Hi all, does anyone here uses Zone installed on Suse Linux?
What's your impressions? Particular pros/cons?
Thanks
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
--On 8. Juli 2005 09:39:44 +0200 Negroup - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, does anyone here uses Zone installed on Suse Linux?
Zope is Zope. Ensure to have the latest Zope version installed.
-aj
pgpuU0QgN1jk2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
On 7/8/05, Negroup - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, does anyone here uses Zone installed on Suse Linux?
What's your impressions? Particular pros/cons?
There are difference between different unixes,
Linux/MacOSX/Solaris/xBSD. But all linuxes seems to work equally well.
It's usally easiest to
(Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 12:00:30PM -0400) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote/schrieb/egrapse:
From: Ed Colmar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been hacking together a few seperate paypal IPN connections, some
code from basion, and some from random web scrapings... Anyway...
Things are working for the most part,
2005/7/8, Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There are difference between different unixes,
Linux/MacOSX/Solaris/xBSD. But all linuxes seems to work equally well.
I asked this because I know there where, in the past, some issues
using RH9 due to threading library, and to avoid surprises I'm
Peter Bengtsson wrote:
Shane (and the Zope list),
I've patched your lovely BTreeFolder2 product (version 1.0.1) so that
I can doubleclick on options in the dropdown instead of having to
click the Edit button. This is using Javascript and if Javascript is
disabled, nothing happens, it just goes
On 7/8/05, David Convent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Bengtsson wrote:
Shane (and the Zope list),
I've patched your lovely BTreeFolder2 product (version 1.0.1) so that
I can doubleclick on options in the dropdown instead of having to
click the Edit button. This is using Javascript and if
Negroup - wrote:
Hi all, does anyone here uses Zone installed on Suse Linux?
What's your impressions? Particular pros/cons?
It comes with a script to manage multiple Zopes, which is very useful.
I have around 50 separate Zope/Plones running for student teaching.
The only negative that I know
The only negative that I know of comes with SuSE 9.3 Pro. Zope is
compiled with Python 2.4!
Why do these bastards ship Zope with an unsupported Python version...
unbelievable! Maybe a reason *not* to use Suse.
he he. I think the equivalent of using deb packages (or alike) to
install
I've learnt that it's better to use getSecurityManager instead of
REQUEST.AUTHENTICATED_USER
because it's more secure. Other than that, what is the difference. I
fear I've come a across a situation when getSecurityManager() returns
nothing where AUTHENTICATED_USER did. I'm currently trying to
--On 8. Juli 2005 13:24:20 +0100 Peter Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've learnt that it's better to use getSecurityManager instead of
REQUEST.AUTHENTICATED_USER
because it's more secure. Other than that, what is the difference. I
fear I've come a across a situation when
Hello everybody,
I am a new zope user that has received an application to maintain and
I'm learning about zope at the same time.
One of the features of the app requires users to subscribe to receive
a newsletter.
A user is presented with a very simple form
form method=post tal:attributes=action
--On 8. Juli 2005 14:59:46 +0100 Susana Beatson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I am new to zope I'm sure I'm missing on something important about
external methods, can anyone help?
In general you should not see and Unauthorized exception causing the popup
username/password request. First you
How about setting the proxy role of your Register script to 'Manager'? (to
allow Register to invoke your external method)
Jonathan
- Original Message -
From: Susana Beatson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zope@zope.org
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:59 AM
Subject: [Zope] sending e-mail in
I need to make a temporary connection to the ZODB. I have really good
reasons relating to performance and not wanting have objects in the
current cache getting removed from the cache on why I don't want to
make use of the connections in the pool. I can elaborate on this if
really nescessary...
Peter Bengtsson wrote:
The only negative that I know of comes with SuSE 9.3 Pro. Zope is
compiled with Python 2.4!
Why do these bastards ship Zope with an unsupported Python version...
unbelievable! Maybe a reason *not* to use Suse.
he he. I think the equivalent of using deb
Tony Addyman wrote:
Peter Bengtsson wrote:
The only negative that I know of comes with SuSE 9.3 Pro. Zope is
compiled with Python 2.4!
Why do these bastards ship Zope with an unsupported Python version...
unbelievable! Maybe a reason *not* to use Suse.
he he. I think the equivalent of
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 04:01:23PM +0100, Tony Addyman wrote:
Removing python-2.4 from the system is not an option. Too many thinks link
in to it.
No need to remove anything.
Just build python 2.3 and install it in /usr/local (the default).
Then build zope from source like so:
./configure
Why do these bastards ship Zope with an unsupported Python version...
unbelievable! Maybe a reason *not* to use Suse.
he he. I think the equivalent of using deb packages (or alike) to
install and maintain your zope is like create and maintain a zclass
project: you get started quickly
When installing from the source, Python does offer a make altinstall which is terrific for installing a newer or older version of Python alongside an existing installation.
For example, Fedore Core 4comes with Python 2.4 and as far as I can tell, doing amake altinstallwith the 2.3.5 tarballputs
I am using arrays in Postgres. I need to be able to compare a string value in a specific position of a text array field (text[] is a field type in Postgres) against a variable(argument) I am passing to my query. I am only using parts of the query to illustrate the problem as the rest is
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 04:01:23PM +0100, Tony Addyman wrote:
Removing python-2.4 from the system is not an option. Too many thinks
link in to it.
