Question #288118 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/288118
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
The change is not yet reflected in the binary package "yadedaily", the fast
solution is to compile from sources.
See the "compilation" section
Question #288118 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/288118
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
It is fixed here, please update your code and let me know if it makes more
sense:
https://github.com/yade/trunk/commit/12f9bf90e84da4d79ec1443bc1e24f4e77e55b01
--
You
Question #288118 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/288118
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
You guessed correctly.
The normal, it is not a unit vector because it is proportional to the fluid
cross section.
Not sure how
Question #288003 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/288003
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Given the additional information, I would say you found a rather intricate
problem for profiling in multithread context.
Do you really need profiling and parallel execution
Question #285260 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/285260
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
I understand your view. On my side I'm reluctant to spend time on fixing
something when I think it cannot work. :)
Understanding the cause of your problem needs a clear
Question #285260 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/285260
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
I just checked the reference in #9. IMHO the approach is flawn and its
implementation is a nightmare (section 5 as whole is weird on other points to).
Eq. 1
Question #285260 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/285260
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
>The idea is to get a viscoelastic model embedded in an elastic model.
What is the advantage of not writing simply a viscoelastic equation?
There are examp
Question #286542 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/286542
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Doesn't work for me. Which version are you using?
bchareyre@dt-rv020:~/yade/yade/bin$ yadedaily test.py
Welcome to Yade 1.14.0-54-f44c022~trusty
TCP python prompt
Question #286542 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/286542
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Please see https://yade-dem.org/wiki/Howtoask, especially point 3.
--
You received this question notification because your team y
Question #285535 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/285535
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
>I am using the yadedaily version of the software.
It is not synchronized yet I think, but you can compile the source if
you want to try the last.
--
You recei
Question #285535 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/285535
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
@Jan
> "To get the dissipation energy, you have to define O.trackEnergy=True."
It depends on the contact model in fact. Some law functors have their own
Question #285535 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/285535
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Fix commited [1].
Please confirm if it fixes the problem.
[1]
https://github.com/yade/trunk/commit/754f20fc64f41f73d34b96f68d3c00c039f1cd4e
--
You received
Question #285535 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/285535
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi Tijan,
Kinetic energy is not specific to any contact law, that is why you don't find
it in a contact law:
KE=kineticEnergy(), j
Question #284255 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/284255
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Again: why do you need a stress controller at all? You are making a
simple task more complex.
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users
Question #284255 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/284255
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Why triax.stressMask=3?
You cannot impose stress and constant volume at the same time. Not due to Yade:
from a mechanical po
Question #280376 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/280376
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Hi, sorry for late remark but I think this paper [1] is relevant to your
question.
It shows an example of a deformable potatoe (spherical potatoe in the example
Question #284255 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/284255
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi Seti,
Keeping the volume constant is very easy. So easy that you don't need a stress
controller for that (as the name suggests, the main purpose
ved by DOI number:
dx.doi.org/DOI
where DOI is one of
10.5281/zenodo.34073
10.5281/zenodo.34045
10.5281/zenodo.34043
10.5281/zenodo.34044
Happy Yading!
Bruno
--
_______
Bruno Chareyre
Associate Professor
ENSE³ - Grenoble INP
Lab. 3SR
BP 53
38041 Grenoble cedex 9
Tél : +33 4 56 52 86 21
F
Question #279270 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/279270
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
The remarkable result in the OP is:
InteractionLoop 1000 697955915us 99.50%
99.5% of the time in interactions is very surprising. The only real changes in
clump
Question #280183 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/280183
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
GCC can add debug symbols to optimized code. That is why "-g" (debug symbols)
can still lead to "optimized out&quo
Question #279359 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/279359
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
makeCloud() is a function, not an engine, therefore it can't be used in
ParallelEngine.
More generally, parallelizing an algori
Question #277023 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/277023
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi, if you don't "make install" then you don't run the modified code, and then
it is expected that you don't see an
Question #276590 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/276590
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
I never did the step/breakpoint thing directly with gdb, since kdevelop is a
very efficient frontend for that.
You just start yade as usual, then you attach
Question #275779 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/275779
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
You script is generating only one output file, so yes, you have only one
image. I don't really see what you were expecting.
