Stephen Beecroft wrote:
> -Marc-
> > Let me ask you the same question I've been asking others, than. If
> > the criteria that the U.S. are using were to be applied to other
> > countries in the area, a much better case could be made for
> > invading Pakistan. Yet instead the US pours billions i
-Marc-
> Let me ask you the same question I've been asking others, than. If
> the criteria that the U.S. are using were to be applied to other
> countries in the area, a much better case could be made for
> invading Pakistan. Yet instead the US pours billions into military
> aid for Pakistan. Why
Stephen Beecroft wrote:
> -Marc-
> > Let me ask you the same question I've been asking others, than. If
> > the criteria that the U.S. are using were to be applied to other
> > countries in the area, a much better case could be made for
> > invading Pakistan. Yet instead the US pours billions i
Stephen Beecroft wrote:
> -Stephen-
> > Nowhere in here is found an explicit or implicit condemnation of
> > the US actions against Iraq.
>
> -Marc-
> > Something neither John nor I said, incidentally.
>
> Sure you did. You wrote, regarding your criticisms of US actions against
> Iraq:
>
>
-Stephen-
> Nowhere in here is found an explicit or implicit condemnation of
> the US actions against Iraq.
-Marc-
> Something neither John nor I said, incidentally.
Sure you did. You wrote, regarding your criticisms of US actions against
Iraq:
"I myself have a difficult time seeing how p
-Marc-
> Let me ask you the same question I've been asking others, than. If
> the criteria that the U.S. are using were to be applied to other
> countries in the area, a much better case could be made for
> invading Pakistan. Yet instead the US pours billions into military
> aid for Pakistan. Why
Stephen Beecroft wrote:
> RE: Iraq and war
>
> -John-
> > I felt that it should throw a bucket of cold water on some of those
> > saints who are in favor of a war with Iraq. He said that as a Church
> > we have to remain neutral and our members have to obey the laws of
> > the land even if that
Stephen Beecroft wrote:
> -Stephen-
> > The US maintains that the actions against Iraq do not constitute
> > a war of aggression, but are a defense of family and freedoms.
>
> -Mark-
> > Saying it doesn't make it so.
>
> That's beside the point, which is that an argument can be made to
> justif
-Stephen-
> The US maintains that the actions against Iraq do not constitute
> a war of aggression, but are a defense of family and freedoms.
-Mark-
> Saying it doesn't make it so.
That's beside the point, which is that an argument can be made to
justify the US actions. The US government is no
> The US maintains that the actions against Iraq do
not constitute a war of aggression, but are a defense of family and
freedoms.
Saying it doesn't make it so. Individuals are free to decide for themselves the
justice of a particular action. If an American member feels that the governm
10 matches
Mail list logo
