[Zope-Coders] [Zope2.9] Schedule
Hi everyone, with Zope 2.9 and Zope 3.2 we are switching to a time-based release cycle. Major release are supposed to appear every six months (December and June). For Zope 2.9 the schedule is as follows: - 2.9 beta 1 on 2005-11-07 - 2.9 beta 2 aka RC1 on 2005-11-20 - 2.9 final on 2005-12-01 The 2.9 SVN branch will be created for the 2.9 beta 1 release. After creation the 2.9 branch will be feature-frozen and open only for bug-fixes. The trunk is then open again for new features (Zope 2.10). We are planning a bug day for Zope 2.9 and Zope 3.2 for this Friday, November 4th (somewhere on irc.freenode.net, channel to be announced). Cheers, Andreas pgpc5OLdxBvhn.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Re: [Zope-dev] Schedule Zope 2.8.2/2.7.8
--On 14. September 2005 16:20:47 +0200 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I plan to release Zope 2.8.2 + 2.7.8 on 12.9.2005. ..should be 12.10.2005 (October 12) :-) internally-still-on-vacation, Andreas pgpTCoXpEahNy.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Schedule Zope 2.8.2/2.7.8
Hi, I plan to release Zope 2.8.2 + 2.7.8 on 12.9.2005. As discussed a while ago I will release minor releases without going through a beta cycle except when there are critical fixes that need further testing. Andreas pgpYTUAoUa1y4.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Back/new Zope 2 release schedule?
Hi, I am back from vacation. Anything important happened meanwhile that would require a new release soon? Otherwise I do propose 2.7.8 and 2.8.2 releases for mid-October. Cheers, Andreas pgphdf673DuKx.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Out for Holidays
Just to let you know: I am off for holiday from August 20th until September 13th...no email, no phone, no Zope during that time :-) Andreas pgp48pNsrfqta.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Zope 2.8.1 final
Heads up for the upcoming Zope 2.8.1 final release. I will cut the release on Thursday this week. This will be - as the name says - the final release so there won't be any further beta releases. So fixes and whatever must be commited before Thursday. Depending on the number of fixes that will happen after the 2.8.1 release I will focus on a 2.8.2 release in mid-October (after a longer vacation :-)). Cheers, Andreas pgpX68goPx233.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Rescheduling Zope 2.8.1 b1
Because of some traveling next week I will push back the release for one or two days (means Jul 28th or 29th). Hope this won't hurt anyone. Andreas pgpLTH5RalkWJ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
Re: [Zope-Coders] Upcoming 2.8.1 release
--On 16. Juli 2005 14:57:01 -0400 Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [Andreas Jung] Just the usual reminder from the release management :-) Zope 2.8.1 b1 will be released next Wednesday Is this correct? Please confirm. http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/Zope2.8/MilestonePlan still says 2.8.1 b1: 2005/7/27 2.8.1 final: 2005/08/10 Argh...you're right again...I wonder why my Ical has all release dates one week earlier. I was not my goal to annoy or anger you :-) The milestone plan is correct. Never-plan-release-while-having-a-glass-of-wine-or-two, Andreas pgpItc790j2Yd.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Upcoming 2.8.1 release
Just the usual reminder from the release management :-) Zope 2.8.1 b1 will be released next Wednesday and 2.8.1 final two weeks later. Please commit any pending fixes for 2.8.1 before the beta 1 release and not between beta and final release. Thanks, Andreas pgpweMawEHq6g.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Zope 2.7.7b1 this weekend
Hi, please keep in mind that I want to release 2.7.7b1 on Sunday. Please commit pending fixes *before* Sunday. -aj pgpRRCkiCtCW5.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] 2.8.1 release schedule
Please see: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/Zope2.8/MilestonePlan -aj pgp1xIEqK5jGZ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Zope 2.7.7 release schedule
Planned release dates are: 2.7.7 b1 : July, 3rd 2.7.7 final: July, 10th All dates in 2005 of course :-) Cheers, -aj pgprxd15ZaKKH.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
Re: [Zope-Coders] Zope 2.8 coming this weekend
--On 10. Juni 2005 12:39:50 -0400 Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/10/05, Paul Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mind if I check in text-only changes to the 2_8 branch? It's still Friday for Andreas, so this is a good time! yeah...countdown is running :-) -aj pgprqef5iEsSb.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Zope 2.8 coming this weekend
