On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:57:54 -0700, "Marc A. Schindler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I have to say, I'm not sure there are 4 Imp gals / 5 US gals in there --
> it looks
> more like 3 Imp gals to me, but I'm just estimating.
Hmm, you could always shut of the water, flush to empty the tank and then
p
-Marc-
> W/L 5/8 BELOW
> Any plumbers out there who can read toiletese? ;-)
I'm neither a plumber nor fluent in toiletese, but I suspect the first
number is the tank capacity, while the second refers to the total amount
of water per flush.
Septic Stephen
///
At 09:51 AM 11/26/02 -0500, Jon Spencer wrote:
Speaking of bathroom humor :-)
This is not so humorous. Whoever came up with these don't work toilets need
to be flushed down one of them!
Then aren't you glad Al Gore wasn't elected President so he could force
more stuff like that down our
You guys are the lucky ones over in Canada. You have full capacity and I
have to struggle with six.
Stacy.
At 05:57 PM 11/26/2002 -0700, you wrote:
Don't quote me on that -- I'm going from memory and I actually went and
looked at
our nearest toilet, but it doesn't say what the capacity is.
Don't quote me on that -- I'm going from memory and I actually went and looked at
our nearest toilet, but it doesn't say what the capacity is.
...I went and took the tank cover off. There's some stuff stamped into the
ceramics near the top. Besides CSA (like your UL) it says American Standard
(th
That would be so great! Imagine lifting the lid and not finding any little
surprises, and not having to unplug the stupid thing once a week. But 5
gallons! I would settle for 3! This may be enough reason to move to
Canada, even with the socialized medicine! (well ...)
Jon
Marc A. Schindl
Jon Spencer wrote:
> Speaking of bathroom humor :-)
>
> This is not so humorous. Whoever came up with these don't work toilets need
> to be flushed down one of them! Who wants to go in with me when I drive up
> to Canada to get some toilets that actually do not need the Seinfeld
> "courte
Speaking of bathroom humor :-)
This is not so humorous. Whoever came up with these don't work toilets need
to be flushed down one of them! Who wants to go in with me when I drive up
to Canada to get some toilets that actually do not need the Seinfeld
"courtesy flush"? (I assume that it is
At 05:01 PM 11/23/02 -0500, Jon Spencer wrote:
Raw vegetables will cause excessive gas for about two weeks when you start
eating them. This is the case for everyone that I know who has started to
better their diet. But after two weeks, your gut acclimates to the veggies
and you have no more prob
I wish Jesus would do a number on my taste buds also.
Stacy.
At 05:01 PM 11/23/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Raw vegetables will cause excessive gas for about two weeks when you start
eating them. This is the case for everyone that I know who has started to
better their diet. But after two weeks, yo
In astronomy they call this a "black hole".
"Elmer L. Fairbank" wrote:
> At 12:18 11/22/2002 -0700, Sir Goef wrote:
>
> >
> >PS - Right now I am enjoying a vegetable lasagna for lunch (left over
> >from last night) - delicious!
> >
> >--
> >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Raw vegetables will cause excessive gas for about two weeks when you start
eating them. This is the case for everyone that I know who has started to
better their diet. But after two weeks, your gut acclimates to the veggies
and you have no more problems. And, of course, you feel a lot better as
At 12:18 11/22/2002 -0700, Sir Goef wrote:
PS - Right now I am enjoying a vegetable lasagna for lunch (left over
from last night) - delicious!
--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Till is afraid to think what the non-text portions of a vegetable lasagne
might look like
-Paul-
> PS. Hi Jack!
Tut, tut. We don't make such overt terroristic threats on this list.
A Pauled,
Stephen
//
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
>>> Stacy, in all seriousness, asked:
>Suppose I never learn to like them? Can I still get into the
>celestial kingdom without liking them?
You'll like them. It's all a matter of faith - first you EAT, and then
you'll LIKE. :)
I didn't think liking (or eating) vegetables was a requirement for t
Suppose I never learn to like them? Can I still get into the celestial
kingdom without liking them?
Stacy.
At 11:35 AM 11/22/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>>> Stacy wrote:
>I have endeavored to eat raw vegetables but find they really don't
>agree with me. What am I supposed to do if my family absolu
The butter may be the only thing that saves them from complete extinction
from my diet. I can't really stand the taste and they are hard going down
my esophagus.
Stacy.
At 12:51 PM 11/22/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>I have endeavored to eat raw vegetables but find they really don't agree
>with me
>I have endeavored to eat raw vegetables but find they really don't agree
>with me. What am I supposed to do if my family absolutely insists I eat
>them? It is questions of this nature that trouble me.
Get a vegetable steamer and lightly steam them. Steamed vegetables are
totally yummy! Use a
>>> Stacy wrote:
>I have endeavored to eat raw vegetables but find they really don't
>agree with me. What am I supposed to do if my family absolutely
>insists I eat them? It is questions of this nature that trouble me.
My wife is vegetarian (although she does eat fish - I think you are
still "t
I have endeavored to eat raw vegetables but find they really don't agree
with me. What am I supposed to do if my family absolutely insists I eat
them? It is questions of this nature that trouble me.
Stacy.
At 10:00 AM 11/21/2002 -0600, you wrote:
The Lord tells us he doesn't/shouldn't have t
Gary wisely wrote:
>Why do so many members not drink caffeine drinks?
>Because the Spirit has guided them to that decision. It becomes
>personally binding on them, but not on others who are not prepared.
