experimental grab-testing code (the TouchBegin
grab, as well as 'thong' and the associated XIAllowTouchEvents), which
will be removed from the final revision. For the time being, it's
useful for testing.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas chase.doug...@canonical.com
Co-authored-by: Daniel
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 03:31:40PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
If configured, and enabled at runtime, use a separate thread for
handling input devices. Use pipes to communicate plug events from main
thread to input thread, and to communicate event queue updates from
input thread to main
file a
bug):
Reviewed-and-regretted-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http
with that:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:59:21PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Jan 19, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:58:40AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
@@ -229,6 +229,10 @@ miPointerSetCursorPosition(DeviceIntPtr pDev,
ScreenPtr pScreen,
[...]
This looks good
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 09:16:09PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org (19/01/2011):
--- a/dix/getevents.c
+++ b/dix/getevents.c
[…]
+int
+GetTouchEvents(EventList *events, DeviceIntPtr pDev, TouchPointInfoPtr ti,
+ uint16_t type, uint32_t
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 04:56:45PM +, Popescu, CatalinX wrote:
I have an issue with the X server, evdev library more precisely. When a mouse
(or a compatible device) is detected by the X server, the server does
actually detect an event device (/dev/input/eventN) and a mouse device
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 03:32:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
There is currently no mapping between XI devices and physical devices other
than what can be extracted by parsing the Xorg logfile. Add new property
Device Node to the driver to export the open device file.
The client is
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:32:16AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
CC'ing Lennart, he can contribute more details I supposed.
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:58:22AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 03:32:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
There is currently no mapping
-off-by: Carlos Garnacho carl...@gnome.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org
a/XI2proto.txt b/XI2proto.txt
index d079ddb..5ebe59d 100644
--- a/XI2proto.txt
+++ b/XI2proto.txt
@@ -9,11 +9,11 @@
Daniel Stone
dan...@fooishbar.org
- Collabora, Ltd.
+ Collabora, Ltd
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:12:19AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:53:19 +, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
This
means that one touch event may be simultaneously sending touch events
through to touch clients, and enqueuing emulated pointer events
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:08:36AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 18:21:31 +0100, carl...@gnome.org wrote:
From: Carlos Garnacho carl...@gnome.org
The previous XKB info was being returned instead of the current
one, producing inconsistent results between the latest
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:24:47PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
If the WM consumes the event and indicates so to the server with
Sync{Pointer,Both}, this is treated the same as a client calling
XIAllowTouchEvents with XITouchOwnerAccept: the app gets a TouchEnd
event indicating
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 02:04:11PM -0800, Rick Stockton wrote:
I was wondering about an idea- and rather than stumble around (for
weeks) on my own, I want to ask you WAY SMARTER guys about it:
As you already know, I'm planning to bring some decent support for
additional mouse buttons
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:00:07AM +0200, mugunthan wrote:
I want to test the touch interface of the device.
Can anybody could help me out how to generate the touch events using
XInput 2
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~whot/evtest
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 02:49:26PM +0200, mugunthan wrote:
Thanks a lot for your information.
I downloaded the event tester. But it says you can check the output from
the device .
But I want to generate some events which could be sent to the device.
For example
I need to generate
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 04:30:54PM +0200, mugunthan wrote:
I already have the hardware. So I would like to test on that .
So I was wondering how to do that.
I have no idea what you're actually asking. If you have hardware which
you want to test on, then use the hardware. The text file I
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 05:17:20PM +0200, mugunthan wrote:
I got it ... thanks a lot for your inputs ... I have just one more
question
when I m running the evtest for a device .like this
==
[...]
===
how
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 03:34:32PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
We really need symbols, compat and types for a sensible keymap.
Try this in your xorg.conf.d snippets for all keyboards:
Option XkbLayout us
Option XkbVariant nodeadkeys
us(nodeadkeys) doesn't exist so xkbcomp
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 03:55:16AM +0300, Van de Bugger wrote:
Advantages are obvious: better maintainability due to (1) better type
control from compiler (because the first argument is of unique type, not
widely used faceless int), (2) not using global variables, etc.
Who is the
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 09:36:02PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
The following series fixes a couple of bugs I found by inspection, and
shuffles a few things around in preparation for expanding InternalEvent
usage. There's a few more patches in my people.fd.o tree, but I'm going
to wait until I've had more time to test them before I push them.