Heads up for the 2.8.0 final release. My plans are to make the final release on Saturday morning. So any further changes should be done by tomorrow at the latest. Cheers, -aj pgp6Dzj88zd5Z.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
Re: [Zope-Coders] ZClass problem in 2.8 (Was: Re: [Zope-dev] Upcoming Zope 2.8 release)
--On 7. Juni 2005 16:10:55 +1000 Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 07 June 2005 14:27, Andreas Jung wrote: This is likely a task for Jim. I don't have any about ZClasses (and I won't them). If necessary this problem might be fixed in a later release. This problem is not as serious as I could hold up the final 2.8 release. This release has to go out now. Are working ZClasses no longer a requirement for Zope? (This is not a flame, just a question). There's plenty of people out there with ZClass-based products, so if 2.8 is going to ship with broken ZClass, there should probably be a reasonably prominent warning in the release notes about this. According to Jim ZClasses are working. A possibly isolated bug in ZClasses is bad but there are in general lots of such bugs in Zope. So this is not a release stopper for me now. We have discussed ZClasses already and about how ZClasses can be maintained in the future. Since I see little commitment to ZClasses (except from Jim) ZClasses are not really a blocker for *this* 2.8.0 release. We defered this release already a bunch of times and it is now time to get 2.8.0 with Five and MVCC support to people. This is much, much more important for Zope than having to care about ZClasses. People can stick with Zope 2.7 if there is a problem for them with ZClasses in the hope that someone fixes outstanding ZClasses in a further 2.8 release. I don't care getting some beatings for my opinon that ZClasses are a neat ancient toy but not the tool of choice for nowadays Zope applications. We need a strong ZODB with MVCC and we need Five to bridge the world to Zope 3. And therefore ZClasses are absolutely not a reason to block the 2.8.0 release. -aj pgpkNjKwwKyud.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
Re: [Zope-Coders] ZClass problem in 2.8 (Was: Re: [Zope-dev] Upcoming Zope 2.8 release)
--On 7. Juni 2005 10:08:56 +1000 John Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What about the ZClasses? Jim fixed them (hopefully :-)) Thanks for any help. I hope this can be resolved before 2.8 goes final! This is likely a task for Jim. I don't have any about ZClasses (and I won't them). If necessary this problem might be fixed in a later release. This problem is not as serious as I could hold up the final 2.8 release. This release has to go out now. -aj pgpfYDFoFTpj2.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
Re: [Zope-Coders] WebDAV issue with Finder (Mac OS X 10.3.2)
--On Montag, 23. Mai 2005 0:53 Uhr +0200 Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have an issue with WebDAV PUTs from/with Finder of Mac OS X 10.3.2. I'm trying to upload an image to a plone site using my ATContentTypes 1.0 (svn development version) with Archetypes 1.3 (svn development version). Uploading with ftp from my Mac box works fine. Also WebDAV uploads with Transmit and Goliath from my Mac and Konqueror from my linux box is working as expected but not from Finder. I have hooked into PUT() with pdb. It shows some strange things. REQUEST.BODY contains just an empty string ''. REQUEST.BODYFILE.read() is an empty string, too. I am sure it worked some weeks ago. Because only Finder uploads over http are broken it might be a Finder bug introduced by the latest updates. Can anybody verify my approach? Is it a Finder bug or an issue introduced by latest chances in the Zope sources? I am not aware of any related changes lately. Maybe Sidnei knows about some DAV issues?! Andreas pgp1CiiprJOFt.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Re: [Zope-dev] Upcoming Zope 2.8 release
--On Donnerstag, 19. Mai 2005 19:59 Uhr +0200 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andreas Jung wrote at 2005-5-19 13:43 +0200: after resolving all outstanding problems with Zope 2.8 under Windows the next releases will be Zope 2.8 b2 (this weekend) and Zope 2.8.0 final (scheduled for 2005/06/11). What about the ZClasses? Jim fixed them (hopefully :-)) -aj pgpGpY5XdYybT.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Upcoming Zope 2.8 release