No need to remove anything.
Just build python 2.3 and install it in /usr/local (the default).
If only it was that simple.
Garth B. wrote:
When installing from the source, Python does offer a make altinstall
which is terrific for installing a newer or older version of Python
alongside an existing installation.
For example, Fedore Core 4 comes with Python 2.4 and as far as I can
tell,
doing a make altinstall
Susana Beatson wrote at 2005-7-8 14:59 +0100:
...
The problem I have is that the sendEmail() function always requires
the user to be logged in as manager of the portal to work.
What type of object is sendEmail?
Have you (carefully) looked at the traceback (in your error_log
object -- you need
On Friday 08 July 2005 08:01 am, Tony Addyman wrote:
Peter Bengtsson wrote:
The only negative that I know of comes with SuSE 9.3 Pro. Zope is
compiled with Python 2.4!
Why do these bastards ship Zope with an unsupported Python version...
unbelievable! Maybe a reason *not* to use Suse.
Tony Addyman wrote:
Negroup - wrote:
Hi all, does anyone here uses Zone installed on Suse Linux?
What's your impressions? Particular pros/cons?
It comes with a script to manage multiple Zopes, which is very useful.
I have around 50 separate Zope/Plones running for student teaching.
The
On 7/8/05, Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Bengtsson wrote at 2005-7-8 13:24 +0100:
I've learnt that it's better to use getSecurityManager instead of
REQUEST.AUTHENTICATED_USER
because it's more secure. Other than that, what is the difference.
The security manager could be
Please join us July 13, 7:30-9:00 PM, for the second meeting of the
Fredericksburg, VA Zope and Python User Group (ZPUG). Zac Bir, Zope
Corporation Senior Software Engineer, will present on PyObjC. Further
meetings are planned for the second Wednesday of every month.
Location will be at
Log message for revision 31024:
experimenting with z3 - z2 interface bridge
Changed:
A Zope/branches/yuppie-z3z2bridge/
-=-
Copied: Zope/branches/yuppie-z3z2bridge (from rev 31023, Zope/trunk)
___
Zope-Checkins maillist -
Log message for revision 31025:
ported and reversed bridging code from Five; added fromZ3Method
Changed:
A Zope/branches/yuppie-z3z2bridge/lib/python/Interface/bridge.py
A Zope/branches/yuppie-z3z2bridge/lib/python/Interface/tests/bridge.txt
A
Update of /cvs-repository/Packages/ZODB
In directory cvs.zope.org:/tmp/cvs-serv1018/ZODB
Modified Files:
Tag: Zope-2_7-branch
__init__.py
Log Message:
Fiddle stuff for a 3.2.9 release.
=== Packages/ZODB/__init__.py 1.23.4.27 = 1.23.4.28 ===
--- Packages/ZODB/__init__.py:1.23.4.27
Log message for revision 31041:
Move to ZODB 3.4.1a4.
Changed:
_U Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/
_U Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/utilities/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python
Log message for revision 31042:
Merge rev 31041 from 2.8 branch.
Move to ZODB 3.4.1a4.
Changed:
_U Zope/trunk/lib/python/
_U Zope/trunk/utilities/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/trunk/lib/python
___
Name:
Lennart, please check your subscriptions to zope-checkins and cmf-
checkins. Your log messages don't seem to show up on the lists. Maybe
your zope.org email address does not match the address you are
subscribed with?
Thanks,
Stefan
--
Software Engineering is Programming when you can't.
How about boosting the default ZODB cache_size to something less
ridiculous than the default 4000 ?
I propose changing etc/zope.conf.skel to have an explicit value of
2.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of RD
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com
Florent Guillaume wrote at 2005-7-8 12:02 +0200:
How about boosting the default ZODB cache_size to something less
ridiculous than the default 4000 ?
I propose changing etc/zope.conf.skel to have an explicit value of
2.
That may already be a bit large:
We use 15.000 with 6 workers and
The RAMCacheManager does a costly pseudo-pickling of the objects it
stores to compute their size, but that information is only used in
the statistics screen.
1. how about not computing size by default?
2. or, how about using the size to have a cache threshold based on
the size. That would
[Florent Guillaume]
How about boosting the default ZODB cache_size to something less
ridiculous than the default 4000 ?
I propose changing etc/zope.conf.skel to have an explicit value of
2.
[Dieter Maurer]
| That may already be a bit large:
We use 15.000 with 6 workers and our Zope
So, it looks like PluginRegistry (a product that PAS depends on) will
need the same kinds of Interface adjustments to make it work in the
bridged manner that PAS now has. I'll be working on this today, and
hopefully cut a new release of PluginRegistry.
Zac
Takahashi, Michael wrote at 2005-7-7 09:27 -0700:
But there must be another more efficient way to delete
just the single object in the ZCatalog.
Indeed: If you look at the catalog API (e.g. in the source
or via DocFinder), you will find the uncatalog_object method.
--
Dieter
40 matches
Mail list logo
