On Wed 07 Sep 2011 at 07:42AM, Paul Kraus wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Mike Gerdts wrote:
>
> >> 3)zfs dataset requirement
> >
> > How does this negatively impact you or other users? As of Solaris 11
> > Express, this requirement means that you have to run 'zfs create' once
> > to cr
this is old but interesting blog on sparse zone in opensolaris / solaris 11
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~bmiller/blog/2010/03/15/sparse-zones-not-supported-in-opensolaris/
Sent from my iPad
Hung-Sheng Tsao ( LaoTsao) Ph.D
On Sep 7, 2011, at 7:42, Paul Kraus wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:11 PM
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Mike Gerdts wrote:
>> 3)zfs dataset requirement
>
> How does this negatively impact you or other users? As of Solaris 11
> Express, this requirement means that you have to run 'zfs create' once
> to create a ZFS filesystem that will be the parent of an arbitrry nu
On 9/6/2011 5:11 PM, Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Tue 06 Sep 2011 at 04:37PM, "Hung-Sheng Tsao (Lao Tsao ??) Ph.D." wrote:
current s10 zone user will not be unhappy when move to s11
1)there is no sparse zone in s11 (yet)
2)there is no v2v from s10 zone to s11 zone (yet)
That is not correct.
http:
On Tue 06 Sep 2011 at 04:37PM, "Hung-Sheng Tsao (Lao Tsao ??) Ph.D." wrote:
> current s10 zone user will not be unhappy when move to s11
> 1)there is no sparse zone in s11 (yet)
> 2)there is no v2v from s10 zone to s11 zone (yet)
That is not correct.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E19963-01
Hung-Sheng Tsao (Lao Tsao ??) Ph.D. wrote:
> current s10 zone user will not be unhappy when move to s11
> 1)there is no sparse zone in s11 (yet)
> 2)there is no v2v from s10 zone to s11 zone (yet)
> 3)zfs dataset requirement
> 4)people just does not like changes
Given the changes in packaging an
current s10 zone user will not be unhappy when move to s11
1)there is no sparse zone in s11 (yet)
2)there is no v2v from s10 zone to s11 zone (yet)
3)zfs dataset requirement
4)people just does not like changes
My 2c
On 9/6/2011 3:33 PM, Frank Batschulat wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:27:40 +0
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:27:40 +0200, LaoTsao wrote:
interesting, IMHO, this type of change will make many many s10 users
unhappy
I assume you are refering to Mike's response that zones require their own
seperate ZFS dataset going forward ? if so can you give some reasons
why this would make c
thx
interesting, IMHO, this type of change will make many many s10 users unhappy
Sent from my iPad
Hung-Sheng Tsao ( LaoTsao) Ph.D
On Sep 6, 2011, at 15:19, Mike Gerdts wrote:
> On Tue 06 Sep 2011 at 03:00PM, "Hung-Sheng Tsao (Lao Tsao ??) Ph.D." wrote:
>>
>> I just did the same on s10u9 vbox
On Tue 06 Sep 2011 at 03:00PM, "Hung-Sheng Tsao (Lao Tsao ??) Ph.D." wrote:
>
> I just did the same on s10u9 vbox
> bash-3.00# zfs list
[snip]
> bash-3.00# zoneadm -z test1 install
If zoneadm creates a dataset for this zone, at this point you would see:
A ZFS file system has been created for t
I just did the same on s10u9 vbox
bash-3.00# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
rpool 22.1G 7.88G34K /rpool
rpool/ROOT12.1G 7.88G21K legacy
rpool/ROOT/s10x_u9wos_13 12.1G 7.88G 12.1G /
rpool/dump1.
On Tue 06 Sep 2011 at 10:09AM, Jeremy Loukinas wrote:
> First:
> root@opensolaris:~# zfs mount
> rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-1/
> rpool/export/export
> rpool/export/home /export/home
> rpool /rpool
> zpool/zones /zon
On 9/6/2011 1:09 PM, Jeremy Loukinas wrote:
First:
root@opensolaris:~# zfs mount
rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-1/
rpool/export/export
rpool/export/home /export/home
rpool /rpool
zpool/zones /zones
zpool
On 22 feb 2010, at 12:02, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:49:46 +0100, Paul van der Zwan
> wrote:
>
>> I upgraded my system from b132 to b133 this weekend and I got error messages
>> when I ran attach -u to upgrade my zones.
>> The second run of the install of updated
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:49:46 +0100, Paul van der Zwan
wrote:
> I upgraded my system from b132 to b133 this weekend and I got error messages
> when I ran attach -u to upgrade my zones.