--
You received this question notification
Question #275459 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/275459
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Both ways are consistent. If it considered that friction coefficient gives an
upper bound of the elastic force then the f
Question #275840 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/275840
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
>I thought updating might cause some strange trouble..
To not update frequently is for sure causing most of the troubles. It resulted
in wasting many developme
Question #275840 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/275840
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
More than that, you should have small scripts integrated in the
regression tests, so that you are warned if some changes in the source
code have side effects on your code
Question #274781 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/274781
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hello,
My suggestion is to use either the preprocessors through the GUI _OR_ python
scripts. Don't mix scripting and preprocessing.
There is no fundamental reason
Question #274324 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/274324
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
For future reference:
Answer #1 refer to the "aspherical" integration scheme [1]. For spheres, or as
soon as the "spherical" approximation is used for
Question #274242 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/274242
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Assigning gravity for a compression test is a little bit strange. If it
plays a role there will be a significant stress gradient and thus the
results can't be interpreted
Question #274043 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/274043
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
Is it that the interactions are not created (did you check?) or that you define
physical parameters in such a way that it _has
Question #273947 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/273947
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
>it does not interact with Facet
because it is not implemented although not difficult.
The main question is if you really need
Question #273812 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/273812
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
You pasted the tutorial script or almost.
Did you check if changing the parameters of the original script give different
resu
Question #273367 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/273367
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Side remark: increasing triax.goal2 by frequent small steps (e.g. every
ten iterations) is better that large steps every 5000 iterations, as it
avoids shock waves.
--
You
Question #272484 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/272484
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
@Jérôme, Jerier et al. does not have an input PSD.
@Bruna, a possible method is to grow particles in the defined shape
(bound by facets, for instance), how well
Question #272184 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/272184
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
In theory the code compiles on windows. In practice it is a pain since that
environment makes gathering the 3rd party libraries tedious [1].
For just testing
Question #272184 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/272184
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
I have no experience, sorry.
B
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade
Question #271818 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/271818
Status: Open => Needs information
Bruno Chareyre requested more information:
I don't understand your question, sorry.
Please be more clear.
--
You received this question notification because your t
Question #271596 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/271596
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
EnergyTracker is the only way to track some energy terms (e.g. dissipation by
Newton.damping is nearly impossible to compute by yourself).
On the other hand
Question #271394 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/271394
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
1) Not sure what Euler's theorem is. What I can tell is the equations
are exact, just like having rotation matrices R1 and R2, then defining
the rotation 1->2 as inv(R1)
Question #271430 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/271430
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi Alexander,
There is no kinetic friction, there is shear, rolling and twisting.
>so where is rolling friction coefficient...
Question #271394 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/271394
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
momentRotationLaw =False just means that there is no moment _at contact_.
The shear force is as usual it produce a moment wrt to particle centers, as
usual
Question #271097 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/271097
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Yes you are right. We use rather different semantic and that's why the doc is
confusing for you probably.
I never speak of cohes
Question #271097 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/271097
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi Alexander,
Arguably, the documentation of Law2_ScGeom6D_CohFrictPhys_CohesionMoment is
short (did you read it [1]) but it actua
Question #271071 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/271071
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
>"The problem is exactly here which I am not sure what parameter causes
the problem"
What we both suggested is that o
Question #271071 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/271071
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
You should identify which parameter(s) cause the problem.
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-us
Question #270991 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/270991
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
The problem is here:
O.bodies.append([utils.sphere(c,r,material='coke') for c,r in sp])
You need to filter out those spheres which correspond to the initial
clumps
Question #270991 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/270991
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
It doesn't matter how you generate the clumps.
After generating them define an empty SpherePack and put all the clumped
spheres in it with sp.fromSimulation
Question #270991 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/270991
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
A rather simple option could be:
- insert all the clumped spheres in a SpherePack (sp.fromSimulation())
- generate the standalone spheres (sp.makeCloud
Question #270818 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/270818
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hello,
You want to control the porosity of a dense sample (I guess).