Cheers,
not all callers were doing (I'm looking at you,
ComputeFreezes). Just set it in CheckDeviceGrabs instead.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
Xi/exevents.c |4 +---
dix/events.c | 20 +++-
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Xi
had a non-SyncBoth grab on another unrelated master
device.
Fix this by completely ignoring devices that aren't our paired device.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
dix/events.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dix/events.c b/dix
Instead of switching on the event filter to determine delivery, use the
event type instead.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
dix/events.c | 44 +---
1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dix/events.c b/dix
.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
Xi/exevents.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Xi/exevents.c b/Xi/exevents.c
index 5131167..e10cc3a 100644
--- a/Xi/exevents.c
+++ b/Xi/exevents.c
@@ -1278,7 +1278,7 @@ DeviceFocusEvent(DeviceIntPtr dev
-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
dix/events.c| 26 +++---
include/input.h | 11 ++-
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dix/events.c b/dix/events.c
index 80792ee..2b6f9c0 100644
--- a/dix/events.c
+++ b/dix/events.c
@@ -2287,8
Some event types (notably Expose and GraphicsExpose) require multiple
events, a la XI 1.x. Bring the EventToCore API in line with EventToXI's
and allow it to generate multiple events.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
dix/eventconvert.c | 37
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:01:37AM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 02/17/11 07:25 AM, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
In short, using dynamic allocation and checking for error returns is
actually the *pragmatic* approach.
I'd think the pragmatic approach would be to tell anyone putting a
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:28:19PM +0300, Van de Bugger wrote:
Thus, I want my keyboard stuff to be located in a place of my choice.
Probably, I like very-very-very-long directory and file names, and my
names are not in Latin alphabet, so 1024 bytes may actually mean just
512 characters or
patch would still copy the keymap into the
attached master, not the master keyboard. fix this.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:44:31PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
These tests don't test everything, but hey, life is short and I'm trying to
have one.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital
had a non-SyncBoth grab on another unrelated master
device.
Fix this by completely ignoring devices that aren't our paired device.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
dix/events.c |7 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dix/events.c b/dix
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 09:13:07AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 08:11:25PM +0100, Simon Thum wrote:
On 02/15/2011 12:27 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
--- a/dix/events.c
+++ b/dix/events.c
@@ -3884,14 +3884,14 @@ DeliverGrabbedEvent(InternalEvent *event
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 03:46:14PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:16:46 -0800, Aaron Plattner aplatt...@nvidia.com
wrote:
However, I do need to object strongly to such a major protocol change being
made after RC2 of a release cycle. We're supposed to be making only
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:18:37PM +0200, Rami Ylimäki wrote:
On 02/25/2011 02:48 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:08:38PM +0200, Rami Ylimäki wrote:
Documentation of C.2.1 XInitExtension from Xlib manual says that
the Xlib specific extension number in XExtCodes is connection
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:53:00AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:04:56 +0100, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com (25/02/2011):
So, I'm a bit confused here -- I do 'make distcheck' to build
releases, and it works for me. I'd like to
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:02:20PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 00:00:39 +0100, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
wrote:
Some architectures (hi, sparc!) are unhappy with unaligned memory
accesses. So make sure the axisVal member of ValuatorClassRec has
sizeof(double)
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:39:15AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 21:14 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Do we need more formal rules for merging code? The RandR 1.4 server code
was merged before the protocol and library APIs had seen sufficient
review, but we don't have a
how to help with that? -- We don't have an official
protocol tree maintainer at this point, although Daniel Stone did
volunteer to put together another proposal for merging those trees
together, and if that happened, maybe we could convince him to run a
couple of cycles as release manager.
Yeah
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:08:02AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:52:34 +, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
I described my rough plan here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-devel/2010-September/013145.html
Get it started and I'll start pushing RandR
Hi,
Sorry about the lateness, have been kind of in a mad rush to finish
other work, but should be back on multitouch soon. Hopefully.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Chase Douglas wrote:
--- a/XI2.h
+++ b/XI2.h
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#define Dont_Check 0
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 04:34:30PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:53:19AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
--- a/XI2.h
+++ b/XI2.h
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
#define XIGrabtypeEnter 2
#define XIGrabtypeFocusIn 3
#define
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:58:08AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Chase Douglas wrote:
+In order to prevent touch events delivered to one window while pointer
events
+are implicitly grabbed by another, all touches from indirect devices will
end
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 03:33:31PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
These defines are currently defined in XI.h and XI2.h. Their only use is as
offset into a library-internal array. Move them to XIint.h so they may be
removed from the protocol headers with the next revision.
