local definition of basename is provided for those
platforms that don't have it. However, libgen.h is still included even
on those platforms that define NEED_BASENAME. Thus, the
Hi!
I'm using Debian woody(unstable version) and I'm trying to install XFree86
4.3. I downloaded Xinstall.sh and run:
# sh Xinstall sh -check
Checking which OS you're running...
uname reports 'Linux' version '2.4.18', architecture 'i686'
Object format is 'ELF'. libc version is '6.3.2' (6.3).
Hi!
I'm using Debian woody(unstable version) and I'm trying to install XFree86
4.3. I downloaded Xinstall.sh and run:
# sh Xinstall sh -check
Checking which OS you're running...
uname reports 'Linux' version '2.4.18', architecture 'i686'
Object format is 'ELF'. libc version is '6.3.2' (6.3).
Hi!
I'm using Debian woody(unstable version) and I'm trying to install XFree86
4.3. I downloaded Xinstall.sh and run:
# sh Xinstall sh -check
Checking which OS you're running...
uname reports 'Linux' version '2.4.18', architecture 'i686'
Object format is 'ELF'. libc version is '6.3.2' (6.3).
Todd T. Fries wrote:
Penned by Daniel Stone on Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 04:51:49PM +1000, we have:
[..]
| I did suggest this (mv hp,v hp.old,v).
If you guys care about history at all, aka the ability to checkout files
in the past, you would not suggest nor impement this suggestion.
Does history
Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Todd T. Fries wrote:
Penned by Daniel Stone on Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 04:51:49PM +1000, we have:
[..]
| I did suggest this (mv hp,v hp.old,v).
If you guys care about history at all, aka the ability to checkout files
Egbert,
My main question here is why does HEAD not have hp while xf-4_3-branch
still does? I can checkout HEAD, but I cannot check out xf-4_3-branch
because hp is in the way.
Do the changes that you applied to HEAD need to be applied to
xf-4_3-branch as well?
Harold
Egbert,
I don't see a way how you can work around this as there seems to
be no way to exclude files from checkout/update.
One could create an alias module in the CVS repositry which excludes
the HP directory. Like
xc-win -a !xc/programs/xkbcomp/geometry/HP xc
Then doing a
cvs
David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 01:09:50PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Egbert,
I don't see a way how you can work around this as there seems to
be no way to exclude files from checkout/update.
One could create an alias module in the CVS repositry which excludes
the HP directory
Egbert,
I cannot checkout xf-4_3_0_1 because of this whole hp/HP issue. The
following is from my cvs checkout log:
cvs server: Updating xc/programs/xkbcomp/geometry
U xc/programs/xkbcomp/geometry/Imakefile
U xc/programs/xkbcomp/geometry/README
U xc/programs/xkbcomp/geometry/amiga
U
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:06:22AM +0200, james amen atayi wrote:
Hallo!
Is it possible to directly read the video card output and save it into a file
as a screen shot? I have to capture for a long time the display. Doing it
making screen shots is not a good solution. That why I'm trying
localhost lookupd[196]: Caught SIGHUP - reset
htmldivPBIgnatius M L Oh/BBRICQ#:FONT color=#4051c8
174365101/FONTBRIMG
src=http://web.icq.com/whitepages/online?icq=174365101amp;img=7;BRMore
ways to contact me @ FONT color=#ffBYahoo!/B/FONT
Messenger:FONT color=#800080 OHMLPC/FONT/P
expert users please kindly guide me on the following problem: xfree v. 4.3.0
installed in mac os x v. 10.1.5 starts for only a few seconds before
quitting.
the following is the log:
XDarwin 1.2.0
XFree86 Version 4.3.0 / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
