Hi,
For my carelessness, I added two disks into a raid-z2 zpool as normal data
disk, but in fact
I want to make them as zil devices.
Any remedy solutions?
Many thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Fred Liu
For my carelessness, I added two disks into a raid-z2 zpool as normal data
disk, but in fact
I want to make them as zil devices.
That's a huge bummer, and it's the main reason why
That's a huge bummer, and it's the main reason why device removal has
been a
priority request for such a long time... There is no solution. You
can
only destroy recreate your pool, or learn to live with it that way.
Sorry...
Yeah, I also realized this when I send out this message.
On 19 September, 2011 - Fred Liu sent me these 0,9K bytes:
That's a huge bummer, and it's the main reason why device removal has
been a
priority request for such a long time... There is no solution. You
can
only destroy recreate your pool, or learn to live with it that way.
From: Fred Liu [mailto:fred_...@issi.com]
Yeah, I also realized this when I send out this message. In NetApp, it is
so
easy to change raid group size. There is still a long way for zfs to go.
Hope I can see that in the future.
This one missing feature of ZFS, IMHO, does not result in a long
This one missing feature of ZFS, IMHO, does not result in a long way
for
zfs to go in relation to netapp. I shut off my netapp 2 years ago in
favor
of ZFS, because ZFS performs so darn much better, and has such
immensely
greater robustness. Try doing ndmp, cifs, nfs, iscsi on netapp
You can add mirrors to those lonely disks.
Can it repair the pool?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Mon, September 19, 2011 08:07, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
This one missing feature of ZFS, IMHO, does not result in a long way for
zfs to go in relation to netapp. I shut off my netapp 2 years ago in
favor of ZFS, because ZFS performs so darn much better, and has such
immensely greater
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Fred Liu fred_...@issi.com wrote:
Yes. I have connected them back to server. But it does not help.
I am really sad now...
I cringed a little when I read the thread title. I did this on
accident once as well, but lucky for me, I had enough scratch
storage around
From: Krunal Desai [mailto:mov...@gmail.com]
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Fred Liu fred_...@issi.com wrote:
Yes. I have connected them back to server. But it does not help.
I am really sad now...
I'll tell you what does not help. This email. Now that you know what you're
trying to
I'll tell you what does not help. This email. Now that you know what
you're trying to do, why don't you post the results of your zpool
import command? How about an error message, and how you're trying to
go about fixing your pool? Nobody here can help you without
information.
User
I also used zpool import -fFX cn03 in b134 and b151a(via live SX11 live cd). It
resulted a core dump and reboot after about 15 min.
I can see all the leds are blinking on the HDD within this 15 min.
Can replacing empty ZIL devices help?
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Fred Liu
The core dump:
r10: ff19a5592000 r11:0 r12:0
r13:0 r14:0 r15: ff00ba4a5c60
fsb: fd7fff172a00 gsb: ff19a5592000 ds:0
es:0 fs:
I use opensolaris b134.
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: 星期一, 九月 19, 2011 22:21
To: Fred Liu
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] remove wrongly added device from zpool
On Sep 19, 2011, at 12:10
You don't mention which OS you are using, but for the past 5 years of
[Open]Solaris
releases, the system prints a warning message and will not allow this
to occur
without using the force option (-f).
-- richard
Yes. There is a warning message, I used zpool add -f.
Thanks.
Fred
I get some good progress like following:
zpool import
pool: cn03
id: 1907858070511204110
state: UNAVAIL
status: One or more devices are missing from the system.
action: The pool cannot be imported. Attach the missing
devices and try again.
see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-6X
On Sep 19, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Fred Liu wrote:
For each disk, look at the output of zdb -l /dev/rdsk/DISKNAMEs0.
1. Confirm that each disk provides 4 labels.
2. Build the vdev tree by hand and look to see which disk is missing
This can be tedious and time consuming.
Do I need to export
No, but your pool is not imported.
YES. I see.
and look to see which disk is missing?
The label, as displayed by zdb -l contains the heirarchy of the
expected pool config.
The contents are used to build the output you see in the zpool import
or zpool status
commands. zpool is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a new answer: interaction between dataset encryption and L2ARC
and ZIL.
1. I am pretty sure (but not completely sure) that data stored in the
ZIL is encrypted, if the destination dataset uses encryption. Can
anybody confirm?.
2. What happens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/09/11 19:45, Jesus Cea wrote:
I have a new answer: interaction between dataset encryption and
L2ARC and ZIL.
Question, a new question... :)
- --
Jesus Cea Avion _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/
j...@jcea.es -
more below…
On Sep 19, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Fred Liu wrote:
No, but your pool is not imported.
YES. I see.
and look to see which disk is missing?
The label, as displayed by zdb -l contains the heirarchy of the
expected pool config.
The contents are used to build the output you see in
-Original Message-
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: 星期二, 九月 20, 2011 3:57
To: Fred Liu
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] remove wrongly added device from zpool
more below…
On Sep 19, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Fred Liu wrote:
Is
zdb -l /dev/rdsk/c22t2d0s0
LABEL 0
failed to unpack label 0
LABEL 1
failed to unpack label 1
Hi,
I did this:
1): prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c22t3d0s0 | fmthard -s - /dev/rdsk/c22t2d0s0
2): zpool import cn03
3): zpool status
pool: cn03
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
corruption. Applications may be affected.
action: Restore the
On 9/19/11 11:45 AM, Jesus Cea wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a new answer: interaction between dataset encryption and L2ARC
and ZIL.
1. I am pretty sure (but not completely sure) that data stored in the
ZIL is encrypted, if the destination dataset uses encryption.
25 matches
Mail list logo
