It was actually another problem we were trying to solve and happened to
notice the df behaviour while debugging.
We had a script in the gz that wanted to mount the nfs share. It did a
simple check to see if it was already mounted by parsing mount output which
showed the ngz mount. The script in th
It took me a while to find it but in some of my previous searches I came
across something which might help:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=378354&tstart=0
There are some links in one of the messages that talk about these packages.
Derek
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Kevin
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Derek
McEachern wrote:
> In doing some testing we came across some unexpected behaviour (at least
> unexpected to me) of the df -Z command when run in the global zone.
>
> If a non-global zone has an nfs fs mounted df -Z dumps all kinds of statvfs
> errors because a
In doing some testing we came across some unexpected behaviour (at least
unexpected to me) of the df -Z command when run in the global zone.
If a non-global zone has an nfs fs mounted df -Z dumps all kinds of statvfs
errors because as best I can tell he can't actually see the fs. It's in the
gz's
On 06/05/09 06:18, Jon Anderson wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Can you post a log of what you dig and what response
you got?
I assume that e1000g0 was not already plumbed in the
global zone?
Rgds,
Jon
dladm show-phys
output could be useful.
Kevin Pan wrote:
Hi,
I have installed OpenSolaris 2009.06,
On 06/05/09 05:17, Tom Stocker wrote:
Do you know something about OSOL 2009.06? I can't get routing to work. But I
need to use exactly this version. Very strange.
I'll try quagga now.
no details, no clue :(
in general, attempts to manipulate networking will fail if network
automagic (NWAM)
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Steve Lawrence wrote:
> No. Those are only used for s10u4 or s10u5 systems. You should already
> have them if you install s10u6 or later.
Having just completed the S10 u7 installation, you are correct. Only
the package under the 1.0.1 tree needed to be installed. Thanks ag
http://www.osiconsulting.co.uk/solutions/solariszones.html
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 07:13:14AM -0700, Rich Teer wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Steve Lawrence wrote:
>
> > That's correct. You need only install the 1.0.1 SUNWs?brandk package for
> > each, which enable the brand(s).
>
> Cool. So I don't need to install the packages under the 1.0 tree before
On 06/03/09 02:06, Nicolas Dorfsman wrote:
Le 2 juin 09 à 23:21, Dan Price a écrit :
We don't have sparse zones in 2009.06, but zones work fine, and are
quite small by default. Please try installing a zone, and just add
the additional software you need use 'pkg install'.
Any chance to hav
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Steve Lawrence wrote:
> That's correct. You need only install the 1.0.1 SUNWs?brandk package for
> each, which enable the brand(s).
Cool. So I don't need to install the packages under the 1.0 tree before
I install the 1.0.1 package?
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
URLs:
Hi Kevin,
Can you post a log of what you dig and what response
you got?
I assume that e1000g0 was not already plumbed in the
global zone?
Rgds,
Jon
Kevin Pan wrote:
Hi,
I have installed OpenSolaris 2009.06, and tried to:
add net
set physical=e1000g0
... does not work
I also tried "hme0",
Hi,
I have installed OpenSolaris 2009.06, and tried to:
add net
set physical=e1000g0
... does not work
I also tried "hme0", "bge0", "bge1" all didn't work.
The IP-type is "exclusive".
Can anyone please help? I would also like to set up an exclusive-IP zone with
an externally-visible IP a
Do you know something about OSOL 2009.06? I can't get routing to work. But I
need to use exactly this version. Very strange.
I'll try quagga now.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Many thanks Edward for your answer.
Comments below.
Le 5 juin 09 à 10:24, Edward Pilatowicz a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 09:39:12AM +0200, Nicolas Dorfsman wrote:
Le 5 juin 09 à 04:45, Edward Pilatowicz a écrit :
ipkg seems to be a great advanced techno.
Anywa
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 09:39:12AM +0200, Nicolas Dorfsman wrote:
>
> Le 5 juin 09 à 04:45, Edward Pilatowicz a écrit :
>
>>> The difference between Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris is that, on
>>> Solaris 10 by using the "create" would automatically inherit all the
>>> 4 directories mentioned above, and
I am also interested in that script.
Where would I be able to download it?
Thanks!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
I too am interested in this script!
Where can I download it please ;)
Thanks!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
I too am interested in this script!
Where can I download it please ;)
Thanks!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Le 5 juin 09 à 04:45, Edward Pilatowicz a écrit :
The difference between Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris is that, on
Solaris 10 by using the "create" would automatically inherit all
the 4 directories mentioned above, and by using "create -b" would
create a "whole-root" zone. On OpenSolaris, how
20 matches
Mail list logo