Chris Withers wrote:
> It's a hard problem to solve, made harder by the fact that Zope supports
> loads of protocols and is totally manageable through the web. These are
> Zope's strengths, but they do raise itneresting problems :-S
It would be nice to have "security by default". This is the sam
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> That's not to say that Greg's difficulties are unique. I just don't
> think his solution is appropriate for most. Synchronization is a major
> need for Zope. In fact, I have some working code! But *I need
> feedback*.
Great, but this demonstrates another Zope problem
The thread at the ZEO list is indeed very interesting.
I wanted to write something like this:
http://lists.zope.org/pipermail/zope-zeo/2000-September/000131.html
Nice to see someone else having the same thoughts.
Cheers,
Nils
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (preferred)
[EMAIL PROTE
== Forwarded Message ==
Date: 19.09.2000 16:57 Uhr
Received: 19.09.2000 22:58 Uhr
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Free Software Foundation)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nils Kassube)
Nils Kassube wrote:
> If I use a GPL'ed component in a complex object oriented environment
> like Zope
Guten Abend.
> Er, this is fine if you're building a new box (and if you're using
> simple IDE drives) but rather less so if you've exceeded the capacity on
> an existing system and/or you're using SCSI drives.
I use Ultra Wide SCSI on my main workstation. Compared to what I had to
pay for a 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (George) wrote:
> I recently transformed my web site into a zope site. It's fantastic no
> question about that but I am a bit warried about the size of the web
> site. I already had to ask for user quota increase and it looks like
This is funny. HDs are so cheap today, your com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lalo Martins) wrote:
> Renderable wasn't even GPL'ed to begin with. And this isn't a
> mistake; now that I think if it, I clearly remember having
> chosen the ZPL so that DC folks could easily take the changes
> and merge them into Zope if they wished.
My copy of Renderable ZC
Jim Hebert wrote:
> Third, again, you're responding as though the discussion is about
> re-licensing all of Zope under the, which simply isn't what anyone has
I'm only pointing out what I think is a problem with using a
GPL'ed component in a Zope site.
My Zope-specific problem is: If I use a G
I wrote a lot of nonsense:
> you are not able to use GPL'ed Zope products with Python 1.6
> (or 2.0) until the dispute is settled.
This is WRONG. Of course it is possible to use GPL'ed software
with less restrictive licensed programs.
Must be the starting alcohol intoxication because of the
Guten Abend.
I recalled (?) my mail within a few minutes after sending. It
didn't yet appear on the mailing list. Too bad you can't
cancel a mail like a Usenet posting.
> They can only constrain *distribution* of that software and derived
> works. This is a serious problem for software authors
Jon Nathan wrote:
> could break code. can i run zope 2.2.1 on python 1.6 or should i
> stick with 1.5.2?
According to Guido van Rossum in
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-09-07-011-21-OS-CY-SW
you are not able to use GPL'ed Zope products with Python 1.6
(or 2.0) until the dis
Jim Hebert wrote:
> Look, I'm the last person on earth to say the GPL is perfect, or is the
> one true license, or anything else. I've heard a number of GOOD arguments
> in a number of venues about why the GPL may not be the best choice in that
> setting.
From:
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.
Dario Lopez-Ksten wrote:
> and then, when you want to distribute your modifications, you find yourself
> in a bad position, because it will mean that you would have to give
> everybody else the same rights that allowed you to distribute a modification
> of someone elses work, in the first place?
Magnus Alvestad wrote:
> Third, you are only obligated to distribute source to parties you have
> already distributed the binary version to. I can't really see a
> customer buying a zope site from you and not expecting 'source'
> anyway.
The problem is not that a client who paid for custom deve
Danny William Adair wrote:
> Is it not possible to take a few GPLed Zope products, add your own effort of
> configuring, integrating, building, (re-)designing, and even documenting the
> outcome of your efforts and - ___sell___ this? Maybe not only to _one_
> customer, but burn a CD and sell it t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Oleg Broytmann) wrote:
>No, you are not forced to publish anything. GPL "virus" applied only if
> you want to *distribute* combined (your code + my GPL'd code).
Like in "distributing to clients"? So that I have to publish
source code to the whole world (not only clients) t
Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> LICENSE
>GPL
I've seen several Zope products using the GPL. In my not so
humble opinion, this could develop into a serious problem
for Zope deployment. I'm not a lawyer (nor do I play one on TV),
but the use of GPL'ed source code like e.g. Renderable ZClass
in your we
Jason Cunliffe wrote:
> What's missing?
For example, everything with Java (e.g. Apple WebObjects) or
Perl (e.g. Mason).
There is a good overview of Content Management Systems at
http://www.camworld.com/cms/
> For each of above I'd like to fill in the following:
>
> {'name':"", 'fe
Jason Cunliffe wrote:
> I need to present the arguments for why we haev chosen Zope vs. Others.
> Does anyone know of a clear at-a-glance table or anything with the main
> contenders, features, price, licensing etc.
