-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23 Feb 2007, at 00:39, Rocky wrote:
So... what's next?
Figuring out how to deal with existing sites that need to be modified
on the fly somehow so they don't break completely.
jens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23 Feb 2007, at 00:39, Rocky wrote:
So... what's next?
Figuring out how to deal with existing sites that need to be modified
on the fly somehow so they don't break completely.
Does CMF core not have any kind of
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF).
Assigned and Open
mhammond
- Windows DevelopmentMode penalty in CMFCore.DirectoryView,
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/366
yuppie
- support
Hi!
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 23 Feb 2007, at 00:39, Rocky wrote:
So... what's next?
Figuring out how to deal with existing sites that need to be modified on
the fly somehow so they don't break completely.
I propose to hardcode PortalObjectBase as IObjectManagerSite. AFAICS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yuppie wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 23 Feb 2007, at 00:39, Rocky wrote:
So... what's next?
Figuring out how to deal with existing sites that need to be modified on
the fly somehow so they don't break completely.
I propose to hardcode
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
After reading Phillip's book I really like Zope 3 generations, but I
have no idea if that mechanism could be used at all.
I had a look at it and started thinking about a CMFish version. The main
challenge is that generates just get the app root as a handle, so you
Am 23.02.2007 um 12:52 schrieb Tres Seaver:
Hmm, I won't quibble about migration code. +1.
+1 me neither
For registering the tools as utilities you still need to run the
componentregistry import step. I would not use on-the-fly magic
for that
part, I think people should do that
Hi!
Tres Seaver wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 23 Feb 2007, at 00:39, Rocky wrote:
So... what's next?
Figuring out how to deal with existing sites that need to be modified on
the fly somehow so they don't break completely.
I propose to hardcode PortalObjectBase as
On Feb 23, 8:10 am, yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose to hardcode PortalObjectBase as IObjectManagerSite. AFAICS
getSiteManager() could create a component registry on the fly if
necessary. So for that part we would neither need the new code in
importVarious nor migration code.
While
Rocky wrote:
On Feb 23, 8:10 am, yuppie y.20...-E2EsyBC0hj3+aS/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose to hardcode PortalObjectBase as IObjectManagerSite. AFAICS
getSiteManager() could create a component registry on the fly if
necessary. So for that part we would neither need the new code in
On Feb 23, 10:15 am, yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rocky wrote:
http://svn.zope.org/?rev=72782view=rev
I just added notify(BeforeTraverseEvent(self, REQUEST)) to DynamicType's
__before_publishing_traverse__.
Hmm... ok, which sounds like we've done away with the need to call
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yuppie wrote:
Hi!
Tres Seaver wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 23 Feb 2007, at 00:39, Rocky wrote:
So... what's next?
Figuring out how to deal with existing sites that need to be modified on
the fly somehow so they don't
Hi Rocky!
Rocky wrote:
Done. five.localsitemanager is now included with CMFCore on the jens
branch. There aren't any CMF specific tests in place for any of this,
but the CMFCore tests all run fine with sys.path stuff setup (they
failed when I misconfigured things).
So... what's next?
On Feb 23, 1:52 pm, yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something. But wasn't a major goal of
five.localsitemanager to return acquisition wrapped tools?
I can't find any code in five.localsitemanager that deals with that
issue. So we now have support for nested sites, but still
yuppie wrote:
Hi Rocky!
Rocky wrote:
Done. five.localsitemanager is now included with CMFCore on the jens
branch. There aren't any CMF specific tests in place for any of this,
but the CMFCore tests all run fine with sys.path stuff setup (they
failed when I misconfigured things).
So...
15 matches
Mail list logo