I agree.
;-)
Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Very well stated--that is why I like this list so much. Many times I know what I want
to say, I feel what I want to say, I just don't know how to say it.
Then someone, Gary this time, writes along and puts the words there that sum up my
feelings.
Thanks ;-)
your sis in Mishawaka, IN
val
---
Because the WoW *isn't* primarily a health law. It is a law of obedience and
spirituality.
Stacy Smith wrote:
> If the recommendations were changed to not include caffeine, why not, since
> we know the following about it? I read or heard on the radio that caffeine
> takes calcium from the bones.
If the recommendations were changed to not include caffeine, why not, since
we know the following about it? I read or heard on the radio that caffeine
takes calcium from the bones. If this is true, it seems likely that it
should be included.
Stacy.
At 06:06 AM 11/20/2002 +, you wrote:
Jon,
It appears that the generally accepted definition of "hot drinks" may
have been fairly broad for a period of time. A quote from Widtsoe's
1937 book on the Word of Wisdom--
Caffeine, the essential principle of tea and coffee, was discovered, as
a chemical substance, a few years before th
We talked about this issue today with a couple of sister customers in our
bookstore. They both recall that when they were married (many moons ago),
it was taught that caffeine was against the WoW. They said it was in the
lesson manuals (I'll take their word for it because I am just a newbie - 9
y
The reason I can't drink that barley drink is that I haven't found a good
way to measure it easily.
Stacy.
At 09:33 AM 11/18/2002 -0700, you wrote:
"John W. Redelfs" wrote:
> Stacy Smith wrote:
> > Then why can't the church take an active stance on caffeine if that is
> > the
> > real proble
>Well, he'll be at our place Thursday evening for dinner. I think all we
have in
>the house is orange juice, cocoa and ginger ale. I'll have to go to
SuperStore and
>get some real Jamaican ginger beer for them -- that stuff's almost
flammable
>(totally alcohol free -- flammable in the spicy sense).
Well, he'll be at our place Thursday evening for dinner. I think all we have in
the house is orange juice, cocoa and ginger ale. I'll have to go to SuperStore and
get some real Jamaican ginger beer for them -- that stuff's almost flammable
(totally alcohol free -- flammable in the spicy sense).
Pa
Jon Spencer:
I use Dr. Pepper.
___
Dr. Pepper is out of network for me.
And that's the trouble with POSs and HMOs and WOWs, etc. The
help line gives a different answer everytime I call. [grin]
Larry Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Sorry - that drink is against my religion. I use Dr. Pepper.
Jon
Paul Osborne wrote:
> JWR's assessment of the WoW is exactly how I think. It's too bad we live
> so far away from each other or we could sit down and celebrate our
> agreement with a Coke!
>
> ;-)
>
> Paul O
>
>
> On Mon, 18
JWR's assessment of the WoW is exactly how I think. It's too bad we live
so far away from each other or we could sit down and celebrate our
agreement with a Coke!
;-)
Paul O
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 08:15:05 + "John W. Redelfs"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Because the WoW is not so much a health law
"John W. Redelfs" wrote:
> Stacy Smith wrote:
> > Then why can't the church take an active stance on caffeine if that is
> > the
> > real problem?
>
> Because the WoW is not so much a health law as it is a spiritual law.
> It is one of the ways that the Church uses to determine which members
> a
Stacy Smith wrote:
> Then why can't the church take an active stance on caffeine if that is
> the
> real problem?
Because the WoW is not so much a health law as it is a spiritual law.
It is one of the ways that the Church uses to determine which members
are serious about the restored gospel
>President Hinckley, twice, say on national television that we do not
>drink soda with caffeine,
I heard it too, but he is not speaking for me or my house. I have no
problem with cokes. Everyone must make their own choice and go with it.
Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
>There are lots of silly apostateisms that creep into our religion. One
is
>you can't drink any caffeinated beverages. Another is that you have to
pass
>the Sacrament tray with your right hand. Some claim that you can't do
>anything that might be considered physical exercise on Sunday (like
taki
Jon Spencer wrote:
> Not correct (so much nicer than saying "Wrong!" :-). There was a letter
> sent out some time ago clarifying that caffeine is not prohibited by the
> WoW. And I believe that the point of President Hinckley not contradicting
> Wallace on the caffeine question was to not get
Not correct (so much nicer than saying "Wrong!" :-). There was a letter
sent out some time ago clarifying that caffeine is not prohibited by the
WoW. And I believe that the point of President Hinckley not contradicting
Wallace on the caffeine question was to not get sidetracked. I presume he
fel
I have forwarded this on to the Prophet so that he can take it up with
Christ. I'll let you know when I hear back.
Noj
Stacy Smith wrote:
> Then why can't the church take an active stance on caffeine if that is the
> real problem?
///
Valerie Nielsen Williams wrote:
> I have heard that tannic acid is used in the making of coffee and tea and
> that can be more harmful than caffeine. It's kind of reminiscent of the
> WhiteLies anti-smoking campaign telling us what is REALLY in a
> cigarette--it ain't just tobacco. Yet I can
Then why can't the church take an active stance on caffeine if that is the
real problem?
Stacy.
At 05:43 PM 11/16/2002 -0500, you wrote:
I have heard that tannic acid is used in the making of coffee and tea and
that can be more harmful than caffeine. It's kind of reminiscent of the
WhiteLies a
41 matches
Mail list logo