NAK: while you're
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 07:01:04PM +0200, Pauli wrote:
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/dri2/dri2ext.c b/hw/xfree86/dri2/dri2ext.c
index 4e48e65..725823e 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/dri2/dri2ext.c
+++ b/hw/xfree86/dri2/dri2ext.c
@@ -227,11 +227,15 @@ send_buffers_reply(ClientPtr client, DrawablePtr
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 08:44:20AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Feb 28, 2011, at 22:53, Keith Packard wrote:
2) I think the early rcs might not have been as well tested because
they relied on xextproto and randrproto versions that were not
released. Perhaps we should ensure that
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 01:30:52PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 03/ 1/11 09:52 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:14:26PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Do we need more formal rules for merging code? The RandR 1.4 server code
was merged before the protocol and library
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:37:31PM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
Yeah, that got caught up in unexpected holiday and/or moving continents;
by the time I'd got to it, I'd missed the feature freeze for 1.10, so
just
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 04:17:55PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
This joke is no longer funny.
I like how they even ensured that str_dup(NULL) also didn't do what you
want. God.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:43:02PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Each XI2 call should check _XiCheckExtInit for XI version 2.0 or higher.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:43:03PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
XISetClientPointer is an XI2.0 call and should be named accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:41:25PM +0200, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
On 02/03/11 11:37 +, ext Daniel Stone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 07:01:04PM +0200, Pauli wrote:
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/dri2/dri2ext.c b/hw/xfree86/dri2/dri2ext.c
index 4e48e65..725823e 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/dri2
)
====by 0x653B3: ProcessInputEvents (xf86Events.c:165)
==== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
====at 0x503FAA0: send_buffers_reply (dri2ext.c:210)
Signed-off-by: Pauli Nieminen ext-pauli.niemi...@nokia.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:28:12AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
unsigned long is needlessly large on LP64. Use unsigned int instead.
Could we just use uint32_t?
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org:
position (as seen from the protocol) is valid.
Block signals during this window.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel
that:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:17:09PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 19:37 +, Daniel Stone wrote:
Being really pedantic again, can't these two be uint8_t or something?
You've just grown format from 16 to 32 bytes. :P
size pretty much needs to be uint32_t
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 03:45:40PM +0200, Rami Ylimäki wrote:
Valgrind complains about uninitialized data being written to clients.
Reviewed-by: Erkki Seppälä erkki.sepp...@vincit.fi
Signed-off-by: Rami Ylimäki rami.ylim...@vincit.fi
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 03:42:14PM +0200, Erkki Seppälä wrote:
The record allocated by miSpriteDeviceCursorInitialize was not being
released. This patch adds a call to free and resetting the private
record to miSpriteDeviceCursorCleanup.
Reviewed-by: Rami Ylimäki rami.ylim...@vincit.fi
: rrGetScreenResources (rrscreen.c:313)
Signed-off-by: Oliver McFadden oliver.mcfad...@nokia.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 04:19:06PM +0200, Erkki Seppala wrote:
On 09.03.2011 15:57, Daniel Stone wrote:
You could get this automatically by having miSpriteDevPrivatesKey
allocate sizeof(miCursorInfoRec), rather than doing the allocation and
free separately.
Thanks for the feedback
.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
], rather than
info[1..n]. Looks like you might just be able to turn this into a
FOR_NSCREENS_FORWARD_SKIP though?
Other than that, for the series:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:34:39AM -0500, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 10:47 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
I think this won't work for gnu/kfreebsd. Maybe use *-gnu for the
glibc
case, and put it before the *bsd* one?
Make that *-gnu* so it can handle linux-gnueabi
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:35:22AM +0200, Rami Ylimäki wrote:
On 03/16/2011 02:43 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
-memcpy(wire[2],str,len);
-wire+= ((2+len+3)/4)*4;
+paddedLen= pad_to_int32(sizeof(len)+len)-sizeof(len);
+strncpy(wire[sizeof(len)],str,paddedLen);
+wire+=
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:35:13AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:33:55PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 02:19:45PM +1100, Harshula Jayasuriya wrote:
Add #define XK_SINHALA so that the Sinhala keysyms can be used by
the lk xkb keymap.
Pushed to master, thanks.
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Hi,
Thinking out loud ...