Hi, after resolving all outstanding problems with Zope 2.8 under Windows the next releases will be Zope 2.8 b2 (this weekend) and Zope 2.8.0 final (scheduled for 2005/06/11). I will cut a 2.8 release branch for Zope 2.8 b2. This means that the trunk is open for new development (Zope 2.9). Bugs (as always) have to be fixed on the 2.8 branch, SVN trunk and 2.7 branch (CVS). Andreas pgpp2uD0iDPON.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] lib/python/zope/interface/_zope_interface_coptimizations.c/GCC 4 compile error
Hi, could someone please change on the 2.8 trunk the file above and apply the following patch: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sandboxes/Zope/Zope/lib/python/zope/interface: svn diff Index: _zope_interface_coptimizations.c === --- _zope_interface_coptimizations.c(revision 30353) +++ _zope_interface_coptimizations.c(working copy) @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ return 0; } -extern PyTypeObject SpecType; /* Forward */ +static PyTypeObject SpecType; /* Forward */ static PyObject * implementedByFallback(PyObject *cls) This fixes a compilation error with GCC 4. I tried to commit the patch myself but on my trunk checkout this part is only a readonly checkout and I did not succeed get a read-write checkout myself from the svn server :-/ Andreas pgpCioCxntHRs.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
Re: [Zope-Coders] Re: ZConfig changes: please try on Windows
Thanks guys! --On Donnerstag, 19. Mai 2005 9:00 Uhr +0200 yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: yuppie wrote: Fred Drake wrote: So if the Windows Zope users are happy with it, then I guess we're done with this issue, which exhausts what I know needs to be done. Thanks! But one test still fails: [...] Either something is wrong with socket-address or the test should expect ZConfig.datatypes.DEFAULT_HOST. Fixed now. component.xml still used the old socket-address datatype, but the new socket-binding-address works. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders pgpIyPdraSUpX.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] ZConfig changes: please try on Windows
Hi, thanks to Fred for doing the latest ZConfig changes. @Fred: this should resolve the binding problems on Windows? I assume there is nothing else to be done in the Zope 2.8 core?! Could someone from the Windows world check asap if this really resolves the issue? If everything is ok I will release 2.8b2 on Sunday. Andreas pgpcmu5Jmh3g2.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
Re: [Zope-Coders] Zope tests: 5 OK, 1 Failed
--On Sonntag, 15. Mai 2005 19:20 Uhr +0200 "Stefan H. Holek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This test passes with Python 2.4.1 on that (Linux) box and it passes fine with both 2.3.5 and 2.4.1 on Mac OS X. Also, when I run the ZEO tests alone: python2.3 test.py --dir lib/ python/ZEO they pass as well. The box I use to run the nightly tests is rather sluggish, so it may just be an artefact of that (like other test failures have turned out to be). Do you have a Linux box you could confirm the failure on? I could not see any failures on my linux box with Python 2.3.5 + trunk. Andreas pgpU85HlikDUh.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
Re: [Zope-Coders] Zope tests: 5 OK, 1 Failed
Trying to run the tests now... --On Sonntag, 15. Mai 2005 19:20 Uhr +0200 "Stefan H. Holek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This test passes with Python 2.4.1 on that (Linux) box and it passes fine with both 2.3.5 and 2.4.1 on Mac OS X. Also, when I run the ZEO tests alone: python2.3 test.py --dir lib/ python/ZEO they pass as well. The box I use to run the nightly tests is rather sluggish, so it may just be an artefact of that (like other test failures have turned out to be). Do you have a Linux box you could confirm the failure on? Hunting-for-a-faster-box-ly, Stefan On 15. Mai 2005, at 13:17, Andreas Jung wrote: Is this a serious ZEO problem? Andreas --On Sonntag, 15. Mai 2005 12:01 Uhr +0100 Zope tests summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Zope Unit Tests : FAILED (failures=1) Zope-trunk Python-2.3.5 : Linux Running /usr/local/python2.3/bin/python test.py Script (Python):filepath:1: DeprecationWarning: integer argument expected, got float == FAIL: checkCrossDBInvalidations (ZEO.tests.testConnection.MappingStorageConnectionTests) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/autotest/temp/python23-zope28/lib/python/ZEO/tests/ ConnectionTests.py", line 658, in checkCrossDBInvalidations self.assertEqual(r1._p_state, -1) # ghost File "/usr/local/python2.3/lib/python2.3/unittest.py", line 302, in failUnlessEqual raise self.failureException, \ AssertionError: 0 != -1 -- Ran 5691 tests in 583.749s -- Software Engineering is Programming when you can't. --E. W. Dijkstra pgpWkhM2268g4.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