MakeCloud is making a cloud, not a dense sample. So the porosity parameter
there is unrelated
Question #270503 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/270503
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Converting material parameters to contact parameters is the job of Ip2
functors and that is where the documentation should be. In this case
Question #270503 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/270503
Status: Open = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hello,
It can't be right or wrong in the sense you think to it.
It is just a normalization equation such that scaling all particle sizes
Question #269739 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269739
Status: Open = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Speaking of wall-sphere, the definition of symmetric sphere radius is in [1].
This functor could optionaly define the radius
Question #269739 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269739
Status: Open = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Interesting comparison!
For sphere vs. wall the wall is calculated as if it was a symmetric sphere. Not
bad in general but in your
Question #269724 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269724
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi Alexander,
Your are maybe looking for Law2_ScGeom6D_CohFrictPhys_CohesionMoment (second
one in [1]).
It contains, but it is much more general that the BPM you
Question #269724 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269724
Status: Open = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Do you agree with Jan that in general bonded particle model equals
particle model, that supports cohesion?
It depends. First, how do
Question #269724 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269724
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Here i mean that bonds described in...
So #2 applies: It contains, but it is much more general that the BPM
you mention
--
You received this question notification because
Question #269724 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269724
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
@Jerome
This last one (supporting cohesion too: it is designed for rock) having as
particular feature a controlled interaction range so that distant particles
may be bonded
Question #269724 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269724
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
You mean that there is no need to add this in the script:
for i in O.interactions: i.phys.unp=i.phys.un #set current=equilibrium
distance in CM
You were right, it adds
Question #269576 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269576
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Is your question closed Jabrane?
https://yade-dem.org/wiki/Howtoask
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
yade-users, which is an answer
Question #269486 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269486
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Dear Yor1,
Error messages are usually of great help. The complete message includes a very
important part that you skipped:
File test.py, line 22, in module
O.bodies
Question #269486 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269486
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Please read again #1
:)
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
yade-users, which is an answer contact for Yade
Question #269491 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269491
Status: Needs information = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Anyone experienced this?
Not me.
See also:
https://yade-dem.org/wiki/Howtoask
--
You received this question notification
Question #269486 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269486
Status: Open = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
https://yade-dem.org/wiki/Howtoask
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
yade-users, which
Question #269486 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269486
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Yes you can have two engines in a script.
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
yade-users, which is an answer contact for Yade
Question #269393 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269393
Status: Open = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
So i get the average stress equal to applied stress for the whole model
But i get this result only after half of prescribed stress
Question #269393 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269393
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
5 posts for one question, wow! This is becoming confused again. Please
Alexander, keep things simple and concise, be specific, and think twice
to avoid avalanches of emails
Question #269383 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269383
Status: Open = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
It is related to the fact that you don't have boundaries for your problem (they
could take the ids 0,...,5 if they were 6 walls).
I
Question #269063 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269063
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
So is it correct to apply force (pressure) to sphere without taking
into account it's size, or i need to multiply by it's radius, diameter
or volume?
None of them
Question #269063 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269063
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
the mesh constructed in Ansys is also not very fine
The real question is the number of nodes/gauss points in each element
times the number of elements
Question #269063 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269063
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Last thing, as far as per-body stress is a topic of concern: getBodyStress is
exact.
It should be exactly equal to applied stress as long as you account
Question #268954 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/268954
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Ok.
I have ~2500 iter/sec here on a relatively old desktop (and 3sec for opening
the window). It corresponds to 33min calc. time for 5s of simulated time
Question #268954 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/268954
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
@Anastasia
Your problem is - I think - the calculation of clumps mass, which takes ages
for the reason you can read at runtime:
core/Clump.cpp:162 updateProperties: Clump
Question #269063 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269063
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Short comments (I didn't follow the complete discussion, sorry):
1/ About comparison of stress:
- stress Yade - http://i11.pixs.ru/storage/7/6/4/pic2JPG_7240037_18032764.jpg
Question #268954 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/268954
Status: Open = Needs information
Bruno Chareyre requested more information:
@Henry, could you please reply to #1?
@Anastasia, thank you for the scripts. Now could you please follow #3?
You guys seem
Question #268954 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/268954
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Dear Nastya, could you be more specific?
