Looks really beautiful...
> -Original Message-
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of David Magda
> Sent: 星期二, 一月 17, 2012 8:06
> To: zfs-discuss
> Subject: [zfs-discuss] Windows 8 ReFS (OT)
>
> Kind of off topic, but I fig
On 01/17/2012 01:06 AM, David Magda wrote:
> Kind of off topic, but I figured of some interest to the list. There will be
> a new file system in Windows 8 with some features that we all know and love
> in ZFS:
>
>> As mentioned previously, one of our design goals was to detect and correct
>> co
2012-01-16 23:29, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 6:53 AM, sol mailto:a...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
I would have liked to think that there was some good-will between
the ex- and current-members of the zfs team, in the sense that the
people who created zfs but then left Oracle
I have a desktop system with 2 ZFS mirrors. One drive in one mirror is
starting to produce read errors and slowing things down dramatically. I
detached it and the system is running fine. I can't tell which drive it is
though! The error message and format command let me know which pair the bad
driv
>
>I have a desktop system with 2 ZFS mirrors. One drive in one mirror is
>starting to produce read errors and slowing things down dramatically. I
>detached it and the system is running fine. I can't tell which drive it is
>though! The error message and format command let me know which pair the ba
2012-01-17 16:17, casper@oracle.com пишет:
I have a desktop system with 2 ZFS mirrors. One drive in one mirror is
starting to produce read errors and slowing things down dramatically. I
detached it and the system is running fine. I can't tell which drive it is
though! The error message and
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Anonymous Remailer (austria)
>
> I have a desktop system with 2 ZFS mirrors. One drive in one mirror is
> starting to produce read errors and slowing things down dramatically. I
> detached it a
Hi all.
I'm totale newbie on ZFS so if I ask some stupid question, please don't
send some angry mail to this mailing list, send-it directly to me ;-)
Well I've a Dell server running FreeBSD 9.0 with 4 MD1200 with 48 disks.
It's connect through a LSI card. So I can see all /dev/da0 --> /dev/da47
Le 17/01/2012 à 06:31:22-0800, Brad Stone a écrit
> Try zpool import
Thanks.
It's working.
Regards.
--
Albert SHIH
DIO batiment 15
Observatoire de Paris
5 Place Jules Janssen
92195 Meudon Cedex
Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71
Heure local/Local time:
mar 17 jan 2012 15:35:31 CET
___
2012-01-17 18:16, Albert Shih пишет:
Hi all.
I'm totale newbie on ZFS so if I ask some stupid question, please don't
send some angry mail to this mailing list, send-it directly to me ;-)
Well I've a Dell server running FreeBSD 9.0 with 4 MD1200 with 48 disks.
It's connect through a LSI card. So
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 16:28 +0400, Jim Klimov wrote:
> 2012-01-14 18:36, Stefan Ring wrote:
> > Inspired by the paper "End-to-end Data Integrity for File Systems: A
> > ZFS Case Study" [1], I've been thinking if it is possible to devise a way,
> > in which a minimal in-memory data corruption would
Hello all,
Trying to reply to everyone so far in one post.
casper@oracle.com said
> Did you try:
>
> iostat -En
I issued that command and I see (soft) errors from all 4 drives. There is a
serial no. field in the message headers but it is has no contents.
>
> messages in /var/adm/mes
Hello all, I have a question about what output "ZDB -dd" should
produce in L0 DVA fields. I expected there to be one or more
same-sized references to data blocks stored in top-level vdevs
(one vdev #0 in my 6-disk raidz2 pool), as confirmed by the source:
http://src.illumos.org/source/xref/il
On Jan 16, 2012, at 8:08 AM, David Magda wrote:
> On Mon, January 16, 2012 01:19, Richard Elling wrote:
>
>>> [1] http://www.usenix.org/event/fast10/tech/full_papers/zhang.pdf
>>
>> Yes. Netapp has funded those researchers in the past. Looks like a FUD
>> piece to me.
>> Lookout everyone, the me
On Jan 17, 2012, at 4:11 AM, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
> I have a desktop system with 2 ZFS mirrors. One drive in one mirror is
> starting to produce read errors and slowing things down dramatically. I
> detached it and the system is running fine. I can't tell which drive it is
> though!
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Richard Elling wrote:
Agree with the ECC comment :-)
If we can classify this as encouragement to use ECC, then you don't need to
drag ZFS
into the conversation. Interestingly, the only market that doesn't use ECC is
the PeeCee
market. Embedded and enterprise markets use EC
Richard Elling said
> If the errors bubble up to ZFS, then they will be shown in the output of
> "zpool status"
On the console I was seeing retryable read errors that eventually
failed. The block number and drive path were included but not any info I
could relate to the actual disk.
zpool statu
> The issue is definitely not specific to ZFS. For example, the whole OS
> depends on relable memory content in order to function. Likewise, no one
> likes it if characters mysteriously change in their word processing
> documents.
I don’t care too much if a single document gets corrupted – there
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Stefan Ring wrote:
Additionally, consider that Joyent’s port of KVM supports only Intel
systems, AFAIK.
Hopefully that will be a short-term issue. 64-core AMD Opteron
systems are affordable now.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesyst
19 matches
Mail list logo