Re: [Zope-Coders] Zope tests: 5 OK, 1 Failed
Is this a serious ZEO problem? Andreas --On Sonntag, 15. Mai 2005 12:01 Uhr +0100 Zope tests summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2005-May/002125.html ? Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Zope Unit Tests : FAILED (failures=1) Zope-trunk Python-2.3.5 : Linux Running /usr/local/python2.3/bin/python test.py Script (Python):filepath:1: DeprecationWarning: integer argument expected, got float == FAIL: checkCrossDBInvalidations (ZEO.tests.testConnection.MappingStorageConnectionTests) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/autotest/temp/python23-zope28/lib/python/ZEO/tests/ConnectionTests.py", line 658, in checkCrossDBInvalidations self.assertEqual(r1._p_state, -1) # ghost File "/usr/local/python2.3/lib/python2.3/unittest.py", line 302, in failUnlessEqual raise self.failureException, \ AssertionError: 0 != -1 -- Ran 5691 tests in 583.749s pgpivNTzNzubN.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
Re: [Zope-Coders] Re: ZConfig in SVN repository
--On Freitag, 13. Mai 2005 9:07 Uhr -0400 Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - the ZConfig and zdaemon should have a minimal release management (means stable released should be tagged properly) Definitely needed. So let's do it. Amen. Tagging a package should not be so much overhead for the maintainer. More generally, all releases of all projects P should be done against tags of all P's external dependencies. right. The ZODB in 2.8 is currently not an svn:external but a local copy as well? Right? No. Do you ever use SVN ? Go to a shell right now, cd to the root of a Zope 2.8 checkout, and type: ...still learning to fly :-) The first time ZConfig and zdaemon get tagged, it's important that whoever do that first search all clients (ZODB and both Zopes) for changes to those checked in from a wrong project, and do merges back to ZConfig and zdaemon (I explained that dance last time) -- else those changes (if any) will get lost. That's a job for loosers :-) but I will take it over for ZConfig and ZDaemon.. maybe not for the next beta but hopefully for the final for 2.8.1 release. Andreas pgpd7ftJKUqcH.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
Re: [Zope-Coders] Re: ZConfig in SVN repository
--On Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2005 12:53 Uhr -0400 Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > @Jim: what's your opinion on this subject? Jim likes copies better than externals. If you can get him to explain why, you should win a fabulous prize . But, regardless, you and Brian (I think) are in charge of Zope 2.8 now, so "your project, your call" rules. Well it is not my job to convince Jim of anything :-) I do care about Zope 2 and I will try to maintain it in a sane way and in way where we have little trouble and little time to spend instead of maintaining multiple versions of stuff laying around. So for Zope 2.8 this means to me: - the ZConfig and zdaemon should have a minimal release management (means stable released should be tagged properly) - ZODB development can be done against any version - ZODB releases should done against a dedicated ZConfig, zdaemon release (means something tagged) - the local copies of ZConfig, zdaemon in Zope 2.8 will replaced by svn:externals (using a dedicated tag) The ZODB in 2.8 is currently not an svn:external but a local copy as well? Right? It might also make sense to tag ZConfig+ZODB together since ZODB depends on ZConfig. Andreas pgp8P1zWZEf0m.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
Re: [Zope-Coders] Re: ZConfig in SVN repository
--On Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 14:11 Uhr -0400 Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From my point of view it would make sense to replace the copies in the 2.8 tree with external references for the next beta...any objections? People who think they understand those projects first need to make tags, so Zope 2.8 has something to point _to_. Also, Zope, Zope3, and ZODB should all coordinate to make sure they're using the same tags for zdaemon and ZConfig. Else, e.g., I develop ZODB using a ZConfig that doesn't match the one Zope uses, and then things break when Zope moves to a newer ZODB. So am I right that you develop the ZODB already against two different ZConfig versions (for Zope 2.8 and Zope 3)? So an unique ZConfig repository does make sense to you - of course only it is used by everyone. For me it would make perfect sense to get rid of the local copies since it removes the need to maintain multiple copies. @Jim: what's your opinion on this subject? Andreas pgp1g2SZOPVNV.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
