On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Mike Gerdts wrote:
> Some people have trained their fingers to use the -f option on every
> command that supports it to force the operation. For instance, how
> often do you do rm -rf vs. rm -r and answer questions about every
> file?
The last time I tried i
> Some people have trained their fingers to use the -f option on every
> command that supports it to force the operation. For instance, how
> often do you do rm -rf vs. rm -r and answer questions about every
> file?
>
> If various zpool commands (import, create, replace, etc.) are used
> against
Paul,
Thanks.
I understand now.
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Paul Kraus
> Sent: 星期一, 十月 24, 2011 22:38
> To: ZFS Discussions
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] FS Reli
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Paul Kraus wrote:
> Recently someone posted to this list of that _exact_ situation, they loaded
> an OS to a pair of drives while a pair of different drives containing an OS
> were still attached. The zpool on the first pair ended up not being able to
> be import
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Paul Kraus wrote:
> Recently someone posted to this list of that _exact_ situation, they loaded
> an OS to a pair of drives while a pair of different drives containing an OS
> were still attached. The zpool on the first pair ended up not being able to
> be importe
Recently someone posted to this list of that _exact_ situation, they loaded
an OS to a pair of drives while a pair of different drives containing an OS
were still attached. The zpool on the first pair ended up not being able to
be imported, and were corrupted. I can post more info when I am back in
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
>
>> 3. Do NOT let a system see drives with more than one OS zpool at the
>> same time (I know you _can_ do this safely, but I have seen too many
>> horror stories on this list that I just avoid it).
>>
>
> Can you elaborate #3? In what situation wi
> 3. Do NOT let a system see drives with more than one OS zpool at the
> same time (I know you _can_ do this safely, but I have seen too many
> horror stories on this list that I just avoid it).
>
Can you elaborate #3? In what situation will it happen?
Thanks.
Fred
___
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Cindy Swearingen
wrote:
> Your 1-3 is very sensible advice
Unfortunately, I don't think I have ever seen the recommendations
I made stated quite so plainly.
>and I must ask about this
> statement:
>>I have yet to have any data loss with ZFS.
>
> Maybe this
Hi Paul,
Your 1-3 is very sensible advice and I must ask about this
statement:
>I have yet to have any data loss with ZFS.
Maybe this goes without saying, but I think you are using
ZFS redundancy.
Thanks,
Cindy
On 10/18/11 08:52, Paul Kraus wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Gregory Sh
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Gregory Shaw wrote:
> Another item that made me nervous was my experience with ZFS. Even when
> called 'ready for production', a number of bugs were found that were pretty
> nasty.
> They've since been fixed (years ago), but there were some surprises there
> th
11 matches
Mail list logo