You didn't collect this data _before_ choosing Zope? :-)
Cheers,
Nils
--
[EMAI
Francois-Regis CHALAOUX wrote:
> Any idea ?
A broken X.400 e-mail gateway? Your sysadmin should be able to
help you.
| Received: (from x400@localhost)
| by gtlhpmed.paris.sanofi.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) id PAA29215
| for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 31 Aug 2000 15:38:29 +0200 (METDST)
| O
R. David Murray wrote:
> http://www.yoursite.com/yourmethod/recordid
This is really easy to do. Now, what do I have to do if I want to use
URLs like this:
http://www.yoursite.com/events/recordid/index.html
http://www.yoursite.com/events/recordid/pics.html
http://www.yoursite.com/ev
Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
> return map( (lambda x,y:(x,y)), l1, l2)
You can replace this with
return map(None, l1, l2)
You can see why via
print map.__doc__
Cheers,
Nils
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (preferred)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTE
Oleg Broytmann wrote:
>I coolected some on the page: http://zope.net.ru/Zope/rivals/
Disney's Open Source Tea project looks interesting:
http://opensource.go.com/
Is here anyone with enough time to check it out? :-)
Cheers,
Nils
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rajil Saraswat) wrote:
> No isee the rendered page in the browser but i donot see the valname> value. it just gives a blank.
> is something wrong here.
Weird. Are you absolutely, positively sure that you use the DTML
source you published here? I mean are you sure that the ac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rajil Saraswat) wrote:
> i tried out this but this isnt working out for me. can you point out the
> error.
The DTML source is okay. This should work.
> when i submit the form the print page is outputted but the value of the
> textbox(valname) is not outputted. whats wrong?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rajil Saraswat) wrote:
> browser with the name as valname. Then how do i print this valname thru
> dtml.
This is easy.
See the rules for "Name Lookup" in the DTML Reference Guide. There
are circumstances where it's not so simple...
> ofcourse i checked out with the guide
[Sorry for writing in German.]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruno Nana) wrote:
[Die deutschsprachige Mailing-Liste zu Zope kann man auf
http://mailman.beehive.de/mailman/listinfo/zope
abonnieren. Diese Liste, [EMAIL PROTECTED], ist üblicherweise
englischsprachig.]
> Und alle diese Tabellen
Pavlos Christoforou wrote:
> contents in the formats required by most journals. Check also Lynx which
Lynx is text-only web browser with a code open for lots of
potential security issues.
[A quick look to my TV: Netherlands vs. Italy still 0-0, okay,
so I can write a bit more...]
> is a minim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> build on. What I did not find about LaTeX was a screenshot (isn't it
> a wysiwg enviroment on top of TeX marked-up text) and a content link
No. LaTeX is, simply phrased, a collection of macros and templates
for the TeX system. They include a lot of professional typese
Ben Leslie wrote:
> You might want to check out DocBook, (sorry don't have a URL handy).
Official homepage of Doc Book
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/
O'Reilly's DocBook: The Definitive Guide
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/docbook/index.html
Official home page of the boo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> and, of'course, teamworking.
I use the Concurrent Versions System (CVS) also for LaTeX
documents:
http://www.cvshome.org/CVS/index_html
Well, I'm not convinced that a web browser is a good _writing_
environment at all, especially not for scientific paper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Better integration into the Web, resources should be accessible on
> the fly. I would like to have the sources of my ideas packed close
You can have this with LaTeX _and_ an excellent quality
of the printed document.
> together with the actual content I am producing,
Guten Abend.
> Should I consider a different linux distribution than PPC?
SuSE 6.4 is now also available for the Power Macintosh and other
PowerPC platforms. I'm very interested in knowing if Zope runs
as good on SuSE/PPC as on SuSE/x86. Please try it... :-)
Cheers,
Nils
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In short, I would like to have Zope assist me in producing a
> scientific paper.
Why do you want to use Zope for this? What's the expected
advantage against using e.g. LaTeX?
Cheers,
Nils
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (preferred)
[EMAI
Ian Sparks wrote:
> Ideally I'd like members of my portal site to be given a free email address
> @, bouncing all mail to that address to their real email
> address.
Well, I'm not sure if I understand you correctly, but this has
nothing to do with Majordomo or any Mailing List management
softwa
Patrick J.M. Keane wrote:
> I get the opposite behaviour. Any easy way to reverse the sort order?
Well, I found there _is_ a reverse attribute to the
tag, but it's not documented in my version (2.1.0, 1999/12/17)
of the DTML Reference. It works.
Cheers,
Nils
___
Bill Anderson wrote:
> GVIM
Yes! This is a powerful editor with an easy-to-use interface
available for every major platform (and a lot of minor ones):
http://www.vim.org
http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?EmacsVsVi
I use Vim daily on Mac OS, Win98 and Unix (Linux, Slowlaris)
and love the co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hile) wrote:
[MySQL database]
> Having two people simultaneously access pages that DID access the database
> without the client running on either machine DID cause memory creep.
Are you sure that you want to use MySQL for this?
http://openacs.org/why-not-mysql.html
38 matches
Mail list logo