Re: [Zope-Coders] Re: ZConfig in SVN repository
--On Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 12:59 Uhr -0400 Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [Andreas Jung] do I see right that we have two different ZConfig versions in the SVN? One one the root level and one under Zope/lib/python? Shouldn't we unify the versions by making the most current version the master? [yuppie] Other copies are here: http://svn.zope.org/Zope3/trunk/src/ZConfig/ http://svn.zope.org/ZODB/trunk/src/ZConfig/ Also copies in various branches and tags of the above. Note that all the same goes for zdaemon too. Maybe using svn:external would make the dependencies more obvious? Yup -- although so far there isn't a tag to point at, for either zdaemon or ZConfig. A quick diff over the the ZConfig trunk and the version 2.8 shows that the ZConfig version on the trunk is the "maintained" version. But I have no idea about zdaemon. From my point of view it would make sense to replace the copies in the 2.8 tree with external references for the next beta...any objections? Andreas pgp56crgeh5WV.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] ZConfig in SVN repository
Hi, do I see right that we have two different ZConfig versions in the SVN? One one the root level and one under Zope/lib/python? Shouldn't we unify the versions by making the most current version the master? Andreas pgpWLOGAKhlCq.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Zope 2.7.6 final release delayed
I will release 2.7.6 final on Friday and not today (as planned) because to a tight schedule and some travelling. Andreas pgpF2pGwwyf3m.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] BTreeFolder2 for Zope 2.8?
Any objections to move BTreeFolder2 into the Zope core for Zope 2.8? BTF is widely used in the Zope, CMF & Plone world and it would not hurt to ship it with Zope. Andreas pgpivEummxXJr.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Zope 2.8 b1 coming ...
Hi, last chance to commit your changes and patches and whatever for the first 2.8 beta release. I am going to make the release over the weekend. Andreas pgpDfVNtzVwKz.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Zope 2.7.6 release schedule
The schedule for the next Zope release is a follows: 2.7.6 b1: April 13th 2.7.6 RC1: April 20th 2.7.6 final: April 27th Although 2.7.5 had been relased lately, yesterdays hotfix and another bug justify a new release this month. Andreas pgpUdi8AIHsLz.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] Re: [Zope2.8a2] ...to be released by tomorrow....
--On Freitag, 1. April 2005 18:44 Uhr -0500 Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [Tim Peters] ... All the substantive changes I needed to make were completed last night, and the overnight test runs were successful. I still need to write up ZODB NEWS, fiddle the version numbers, make a 3.4a1 release tag, and edit the svn:externals in Zope trunk to point at that tag. That's all very low risk, so just assume it's been done if I don't say anything else later. Still, explicit is better than implicit: that's all been done, are there are no remaining ZODB issues holding up release of Zope 2.8a2. Excellent! Thanks, Andreas pgpnK4ahSgbYs.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list Zope-Coders@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] RE: [Zope-dev] [Zope2.8a2] ...to be released by tomorrow....
Ok, I am waiting for "go ahead" sign (I haven't followed the recent discussion because I am currently on a business trip) -aj --On Freitag, 1. April 2005 0:13 Uhr -0500 Brian Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Andreas - please don't cut the release until we get the OK from Tim Peters - he's still working on merging recent ZODB changes, I believe. Brian Lloyd[EMAIL PROTECTED] V.P. Engineering 540.361.1716 Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andreas Jung Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 12:03 AM To: zope-dev@zope.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Zope-dev] [Zope2.8a2] ...to be released by tomorrow Hi, I am planning to make the release tomorrow (Saturday afternoon (German time :-)). So please make your final fixes very soon or cry out loud STOP if there are any show stoppers. Andreas pgpo8KZG9mvLE.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
[Zope-Coders] [Zope2.8a2] ...to be released by tomorrow....
Hi, I am planning to make the release tomorrow (Saturday afternoon (German time :-)). So please make your final fixes very soon or cry out loud STOP if there are any show stoppers. Andreas pgpaWpMBoFvAv.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
