On 7/03/10 12:28 PM, norm.tallant wrote:
I'm about to try it! My LSI SAS 9211-8i should arrive Monday or
Tuesday. I bought the cable-less version, opting instead to save a few
$ and buy Adaptec 2247000-R SAS to SATA cables.
My rig will be based off of fairly new kit, so it should be
Hi, have a look at
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=11062#c4
think it's related to your problem.
--
http://unixinmind.blogspot.com
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
It turns out that the problem that was being hit by Kristin was bug
10990 which is caused by using zoneadm cone to clone a zone. This
causes a snapshot name collision that we where not catching due to
bug 11062.
To work around this issue there are two possibilites:
1) delete zones that have been
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:12 AM, James C. McPherson j...@opensolaris.orgwrote:
On 7/03/10 12:28 PM, norm.tallant wrote:
I'm about to try it! My LSI SAS 9211-8i should arrive Monday or
Tuesday. I bought the cable-less version, opting instead to save a few
$ and buy Adaptec 2247000-R SAS to
There isn't some syntax I'm missing to use wildcards in zfs list to list
snapshots, is there? I find nothing in the man page, and nothing I've
tried works (yes, I do understand that normally wildcards are expanded
by the shell, and I don't expect bash to have zfs-specific stuff like
that in
On 07 March, 2010 - David Dyer-Bennet sent me these 1,1K bytes:
There isn't some syntax I'm missing to use wildcards in zfs list to list
snapshots, is there? I find nothing in the man page, and nothing I've
tried works (yes, I do understand that normally wildcards are expanded
by the
On 3/7/2010 11:23 AM, Tomas Ögren wrote:
On 07 March, 2010 - David Dyer-Bennet sent me these 1,1K bytes:
There isn't some syntax I'm missing to use wildcards in zfs list to list
snapshots, is there? I find nothing in the man page, and nothing I've
tried works (yes, I do understand that
I have a failing drive, and no way to correlate the device with errors in
the zpool status with an actual physical drive.
If I could get the device's serial number, I could use that as it's printed
on the drive.
I come from linux, so I tried dmesg, as that's what's familiar (I see that
the man
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Ethan notet...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a failing drive, and no way to correlate the device with errors in
the zpool status with an actual physical drive.
If I could get the device's serial number, I could use that as it's printed
on the drive.
I come from
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Ethan notet...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a failing drive, and no way to correlate the device with errors
in
the zpool status with an actual physical drive.
If I could get the device's serial number, I could use that as it's
printed
on the drive.
I come from
Hello, to automate all these, the best thing to do is to create Sun Cluster
HA Storage resource.
Have a look:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2974/gbspx?a=view
--
http://unixinmind.blogspot.com
From:
Hello list,
when consolidating storage services, it may be required to prioritize I/O.
e.g. the important SAP database get all the I/O we can deliver and that it
needs. The test systems should use whats left.
While this is a difficult topic in disk based systems (even little I/o with
long
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Ethan notet...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a failing drive, and no way to correlate the device with errors
in
the zpool status with an actual physical drive.
If I could get the
On Mar 5, 2010, at 7:32 AM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
My full backup script errorred out the last two times I ran it. I've got
a full Bash trace of it, so I know exactly what was done.
There are a moderate number of snapshots on the zp1 pool, and I'm
intending to replicate the whole thing
On Mar 6, 2010, at 9:31 PM, Abdullah Al-Dahlawi wrote:
Hi ALL
I might be little bit confused !!!
I will try to ask my question in a simple way ...
Why would a 16GB L2ARC device got filled by running a benchmark that uses a
2GB workingset while having a 2GB ARC max ?
ZFS is COW,
On Mar 7, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Lutz Schumann wrote:
Hello list,
when consolidating storage services, it may be required to prioritize I/O.
e.g. the important SAP database get all the I/O we can deliver and that it
needs. The test systems should use whats left.
While this is a
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 15:30, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Ethan notet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 14:55, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.orgwrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 12:30
On Mar 7, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Ethan wrote:
I have a failing drive, and no way to correlate the device with errors in the
zpool status with an actual physical drive.
If I could get the device's serial number, I could use that as it's printed
on the drive.
