Hi,
For my carelessness, I added two disks into a raid-z2 zpool as normal data
disk, but in fact
I want to make them as zil devices.
Any remedy solutions?
Many thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Fred Liu
For my carelessness, I added two disks into a raid-z2 zpool as normal data
disk, but in fact
I want to make them as zil devices.
That's a huge bummer, and it's the main reason why
That's a huge bummer, and it's the main reason why device removal has
been a
priority request for such a long time... There is no solution. You
can
only destroy recreate your pool, or learn to live with it that way.
Sorry...
Yeah, I also realized this when I send out this message.
On 19 September, 2011 - Fred Liu sent me these 0,9K bytes:
That's a huge bummer, and it's the main reason why device removal has
been a
priority request for such a long time... There is no solution. You
can
only destroy recreate your pool, or learn to live with it that way.
From: Fred Liu [mailto:fred_...@issi.com]
Yeah, I also realized this when I send out this message. In NetApp, it is
so
easy to change raid group size. There is still a long way for zfs to go.
Hope I can see that in the future.
This one missing feature of ZFS, IMHO, does not result in a long
This one missing feature of ZFS, IMHO, does not result in a long way
for
zfs to go in relation to netapp. I shut off my netapp 2 years ago in
favor
of ZFS, because ZFS performs so darn much better, and has such
immensely
greater robustness. Try doing ndmp, cifs, nfs, iscsi on netapp
You can add mirrors to those lonely disks.
Can it repair the pool?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Mon, September 19, 2011 08:07, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
This one missing feature of ZFS, IMHO, does not result in a long way for
zfs to go in relation to netapp. I shut off my netapp 2 years ago in
favor of ZFS, because ZFS performs so darn much better, and has such
immensely greater
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Fred Liu fred_...@issi.com wrote:
Yes. I have connected them back to server. But it does not help.
I am really sad now...
I cringed a little when I read the thread title. I did this on
accident once as well, but lucky for me, I had enough scratch
storage around
From: Krunal Desai [mailto:mov...@gmail.com]
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Fred Liu fred_...@issi.com wrote:
Yes. I have connected them back to server. But it does not help.
I am really sad now...
I'll tell you what does not help. This email. Now that you know what you're
trying to
I'll tell you what does not help. This email. Now that you know what
you're trying to do, why don't you post the results of your zpool
import command? How about an error message, and how you're trying to
go about fixing your pool? Nobody here can help you without
information.
User
Sent: 星期一, 九月 19, 2011 21:54
To: 'Edward Ned Harvey'; 'Krunal Desai'
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] remove wrongly added device from zpool
I'll tell you what does not help. This email. Now that you know
what
you're trying to do, why don't you post
-discuss@opensolaris.org'
Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] remove wrongly added device from zpool
I also used zpool import -fFX cn03 in b134 and b151a(via live SX11 live
cd). It resulted a core dump and reboot after about 15 min.
I can see all the leds are blinking on the HDD within this 15 min.
Can
I use opensolaris b134.
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: 星期一, 九月 19, 2011 22:21
To: Fred Liu
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] remove wrongly added device from zpool
On Sep 19, 2011, at 12:10
You don't mention which OS you are using, but for the past 5 years of
[Open]Solaris
releases, the system prints a warning message and will not allow this
to occur
without using the force option (-f).
-- richard
Yes. There is a warning message, I used zpool add -f.
Thanks.
Fred
@opensolaris.org
Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] remove wrongly added device from zpool
You don't mention which OS you are using, but for the past 5 years of
[Open]Solaris
releases, the system prints a warning message and will not allow this
to occur
without using the force option (-f
On Sep 19, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Fred Liu wrote:
For each disk, look at the output of zdb -l /dev/rdsk/DISKNAMEs0.
1. Confirm that each disk provides 4 labels.
2. Build the vdev tree by hand and look to see which disk is missing
This can be tedious and time consuming.
Do I need to export
No, but your pool is not imported.
YES. I see.
and look to see which disk is missing?
The label, as displayed by zdb -l contains the heirarchy of the
expected pool config.
The contents are used to build the output you see in the zpool import
or zpool status
commands. zpool is
more below…
On Sep 19, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Fred Liu wrote:
No, but your pool is not imported.
YES. I see.
and look to see which disk is missing?
The label, as displayed by zdb -l contains the heirarchy of the
expected pool config.
The contents are used to build the output you see in
-Original Message-
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: 星期二, 九月 20, 2011 3:57
To: Fred Liu
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] remove wrongly added device from zpool
more below…
On Sep 19, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Fred Liu wrote
To: 'Richard Elling'
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] remove wrongly added device from zpool
-Original Message-
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: 星期二, 九月 20, 2011 3:57
To: Fred Liu
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject
21 matches
Mail list logo