> The second run of the install of updated packages fails.
> In the log I find:
>
> $ pfexec cat /var/tmp/dns.a
In message <4b145e73.3080...@sun.com>, Jerry Jelinek writes:
>Thats not a workaround, thats what you have to do if you want to set
[snipped]
Thank you for the detailed explanation.
Work-around or not its documented here the next time someone
stumbles across the error, at least until the enhanceme
John D Groenveld wrote:
In message <4b141dac.7060...@sun.com>, Jerry Jelinek writes:
The workaround for what?
On snv_127, "zfs receive" does not mount the zbe and "zoneadm attach"
fails until its mounted:
# uname -v
snv_127
# zfs receive -d rpool < /var/tmp/foo.snapshot
# zonecfg -z foo create
In message <4b141dac.7060...@sun.com>, Jerry Jelinek writes:
>The workaround for what?
On snv_127, "zfs receive" does not mount the zbe and "zoneadm attach"
fails until its mounted:
# uname -v
snv_127
# zfs receive -d rpool < /var/tmp/foo.snapshot
# zonecfg -z foo create -a /var/opt/zones/foo
# zf
John D Groenveld wrote:
In message <4b1403ff.6000...@sun.com>, Jordan Vaughan writes:
If I remember correctly, zbe datasets' mountpoints should be set to
"legacy". rpool/var/zones/oracle-1/ROOT/zbe's mountpoint isn't "legacy"
on your snv_127 system. What was rpool/var/zones/oracle-1/ROOT/zbe'
In message <4b1403ff.6000...@sun.com>, Jordan Vaughan writes:
>If I remember correctly, zbe datasets' mountpoints should be set to
>"legacy". rpool/var/zones/oracle-1/ROOT/zbe's mountpoint isn't "legacy"
>on your snv_127 system. What was rpool/var/zones/oracle-1/ROOT/zbe's
>mountpoint property
If I remember correctly, zbe datasets' mountpoints should be set to
"legacy". rpool/var/zones/oracle-1/ROOT/zbe's mountpoint isn't "legacy"
on your snv_127 system. What was rpool/var/zones/oracle-1/ROOT/zbe's
mountpoint property's value on the snv_125 system prior to the zfs send
operation?
The Real Warren Belfer wrote:
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Andrew Dishong wrote:
Getting the following error after trying to uninstall a zone,any ideas?
[lab-15k-c]:~\ # zoneadm -z test1 uninstall
Are you sure you want to uninstall zone test1 (y/[n])? y
rm: Unable to remove directory /zonesHA/test1/te
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Andrew Dishong wrote:
Getting the following error after trying to uninstall a zone,any ideas?
[lab-15k-c]:~\ # zoneadm -z test1 uninstall
Are you sure you want to uninstall zone test1 (y/[n])? y
rm: Unable to remove directory /zonesHA/test1/test1/root/usr/lib/cpu:
File exi
BTW: This is a whole root zone I did not state that in the earlier
email, Andy
---
Andrew Dishong: Solutions Architect
Dayton, Ohio - JPMC WIN Team
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accessline: 877-226-8297
Page: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.central/adishong
Blog: http://blogs.sun.com/adishong
AIM:
I have not but my customer may have I will have to check but I would
be surprised if this was the case. I also have been able to
uninstall other zones on this system using the same method, Andy
---
Andrew Dishong: Solutions Architect
Dayton, Ohio - JPMC WIN Team
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acce
Andrew Dishong wrote:
Getting the following error after trying to uninstall a zone,any ideas?
[lab-15k-c]:~\ # zoneadm -z test1 uninstall
Are you sure you want to uninstall zone test1 (y/[n])? y
rm: Unable to remove directory /zonesHA/test1/test1/root/usr/lib/cpu:
File exists
rm: Unable to remo
No did not touch them and the zone was halted, Andy
---
Andrew Dishong: Solutions Architect
Dayton, Ohio - JPMC WIN Team
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accessline: 877-226-8297
Page: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.central/adishong
Blog: http://blogs.sun.com/adishong
AIM: softvtwin03
On May 30, 20
hm.
the errors below seem to indicate that you're tying to uninstall a
running zone. did you by chance edit any of the files in /etc/zones?
i've only seen this error if i've mucked with those files and made the
zone state inconsistent between the kernel and userland.
ed
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09
Paul Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
I am running Solaris 10 11/06 and trying to use the new zoneadm detach and
attach commands. I am running into a problem when trying to create a blank
zone on the target host. 'Invalid path to detached zone'. Has someone seen
this error and know how to get past it?
O
29 matches
Mail list logo