What are you running? What difference do you get? Please help us to help you.
--
You received this question notification
Question #268954 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/268954
Bruno Chareyre requested more information:
The script is not working, please provide a minimal AND working script.
File test.py, line 24, in module
Question #268691 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/268691
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
I don't understand the details but for the record:
- applying a force for one step is: O.forces.addF(id_ball, f)
- applying a force permanently is: O.forces.addF(id_ball, f
Hi,
Not sure but I guess details of the saved binary can be system dependent
(or boost-version dependent or such).
This could be the unique reason to save in xml sometimes. you could try
that and see.
I am assuming that you compiled exactly the same version of the source
code on both machines, of
Question #267964 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/267964
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
I don't understand what you are looking for. Could you clarify the question?
Law2_ScGeom6D_CohFrictPhys_CohesionMoment does not impose anything. It can give
brittle
Question #267815 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/267815
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi, the main source of energy sink is usually due to the fact that there is no
accurate creation-deletion of contacts. When a new contact is created during
Question #267673 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/267673
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hello Raphaël,
Usually it is useless to paste long error logs, since one initial error is
usually triggering much more errors.
The interesting part is:
In file
Question #267566 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/267566
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
I would use the word classical very carefuly when it comes to contact laws.
I think the version we have in Yade is some of the most consistent around. It
does
Question #267328 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/267328
Status: Open = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
1 I will try to use the triaxial example
Great move.
2 is there a script that can allow to check for desired porosity
GOTO 1
Note
Question #267350 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/267350
Status: Open = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hello,
I suggest to read the documentation of TesselationWrapper, especially this part:
The calculation of microstrain is explained
Question #266828 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/266828
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
For arbitrary initial positions you can define the the equilibrium displacement
via i.phys.unp like this:
i.phys.unp = i.geom.penetrationDepth #I didn't check
Question #266605 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/266605
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
@Jérôme,
Even with gravity unbF-0 at equilibrium.
@Carrie
If it does not, then you probably have a simulation not doing what you think it
does.
It is not possible
Question #266331 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/266331
Status: Open = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hello,
TW actually returns the displacement gradient tensor, that is why it can be
non-symmetric. Take the symmetric part to keep only
Question #266037 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/266037
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Did you try a fresh build? IIRC Timos added the flag to solve a problem,
then removed it and it kept working. It is very unclear what's going on
with this flag. It was here
Question #265995 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/265995
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
@Jan
what is a good place for the manual and examples? Wiki?
Gold: a section in theory.rst, possibly reusing content from previous papers
Silver: a section in user manual
Question #265995 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/265995
Status: Open = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hello,
As a starting point I recommend the papers of Jan Stransky that you can find on
Yade publications page.
Your question is very
Question #265223 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/265223
Status: Open = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
The above sequence define strain by comparing the initial state to the current
state. It makes sense.
If you expect a more incremental
Question #265598 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/265598
Status: Open = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hello,
I guess you have seen makeCloud() (else you would ask how to generate one set?)
So, calling makeCloud() repeateadly with the same
Question #265521 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/265521
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
You are right, there should be no difference and there will be no
difference.
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
yade-users
Question #265275 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/265275
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
In addition to fixing y/Y, you need the YADE_PLUGIN macro somewhere in a
*.cpp.
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
yade-users
Question #265275 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/265275
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
A nice collective answer ;)
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
yade-users, which is an answer contact for Yade
Question #265223 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/265223
Status: Open = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hello,
If I understand correctly you are triangulating a packing with a non-flat free
surface, correct?
If so, it is expected that you
Question #261965 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/261965
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
@Bruno: Yes, it's in loading and saving section of introduction
TYVM. I just fixed it.
B
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
yade-users
Question #265275 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/265275
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
You can use conventional C++ inheritance and add the new variables with the
YADE_CLASS macro:
class MyState: State
{
YADE_CLASS(...
((int
Question #261965 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/261965
Status: Open = Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
as for saving as xml, I thought it's the only option we have!
Why? Did you read it somewhere?
how we call the loading script?
What do
1001 - 1100 of 1784 matches
Mail list logo