I come from linux, so I tried
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Ethan notet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 15:30, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Ethan notet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 14:55, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Dennis
On 8/03/10 01:42 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:12 AM, James C. McPherson j...@opensolaris.org
mailto:j...@opensolaris.org wrote:
On 7/03/10 12:28 PM, norm.tallant wrote:
I'm about to try it! My LSI SAS 9211-8i should arrive Monday or
Tuesday. I bought
I want to move my pool (consisting of five 1.5TB sata drives in raidz1) to a
different computer. I am encountering issues with controllers - the
motherboard (Asus P5BV-C/4L) has 8 sata ports: 4 on a marvell 88se6145,
which seems not to be supported at all; and 4 on intel 82801G, which uses
the
Hello All,
I build a new Storage Server to backup my data, keep archives of client files,
etc I recently had a near loss of important items.
So I built a 16 SATA bay enclosure (16 hot swappable + 3 internal) enclosure, 2
x 3Ware 8 port RAID cards, 8gb RAM, dual AMD Opertron.
I have a 1tb
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Slack-Moehrle
mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com wrote:
OpenSolaris or FreeBSD with ZFS?
zfs for sure. it's nice having something bitrot-resistant.
it was designed with data integrity in mind.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
On 3/7/2010 8:09 PM, Slack-Moehrle wrote:
I build a new Storage Server to backup my data, keep archives of client files,
etc I recently had a near loss of important items.
So I built a 16 SATA bay enclosure (16 hot swappable + 3 internal) enclosure, 2
x 3Ware 8 port RAID cards, 8gb RAM, dual
David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
For a system where you care about capacity and safety, but not that
much about IO throughput (that's my interpretation of what you said
you would use it for), with 16 bays, I believe the expert opinion will
tell you that two RAIDZ2 groups of 8 disks each is one of
On 3/7/2010 2:08 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
On Mar 5, 2010, at 7:32 AM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
sending from @bup-4hr-20100228-04CST to
zp1/l...@bup-4hr-20100228-08cst
received 312B stream in 1 seconds (312B/sec)
receiving incremental stream of zp1/l...@bup-4hr-20100224-12cst
Hi David,
Did you pick the chassis and disk size based on planned storage
requirements, or because it's what you could get to build a big honking
fileserver box? Just curious.
I have a 4tb Buffalo Terastation that cannot be expanded further and I am using
2.7tb. Also, I have need to make
Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Do you have any thoughts on implementation? I think I would just like to put my
Home directory on the ZFS pool and just SCP files up as needed. I dont think I
need to mount drives on my mac, etc. SCP seems to suite me.
One important point to note is you can only boot off
Be sure to read the 3Ware info on their controllers under OpenSolaris:
http://www.3ware.com/kb/article.aspx?id=15643
That said, 3ware controllers are hardly the best option for a
OpenSolaris server. You DON'T want to make use of any of the hardware
raid features of them, and you may not even
I think ZFS should look for more opportunities to write to disk rather than
leaving it to the last second (5seconds) as it appears it does. e.g.
if a file has record size worth of data outstanding it should be queued within
ZFS to be written out. If the record is updated again before a txg,
Hi Erik,
Be sure to read the 3Ware info on their controllers under OpenSolaris:
http://www.3ware.com/kb/article.aspx?id=15643
That said, 3ware controllers are hardly the best option for a
OpenSolaris server. You DON'T want to make use of any of the hardware
raid features of them, and you may
On Monday 08,March,2010 10:09 AM, Slack-Moehrle wrote:
OpenSolaris or FreeBSD with ZFS?
I am also having some NAS storage at home, and consists of :
a. OpenSolaris booted from hard disk with ZFS, mostly doing NFS and
iSCSI Target for VMWare ESX, Intel Core Duo proc+ICH7 controller
b.
On Mar 8, 2010, at 12:05 AM, Dedhi Sujatmiko wrote:
2. OpenSolaris (and EON) does not have proper implementation of SMART
monitoring. Therefore I cannot get to know the temperature of my hard disks.
Since they are DIY storage without chassis environment monitoring, I consider
this an
33 matches
Mail list logo