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:13:55PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Having rotation support has been a feature requested for a while
now. Now we've had two independent implementations happen within quite a
short timeframe, one in synaptics, one in evdev (and wacom has had
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:20:39AM -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 23:29 -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
Fixes: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360227
Problem is easily seen during compile:
-DDFLT_XKB_CONFIG_ROOT='/usr/share/X11/xkb'
This is what I get on Ubuntu
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 03:42:46PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Sorry, but what gives you the authority to say this debug code isn't useful?
Are you asserting that it's useful? If so, what gives _you_ the authority
to say that?
Cheers,
Daniel, who totally loves nothing more than content-free
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:07:33PM +0200, Simon Thum wrote:
Well, it's an RFC by Peter at the moment, AFAIK not much to read. I'll
add a bit to my idea FYC. The concept would probably use pixman and
list.h-lists and look something like:
So, at the risk of sounding like a bit of an arse
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:45:58PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
On 04/05/2011 03:41 PM, ext Daniel Stone wrote:
I ask mainly because we already have a very extensively-engineered
pointer acceleration architecture, where 90% of the code could probably
be removed without more than seven
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:30:38PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
On 04/05/2011 04:05 PM, ext Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:45:58PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
and bonus points if we could disable/enable the acceleration
architecture in compilation time also.
If we get
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 08:21:43PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
On 04/05/2011 05:51 PM, ext Daniel Stone wrote:
Sure, but at some stage there has to be a limit. Every configuration
option has a cost: in making the source files larger by putting #ifdefs
everywhere - and you could argue we
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:28:10PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Chase pointed out that we don't have _any_ of the XI 2.1 stuff in the
official repos yet. That makes testing harder for everyone and incremental
review as well. This patchset is a simple one, just adding a few bumps and a
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:46:52AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
added and pushed. branch inputproto-2.1-devel is now available. You ok to
take maintainership of this branch?
Sure.
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 05:36:11PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
@@ -1827,33 +1827,25 @@ TryClientEvents (ClientPtr client, DeviceIntPtr dev,
xEvent *pEvents,
{
int type;
-#ifdef DEBUG_EVENTS
-ErrorF([dix] Event([%d, %d], mask=0x%lx), client=%d%s,
+DebugF([dix]
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 06:58:36PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
Also, if REGION_INIT is going to ignore an argument, you should simply
remove it from the API.
You mean like pScreen? :)
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:40:40AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
diff --git a/fb/fbscreen.c b/fb/fbscreen.c
index 2502efe..392de81 100644
--- a/fb/fbscreen.c
+++ b/fb/fbscreen.c
@@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ _fbGetWindowPixmap (WindowPtr pWindow)
void
_fbSetWindowPixmap (WindowPtr pWindow,
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 05:35:22PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 08:18:38PM +1000, Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
From: Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:00:52 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] cleanup trivial Indic UTF-8 aliases uppercasing lang
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30112
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:31:00PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 09:58:57AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:05:56AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
+/* force alignment with double */
+union align_u { ValuatorClassRec valc; double d
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:47:22PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
GetKeyboardValuatorEvents handles NULL valuator masks already, so the
GetKeyboardEvents wrapper is not needed. Rename GKVE to GKE.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:20:56PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:20:57PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:20:58PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:20:59PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Reported-by: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
One other thing I noticed here is the confusion between grab status
codes (e.g
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:21:00PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Acked-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
If I'm completely honest, my eyes started glazing over about 75% of the
way through and I've not had a look at the request-wrapping
(uint32_t: %PRIu32\n, foo);
But it's non-portable, and also seriously ugly. Oh well.
Anyway, given that this quashes the warning on the most common
development platform:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-by: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman
. With or without that, for the series:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
I'd also found and written 01/20 independently (it's sitting in another
branch) while having a similar 'wtf is all this?' excursion through the
pointer code, and had wondered how it worked!
Cheers,
Daniel
, take my
R-b for either form:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org
, cursor jumps between the two positions.
Introduced in 31737fff08ec19b394837341d5e358ec401f5cd8
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 07:47:58PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
I've merged these into my tree (and reviewed the xwin patch which was missing
review). They'll be included in my next PULL to keithp (once my clang
warning patches are reviewed ... v2 on its way).
Damnit, I
before: 4337008 Xorg
File size after:4316568 Xorg
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
I've merged this into my tree, thanks.
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org
1 - 100 of 1598 matches
Mail list logo
